ML091680107: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:IL-=- 1 ((I DOCKETED USNRC June 5, 2009 (2:43pm)OFFICE OF SECRETARY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RULEMAKINGS AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADJUDICATIONS STAFF'BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of Docket # 50-293 Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 4, 2009 POST HEARING DEVELOPMENTS:
{{#Wiki_filter:IL-=-     1   ((I                                                                   DOCKETED USNRC June 5, 2009 (2:43pm)
LEAKS OF CONTAMINATED WATER FROM BURIED PIPING AT OYSTER CREEK & INDIAN POINT AS THEY PERTAIN TO PILGRIM WATCH'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LBP-06-848 AND INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS To the Honorable Chairman Jaczko and Members of the Commission:
OFFICE OF SECRETARY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                         RULEMAKINGS AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       ADJUDICATIONS STAFF
Post hearing developments at Oyster Creek and Indian Point directly pertain to Pilgrim Watch's Petition for Review of LBP-06-848, Contention 1 now before the Commissioners.
                  'BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of                                           Docket # 50-293 Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 4, 2009 POST HEARING DEVELOPMENTS: LEAKS OF CONTAMINATED WATER FROM BURIED PIPING AT OYSTER CREEK & INDIAN POINT AS THEY PERTAIN TO PILGRIM WATCH'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LBP-06-848 AND INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS To the Honorable Chairman Jaczko and Members of the Commission:
These developments include the recent leaks of radioactive contaminated water from buried pipes at both Oyster Creek and Indian Point; and the Honorable Edward J. Markey's letter to the Commissioners expressing his "grave concerns regarding the current inspections regime for buried pipes" and that he finds them "profoundly inadequate to ensure the public health and safety." These developments were not brought forward by Pilgrim Watch at the Hearing for the simple reason that they had not yet occurred.1. Oyster Creek: Leaks Of Radioactive Liquid Nine Days After License Renewal Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Company's renewed license was issued April 8, 2009. Nine days later (April 17) workers found an elevated level of radioactive tritium (102,000 picocuries from one sample, 5 times higher than the EPA limit for drinking water per liter) from two buried pipes associated with the condensate storage tank. One pipe had a 5/8 of an inch hole in an 8-inch carbon steel pipe; the other had a 1-inch hole in it.1 These leaks demonstrate The Inadequacy of NRC's staff safety inspections during the license renewal process and inadequacy of the aging management program for buried components.
Post hearing developments at Oyster Creek and Indian Point directly pertain to Pilgrim Watch's Petition for Review of LBP-06-848, Contention 1 now before the Commissioners. These developments include the recent leaks of radioactive contaminated water from buried pipes at both Oyster Creek and Indian Point; and the Honorable Edward J. Markey's letter to the Commissioners expressing his "grave concerns regarding the current inspections regime for buried pipes" and that he finds them "profoundly inadequate to ensure the public health and safety."
According to press reports, NRC's Neil Sheehan reported in an email that Exelon said that they examined one of the two pipes with holes before its operating license was renewed; however it appears the pipe was inspected in a different spot than where the hole was found.2 This highlights a fundamental weakness of the Aging Management Program (AMP) that Pilgrim Watch brought forward in Pilgrim's license renewal adjudication.
These developments were not brought forward by Pilgrim Watch at the Hearing for the simple reason that they had not yet occurred.
Exelon stated that underground piping systems carrying radioactive water will be moved above ground or placed in vaults. In other words Exelon admits, after the fact, that there is a problem.Will Pilgrim's buried piping carrying radioactive water be similarly placed above ground or in vaults; or does NRC condone New Jersey citizens being safer than Massachusetts citizens?The inescapable conclusion from these leaks is as follows.(A) The pipes leaked nine days into the twenty year license extension.
: 1. Oyster Creek: Leaks Of Radioactive Liquid Nine Days After License Renewal Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Company's renewed license was issued April 8, 2009. Nine days later (April 17) workers found an elevated level of radioactive tritium (102,000 picocuries from one sample, 5 times higher than the EPA limit for drinking water per liter) from two buried pipes associated with the condensate storage tank. One pipe had a 5/8 of an inch hole in an 8-
The Oyster Creek Aging Management Program for Buried Pipes was obviously insufficient.(B) The NRC Staff Safety Review did not identify deficiencies in the buried piping AMP; there is no basis to assume that Pilgrim's SER was any better.(C) Although the applicant must "demonstrate that the effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the intended function(s) will be maintained consistent with the CLB for the period of extended operation;" the definition of those intended functions is too limited. The Applicant, NRC Staff and the ASLB maintained in Pilgrim's License Renewal that the intended function of buried components does not include containment of radioactive liquids to prevent leaks, such as at Oyster Creek of unmonitored radioactivity into the environment.
 
Brick Township Bulletin, Holes in two pipes thought to be source of tritium leaks, Patricia Miller, May 7, 2009 2 Cherry Hill Courier Post, Only one leaking Oyster Creek pipe inspected, Todd Bates, May 2, 2009 2 Does the Commission support this astounding assertion?
inch carbon steel pipe; the other had a 1-inch hole in it.1 These leaks demonstrate The Inadequacy of NRC's staff safety inspections during the license renewal process and inadequacy of the aging management program for buried components.
Can the Commissioners seriously tell the public that the unmonitored leakage of radioactive liquids from components is so unimportant that it does not care whether there is reasonable assurance that the AMP will prevent them?2. Indian Point: Leaks of Radioactive Liquid; License Application Currently Under Review On April 30, 2009 the Honorable Edward Markey, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment and the Honorable John J. Hall, Member of Congress, wrote to the Commission about the leak at Indian Point.3 On February 16, 2009, again after the close of the.Pilgrim Hearing, Entergy determined that a buried section of the Unit 2 condensate storage tank (CST) return line leaked water at a rate of approximately 18 gallons per minute. Entergy determined that a 1.5 inch diameter corrosion hole was the source of the leak. All told, 100,000 gallons had leaked.James Sheets, a spokesman for Entergy, said that the pipe that broke was made of carbon steel covered with a protective coating and external corrosion caused the rupture.4 Lessons learned from Indian Point A. Carbon steel, like all metals, corrodes.
According to press reports, NRC's Neil Sheehan reported in an email that Exelon said that they examined one of the two pipes with holes before its operating license was renewed; however it appears the pipe was inspected in a different spot than where the hole was found.2                             This highlights a fundamental weakness of the Aging Management Program (AMP) that Pilgrim Watch brought forward in Pilgrim's license renewal adjudication.
Protective coating corrodes, is defective or becomes damaged. External corrosion caused the rupture at Indian Point. Chemistry control that targets interior surfaces provides no guarantee that pipes shall maintain their integrity.
Exelon stated that underground piping systems carrying radioactive water will be moved above ground or placed in vaults. In other words Exelon admits, after the fact, that there is a problem.
All of these issues were raised by Pilgrim Watch. Indian point shows their importance.
Will Pilgrim's buried piping carrying radioactive water be similarly placed above ground or in vaults; or does NRC condone New Jersey citizens being safer than Massachusetts citizens?
B. The corroded pipe at Indian Point adds to the long and growing list of pipe leaks around the county. Leaks of water with radioactivity have been discovered in underground piping, for 3 Their letter is attached; the Commission has yet to respond.4 New York Times, Indian Pt. Broken Pipe Spurs Safety Worries, Annie Correal, February 28, 2009 3 example, at Byron, Braidwood, Dresden, Palo Verde, Indian Point, and Oyster Creek. Tritium was discovered in monitoring wells at Pilgrim.C. Representative Markey said in his letter to then-Chairman Klein that the leak raised serious questions about Entergy's and the regulatory commission's oversight. "This leak may demonstrate a systemic failure of the licensee and the commission to inspect critical buried pipes in a manner sufficient to guarantee the public health and safety." He noted that physically inspecting buried piping systems poses unique challenges due to limited accessibility.
The inescapable conclusion from these leaks is as follows.
However, he noted that many industries have successfully developed technologies and programs to deal with this problem. Congressman Markey concluded his letter by asking "Has the Commission ever considered requiring licensees to develop technologies and methods to inspect difficult to access buried pipes? If so, why are such requirements not in place?" Pilgrim Watch's testimony at the Pilgrim hearing specifically answered Congressman Markey's question.
(A) The pipes leaked nine days into the twenty year license extension. The Oyster Creek Aging Management Program for Buried Pipes was obviously insufficient.
There are technologies and programs available to supplement the AMP to make it sufficient  
(B) The NRC Staff Safety Review did not identify deficiencies in the buried piping AMP; there is no basis to assume that Pilgrim's SER was any better.
-backfit cathodic protection, require a robust inspection protocol, install a sufficient number of monitoring wells, and perform a baseline inspection prior to license renewal so that there is a benchmark of conditions to measure the rate of corrosion going forward.The post-hearing leaks of radioactive liquid at Oyster Creek and Indian Point support Pilgrim Watch's position that leaving leakage of unmonitored quantities of radioactive liquids out of the licensing procedure and subject only to some industry voluntary program, is an abdication of NRC's responsibility to protect the public from unmonitored radioactive exposure and is contrary to NRC's ALARA principle.
(C) Although the applicant must "demonstrate that the effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the intended function(s) will be maintained consistent with the CLB for the period of extended operation;" the definition of those intended functions is too limited. The Applicant, NRC Staff and the ASLB maintained in Pilgrim's License Renewal that the intended function of buried components does not include containment of radioactive liquids to prevent leaks, such as at Oyster Creek of unmonitored radioactivity into the environment.
Thank-you for your consideration, I am sincerelW  
Brick Township Bulletin, Holes in two pipes thought to be source of tritium leaks, Patricia Miller, May 7, 2009 2 Cherry Hill Courier Post, Only one leaking Oyster Creek pipe inspected, Todd Bates, May 2, 2009 2
-.Mary Lampert, pro se Pilgrim Watch 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 4, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the following was served June 4, 2009, Post Hearing Developments:
 
Leaks of Contaminated Water From Buried Piping at Oyster Creek & Indian Point As They Pertain To Pilgrim Watch's Petition For Review Of LBP-06-848 and Interlocutory Decisions Secretary of the Commission Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop 0-16 C l United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Does the Commission support this astounding assertion? Can the Commissioners seriously tell the public that the unmonitored leakage of radioactive liquids from components is so unimportant that it does not care whether there is reasonable assurance that the AMP will prevent them?
[2 copies]Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hon. Peter B. Lyons Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hon. Dale E. Kline Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hon. Kristine L. Svinicki Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop -T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Administrative Judge Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop -T-3-F23 US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop 0-16 C I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Susan L. Uttal, Esq.James E. Adler, Esq.Marcia Simon, Esq.Andrea Jones, Esq.United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Office of General Counsel Mail Stop 15 D21 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Paul A. Gaukler, Esq.David R. Lewis, Esq.Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037-1138 Martha Coakley, Attorney General Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Mr. Mark Sylvia Town Manager, Town of Plymouth 11 Lincoln Street Plymouth MA 02360 Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.Town of Plymouth MA Duane Morris, LLP 505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Richard R. MacDonald Town Manager, Town of Duxbury 878 Tremont Street Duxbury, MA 02332 Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Town of Duxbury 688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Duxbury, MA 02331 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.Duxbury, MA 023332 2}}
: 2. Indian Point: Leaks of Radioactive Liquid; License Application Currently Under Review On April 30, 2009 the Honorable Edward Markey, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment and the Honorable John J. Hall, Member of Congress, wrote to the Commission about the leak at Indian Point. 3 On February 16, 2009, again after the close of the.
Pilgrim Hearing, Entergy determined that a buried section of the Unit 2 condensate storage tank (CST) return line leaked water at a rate of approximately 18 gallons per minute. Entergy determined that a 1.5 inch diameter corrosion hole was the source of the leak. All told, 100,000 gallons had leaked.
James Sheets, a spokesman for Entergy, said that the pipe that broke was made of carbon steel covered with a protective coating and external corrosion caused the rupture.4 Lessons learned from Indian Point A. Carbon steel, like all metals, corrodes. Protective coating corrodes, is defective or becomes damaged. External corrosion caused the rupture at Indian Point. Chemistry control that targets interior surfaces provides no guarantee that pipes shall maintain their integrity. All of these issues were raised by Pilgrim Watch. Indian point shows their importance.
B. The corroded pipe at Indian Point adds to the long and growing list of pipe leaks around the county. Leaks of water with radioactivity have been discovered in underground piping, for 3 Their letter is attached; the Commission has yet to respond.
4 New York Times, Indian Pt.Broken Pipe Spurs Safety Worries, Annie Correal, February 28, 2009 3
 
example, at Byron, Braidwood, Dresden, Palo Verde, Indian Point, and Oyster Creek. Tritium was discovered in monitoring wells at Pilgrim.
C. Representative Markey said in his letter to then-Chairman Klein that the leak raised serious questions about Entergy's and the regulatory commission's oversight. "This leak may demonstrate a systemic failure of the licensee and the commission to inspect critical buried pipes in a manner sufficient to guarantee the public health and safety." He noted that physically inspecting buried piping systems poses unique challenges due to limited accessibility. However, he noted that many industries have successfully developed technologies and programs to deal with this problem. Congressman Markey concluded his letter by asking "Has the Commission ever considered requiring licensees to develop technologies and methods to inspect difficult to access buried pipes? If so, why are such requirements not in place?"
Pilgrim Watch's testimony at the Pilgrim hearing specifically answered Congressman Markey's question. There are technologies and programs available to supplement the AMP to make it sufficient - backfit cathodic protection, require a robust inspection protocol, install a sufficient number of monitoring wells, and perform a baseline inspection prior to license renewal so that there is a benchmark of conditions to measure the rate of corrosion going forward.
The post-hearing leaks of radioactive liquid at Oyster Creek and Indian Point support Pilgrim Watch's position that leaving leakage of unmonitored quantities of radioactive liquids out of the licensing procedure and subject only to some industry voluntary program, is an abdication of NRC's responsibility to protect the public from unmonitored radioactive exposure and is contrary to NRC's ALARA principle.
Thank-you for your consideration, I am sincerelW       -.
Mary Lampert, pro se Pilgrim Watch 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 4
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                                                   Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application                                         June 4, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the following was served June 4, 2009, Post Hearing Developments:
Leaks of Contaminated Water From Buried Piping at Oyster Creek & Indian Point As They Pertain To Pilgrim Watch's Petition For Review Of LBP-06-848 and Interlocutory Decisions Secretary of the Commission                     Hon. Kristine L. Svinicki Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications             Commissioner Staff                                           U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-16 C l                               Washington, DC 20555-0001 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission [2 copies]                           Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Chair Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko                           Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Chairman                                         Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission               US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001                        Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hon. Peter B. Lyons                             Administrative Judge Commissioner                                     Paul B. Abramson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission               Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, DC 20555-0001                       Mail Stop T-3 F23 US NRC Hon. Dale E. Kline                               Washington, DC 20555-0001 Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
Administrative Judge                 Martha Coakley, Attorney General Richard F. Cole                      Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney Atomic Safety and Licensing Board   General Commonwealth of Mail Stop -T-3-F23                   Massachusetts US NRC                               Office of Attorney General Washington, DC 20555-0001           One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication                        Mr. Mark Sylvia Mail Stop 0-16 C I                  Town Manager, Town of Plymouth United States Nuclear Regulatory    11 Lincoln Street Commission                            Plymouth MA 02360 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board     Town of Plymouth MA Mail Stop T-3 F23                     Duane Morris, LLP United States Nuclear Regulatory     505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Commission                            Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Richard R. MacDonald Susan L. Uttal, Esq.                 Town Manager, Town of Duxbury James E. Adler, Esq.                 878 Tremont Street Marcia Simon, Esq.                   Duxbury, MA 02332 Andrea Jones, Esq.
United States Nuclear Regulatory     Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Commission                           Town of Duxbury Washington, DC 20555-0001             688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Office of General Counsel             Duxbury, MA 02331 Mail Stop 15 D21 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Paul A. Gaukler, Esq.
David R. Lewis, Esq.
Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037-1138 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.
Duxbury, MA 023332 2}}

Revision as of 04:51, 14 November 2019

2009/06/04-Post Hearing Developments: Leaks of Contaminated Water from Buried Piping at Oyster Creek & Indian Point as They Pertain to Pilgrim Watch'S Petition for Review of LBP-06-848 & Interlocutory Decisions
ML091680107
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 06/04/2009
From: Lampert M
Pilgrim Watch
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
06-848-02-LR, 50-293-LR, LBP-06-848, RAS J-193
Download: ML091680107 (6)
v • d • e


Text

IL-=- 1 ((I DOCKETED USNRC June 5, 2009 (2:43pm)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RULEMAKINGS AND NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADJUDICATIONS STAFF

'BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of Docket # 50-293 Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 4, 2009 POST HEARING DEVELOPMENTS: LEAKS OF CONTAMINATED WATER FROM BURIED PIPING AT OYSTER CREEK & INDIAN POINT AS THEY PERTAIN TO PILGRIM WATCH'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF LBP-06-848 AND INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS To the Honorable Chairman Jaczko and Members of the Commission:

Post hearing developments at Oyster Creek and Indian Point directly pertain to Pilgrim Watch's Petition for Review of LBP-06-848, Contention 1 now before the Commissioners. These developments include the recent leaks of radioactive contaminated water from buried pipes at both Oyster Creek and Indian Point; and the Honorable Edward J. Markey's letter to the Commissioners expressing his "grave concerns regarding the current inspections regime for buried pipes" and that he finds them "profoundly inadequate to ensure the public health and safety."

These developments were not brought forward by Pilgrim Watch at the Hearing for the simple reason that they had not yet occurred.

1. Oyster Creek: Leaks Of Radioactive Liquid Nine Days After License Renewal Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Company's renewed license was issued April 8, 2009. Nine days later (April 17) workers found an elevated level of radioactive tritium (102,000 picocuries from one sample, 5 times higher than the EPA limit for drinking water per liter) from two buried pipes associated with the condensate storage tank. One pipe had a 5/8 of an inch hole in an 8-

inch carbon steel pipe; the other had a 1-inch hole in it.1 These leaks demonstrate The Inadequacy of NRC's staff safety inspections during the license renewal process and inadequacy of the aging management program for buried components.

According to press reports, NRC's Neil Sheehan reported in an email that Exelon said that they examined one of the two pipes with holes before its operating license was renewed; however it appears the pipe was inspected in a different spot than where the hole was found.2 This highlights a fundamental weakness of the Aging Management Program (AMP) that Pilgrim Watch brought forward in Pilgrim's license renewal adjudication.

Exelon stated that underground piping systems carrying radioactive water will be moved above ground or placed in vaults. In other words Exelon admits, after the fact, that there is a problem.

Will Pilgrim's buried piping carrying radioactive water be similarly placed above ground or in vaults; or does NRC condone New Jersey citizens being safer than Massachusetts citizens?

The inescapable conclusion from these leaks is as follows.

(A) The pipes leaked nine days into the twenty year license extension. The Oyster Creek Aging Management Program for Buried Pipes was obviously insufficient.

(B) The NRC Staff Safety Review did not identify deficiencies in the buried piping AMP; there is no basis to assume that Pilgrim's SER was any better.

(C) Although the applicant must "demonstrate that the effects of aging will be adequately managed so that the intended function(s) will be maintained consistent with the CLB for the period of extended operation;" the definition of those intended functions is too limited. The Applicant, NRC Staff and the ASLB maintained in Pilgrim's License Renewal that the intended function of buried components does not include containment of radioactive liquids to prevent leaks, such as at Oyster Creek of unmonitored radioactivity into the environment.

Brick Township Bulletin, Holes in two pipes thought to be source of tritium leaks, Patricia Miller, May 7, 2009 2 Cherry Hill Courier Post, Only one leaking Oyster Creek pipe inspected, Todd Bates, May 2, 2009 2

Does the Commission support this astounding assertion? Can the Commissioners seriously tell the public that the unmonitored leakage of radioactive liquids from components is so unimportant that it does not care whether there is reasonable assurance that the AMP will prevent them?

2. Indian Point: Leaks of Radioactive Liquid; License Application Currently Under Review On April 30, 2009 the Honorable Edward Markey, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment and the Honorable John J. Hall, Member of Congress, wrote to the Commission about the leak at Indian Point. 3 On February 16, 2009, again after the close of the.

Pilgrim Hearing, Entergy determined that a buried section of the Unit 2 condensate storage tank (CST) return line leaked water at a rate of approximately 18 gallons per minute. Entergy determined that a 1.5 inch diameter corrosion hole was the source of the leak. All told, 100,000 gallons had leaked.

James Sheets, a spokesman for Entergy, said that the pipe that broke was made of carbon steel covered with a protective coating and external corrosion caused the rupture.4 Lessons learned from Indian Point A. Carbon steel, like all metals, corrodes. Protective coating corrodes, is defective or becomes damaged. External corrosion caused the rupture at Indian Point. Chemistry control that targets interior surfaces provides no guarantee that pipes shall maintain their integrity. All of these issues were raised by Pilgrim Watch. Indian point shows their importance.

B. The corroded pipe at Indian Point adds to the long and growing list of pipe leaks around the county. Leaks of water with radioactivity have been discovered in underground piping, for 3 Their letter is attached; the Commission has yet to respond.

4 New York Times, Indian Pt.Broken Pipe Spurs Safety Worries, Annie Correal, February 28, 2009 3

example, at Byron, Braidwood, Dresden, Palo Verde, Indian Point, and Oyster Creek. Tritium was discovered in monitoring wells at Pilgrim.

C. Representative Markey said in his letter to then-Chairman Klein that the leak raised serious questions about Entergy's and the regulatory commission's oversight. "This leak may demonstrate a systemic failure of the licensee and the commission to inspect critical buried pipes in a manner sufficient to guarantee the public health and safety." He noted that physically inspecting buried piping systems poses unique challenges due to limited accessibility. However, he noted that many industries have successfully developed technologies and programs to deal with this problem. Congressman Markey concluded his letter by asking "Has the Commission ever considered requiring licensees to develop technologies and methods to inspect difficult to access buried pipes? If so, why are such requirements not in place?"

Pilgrim Watch's testimony at the Pilgrim hearing specifically answered Congressman Markey's question. There are technologies and programs available to supplement the AMP to make it sufficient - backfit cathodic protection, require a robust inspection protocol, install a sufficient number of monitoring wells, and perform a baseline inspection prior to license renewal so that there is a benchmark of conditions to measure the rate of corrosion going forward.

The post-hearing leaks of radioactive liquid at Oyster Creek and Indian Point support Pilgrim Watch's position that leaving leakage of unmonitored quantities of radioactive liquids out of the licensing procedure and subject only to some industry voluntary program, is an abdication of NRC's responsibility to protect the public from unmonitored radioactive exposure and is contrary to NRC's ALARA principle.

Thank-you for your consideration, I am sincerelW -.

Mary Lampert, pro se Pilgrim Watch 148 Washington Street Duxbury, MA 02332 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Docket # 50-293-LR Entergy Corporation Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application June 4, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the following was served June 4, 2009, Post Hearing Developments:

Leaks of Contaminated Water From Buried Piping at Oyster Creek & Indian Point As They Pertain To Pilgrim Watch's Petition For Review Of LBP-06-848 and Interlocutory Decisions Secretary of the Commission Hon. Kristine L. Svinicki Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Commissioner Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-16 C l Washington, DC 20555-0001 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission [2 copies] Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young, Chair Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Chairman Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission US NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hon. Peter B. Lyons Administrative Judge Commissioner Paul B. Abramson U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mail Stop T-3 F23 US NRC Hon. Dale E. Kline Washington, DC 20555-0001 Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Administrative Judge Martha Coakley, Attorney General Richard F. Cole Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney Atomic Safety and Licensing Board General Commonwealth of Mail Stop -T-3-F23 Massachusetts US NRC Office of Attorney General Washington, DC 20555-0001 One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mr. Mark Sylvia Mail Stop 0-16 C I Town Manager, Town of Plymouth United States Nuclear Regulatory 11 Lincoln Street Commission Plymouth MA 02360 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Sheila Slocum Hollis, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Town of Plymouth MA Mail Stop T-3 F23 Duane Morris, LLP United States Nuclear Regulatory 505 9th Street, N.W. 1000 Commission Washington D.C. 20004-2166 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Richard R. MacDonald Susan L. Uttal, Esq. Town Manager, Town of Duxbury James E. Adler, Esq. 878 Tremont Street Marcia Simon, Esq. Duxbury, MA 02332 Andrea Jones, Esq.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Fire Chief & Director DEMA, Commission Town of Duxbury Washington, DC 20555-0001 688 Tremont Street P.O. Box 2824 Office of General Counsel Duxbury, MA 02331 Mail Stop 15 D21 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Paul A. Gaukler, Esq.

David R. Lewis, Esq.

Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037-1138 Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, pro se 148 Washington St.

Duxbury, MA 023332 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML091680107&oldid=2144507"