ML11112A132

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, After Action Report

ML11112A132
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	11/17/2010
From:	Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	NRC/RGN-II
References
Download: ML11112A132 (59)

Text

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise AFTER ACTION REPORT FOR THE 2010 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, FULL PLUME PHASE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE EXERCISE November 17,2010 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program PublishedMarch 2011 4

A1,*

2010 SQN REP Exercise

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise This page is intentionally blank 2010 SQN REP Exercise

Administrative Handling Instructions

1. This After Action Report (AAR) for the 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant (SQN)

Radiological Emergency Preparedness, Full Plume Phase Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ)

Exercise is considered a public document.

2. Points of Contact:

Federal: State of Tennessee:

Mr. Kevin Keyes General Bassham North Section Chief Director FEMA Region TV TN Emergency Management Agency 3003 Chamblee-Tucker 3041 Sidco Drive Atlanta, Georgia 30341-4122 Nashville, Tennessee 37204-1502 770/220-5378 616/741-0001 kevin.keyes @dhs.gov Hamilton County: Bradley County:

Mr. Bill Tittle Mr. Troy Spence Chief Director Emergency Management Emergency Management 3403 Amnicola Highway 1555 Guthrie Drive, NW Chattanooga, Tennessee 37406 Cleveland, Tennessee 37311 Tennessee Valley Authority:

Walter H. Lee Manager Emergency Preparedness 1101 Market Street, LP 6B-C Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 Handling Instructions 2010 SON REP Exercise I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Table of Contents Page Administrative Handling Instructions ............................................................................................. 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summ ary ........................................................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Exercise Overview ................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Exercise Details ........................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership .................................. 7 1.3 Participating Organizations ...................................................................................... 7 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary ........................................................................................ 9 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ................................................................................... 9 2.2 FEM A Exercise Objectives and Capabilities .......................................................... 10 2.3 Scenario Summ ary ................................................................................................... 13 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities .......................................................................................... 15 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results ............................................................................ 15 3.2 Capability Summ aries ............................................................................................ 15 3.2.1 State Of Tennessee ...................................................................................... 15 3.2.1.1 State Em ergency Operations Center .......................................... 15 3.2.1.2 Dose Assessm ent ...................................................................... 17 3.2.1.3 Radiological M onitoring Control Center ................................... 17 3.2.1.4 Radiological Field M onitoring Team s ...................................... 19 3.2.1.5 Field Coordination Center ........................................................ 19 3.2.1.6 Local Prim ary I (LP-1) EAS Station ........................................ 20 3.2.2 Joint Operations .......................................................................................... 20 3.2.2.1 Central Emergency Control Center ........................................... 20 3.2.2.2 Joint Inform ation Center .......................................................... 21 3.2.3 Risk Jurisdictions ........................................................................................ 22 3.2.3.1 Bradley County, Tennessee ...................................................... 22 Table Of Contents 2010 SQN REP Exercise 2

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise I 3.2.3.1.1 Emergency Operations Center ................................. 22 3.2.3.1.2 3.2.3.1.3 Traffic and Access Control Points ............................

Backup Route Alerting .............................................

24 24 1

3.2.3.1.4 Protective Actions for Schools .................................. 25 3.2.3.2 Hamilton County, Tennessee .................................................... 25 1

3.2.3.2.1 3.2.3.2.2 Emergency Operations Center .................................

Traffic and Access Control Points ............................

25 26 1

3.2.3.2.3 3.2.3.2.4 3.2.3.2.5 Waterway Clearance .................................................

Hamilton County Backup Route Alerting ................. 28 Reception and Congregate Care Center .................... 28 27 U

3.2.3.2.6 3.2.3.2.7 Protective Actions for Schools ..................................

Emergency Worker &Vehicle Monitoring & Decon .... 30 29 I

Section 4: Conclusion 34 I

List Of Appendices Appendix A: Exercise Tim eline ............................................................................................ 35 I Appendix B: Results Summ ary of Exercise Evaluation ........................................................ 36 Appendix C:

Appendix D:

Exercise Evaluator and Assignm ents ...............................................................

Exercise Locations .............................................................................................

38 41 I Appendix E: Extent of Play A greem ent ................................................................................. 42 Appendix F: Acronym s .......................................................................................................... 54 I

List Of Tables Table 1: Exercise Tim eline ............................................................................................ 35 I

Table 2: REP Criteria Evaluation Result Summ ary ........................................................ 36 Table 3: Target Capability Evaluation Result Summ ary ............................................... 37 1

Table Of Contents 2010 SQN REP Exercise 3

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Executive Summary On November 17, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region IV Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program staff evaluated a full plume exposure pathway exercise in the Emergency Planning Zone for the Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant (SQN). The evaluation of out of sequence (OOS) activities conducted October 21-22 and November 3-4, 2010 are included in this report. The OOS activities included: protective actions for schools; reception and congregate care centers; emergency worker and equipment monitoring and decontamination. SQN is operated by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and is located in Hamilton County, Tennessee near the City of Soddy Daisy. The 10-mile EPZ is divided into four quadrants and affects both risk Counties of Bradley and Hamilton.

FEMA's overall objective of the exercise was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency at SQN. The purpose of this report is to analyze exercise results based on the assessment of target capabilities. This exercise was held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERP) and procedures. The evaluation team conducted this exercise using Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) methodology.

The previous Federal evaluated exercise was conducted on November 15-16, 2008. The qualifying emergency preparedness exercise was conducted in June 1980.

Officials and representatives from the State of Tennessee, Bradley, and Hamilton Counties, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II, and TVA, as well as numerous volunteers participated in this exercise. The cooperation and teamwork of the participants was evident throughout all the phases of the exercise. FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts and hard work of the many individuals who participated in the success of this exercise. FEMA would also like to acknowledge the enthusiasm and contributions of the exercise planning team during the design of the exercise. The introduction of new products and concepts into the design phase of the exercise was embraced by the team, and they exhibited an eagerness to improve emergency management and response at all levels.

During this exercise, FEMA did not identify any Deficiencies; however, one Area Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) was identified. The ARCA involved Hamilton County's inability to properly monitor and decontaminate emergency worker's vehicles. This ARCA was re-demonstrated on January 26, 2011 and was corrected. Overall, State and local organizations demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them. Communications were identified as a general strength throughout the exercise. Not only was the communications equipment interoperable and functional, but the personnel utilizing it kept everyone well informed and helped to maintain situational awareness across the board. The evaluation team noted great progress in the coordination of activities between the State, counties, and all other response entities.

Executive Summary 2010 SQN REP Exercise 4

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise I The objectives for the 2010 SQN REP Exercise were as follows:

I

• Objective 1: Successfully demonstrate the ability to manage emergency operations through the mobilization of personnel, direction and control of the incident, and appropriate equipment, supplies and communications.

1

• Objective 2: Provide appropriate protective action decisions to protect the health and.

safety of emergency workers and the public.

I

" Objective 3: Demonstrate activities associated with the implementation of protective action decisions such as schools and special needs relocation, establishment of traffic and I!

"

access control points, and Potassium Iodide distribution and ingestion.

Objective 4: Demonstrate the equipment, procedures, and management associated with I

plume phase field measurement and analysis.

I

" Objective 5: Promptly notify the public of the emergency through Prompt Notification System, and continue to provide timely and accurate information utilizing the Emergency Alert System and the media. Demonstrate a backup notification method. I

" Objective 6: Conduct a demonstration of operations at support facilities including monitoring and decontamination stations, shelters, and hospitals.

I These objectives encompass the REP Exercise Evaluation Criteria as negotiated in the Extent of Play Agreement.

I FEMA will provide an Improvement Plan (IP) to the State of Tennessee that detail Strengths and Areas for Improvement observed during the exercise. The IP will be published under a separate I

cover and classified For Official Use Only (FOUO) in compliance with HSEEP standards.

I Executive Summary 2010 SON REP Exercise 5

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Section 1: Exercise Overview 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Power (SQN) Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Evaluated Exercise Type of Exercise Full-Scale Exercise Exercise Out of Sequence/Off Scenario Dates October 21-22, November 3-4, and November 16, 2010 Exercise Date November 17, 2010 Locations See Appendix D for a complete listing of locations that supported exercise activities.

Sponsors Tennessee Emergency Management Agency Tennessee Valley Authority 3041 Sidco Drive 1101 Market Street Nashville, Tennessee 37204-1502 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 Program FEMA REP Program Mission

Response

Capabilities

" Emergency Operations Center Management

" Emergency Public Information and Warning

" Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place

" Emergency Public Safety and Security Response

" Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination

" Mass Care Scenario Type REP, Full Plume Phase EPZ Section 1: Exercise Overview 2010 SON REP Exercise 6

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership Role Name Agency Exercise Director Gary Lima TEMA Lead Controller David Green TEMA Lead Evaluator Matthew Bradley DHS/FEMA Region IV Exercise Logistics David Nash TEMA Evaluation Supervisor Kevin Keyes DHS/FEMA Region IV Scenario Development Lead Kenneth King TVA Agency Representative Walt Lee TVA Agency Representative Bill Tittle Hamilton County Agency Representative Wayne Stuntz Hamilton County Agency Representative Jeff Gunter Bradley County Agency Representative Betty Hamby McMinn County Agency Representative Tom Trotter McMinn County Agency Representative Tony Finnell Meigs County Agency Representative Billy Cranfield Rhea County Agency Representative Liz Flanagan TN DHEC Agency Representative Bruce House TN DHEC 1.3 Participating Organizations The following agencies, organizations, and units of government participated in the 2010 SQN REP Exercise.

State of Tennessee

• Military Department

• Tennessee Emergency Management Agency

" Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

" Division of Radiological Health

" Division of State Parks

• Tennessee Department of Health a Division of Food and General Sanitation

" Tennessee Department of Agriculture E Division of Forestry

" Tennessee Department of Safety

• Tennessee Highway Patrol

" Tennessee Department of Human Services

" Tennessee Department of Transportation

" Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency

• Tennessee Department of Tourism Development Bradley County, Tennessee Section 1: Exercise Overview 2010 SON REP Exercise 7

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise

• Bradley County Mayor

• Cleveland Mayor

• Cleveland City Manager

• Cleveland/Bradley County Emergency Management Agency

" Bradley County Fire and Rescue Service

• Bradley County Sherriff's Office

" Bradley County Department of Education

• Bradley County Road Department

• Bradley County 911

" Bradley County Health Department

• Bradley County Emergency Medical Services

" Cleveland Police Department

" Cleveland Public Works

" Cleveland Utilities Department

" Cleveland/Bradley County Auxiliary Communications Service Hamilton County, Tennessee

" Hamilton County Office of Emergency Services

" Hamilton County Sherriff's Office

" Hamilton County Health Department

• Hamilton County Highway Department

" Hamilton County Emergency Medical Service

• Hamilton County Property Assessor's Office

" Hamilton County Department of Education

" Hamilton County 911

" Hamilton County Geographic Information System

• Hamilton County Auxiliary Communications Service

• Chattanooga Police Department

• Chattanooga Fire Department

• Chattanooga/Hamilton County Rescue Squad

• Tri-Com Volunteer Fire Department Federal

• Tennessee Valley Authority

• Nuclear Regulatory Commission Non-Governmental Organizations

• Salvation Army

• American Red Cross, Hamilton County Chapter

• American Red Cross, Bradley County Chapter

" Volunteer State Rescue Service

" AT&T

• Verizon

• Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD)

" SkyRidge Medical Center

• Olin Corporation Section 1: Exercise Overview 2010 SON REP Exercise 8

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administers the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program pursuant to the regulations found in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) parts 350, 351 and 352. 44 CFR 350 codifies 16 planning standards that form the basis for radiological emergency response planning for licensee, State, tribal and local governments impacted by the Emergency Planning Zones (EPZ) established for each nuclear power plant site in the United States. 44 CFR 350 sets forth the mechanisms for the formal review and approval of State, Tribal and local government Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures by DHS/FEMA. One of the REP program cornerstones established by these regulations is the biennial exercise of offsite response capabilities.

During these exercises State, Tribal and local governments demonstrate their abilities to implement their plans and procedures to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency at the nuclear plant.

The 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant (SQN) REP exercise was designed utilizing the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). HSEEP is a capabilities and performance-based exercise program which provides a standardized policy, methodology, and terminology for exercises. The use of HSEEP is intended to ensure that the REP program conforms to established best practices and helps provide unity and consistency of effort for exercises at all levels of government. Prior to the exercise, the design team conducted planning meetings on a regular basis which focused on identifying objectives, designing the scenario, creating documentation, coordinating logistics, planning exercise conduct, and selecting an evaluation and improvement methodology.

The results of this exercise together with the review of the RERPs and procedures and verification of the periodic requirements set forth in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP- 1 through the Annual Letter of Certification and staff assistance visits enable FEMA to provide a statement with the transmission of this final AAR to the NRC that State, Tribal and local plans and preparedness are: (1) adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the nuclear power plant by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency; and (2) capable of being implemented.

June 20, 1980 the State of Tennessee formally submitted the Multi-Jurisdictional Radiological Emergency Response Plan for the SQN to FEMA Region IV. Formal approval of this plan was granted by FEMA on August 7, 1980 in accordance with 44 CFR 350.

A REP exercise was evaluated on November 17, 2010, and included evaluations of the following out of sequence activities:

October 21, 2010 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2010 SQN REP Exercise 9

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3

" Emergency Worker and Equipment Monitoring and Decontamination, conducted at Red Bank High School in Hamilton County

" Reception and Congregate Care Center, conducted at Brainerd High School in Hamilton County October 22, 2010

" Reception and Congregate Care Center, conducted at Chattanooga High School in 3

Hamilton County

" Reception and Congregate Care Center, conducted at Dalewood Middle School in l

Hamilton County November 3, 2010 3

• Protective Actions for Schools, conducted by interview at the following schools in Hamilton County: Hixson Middle School, Sequoyah High School, Soddy-Daisy Middle School, and McConnell Elementary School November 4, 2010

• Protective Actions for Schools, conducted by interview at the following schools in Hamilton County: Ooltewah High School, Browns Middle School, and Harrison Elementary School November 16, 2010

• Protective Actions for Schools, conducted by interview at Prospect Elementary School in Bradley County 2.2 FEMA Exercise Objectives and Capabilities 3 Capabilities-based planning allows for exercise planning teams to develop exercise objectives and observe exercise outcomes through a framework of specific action items that were derived from the Target Capabilities List (TCL). The capabilities listed below form the foundation for the organization of all FEMA Region IV REP Program objectives and observations in this exercise.

• Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Management: Is the capability to provide multi-agency coordination (MAC) for incident management by activating and operating an EOC for a pre-planned or no-notice event. EOC Management includes EOC activation, notification, staffing, and deactivation; management, direction, control, and coordination of response and recovery activities; coordination of efforts among neighboring governments at each level and among 3

local, regional, State, and Federal EOCs; coordination public information and warning; and maintenance of the information and communication necessary for i coordinating response and recovery activities.

" Emergency Public Information and Warning: Is the capability that includes l public information, alert/warning and notification. It involves developing, coordinating, and disseminating information to the public, coordinating officials, and incident management and responders across all jurisdictions and disciplines I effectively under all hazard conditions.

I Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2010 SON REP Exercise 10 I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise

• Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place: Is the capability to prepare for, ensure communication of, and immediately execute the safe and effective sheltering-in-place of an at-risk population (and companion animals), and/or the organized and managed evacuation of the at-risk population (and companion animals) to areas of safe refuge in response to a potentially or actually dangerous environment. In addition, this capability involves the safe reentry of the population where feasible.

• Emergency Public Safety and Security Response: Is the capability to reduce the impact and consequences of an incident or major event by securing the affected area, including crime/incident scene preservation issues as appropriate, safely diverting the public from hazards, providing security support to other response operations and properties, and sustaining operations from response through recovery. Public Safety and Security Response requires coordination among officials from law enforcement, fire, and Emergency Medical Services.

" Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination: Is the capability to assess and manage the consequences of a hazardous materials release, either accidental or as part of a terrorist attack. It includes testing and identifying all likely hazardous substances onsite; ensuring that responders have protective clothing and equipment; conducting rescue operations to remove affected victims from the hazardous environment; conducting geographical survey searches of suspected sources or contamination spreads and establishing isolation perimeters; mitigating the effects of hazardous materials, decontaminating on-site victims, responders, and equipment; coordinating off-site decontamination with relevant agencies, and notifying environmental, health, and law enforcement agencies having jurisdiction for the incident to begin implementation of their standard evidence collection and investigation procedures.

" Mass Care: Is the capability to provide immediate shelter, feeding centers, basic first aid, bulk distribution of needed items, and related services to persons affected by a large-scale incident, including special needs populations. Special needs populations include individuals with physical or mental disabilities who require medical attention or personal care beyond basic first aid. Other special-needs populations include non-English speaking populations that may need to have information presented-in other languages. The mass care capability also provides for pet care/handling through local government and appropriate animal-related organizations. Mass care is usually performed by nongovernmental organizations (NGO), such as the American Red Cross, or by local government-sponsored volunteer efforts, such as Citizen Corps. Special-needs populations are generally the responsibility of local government, with medical needs addressed by the medical community and/or its alternate care facilities. State and Federal entities also play a role in public and environmental health by ensuring safe conditions, safe food, potable water, sanitation, clean air, etc.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2010 SQN REP Exercise 11

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Additionally, each capability is linked to several corresponding activities and tasks to provide additional detail. Based upon the identified exercise objectives, the following capabilities and associated activities were evaluated.

• Objective 1: Successfully demonstrate the ability to manage emergency operations through the mobilization of personnel, direction and control of the incident, and appropriate equipment, supplies, and communications.

Capability: EOC Management - Activate EOC/MACC/IOF; Direct EOC/MACC/IOF Tactical Operations; Provide EOC/MACC/IOF Connectivity;

" Objective 2: Provide appropriate protective action decisions to protect the health and safety of emergency workers and the public. 3 Capability: EOC Management - Gather and Provide Information; Identify and Address Issues; and Support and Coordinate Response Capability: Emergency Public Information and Warning -

Manage Emergency Public Information and Warnings; Activate Emergency Public Information, Alert/Warning, and Notification Plans; Issue Emergency Warnings

" Objective 3: Demonstrate activities associated with the implementation of protective action decisions such as schools and special needs relocation, establishment of traffic and access control points, and Potassium Iodide (KI) distribution and ingestion.

" Capability: EOC Management - Direct EOC Tactical Operations; Gather and Provide Information; and Identify and Address Issues

" Capability: Emergency Public Safety and Security Response -

Activate Public Safety and Security Response; Control Traffic, Crowd, and Scene; Command and Control Public Safety and Security Response Operations

" Capability: Citizen Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place - Direct Evacuation and/or In-Place Protection Operations; Activate Evacuation and/or In-Place Protection I

" Objective 4: Demonstrate the equipment, procedures, and management I associated with plume phase field measurement and analysis.

Capability: Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination

- Site Management and Control; Assess Hazard and Evaluate Risk

" Objective 5: Promptly notify the public of the emergency through the Prompt I Notification System, and continue to provide timely and accurate information I

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 12 2010 SQN REP Exercise 3

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise utilizing the Emergency Alert System and the media. Demonstrate a backup notification method.

Capability: Emergency Public Information and Warning -

Manage Emergency Public Information and Warnings; Activate Emergency Public Information, Alert/Warning, and Notification Plans; Establish JIS; Issue Emergency Warnings; Conduct Media Relations; Conduct Media Relations; and Provide Public Rumor Control.

• Objective 6: Conduct a demonstration of operations at support facilities including monitoring and decontamination stations, shelters, and hospitals.

" Capability: Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination

- Provide Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations; Implement Exposure Control; Conduct Monitoring and Decontamination

" Capability: Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, Related Services) -

Establish Shelter Operations 2.3 Scenario Summary This Exercise was conducted with the Sequoyah Plant Simulator in the interactive mode.

Times given were for planning purposes only. Actual times did vary due to dynamic response of the Simulator.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

UNIT-I:

• 100% power for the last 3.5 days. The core is at BOL. The Boron concentration is 1112 ppm. Core burn up is 1000 MWD/MTU.

- Work results in release of explosive gas.

UNIT-2:

- As is.

METEROLOGICAL DATA WD (deg) WS (m/s) Stability Class Time U I L U I L U-L U-I I-L Precip (mm/h) 0800-0900 337 339 335 6.2 4.8 3.1 D D D 0.0 1000-1100 320 322 317 7.3 5.9 3.8 B D D 0.0 1200-1300 318 321 319 5.1 4.5 3.0 D D D 0.0 1400-1500 310 312 311 6.9 5.5 3.4 D D D 0.0 COMMON:

At about two minutes (T=08:02 EST) into the exercise, it is reported to Operations that damage has occurred which is releasing flammable gas into an area of the Auxiliary Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2010 SON REP Exercise 13

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise I Building.

I At about ten minutes (T=08: I 0 EST) into the exercise, information about an explosive atmosphere in the Auxiliary Building is reported to Operations. An ALERT condition exists due to EAL 4.3 (Unplanned release of Flammable Gas within a facility structure I containing safety related equipment or associated with safe operation of the plant.

At about twenty five minutes (T=08:25 EST) into the exercise, an ALERT should be I declared based on EAL 4.3.

At about one hour forty minutes (T=09:40 EST) into the exercise, the loop 3 Reactor I Coolant Pump (RCP) rotor locks and a large break LOCA occurs. The reactor should trip. When subcooling is lost, conditions exist for EAL 1.2.2L (RCS leak results in subcooling < 400). Enough fuel clad failures occur over the next few minutes due to I

thermal and pressure stresses such that the RCS coolant activity Dose Equivalent Iodine 131 (DEI) exceeds 300 It C/gmn. When containment accident monitors exceed 29 R/hr then conditions exist for EAL 1.1.5. Conditions then exist for a SAE based on the loss of two I

fission product barriers, the fuel clad barrier and the RCS barrier.

At about one hour fifty five minutes (T=09:55 EST) into the exercise, a SAE should be I

declared based on EAL 1.1.5L and EAL 1.2.2L.

At about three hours and ten minutes (T= 11: 10 EST) into the exercise, a break occurs on I

the "A" RHR injection line outside containment and begins leaking into the pipe chase in the Auxiliary building. Once area radiation monitors or ventilation monitors adjacent to containment begin to respond then conditions exist for 1.3.4P (Unexpected valid increase I

in area or ventilation monitors adjacent to containment with LOCA in containment).

After these conditions are met, then conditions exist for a GE based on EAL I .1.5L, EAL 1.2.2L, and 1.3.4P.

I At about six hours (T=14:00 EST) the exercise will end.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 2010 SON REP Exercise 14

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the November 17, 2010 plume exercise and Out of Sequence (OOS) interviews and demonstrations of October 21-22, November 3-4, and November 16, 2010. Exercise criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated by the use of the following terms:

" Met (No Deficiency or Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) assess and no unresolved ARCAs from prior exercise)

" ARCAs assessed or unresolved ARCAs from previous exercises

" Deficiency assessed

" Plan Issues

" Not Demonstrated 3.2 Capability Summaries 3.2.1 State Of Tennessee 3.2.1.1 State Emergency Operations Center Emergency Operations Center Management Capability Summary:

The Tennessee Emergency Management Agency (TEMA) Director and his staff successfully demonstrated this capability. The Mission Control Center (MCC) is a component of the Tennessee State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC). One of the MCC's primary roles is initial notification. Upon notification of an Alert ECL, the MCC Director recommended a Level 3 activation which is a partial activation of the SEOC and declared the MCC operational. Upon arrival, the Direction and Control Officer (DACO) was notified of the Alert and Level 3 activation, and the MCC Director successfully handed off direction and control. The DACO then notified the Tennessee Adjutant General and the Governor of the situation.

The MCC Director established and organized the MCC in a timely manner. Fixed Nuclear Facility Checklists per Emergency Classification Level (ECL) were implemented by the operations staff as directed. Plans and procedures were available for staff and were utilized to clarify uncertainties in protocol and procedures. The State used a dialogic pager system to notify staff to report to the EOC; however exercise participants were prepositioned in accordance with the extent of play. The Lead Operations Officer received all notifications and informed the MCC Director without delay. Briefings were conducted every hour or as new information became available.

The DACO provided direction and control of the overall response effort and ensured the staffing of Emergency Support Functions (ESFs). Protective Action Recommendations Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SQN REP Exercise 15

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise (PAR) were gathered and coordinated with risk counties and other support functions in a timely manner to support emergency operations. Issues were thoroughly discussed between ESFs and key personnel using current plans, procedures, recommendations and meteorological data.

The evaluation of current evacuation plans and associated activities was favorable.

Needed corrections were detected in some Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages and 1

were adjusted prior to transmission. The use of appropriate evacuation routes was carefully examined. All evacuees were directed away from the plume on routes identified in plans. Tennessee Highway Patrol quickly established Traffic control points (TCP) to support the evacuation in both counties during the event and communications were maintained with state resources assigned to support this activity. All traffic flow information was provided through local channels to county emergency operation centers (EOC).

The SEOC is a well-equipped facility capable of supporting emergency response operations for an incident involving the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN).

Communications were redundant and provided reliable interface with all affected jurisdictions and agencies. Communications were clear, acknowledged and understood by receivers and no communications failures were observed throughout the exercise.

Document Control personnel effectively managed the duplication, distribution, and I

control of emergency notification forms, news releases, and EAS messages.

The DACO used the SEOC Emergency Support Function (ESF) staff collectively as a decision base by moving progressively around the room gathering information to provide to risk counties during "meet-me" conference calls. This decision-making process 1 incorporated ESF and risk counties input into the protective action decisions (PAD) process. I The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1, L.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 2.a. 1, and 2.b.2, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.d. 1 Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

The SEOC staff successfully demonstrated the capability to notify and warn the public of a simulated emergency at SQN by coordinating the sounding of sirens and release of EAS messages. Coordination was accomplished via conference call, WebEOC and telephone with the risk counties of Hamilton and Bradley, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), and the Joint Information Center (JIC). Prior to the activation of the JIC, management and coordination of public information through the media is the responsibility of the State Emergency Information Director (SEID). Activation of the SEID and associated Public Information Officer (PIO) support was completed as part of the SEOC activation process.

Before the JIC was activated, the SEOC issued one news release and answered one public inquiry call. After JIC activation, the SEOC PIO staff maintained close contact and coordination with the JIC.

I Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 16

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise TEMA activated the sirens three times during the exercise and issued seven EAS messages. Each siren activation and EAS message broadcast was completed in a timely manner and without any undue delay. The EAS messages contained the minimum elements as required by current FEMA REP guidance.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1 3.2.1.2 Dose Assessment HazMat Response and Decontamination Capability Summary:

This capability was successfully demonstrated by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), Division of Radiological Health (DRH) Dose Assessment Group. Staff was prepositioned at the SEOC in accordance with the extent of play agreement. The Dose Assessment Group occupied sufficient space, possessed equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies to support emergency operations, and successfully established, maintained, and managed communications capabilities. The DRH Radiation Control Officer (RCO) demonstrated effective direction and control over dose assessment and protective action recommendation (PAR) development for the general public, and used a decision-making process, considering relevant factors and appropriate coordination to ensure that an exposure control system, including the use of potassium iodide (KI), was in place for emergency workers.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: l.a. 1, 1.b. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, 4.a.2 3.2.1.3 Radiological Monitoring Control Center HazMat Response and Decontamination Capability Summary:

In accordance with the extent-of-play agreement, Radiological Monitoring Coordination Center (RMCC) staff were prepositioned at the Tennessee Air National Guard facility at Lovell Field in Chattanooga. The Radiological Monitoring Coordinator (RMC) and DRH Coordinator described the notification and mobilization process for RMCC staff. Upon arriving at the facility, RMCC staff signed in with TEMA personnel and received an emergency worker kit containing a permanent record dosimeter (PRD), a 0-20 R direct-reading dosimeter (DRD), and four 65 mg potassium iodide (KI) tablets. Field Monitoring Teams (FMT) and the sample coordination personnel received a similar kit which also included a 0-500 mR DRD.

The RMCC had adequate maps, displays, equipment and supplies to support its operation. Communication capabilities included two fax machines, several commercial telephones, a dedicated "ring down" telephone with a direct connection to the RMC Contact at the SEOC, and a radio linked to the Radiological Monitoring Team Radio Net.

Staff also set up a laptop computer running WebEOC to monitor incident status. A TVA radio was available for use by a liaison from TVA to contact the Central Emergency Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 17

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Control Center (CECC). Field teams used mobile vehicle-mounted radios, handheld radios, and cell phones to communicate with the RMCC. All communications systems worked properly throughout the exercise.

The RMC provided leadership for the RMCC and worked closely with the DRH Coordinator and other RMCC staff to develop FMT strategies. Initial FMT assignments were determined and the RMC also decided that FMT members were to ingest KI. The RMCC is located outside the 10-mile EPZ, so RMCC staff did not ingest KI. The DRH Coordinator briefed all FMTs in the parking lot prior to departure. The briefing included a discussion of plant conditions, current meteorological data, and assigned FMT positions. FMTs were also instructed to ingest their KI and to complete radio checks with the RMCC.

The RMCC staff frequently discussed the movement of FMTs to best identify the location of the radiological plume and FMTs were given instructions by radio or telephone following decisions by the RMC. FMTs reported monitoring data to the RMCC by radio or telephone and data was recorded by RMCC staff on an Environs Radiological Monitoring Record form. Each time a FMT reported monitoring data, they I

also reported dosimeter readings. FMTs were required to report monitoring data at least every 30 minutes, so the RMCC was also able to track dosimeter levels at that frequency.

When interviewed, the RMC and DRH Coordinator were knowledgeable of DRH turn I

back limits and the process for authorizing exposures in excess of those limits.

The RMC maintained frequent communications with the RMC Contact to share information and to determine sampling priorities. The RMC also kept the DRH PIO at the JIC updated on FMT data. DRH assigned a Field Health Physicist to the Field I Coordination Center (FCC) located in the room adjacent to RMCC. The Field Health Physicist frequently came to the RMCC throughout the exercise for updates. The TVA liaison in the RMCC provided frequent updates on plant conditions as well as TVA field team data.

I The RMCC staff was generally focused on determining the edges of the plume and directed FMTs accordingly. However, at one point, FMT 4 traversed the plume and I

provided plume centerline readings as well as edge locations. The RMC directed FMT 4 to return to the centerline location to take an air sample. When FMT 4 arrived at the centerline location, they reported that radiation levels had increased at that location.

Those levels were still well below the team's turn back limits. The RMC, however, directed the team to return to the edge of the plume and take an air sample there rather than at the centerline location.

Sample coordination personnel set up the sample receipt area and performed instrument I operational checks in accordance with their procedure. As each FMT returned from the field, the Sample Coordinator directed the FMT member through the sample receipt process. Samples were logged in, monitored for contamination and radiation levels, and designated for transport to the appropriate laboratory for analysis.

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 18

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, l.c. 1, 1.d.1, L.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 4.a.2 3.2.1.4 Radiological Field Monitoring Teams HazMat Response and Decontamination Capability Summary:

This capability was successfully demonstrated by the DRH FMTs during the SQN REP Exercise. Four FMTs were pre-positioned at the Air National Guard Armory in Chattanooga. The FMT equipment, supplies and vehicles were adequate to support radiological monitoring and emergency worker functions. Two communications systems were available, tested, and verified operational before deployment. The FMTs were provided an operational briefing by the DRH Coordinator at the RMCC. Field team instruments were within calibration dates and properly checked for operation.

Instrumentation was sufficient to perform airborne particulate and radioiodine sampling.

Ambient direct radiation field measurements were also performed. The FMTs performed hazard assessment by traversing downwind locations in a strategic manner, as directed by the RMCC staff, to identify and quantify the magnitude of the simulated release. The teams demonstrated appropriate surveying, sampling, and counting techniques in order to properly track the plume. Ambient readings and personnel exposures were routinely communicated to the RMCC. Airborne radioactivity was assessed using an air sampler fitted with a particulate filter and a silver zeolite cartridge. FMT members were aware of the purpose of KI and the correct dosages to take. KI supplies, instructions, and documentation were all satisfactorily demonstrated. Emergency worker exposure control was satisfactorily demonstrated with appropriate dosimetry use and proper documentation.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: lal, ldl, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a. I and 4.a.3.

3.2.1.5 Field Coordination Center Emergency Operations Center Management Capability Summary:

This capability was successfully demonstrated at the Air National Guard facility at Lovell Field, East TEMA FCC for resource support and logistics between TEMA and risk counties. The FCC Director dispatched Area Coordinators to both counties after the Alert ECL. The Area Coordinators were responsible for briefing the director on resources needed for the counties. The FCC Director and Deputy Director provided frequent briefings to FCC staff on plant conditions, ECL changes, and response activities.

During the briefings they used checklists to ensure appropriate procedures were followed.

They demonstrated strong leadership and thorough knowledge of the State Emergency Response Plans and procedures. Each work station was equipped with a telephone, laptop computer, and copies of plans. Information Technology support was available on site and communications were sufficient to support operations. The FCC staff clearly understood their responsibilities, followed their procedures, and performed their Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 19

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise functions in a coordinated and timely manner.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: l.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e.1I 3.2.1.6 Local Primary 1 (LP-1) EAS Station Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

The Director of Engineering for WUSY FM 100.7 was interviewed concerning the designated Local Primary 1(LP-1) Radio Station's role in broadcasting EAS messages to the public. While the station operates 24/7, there are times when the station is not 1 manned. During the times when the station is not manned, calls for WUSY are automatically forwarded to a Cincinnati, Ohio radio station which is the EOC for WUSY.

TEMA calls WUSY from the SEOC to ensure that the EAS message is received by I WUSY and the public is notified. TEMA contacts WUSY daily to ensure that the direct ring down phone is functioning properly. There is a phone tree list which has all WUSY personnel listed to ensure someone is available at all times. Upon notification, whoever is contacted first must report to the radio station to receive the EAS message. Messages I

are recorded by SEOC staff in the MCC and provided to the radio station via "ring down" phone, voice mail, or other electronic means. The message is repeated as often as I necessary per the instructions of TEMA. The station can broadcast an EAS message for any type of emergency. If there is a power loss, the station can remain operational utilizing its large generator.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 5.a.1I 3.2.2 Joint Operations 3.2.2.1 Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Operations Center Management Capability Summary:

The Sequoyah CECC is located in the utility operator's Corporate Office and serves as the interface between the utility operator and the responding State and local government organizations.

The TEMA and DRH deployed senior staff members to the CECC to serve in a liaison capacity between the SEOC and the utility operator.

DRH successfully demonstrated its capability to effectively conduct independent accident analyses, develop protective actions, and implement these protective actions in a manner consistent with the preservation of public health and safety. All of the State officials deployed to the CECC were well trained, followed plans and procedures, and fulfilled their responsibilities in a professional manner. Tennessee State officials developed and maintained an outstanding, professional relationship with the utility operator.

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SQN REP Exercise 20

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Communications, coordination, and team work between and among all stakeholders was outstanding.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 2.b. 1.

3.2.2.2 Joint Information Center Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

The SQN JIC is located in the TVA Missionary Ridge Building, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee, about 15 miles southwest of the plant. TVA provides the preponderance of support materials to facilitate JIC and media operations in the JIC operations room, the Citizen Information Center/Rumor Control, media monitoring, the media update desk, media work area, and media briefing room. All areas are well equipped and have redundancy in communications with landlines, cell phones, facsimiles, internet connectivity and state and utility radio systems, all of which were operational.

The SQN JIC is truly a joint organization lead by co-directors provided by the State and TVA. It is considered to be one of the best in the region due to the extensive coordination. Written guidance provided in Annex D (Public Information and Education), The Tennessee Multi-Jurisdictional Radiological Emergency Response Plan (MJRERP) for the SQN, and the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the Sequoyah/Watts Bar Nuclear Plants JIC clearly lay out the operations and roles of government and utility personnel assigned to the JIC. The procedures identified in the aforementioned were successfully demonstrated during the November 17, 2010 plume phase exercise.

In accordance with the extent of play agreement the JIC personnel were pre-positioned.

None-the-less, to replicate provisions of the MJRERP, the JIC did not activate until after site area emergency (SAE) had been declared. At 0943, in light of deteriorating plant conditions the TVA JIC Director (TVA-JICD) discussed the pending activation of the JIC with the State-JICD (S-JICD). Subsequent to the utility's declaration of SAE (0947)

TVA personnel began arriving in the facility and the JIC was declared operational by the co-directors at 1015. In view of the pre-positioning, the Assistant S-JICD was interviewed on the process by which State personnel are alerted, assembled and deployed to Chattanooga from the SEOC in Nashville. His description of activities was in consonance with what is described in Annex D (Public Information and Education) to the MJRERP.

Upon activation, the JIC is the central location for the coordination and dissemination of emergency information while the SEOC maintains the responsibility for emergency instructions (e.g., protective action decision coordination/EAS message dissemination).

Effective implementation of the joint information system (JIS) requires close coordination between the State and local PIOs in the JIC and the respective SEOC/local EOCs. The degree of coordination observed was exceptional both internal to the JIC and Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 21

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise with external agencies and offices. Protocols for the reviewing and approval of messages by both co-directors was adhered to and accomplished without adversely affecting timely message release. There was some question as to the efficacy of TVA/SEOC emergency information message coordination prior to the JIC activation.

Although the JIC's role in the exercise entailed a relatively short period of time (less than four hours), twelve messages were prepared and two media briefings were conducted.

The coordination prior to the media briefings prepared the TVA and government spokespersons to address pertinent topics regarding the protection of the public. This was facilitated by the efforts of the Citizen Information Center/Rumor Control staff who maintained an operational awareness that allowed them to respond to public queries and identify topics that needed to be addressed.

The demonstration met the requirements of this capability and criteria: L.a. 1, 1.c. 1 1d. 1, L.e. I and 5.b.1.

3 3.2.3 Risk Jurisdictions 3 3.2.3.1 Bradley County, Tennessee 3 3.2.3.1.1 Emergency Operations Center Emergency Operations Center Management Capability Summary: I The Cleveland/Bradley County Emergency Management Agency Director and his staff successfully demonstrated the capability to provide multi-agency coordination and incident management for the SQN exercise. Key staff and Agency Leads were pre-positioned for this exercise as agreed in the extent of play. Representatives from various county agencies, volunteers, and elected local officials supported the response from the EOC.

The equipment in the EOC was sufficient to accomplish the duties required of it. Each workstation included a laptop computer running WebEOC, a 24 line telephone and a microphone connected to a public address system. The Fixed Nuclear Facility (FNF)

Planner serves a dual role which includes the position of County Radiation Officer (RO).

The RO issued emergency worker dosimetry kits and provided a radiological briefing to Sheriff's deputies involved in traffic control points and back-up route alerting activities.

The briefing covered the use of dosimetry and exposure control measures. Sufficient amounts of emergency worker dosimetry kits each consisting of self-reading and permanent record dosimeters, potassium iodide tablets and radiation record cards were on hand in the EOC. Additional administrative and other supplies were available to support emergency operations.

Primary and alternative communications with State and county agencies were tested throughout the exercise. Coordination with the SEOC, FCC, JIC, and Hamilton County was done over the Meet Me Line, a commercial telephone conference system. The I

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 22

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Director broadcast these calls over the EOC's public address system allowing all agencies/staff to listen and follow the decisions in real time. Following the conference calls, the Director held a staff update where each ESF was allowed to speak and update the EOC staff on their actions in support of the exercise. The Hot Ring Down telephone was used once by the Emergency Management Director to establish communications with the SEOC before moving to pre-scheduled Meet Me Line calls for the remainder of the exercise. The agencies performed their coordination role primarily using commercial telephones; however most if not all had cellular phones for backup. Cleveland/Bradley County Radio Amateur Civil Service (RACES) volunteers utilized a series of UHF/VHF/HF radios to maintain an alternate communication network with other Amateur Radio operators at Skyridge Hospital, Hamilton County EOC, and the State EOC in Nashville.

Both the State and Bradley County used WebEOC software to help in the management of the EOC's. WebEOC was utilized to manage, share, exchange, and track resource requests among each of the different Agencies. The County WebEOC administrator followed these requests and ensured key events are captured in the significant events log.

The County uses its own version of this software and must navigate between the two separate systems. The TEMA liaison helped the Director by capturing key events from the States WebEOC significant events log and relaying these events to his attention. This was done periodically throughout the exercise and helped the Director maintain situational awareness. During the exercise, the Bradley County WebEOC experienced network problems, and was off-line from 0947 until 1040. The EOC staff successfully transitioned smoothly back to the old, hand-written message system, and then back to WebEOC without operational disruption. After the outage, all notes and messages were transcribed back into WebEOC.

The flow of information through the EOC was seamless with the Director conducting frequent staff updates as conditions changed at the plant. All personnel in the EOC performed professionally and displayed excellent teamwork. The Mayors of the City of Cleveland and Bradley County along with the City Manager and Assistant Mayor actively participated in the exercise. Their participation improves their understanding of emergency operations and provides them with an understanding of the responsibilities of their employees during a radiological incident. The Director's proactive leadership contributed to the success of the Bradley County EOC.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: l.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d.l, l.e.l, 2.a.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.3 Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

The primary method of notifying the public of an emergency at SQN is a fixed siren system. A total of 108 sirens are located throughout the 10 mile EPZ in Bradley and Hamilton Counties. The decision to activate the siren system is the responsibility of the SEOC or the Hamilton County EOC if the situation dictates. PARs and PADs were made by the SEOC with input from the risk counties. Following the simulated activation of the sirens, a pre-scripted EAS message was broadcast through the LP-1 radio station WUSY Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 23

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise in Chattanooga and the NOAA weather radios (simulated). The sirens were activated a total of three times during the exercise.

The Bradley County PIO was dispatched to the JIC early in the exercise. An assistant PIO worked in the EOC to coordinate the press releases with the PIO. This was done using WebEOC. The assistant PIO provided the press releases to the Director for approval. Both the Mayor's and City Manager provided input on the press releases prior to their final approval. Prior to the activation of the JIC, Bradley County was responsible for releasing information to the public through the media.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 5.a. 1, 5.b. I 3.2.3.1.2 Traffic and Access Control Points Public Safety and Security Response Capability Summary: 1 The Bradley County Sheriff's Department, through interview, successfully demonstrated this capability. In response to a notification for security assets, the Sheriff's Deputy assessed, coordinated and managed the establishment of a TCP to direct/redirect traffic and residents out of the affected area. The Sheriff's Deputy was well equipped with redundant communications, the appropriate equipment to effectively manage traffic, and accurate instructions for the public. The Deputy was well trained and knowledgeable of 3

his roles and responsibilities, including location of County TCPs, evacuation routes, shelters, emergency worker monitoring and decontamination centers and removal of impediments. His knowledge of radiological exposure control was good, and was further 3

enhanced by a detailed radiological safety briefing by the County RO.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.d. I and 3.d.2 3.2.3.1.3 Backup Route Alerting Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

A Deputy from the Bradley County Sheriff's Department successfully demonstrated back up route alerting and notification during the SQN exercise. In accordance with established plans, and after notification of a failed siren (#60), the Deputy was dispatched to the EOC for a mission brief. He was provided a map with the route to run and detailed I

instructions for warning the public. The County RO issued the Deputy dosimetry and briefed him on exposure control measures. He was knowledgeable of the county plans, procedures and necessary equipment. His experience and familiarity of the county I

coupled with the use of area maps and instructions provided in the briefing enabled him to complete the route within a timely manner. The Bradley County Sheriff's Department i successfully demonstrated their ability to provide adequate warning and notification to the public in the event of a radiological incident at SQN. 3 The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 5.a.3 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 24

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3.2.3.1.4 Protective Actions for Schools Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place Capability Summary:

An interview was conducted with the Prospect Elementary School Principal and Safety Resource Officer on November 16, 2010. Prospect Elementary School has plans and procedures detailing actions to be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at the SQN. The Principal and Safety Resource Officer were knowledge and understood the plans and what actions they would perform during an emergency at SQN. The Principal stated that students would relocate to Ocoee Middle School. The Principal and Resource Officer were professional and well prepared.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 3.c.2 3.2.3.2 Hamilton County, Tennessee 3.2.3.2.1 Emergency Operations Center Emergency Operations Center Management Capability Summary:

Hamilton County successfully demonstrated the capability EOC Management by activating and staffing the EOC, providing direction, and control of response elements, and coordinating response efforts with the SEOC and neighboring counties.

The EOC was activated at the Alert ECL. The EOC Manager alerted county government officials via land line of the EOC activation, however the other EOC staff were pre-positioned in accordance with the extent of play agreement. The EOC was briefed by the EOC Manager on current response and plant conditions after each Meet Me Line conference call with the State and the Risk County. The EOC Manager maintained direction and control of the EOC and regularly consulted with EOC staff present during the exercise.

Redundant communication systems were available and tested during the exercise.

Routine conference calls were conducted via the Meet Me Line to discuss PARs, PADs, siren activations, and messages to the public. The EOC Director actively participated in all discussions and demonstrated sound decision making capabilities that incorporated the health, safety and well being of the county residence. A great deal of time was allocated to discuss PADs for school children such as the relocation of endangered schools and the early dismissal of host schools. This was a precautionary measure based on degrading plant conditions taken at the Alert ECL.

The EOC is well equipped to support operations. WebEOC provides event status boards and task assignments to all the agencies at the EOC. The status board from the county and the state were projected to a ceiling mounted projection board for the EOC personnel to view at all times. This aided EOC staff in maintaining situational awareness of resources needed to support implementation of PADs. The County Radiological Officer assigned Radiological Kits and briefed emergency workers before all missions. All Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SQN REP Exercise 25

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3 personnel within the EOC were knowledgeable of plans and procedures and successfully demonstrated their implementation. l The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: l.a. 1, 1.c. 1, I.d. 1, L.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, 2.c. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a.3 l Prior ARCA - Resolved: Issue No.: 058-08-1.C. l-A-03 Condition: In 2008, an ARCA was issued to Hamilton County for issuing protective actions to residence within the EPZ without confirming resources were in place to support those actions or coordinating the decision with the I State or adjacent risk county. Hamilton County decided to evacuate Quadrants B & C within Hamilton County and notified the residents using their Reverse 911 system. However, their press release indicated that all of I Quadrants B & C were being evacuated which included areas in Bradley County. Hamilton County activated their relocation centers, but did not confirm that resources were in place to support the evacuation prior to l implementing the PAD. Hamilton County did not notify the State or Bradley County of this PAD until the next Meet Me Line conference call.

Corrective action demonstrated: Hamilton County demonstrated the ability to coordinate PADs with the State and the other Risk County.

Coordinated decisions included the relocation and early dismissal of I endangered schools, the evacuation of discussed quadrants, and the issuance and ingestion of KI. All the protective actions were discussed during conference calls via the Meet Me Line.

Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

Hamilton County Emergency Services had trained personnel to successfully activate I plans, procedures, and policies for coordinating, managing, and disseminating public information and warnings, to include the primary warning system (the fixed siren notification system) and to initiate backup route alerting as necessary. All Press Releases and EAS messages were internally coordinated and approved by the EOC Manager. No press releases were issued prior to the activation of the JIC. Once the JIC was activated, four news releases were issued by the Hamilton County PIO located at the JIC. The Hamilton County PIOs located in the EOC and the JIC maintained close communication throughout the exercise and coordinated all public information activities. Each news release contained accurate information and instructions including evacuation instructions, reception center locations, and pet and livestock information.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 5.a. 1, 5.b. 1 3.2.3.2.2 Traffic and Access Control Points 3 Public Safety and Security Response Capability Summary:

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 26

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise A Hamilton County Sheriff's Department deputy initiated select TCPs immediately at Site Area Emergency. The Hamilton County Highway Department and the Tennessee Department of Transportation were placed on standby to provide barricades, signage, and heavy equipment in support of the TCP mission when requested.

Before being dispatched to the TCP by the Sheriff's Department, a county representative in the EOC and a deputy were provided a mission briefing by their supervisor and a safety briefing by the RO. The safety briefing covered radiological exposure controls, dosimetry, administrative and turn back values. KI authorization and precautions were also discussed. The responding Deputy Sheriff was able to maintain uninterrupted communications with the county EOC through use of a mobile 800 MHz radio in his car, a portable 800 MHz radio which he carried and a county Verizon cell phone.

The responding deputy demonstrated knowledge of his role and responsibilities as it relates to TCP operations. The deputy was extremely knowledgeable of the pre-designated emergency evacuation routes, locations of reception and congregate care facilities, medical service facilities, and emergency worker decontamination stations.

Traffic control operations in Hamilton County effectively secured the impacted area, diverted the public from the hazards, and directed them to areas where they would be safe and could receive additional assistance.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2 3.2.3.2.3 Waterway Clearance Public Safety and Security Response Capability Summary:

The Volunteer State Rescue Services (VSRS) personnel successfully demonstrated the capability to safely divert the public from hazards while coordinating with other agencies.

All VSRS officers had 800 MHz portable radios, pagers, marine radios on their boats, and personal cell phones for communicating with other agencies. VSRS had five boats available and 20 volunteers to staff the boats as necessary.

The VSRS Chief was very knowledgeable of the river and all the boat launches. With 20 volunteers, the Chief stated that she had ample staff to handle an extended response on the river if it was necessary. She stated that she would divert her personnel to put their boats in at different points to insure a timely response. The Chief and her officer notified Hamilton County dispatch when they entered the water, they checked in with dispatch while on the river and they notified dispatch when they left the river.

The Chief and the officer were knowledgeable of their dosimetry, exposure limits, and actions to take, at what levels, as well as when to take KI. The five Rescue One Connector boats powered by a 35 horse power motor are sufficient to conduct river clearing in a pre-designated area but would not be sufficient to clear the entire 10-mile Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 27

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3 area. VSRS stated that other agencies such as Tennessee Wildlife and Resource Agency would also have boats on the river to assist in clearing the river. The VSRS personal knew how to approach other boats and what instructions to give the boaters to leave the area. However, if a boater refused to obey VSRS personnel they have no legal authority to order any boater to leave the area. VSRS would have to contact the Tennessee Wildlife and Resource Agency or a law enforcement agency to come to the area and 3

assist in getting the boaters to leave.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 5.a.3 3.2.3.2.4 Hamilton County Backup Route Alerting Emergency Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

Hamilton County Sheriff's Department Deputies successfully demonstrated the capability 3

to warn the public of an incident at SQN following a failure of the primary notification system. The deputy had an 800 MHz radio and a personal cell phone for communications. A pre-scripted message was supplied by the Hamilton County EOC for I

repeating while driving the route. Additional vehicles and personnel were available at the staging area.

Sheriff's Department personnel were knowledgeable of how to conduct route alerting.

The deputies would be deployed from a staging area and additional officers could be obtained from school resource officers or from the reserves. The deputy knew whom to I

contact when his assignment was completed and where to go if his vehicle was contaminated. He was knowledgeable of his dosimetry, exposure limits, and KI. He knew the locations of all emergency worker decontamination areas and who to contact I

for additional information. The deputy had maps of the siren areas to insure he completed the correct routes.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.a. 1, 1.d. 1, L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 5.a.3 3.2.3.2.5 Reception and Congregate Care Center 3 HazMat Response and Decontamination Capability Summary:

Reception and congregate care of evacuees was demonstrated at the following locations:

Brainerd High School, Chattanooga High School, and Dalewood Middle School. The Hamilton County Health Department (HCHD) made excellent use of each facility to monitor and decontaminate evacuees while minimizing the spread of contamination. A briefing was provided to all monitoring and decontamination personnel prior to operations. All equipment was operationally checked and personal protective equipment (PPE) was displayed for demonstration purposes. Adequate personnel were available to provide instructions to those going through decontamination and signs were utilized to assist with protocol. Each station was provided a "position book" that provided guidance Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 28

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise and instructions about procedures for that station. Evacuees were decontaminated in an effective and efficient manner. All HCHD personnel were well trained and it was evident through their demonstrations.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 6.a.1 Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding and Related Services) Capability Summary:

The Chattanooga Chapter of the American Red Cross (ARC) demonstrated their ability to establish and maintain shelter operations. Registration was set up in two locations to ensure all evacuees entering the facility were properly monitored, and if necessary, decontaminated. Everyone entering the facility was registered using standard ARC forms. Information was gathered about medical conditions and a nurse was on hand to provide care if needed. A station was provided to input evacuee's information into the ARC database to check on or provide information to loved ones. Four cots, blankets, and pillows were displayed in the gymnasium to show what would be provided to evacuees.

The Southern Baptist Men's group would be depended upon for much of the food needs, and agreements with local restaurants are utilized as a backup. An ARC mobile food truck was also displayed for the demonstration. A representative from the Hamilton County Auxiliary Communications System was on hand to provide communications between the shelter and the Hamilton County EOC.

For this capability the following criteria were MET: 6.c. 1.

3.2.3.2.6 Protective Actions for Schools Citizen Evacuation and Shelter in Place Capability Summary:

The school district successfully demonstrated its ability to protect the student and staff populations in the EPZ, through interviews with the school Principals, Assistant Principals and Safety Officer, conducted out of sequence on November 3 and 4, 2010.

Upon notification of an Alert ECL by the school Superintendent or designee, busses would be pre-staged at the schools. At SAE the students would be loaded onto their busses and transported to assigned relocation schools outside the 10 mile EPZ. The school Principals and Assistant Principals interviewed had a well thought out relocation plan and were knowledgeable about district procedures including reunification policies.

Procedures included actions to ensure the safe relocation of special needs, medication for children and the safe return of children to their parents or care takers. The school district utilized a robust communications system ensuring organized and redundant communications capability. The plan was well understood and organized. The Principals and Assistant Principals interviewed were enthusiastic, professional and had planned well for the well being of their students, staff and faculty in the event of an emergency situation.

The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: 3.c.2 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 29

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3.2.3.2.7 Emergency Worker and Vehicle Monitoring and Decontamination HazMat Response and Decontamination Capability Summary:

Monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and equipment (EWD) was demonstrated in two areas of the school. The Tennessee Division of Forestry (DOF) 3 demonstrated monitoring and decontamination of vehicles in the parking lot and the HCHD demonstrated monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers at the 1 school entrance and locker room. All personnel conducting operations were equipped with appropriate monitoring equipment and contamination control equipment. Each person had a 0-20R or 0-200 mR DRD, one PRD, four doses of 65mg KI, a record card for dosimetry readings, and instructions on their uses. 1 The HCHD made excellent use of the facility to monitor and decontaminate emergency workers while minimizing the spread of contamination. A briefing was provided to all 3

personnel prior to operations. All equipment was operationally checked and PPE was displayed for demonstration purposes. Adequate personnel were available to provide 1 instructions to those going through decontamination and signs were utilized to assist with protocol. Each station was provided a "position book" that provided guidance and instructions about procedures for that station. Emergency workers were decontaminated I in an effective and efficient manner. All HCHD personnel were well trained and it was evident through their demonstration.

Upon entering the facility, emergency workers were not provided adequate instructions about where their vehicle should go or what they should do. There were also no signs to advise them. The vehicle monitoring personnel were not familiar with the Ludlum 3s and 1 required retraining in order to perform operability checks on the instrumentation and acquire a background reading. Monitoring of the vehicle was conducted at a faster pace and further distance with the survey instrument than the plan's specifications. The layout 1 of the vehicle monitoring station was adequate for minimizing the spread of contamination and the exterior of vehicles were decontaminated in a thorough fashion; however, there was the potential for cross contamination due to confusion of protocol.

No PPE or supplies were available to decontaminate the interior of the vehicles.

On January 26,2011, a re-demonstration of the vehicle monitoring and decontamination l was performed. All of the above mentioned issues were corrected and demonstrated in an effective manner. Excellent use of barrels, cones, and signs helped direct vehicles in the appropriate direction and eliminated much of the confusion noted during the previous demonstration. All personnel were familiar with their instrumentation and used it to thoroughly monitor incoming vehicles for radiological contamination. The facility was well equipped with PPE and decontamination supplies and it was utilized throughout the drill to safely decontaminate vehicles. The DOF confidently executed their mission.

Their training and understanding of their duties were evident during this successful i demonstration.

1 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SQN REP Exercise 30

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise The demonstrations met the requirements of this capability and REP criteria: i.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 6.a.1, 6.b.1 Areas Requiring Corrective Action: 6.b. 1 Issue No.: 058-10-6.b.1-A-01 Condition: Vital equipment such as PPE, decontamination equipment, cones, markers, signs, and contaminated item receptacles were not used or available by the DOF staff performing vehicle decontamination. Also there is the potential for cross contamination after vehicles are decontaminated and the emergency worker returns to the vehicle to move it to the designated parking area. Once the outside of the vehicle is decontaminated the passenger was asked to exit the vehicle so the interior could be monitored. If this area is found to be contaminated, the interior of the vehicle is then decontaminated. The emergency worker is then asked to return to the vehicle in order to move it to the designated parking area. This procedure raised concerns about re-contaminating the vehicle after it was deemed "clean" by placing an unmonitored emergency worker back into the vehicle. The plan states that upon exiting the vehicle the occupant should report directly to the monitoring station. The point was made that if the vehicle's interior could not be decontaminated, they would want the original occupant to move the vehicle to avoid contaminating staff. While this point is valid, it should only be conducted if the interior of the vehicle cannot be decontaminated.

Possible Cause: DOF was unable to participate in either the annual training or the walkthrough prior to the exercise due to forest fires. They were familiar with their responsibilities at the EWD site, however due to the inability to participate in the refresher training, they were not familiar with procedures and protocols that served to provide smooth execution and transition of activities. Proper execution of these activities could have mitigated confusion and potential cross contamination.

Reference:

1. TNMJRERP Hamilton County Implementing Procedures,Section XXVII, Attachment I

2. TNMJRERP, Addendum, Section 20 Effect: Not only would the above mentioned vital equipment serve to make the EWD process much clearer for staff and evacuees, but they are also necessary for the health and safety of the personnel conducting decontamination. Cones, signs, and barricades are necessary to provide guidance to emergency workers entering the facility. This is especially Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 31

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) 1 AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3 important at this facility since clear guidance was not provided to Emergency workers and there was confusion amongst staff about where cars should go.

3 Proper PPE is required to avoid the potential of contaminating the decontamination staff. Also, without appropriate equipment for i decontaminating vehicle's interiors, vehicles would have to be impounded and would not be available during the response. Furthermore, transportation arrangements would have to be made for the occupant of 3

that vehicle.

The procedures used by DOF to transport vehicles from decon to the "clean" parking lot allow for cross contamination of both the vehicle and the occupant. This procedure defeats the purpose of the EWD site, and allows potentially contaminated vehicles and individuals to leave the premises.

3 Although the cross contamination amounts would be minimal, the goal is to eliminate contamination leaving the facility. 3 Recommendations:

I. Insure the availability of the Decontamination Kit for the DOF to insure the appropriate resources are available for the operation.

2. Update the Addendum, Section 20 to include equipment for I

decontaminating the interior of vehicles. Although the plan states that a vacuum with appropriate filter will be utilized, this may be an expensive option. Simple and inexpensive alternatives can be used to decontaminate the cloth interior of vehicles such as lint rollers.

3. Once the vehicle is decontaminated it should be moved to the clean lot by decon personnel and the original vehicle occupant can immediately proceed to the monitoring station as specified in the plan.

4. Update plans to include how vehicles which cannot be contaminated l will be relocated.

Corrective Actions Demonstrated: A re-demonstration of monitoring and decontamination of emergency worker's vehicles was conducted January 3

26, 2011 at 1530 in the parking lot of Red Bank High School. All of the above mentioned issues were corrected and demonstrated in an effective manner. Excellent use of barrels, cones, and signs helped direct vehicles I

in the appropriate direction and eliminated much of the confusion noted during the previous demonstration. All personnel were familiar with their instrumentation and used it to thoroughly monitor incoming vehicles for I

radiological contamination. The facility was well equipped with PPE and decontamination supplies and it was utilized throughout the drill to safely I decontaminate vehicles. The DOF confidently executed their mission.

I Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 32

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Their training and understanding of their duties were evident during this successful demonstration.

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 2010 SON REP Exercise 33

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Section 4: Conclusion Officials and representatives from the State of Tennessee, Bradley and Hamilton Counties, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II, and TVA, as well as numerous volunteers participated in this exercise. The cooperation and teamwork of the participants was evident throughout all the phases of the exercise. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) wishes to acknowledge the efforts and hard work of the many individuals who participated in the success of this exercise. FEMA would also like to acknowledge the enthusiasm and contributions of the exercise planning team during the design of the exercise. The introduction of new products and concepts into the design phase of the exercise was embraced by the team, and they exhibited an eagerness to improve emergency management and response at all levels.

Overall, State and local organizations demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them. Communications were identified as a general strength throughout the exercise. Not only was the equipment interoperable and functional, but the personnel utilizing it kept everyone well informed and helped to maintain situational awareness across the board. The evaluation team noted great progress in the coordination of activities between the State, counties, and all other response entities. During this exercise, FEMA did not identify any Deficiencies; however, one Area Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) was identified. The ARCA involved Hamilton County's inability to properly monitor and decontaminate emergency worker's vehicles. This ARCA was re-demonstrated on January 26, 2011 and was corrected.

Appendix B contains two tables. Both tables provide a summary of exercise results for all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Table 2 presents the status of REP exercise criteria that were demonstrated during this exercise. Exercise criteria are listed by number. Table 3 presents the status of target capabilities and activities that were demonstrated during this exercise.

The demonstration status of the criteria and capabilities is indicated by the use of the following letters:

M - Met (No Deficiency or ARCAs assessed and no unresolved Deficiency or ARCAs remain from prior exercises)

D - Deficiency assessed A - ARCA(s) assessed or unresolved ARCA(s) from prior exercise(s)

N - Not Demonstrated (Reason explained in Subsection B)

Section 4: Conclusion 2010 SON REP Exercise 34

= M M - - M M M - M M M M M M M M M Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix A: Exercise Timeline Table 1: Exercise Timeline Emergency Time Time That Notification Was Received or Action Was Taken Classification Utility Level or Event Declared I J DOSE ASSESSMENT ____ F HAMILTON COUNTY BRADLEY COUNTY Unusual Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Alert 0817 0829 0836 0834 0830 N/A 0830 0831 Site Area Emergency 0947 1002 0954 0958 0948 0958 1000 1001 General Emergency 1121 1131 1128 1129 1125 1127 1130 1128 Simulated Radiological. Release Started 1110 Ill5 1115 1119 1119 1137 1128 1128 Simulated Radiological. Release Terminated Ongoing Ongoing N/A N/A Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Facility Declared Operational 0859 0910 0859 N/A 0927 1015 0831 0945 Declaration of State of Emergency 0837 0910 0951 N/A 0835 1158 0835 N/A State Local N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1210 Exercise Terminated 1400 1406 1403 1404 1402 1400 1400 1400 Early Precautionary Actions: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0831 0831 Recall Busses 22 Schools in Hamilton County and I in Bradley County evacuated: 0935 0935 N/A 0957 1008 0935 0935 River Clearance 1VtProtective Action Decision: Evacuate Al, Bl, CI and DI 1004 1011 1015 1025 1004 1004 1004 I" Siren Activation 1025 1025 N/A 1025 1025 1025 1025 1VtEAS Message: 7.22, 103, 104 1025 N/A N/A 1025 1025 1025 1025 2 "' Protective Action Decision: Evacuate B. C; Shelter A. D; Ingest KI 1145 1201 1212 1149 1158 1145 1146 2 "d Siren Activation 1210 1210 N/A 1210 1210 1210 1210 2"nEAS Messages: 10. 58, 105B 1210 N/A N/A 1210 1210 1210 1210 3 d Protective Action Decision: Clarification on KI and Ingestion 1237 1211 N/A 1245 N/A 1237 1237 3" Siren Activation 1245 1245 N/A 1245 N/A 1245 1245 3r EAS Message: 102 (modified) 1245 N/A N/A 1245 N/A 1245 1245 KI Decision 1145 1201 - EW 0945 1149 1158 1145 1146 Emergency Workers and General Public 112145 - GP I AAR Appendix A: Exercise Timeline 2010 SON REP Exercise 35

m m m m m m m m m m m m m -n mi m m m Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix B: Results Summary of Exercise Evaluation Table 2: REP Criteria Evaluation Result Summa ry ____ FCC

___ Bal Hmt ELEMENT/Sub-Element SEOC Dose IAssessment RM LFMTs FCC J

JC J i-

__JCounty CC Bradley Hamilton JCounty

1. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT 1.a.l. Mobilization M M M M M M M M l.b.1. Facilities M I.e.I. Direction and Control M M M M M M M I.d. 1. Communications Equipment M M M M M M M M M I.e.1. Equipment & Supplies to Support Operations M M M M M M M M M

2. PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISION MAKING 2.a. I. Emergency Worker Exposure Control M M M M M 2.b.l. Rad Assessment & PARs Based on Available Information M M M 2.b.2. Rad Assessment and PADs for the General Public M M M M 2.c. I. Protective Action Decisions for Special Populations M M 2.d.I. Rad Assessment & Decision Making for Ingestion Exposure 2.e. 1. Rad Assessment & Decision Making for Relocation, Re-entry & Return

3. PROTECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION 3.a. 1. Implementation of Emergency Worker Control M M M M 3.b. I. Implementation of KI Decisions M M M M M 3.c. 1. Implementation of PADs for Special Populations M M M 3.c.2. Implementation of PADs for Schools M M 3.d.1. Implementation of Traffic and Access Control M M M 3.d.2. Impediments to Evacuation and Traffic and Access Control M M M 3.e. I. Implementation of Ingestion Decisions Using Adequate Information 3.e.2. Implementation of IP Decisions Showing Strategies & Instructional Materials 3.f.1. Implementation of Relocation, Re-entry and Return Decisions

4. FIELD MEASUREMENT and ANALYSIS 4.a. 1. Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analysis Equipment M 4.a.2. Plume Phase Field Measurement & Analysis Management M M 4.a.3. Plume Phase Field Measurements & Analysis Procedures M 4.b.1. Post Plume Field Measurement & Analysis 4.c. 1. Laboratory Operations 5 EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION & PUBLIC INFO 5.a.I. Activation of Prompt Alert and Notification M M M M 5.a.2. Activation of Prompt Alert & Notification within 15 minutes (Fast Breaker) 5.a.3. Activation of Prompt Alert and Notification Backup Alert and Notification M M 5.b.1. Emergency Info and Instructions for the Public and the Media M M M M

6. SUPPORT OPERATIONS/FACILITIES 6.a.I. Monitoring and Decon of Evacuees and EWs & Registration of Evacuees M 6.b.1. Monitoring and Decon of Emergency Worker Equipment M 6.c. I. Temporary Care of Evacuees M 6.d.1. Transport and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals M AAR Appendix B: Results Sum of Exercise Evaluation 2010 SON REP Exercise 36

- mm mm mm mm mm mm mn m mm u mm -n m n-m nm m mm Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Table 3: Target Capability Evaluation Result Summary 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Bradley IHamilton Capability / Activity SEOC Dose RMCC FMT I FCC I JIC j LP-1 CECC County County Emergency Operation Center Management Activate EOC Direct EOC Tactical Operations M M M M M Gather and Provide Information Identify and Address Issues M

M M

M 7_M M M

M M

M Prioritize and Provide Resources M M Provide EOC Connectivity M M M M M Support and Coordinate Response M M M M M Emergency Public Information and Warning . .I Manage Emergency Public Information and Warning M M M M M Activate Emergency Public Information, Alert/Warning and Notification M M M M Establish JIS M M Issue Emergency Warnings M M M M M Conduct Media Relations M M M M Provide Public Rumor Control Citizen Evacuation and Shelter inPlace Activate Evacuation and/or Shelter in Place Protection M

-I...m M

' ,

M M

M M

Direct Evacuation and/or Shelter In Place Protection M M Emergency Public Safety and Security Response - - - UI- -

Activate Public Safety and Security Response M M Command and Control Public Safety and Security Response M M Control Traffic, Crowd and Scene M M Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination Site Management and Control M M M Hazard Assessment and Risk Evaluation M M M Mass Care - -

Establish Shelter Operations M AAR Appendix B: Results Sum of Exercise Evaluation 2010 SON REP Exercise 37

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix C: Exercise Evaluator and Assignments JURISDICTION CAPABILITIES CRITERIA Evaluator i *e no** sh*am State Emergency Operations Center EOC Management; L.a. 1, l.c. 1, l.d. 1, Gerald Public Information and L.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, Mclemore W arning; 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a. 1, J.T. Ackermann 5.b.1 Lisa Rink Bob Gantt-ICF Dose Assessment, HazMat Response and 1.a. 1, 1.b. l, 1.c. 1, John Wills-ICF Radiation Protection Section, SEOC Decontamination 1.d. 1, i.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 2.b.2, 4.a.2 Radiological Monitoring Coordination HazMat Response and l.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, John Fill Center (RMCC) Decontamination 1.e. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a.2 Radiological Field Monitoring Team 1 HazMat Response and 1.a. 1, 1.d. 1, I.e. 1, Joe Keller-ICF Decontamination 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 4.a. 1, Radiological Field Monitoring Team 2 4.a.3 Alan Bevan-ICF Radiological Field Monitoring Team 3 Gary Snodgrass-ICF Radiological Field Monitoring Team 4 Mario Vigliani-ICF East TEMA Field Coordination Center 1.a.1; l.c.1; 1.d.1; Robert Nash (FCC) EOC Management 1.e. 1 (2.a. 1, 2.b.2, Regional Director: Mr. Gary Ellis only if needed)

Joint Information Center (JIC) Public Information and 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, Bill Larrabee Warning L.e. 1, 5.b. I Matthew Bradley LP- 1 Lorenzo Lewis WUSY FM 100.7 Public Information and 1.d., Le., 5.a.

Chattanooga Warning AAR Appendix C: Exercise Eval & Assign 2010 SON REP Exercise 38

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise U

JURISDICTION CAPABILITIES CRITERIA Evaluator Central Emergency Control Center /

Emergency Operations Facility Bob Trojanowski I

2.b. 1 EOC Management I

U Bradley County-Director: Mr. Troy Spence Emergency Operations Center EOC Management; l.c. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, Bob Spence U

Public Information and 2.c. 1, 5.a. 1 Warning l.a. 1, 1.d. 1, i.e. 1, Obhie Robinson I

3.a. 1,3.b. 1, 3.c. 1, 3.c.2, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2, 5.a.3, 5.b. 1 I

Traffic Control Points (interview) Public Safety and Security Response l.a. 1, 1.d. 1, 1.e. 1, Ron Shaw U

3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.d.l, Backup Route Alerting 3.d.2 1.a.1, l.d.1, L.e. 1, I

Public Information and Warning 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 5.a.3, Odis Spencer I

Endangered School:

Prospect Elementary School Citizen Evacuation and 3.c.2 Robert Nash I

Nov. 16 2010 Hamilton County-Shelter in Place I

Chief EM: Mr. Bill Tittle Emiergency Operations Center EOC Management; 1.c. 1, 2.a. 1, 2.b.2, Alex Sera I Public Information and 2.c. 1, 5.a. I Warning 1.a.1, I. d. 1, 1.e. 1, Mike Dolder I

3.a.1, 3.b.l, 3.c.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.3, 5.b.1 I I

AAR Appendix C: Exercise Eval & Assign 2010 SON REP Exercise I

39 I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise JURISDICTION CAPABILITIES CRITERIA Evaluator Traffic Control Points (interview)

Public Safety and l.a.1, i.d.1, L.e. 1, Walt Cushman Security Response 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 3.d. 1, 3.d.2 Waterway Warning Public Information and l.a.1, l.d.1, L.e. 1, Joe Harworth Warning 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, 5.a.3 Reception Center: HazMat Response and 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 6.a. 1, Matthew Bradley Brainerd High School Decontamination; 6.c. 1 Oct 21, 2010 Mass Care (Sheltering, Chattanooga High School Feeding, and Related Dalewood Middle School Services)

Oct 22, 2010 Endangered School: Matthew Bradley Daisy Elementary School Citizen Evacuation and 3.c.2 Brown Middle School Shelter in Place Harrison Elementary McConnell Elementary Ooltewah High Sequoyah Vocational Falling Water Elementary Hixson Middle Nov 3-4, 2010 Emergency Worker/Vehicle Decon: HazMat Response and 1.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 6.a. I Matthew Bradley Red Bank High School Decontamination Oct 21, 2010 6.b.1 MS-1 Emergency Triage and 1.a. 1, 1.c. 1, 1.d. 1, Matt Bradley Parkridge Hospital Pre-Hospital Treatment L.e. 1, 3.a. 1, 3.b. 1, Gerald Aug 20,2010 6.d. 1 McLemore Memorial Hospital Aug 27, 2010 Matt Bradley John Fill AAR Appendix C: Exercise Eval & Assign 2010 SQN REP Exercise 40

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix D: Exercise Locations Exercise Locations Out of Sequence Locations Tennessee Emergency Management Agency Hamilton County EWD (TEMA) State EOC (SEOC) Red Bank High School 3041 Sidco Drive 640 Morrison Springs Road Nashville, TN 37204-1502 Chattanooga, TN Phone: 615/741-0001 Field Coordination Center (FCC) Hamilton County RCCC Air National Guard Facility Brainerd High School 1001 Airport Road 1020 North Moore Road Chattanooga TN, 37421 Chattanooga, TN Phone: 423/954-3100 Radiological Monitoring and Coordination Hamilton County RCCC Center (RMCC) Chattanooga High School Air National Guard Facility 1301 Dallas Road 1001 Airport Road Chattanooga, TN Chattanooga TN, 37421 Phone: 423/954-3100 Joint Information Center Hamilton County RCCC Missionary Ridge Building Dalewood Middle School 1101 Market Street 1300 Shallowford Road Chattanooga, TN 37402 Chattanooga, TN Phone: 423/751-8580 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) EOF Bradley County Endangered School Missionary Ridge Building Prospect Elementary School 1101 Market Street 2450 Prospect School Road Chattanooga, TN 37402 Cleveland, TN Phone: 423/751-8580 LP-1 WUSY FM 100.7 Hamilton County Endangered Schools 7413 Old Lee Highway List available upon request Chattanooga, TN 37421 Phone: 423.892.3333 Hamilton County Emergency Operation Center (EOC) 3403 Amnicola Highway, Chattanooga, TN Chattanooga, TN 37406 Phone: 423/209-6900 Bradley County Emergency Operation Center (EOC) 1555 Guthrie Drive NW Cleveland, TN 37311 Phone: 423/728-7289 AAR Appendix D: Exercise Locations 2010 SON REP Exercise 41

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix E: Extent of Play Agreement THE STATE OF TENNESSEE TENNESSEE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER MILITARY DEPARTMENT OF TENNESSEE 3041 SIDCO DRIVE, P.O. BOX 41502 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37204-1502 (615) 741-0001 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT 2010 GRADED EVALUATION EXERCISE (PLUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY) 10-MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ)

GOALS, CRITERIA, AND EXTENT-OF-PLAY A full participationexercise will be conducted during the week of November 17, 2010for the purpose of demonstrating an integrated radiologicalemergency response capabilityfor the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN). The exercise will be a one-day event, encompassing response capabilitiesand requirements of the State, local governments, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) in the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).

The State of Tennessee and TVA have prepared goals addressing respective obligations. Both reflect the necessary interactions between the State and local governments as well as the utility as set forth in the Multi-Jurisdictional Radiological Emergency Response Plan (MJRERP) for the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant. The six (6) evaluation areas coupled with specific criteria to accomplish the following goals have been written in accordance with Interim REP Guidance 2002. In addition, the Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP) methodology will be used as a non-graded "pilot" for 2010; while maintaining the current FEMA approved evaluation program methodology for grading exercise performance.

NOTE: All exercise times are Eastern for Exercise Scenario. Ensure entry times annotate Eastern.

STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXERCISE GOALS:

AAR Appendix E: EOP Agreements 2010 SON REP Exercise 42

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3 State and local government goals for this exercise are:

1. Test as well as evaluate the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant MJRERP concurrently with local government implementing procedures.

2. Demonstrate and assess the continued viability of the integrated radiological emergency response effort through State and local government offsite personnel implementing response actions in accordance with established guidance.

3. Ensure the safety of the general public through the issuance of protective action recommendations, as appropriate.

4. Demonstrate operational control of Field Monitoring Teams (FMT) and their sampling capabilities.

Evaluation Area 1 - Emergency Operations Management L.a. Mobilization Criterion L.a. 1: Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) should use effective I procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner (NUREG-0654, A.4; D.3, 4; E.l: H.4.)

EXTENT-OF-PLAY- TEMA Operations will receive the emergency notification from TVA, verify the notification, contact, alert, and mobilize key personnel in a timely manner. Notification to adjacent states will also be demonstrated at the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC), through the Operations section in accordance with the appropriate notification checklist as contained in the Sequoyah MJRERP. Facilities will be considered operational at the START OF EXERCISE (STARTEX) with assigned personnel at the SEOC, Field Coordination Center (FCC), Radiological Monitoring Control Center (RMCC) (to include Field Monitoring Teams), Central Emergency Control Center (CECC),

Risk County (Hamilton and Bradley) Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs);

already pre-positioned and in-place no later than 8:00 AM Eastern/7:00 AM Central.

3 The Joint Information Center (JIC) personnel, State/local and TVA, will be pre-positioned and in place no later than 9:00 AM Eastern/8:00 AM Central. SEOC, FCC, RMCC, CECC, JIC and Risk County EOC assigned personnel will remain on duty until END OF EXERCISE (ENDEX). Release of personnel will be phased and in accordance with performance measures and training objectives, determined as met per senior leadership, by facility location.

The SEOC DACO, FCC Director, RMC Coordinator, TEMA JIC Co-Director and Risk County EMA Directors will discuss with evaluators agency AAR Appendix 43 2010 SON REP Exercise I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise capabilities/procedures to alert and mobilize staffs.

1.b. Facilities Criterion 1.b. 1: Facilities are sufficient to support the emergency response (NUREG-0654, H.3.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Evaluators will "baseline" the Suiter Room for facility support of the Dose Assessment and TDEC functions (see definitions, page 12).

1.c. Direction and Control Criterion I.c. 1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible (NUREG-0654, A. .d; A.2.a, b.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - The Direction and Control Officer (DACO) at the SEOC will assume primary responsibility for direction and control working in concert with the FCC, JIC, and Risk County EOC Directors. The state will discuss the DACO's role at the FEMA (REP)/State briefing.

1.d. Communications Equipment Criterion 1.d. 1: At least two communications systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communications links are established and maintained with appropriate locations. Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations (NUREG-0654, F. 1, 2.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - The SEOC, FCC/RMCC, and Risk County EOCs will demonstrate primary and alternate communications systems. The communications network between the DRH field teams and RMCC and the RMCC and SEOC/CECC will be evaluated at the RMCC.

i.e. Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations Criterion i.e. 1: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, potassium iodide (KI),

and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations (NUREG-0654, H.7, 10; J.1Oa, b, e; J.l1; K.3.a.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - The SEOC, FCC, RMCC, JIC, and Risk County EOCs (Hamilton and Bradley) will be set up in accordance with established plans and procedures. KI will be simulated.

Evaluation Area 2 - Protective Action Decision Making AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 44

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 2.a. Emergency Worker Exposure Control Criterion 2.a.l: OROs use a decision making process, considering relevant factors and appropriate coordination, to insure that an exposure control system, U

including the use of KI, is in place for emergency workers including provisions to authorize radiation exposure in excess of administrative limits or protective action guides (NUREG-0654, K.4; J. 10.e, f.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstration will be accomplished by staff in the SEOC and Risk County EOCs.

2.b. Radiological assessment and Protective Action Recommendations and Decisions for the Plume Phase of the Emergency Criterion 2.b.l: Appropriate protective action recommendations are based on available information and plant conditions, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections, as well as knowledge of on-site and off-site environmental conditions (NUREG-0654, 1.8, 10 and Supplement 3.).

I EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstration will be accomplished by staff in the I SEOC, RMCC, CECC and Division of Radiological Health (DRH) personnel at the SEOC. This will be done in concert with TVA in the CECC, will perform dose assessment and independently validate dose projections. Radiological data I for the field teams will be inserted by Controller injects and sent to the SEOC via the RMCC. Projections will be based on plant data provided by TVA and field radiation measurements.

Criterion 2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary coordination is used to make protective action decisions (PAD) for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of KI, in ORO policy (NUREG-0654, J.9, 10.f, m.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstration will be accomplished by staff in the SEOC. The Chief Medical Officer for the Tennessee Department of Health, after consultation with DRH, will make all decisions concerning the administration of KI to emergency workers, institutionalized persons, and the general public. When a decision is made, instructions will be coordinated with the local EOCs.

2.c. Protection Action Decisions Consideration for the Protection of Special Populations Criterion 2.c.1: Protective action decisions are made, as appropriate, for special population groups (NUREG-0654, J.9, 10.d, e.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Decisions will be coordinated through affected Risk I

AAR Appendix 45 2010 SON REP Exercise I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise County EOCs for understanding and implementation. Lists of the special needs as well as the resources necessary and available for evacuation are maintained by local EMA Directors and when requested, will be provided to the evaluator.

Organizational procedures for executing protective actions will be discussed with evaluators. Contact with the Public School System will be actual. (See Criterion 3.c.2.)

2.d. Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making for the Ingestion Exposure Pathway Criterion 2.d.l: Radiological consequences for the Emergency Planning Zone are assessed and appropriate protective action decisions are made based on the ORO planning criteria (NUREG-0654, 1.8; J. 11.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

2.e. Radiological Assessment and Decision-Making Concerning Relocation, Re-entry, and Return Criterion 2.e. 1: Timely relocation, re-entry, and return decisions are made and coordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions and criteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures (NUREG-0654, A.l.b; 1.10; M.1.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

Evaluation Area 3 - Protective Action Implementation 3.a. Implementation of Emergency Worker Exposure Control Criterion 3.a. 1: The OROs issue- appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans and procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart (NUREG-0654, K.3.a, b.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Determination of Emergency Worker (EW) exposure control will be done by interview with the evaluators (as pertains to direction and control.) EWs with assignments in the 10-mile EPZ and those involved in radiological monitoring and/or decontamination are issued EW dosimetry kits.

Two (2) EWs in each of the Risk County EOCs (Hamilton and Bradley) will be available to evaluators for interview as to knowledge of recording dosimetry readings and actions to be taken when certain thresholds are reached, especially if the established turn-back value (2.5 R [5 R TEDE]) is met or exceeds exposure limits.

AAR Appendix 2010 SQN REP Exercise 46

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise 3.b. Implementation of KI Decision Criterion 3.b. 1: KI and appropriate instructions are available should a decision to recommend use of KI be made. Appropriate record keeping of the administration 1 of KI for emergency workers and institutionalized individuals (not the general public) is maintained (NUREG-0654, E.7; J. 10.e, f.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstration by staff in the SEOC will be based on projected exposure. The Chief Medical Officer for the Tennessee Department of Health is located at the SEOC. After consultation with DRH, the Chief Medical Officer will make all decisions concerning the administration of KI to emergency I

workers, institutionalized persons and the general public. EWs receive KI in an EW kit upon issue. When a decision is made, instructions will be relayed through the local EOCs and, if the general population is included, distribution of KI to shelters will be simulated. The Chief Medical Officer and other staff in the SEOC/Local EOCs will be available for procedural discussions with evaluators.

3.c. Implementation of Protective Actions for Special Populations Criterion 3.c. 1: Demonstration of this process by staff, i.e., DRH, EMS, TEMA, etc., in the SEOC will be based on projected exposure. Protective action decisions are implemented for special population groups within areas subject to protective actions (NUREG-0654, J. 1O.c, d, g.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstration of this process by staff in the SEOC, FCC and local EOCs will be based on projected contamination exposure levels.

Decisions will be coordinated through affected local EOCs for understanding and implementation. Implementation of protective actions will be simulated, however procedural discussions between staff in the SEOC/local EOCs will be discussed with the evaluators. Local EOCs will provide the FEMA Evaluator with a list of transportation dependent individuals (special needs cards) and a list of transportation providers.

Criterion 3.c.2: OROs/school officials implement protective actions for schools (NUREG-0654, J. 1O.c, d, g).

I EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Actual calls will be made to school officials for evaluation purposes. A list of endangered schools and telephone numbers will be provided by the Local EOC Director.

3.d. Implementation of Traffic and Access Control Criterion 3.d.1: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurate instructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel (NUREG-0654, U I AAR Appendix 2010 SQN REP Exercise 47 l

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise J.10.g, j).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Deployment of traffic and access control personnel will be simulated. However, EWs tasked with performing such duties will be interviewed in the parking lot at each of the Risk County EOCs (Hamilton and Bradley). When a roadblock or access point would be established, the EWs will be dispatched to the EOC rather than the location in the field. Interviews will cover all aspects of TCPs. EWs will be equipped with everything needed to establish and maintain traffic and access control points. Real time communications will be conducted with the EOCs.

Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved (NUREG-0654, J. 10.k.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Impediments will be discussed. Staff personnel at the County EOCs will be available to discuss procedures with the evaluators.

3.e. Implementation of EPZ Decisions Criterion 3.e. 1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production within the EPZ. (NUREG-0654, J.9, 11.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

Criterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructional material are developed for implementing protective action decisions for contaminated water, food products, milk, and agricultural production (NUREG-0654, E.5, 7, J.9, 11.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

3. f. Implementation of Relocation, Re-entry, and Return Decisions Criterion 3.f.1: Decisions regarding controlled re-entry of EWs and relocation and return of the public are coordinated with appropriate organizations and implemented (NUREG-0654, M. l, 3.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

Evaluation Area 4 - Field Measurement and Analysis 4.a. Plume Phase Field Measurements and Analysis Criterion 4.a. 1: The field teams are equipped to perform field measurements of AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 48

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise direct radiation exposure (cloud and ground shine) and to sample airborne radioiodine and particulates (NUREG-0654, H. 10; 1.7, 8, 9.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Five (5) Field Teams, four (4) to be evaluated and one (1) in training, will utilize appropriate instrumentation and guidelines as established in DRH Standard Operating Procedures.

Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure (NUREG-0654, H. 12; 1.8, 11; J. 10.a.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - (See Sub-paragraph 4.a. 1.) All field teams will be under the direction of the RMCC.

Criterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded at appropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected.

Teams must move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether any significant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of I

radioactivity has been collected on the sampling media (NUREG-0654, 1.9.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Four (4) field-monitoring teams will be evaluated. Each field team will obtain at least one air sample with a minimum sample volume of 10 cubic feet. The particulate filter and absorber media cartridge will be bagged, l labeled and transported to a collection point for simulated transport to a laboratory. Field monitoring data will be injected by controllers supporting the exercise, and be transmitted by the teams to the RMCC over the normal communications network (portable hand-held/vehicle mounted radios). Cellular telephones will be utilized for back-up communications.

4.b. Post Plume Phase Field Measurements and Sampling Criterion 4.b.l: Field teams will demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, I

vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective action decision-making (NUREG-0654, 1.8; J. 11.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

4.c. Laboratory Operations Criterion 4.c. 1: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiological i analysis to support protective action decisions (NUREG-0654, C.3; J. 11.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Not applicable.

AAR Appendix 2010 SQN REP Exercise 49

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Evaluation Area 5 - Emergency Notification and Public Information 5.a. Activation of the Prompt Alert and Notification System Criterion 5.a. 1: Activities associated with primary alerting and notification of the public are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized off-site emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initiation instructional message to the public must include as a minimum the elements required by current REP manual (10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E.IV.D and NUREG-0654, E.5,6,7).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - The Emergency Alert System (EAS) will be activated simultaneously with the initial activation (silent test) of the Sequoyah Prompt Notification System (PNS) sirens with the simulated broadcast of a test message (EAS Message #1). After the initial activation of the PNS sirens and broadcast of the special test message, subsequent PNS activations and contact with the LP-1 EAS control station will be simulated. Should there be a difference between the State and TVA System Status Monitors (SSMs) or if siren failure/s is/are indicated, backup route alerting for the affected coverage areas will be simulated; except for Bradley County demonstrating a FEMA/TEMA selected route. Risk County law enforcement personnel will be available to discuss the routes and procedures that would be utilized in an actual emergency situation.

NOTE: There is no actual siren test. That is conducted the first Wednesday of each month. Records are on file with SEOC Operations.

Criterion 5.a.2: Reserved at this time. (NUREG-0654)

Criterion 5.a.3: Activities associated with FEMA approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed within 45 minutes following the initial decision by authorized off-site emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within 45 minutes following the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system (NUREG-0654, E.6A Appendix 3.B.2.c).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - One (1) law enforcement officer will discuss with the evaluators procedures for back up route alerting (one (1) law enforcement officer will discuss TCPs under Criterion 3.d.l.) Only Bradley County will send a law enforcement officer with a FEMA evaluator to travel along a pre-designated evacuation route affected by Siren # (FEMA/TEMA selected). River clearing will be demonstrated by Hamilton County. One (1) boat (Fire and Rescue) will conduct the river clearing, meeting with the FEMA evaluator at the boat ramp/dock. Real time communications will be conducted with the EOC.

5.b. Emergency Information and Instructions for the Public and the Media AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 50

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Criterion 5.b.1: OROs provide accurate emergency information and instructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner (NUREG-0654, E.5, 7; G.3.a, 4.c.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Emergency instructions/information will originate from the SEOC prior to JIC activation; after activation, information will be disseminated from the JIC while emergency instructions will continue to be disseminated from the SEOC via the EAS.

Evaluation Area 6 - Support Operations/Facilities:

6.a. Monitoring and Decontamination of Evacuees and Emergency Workers and Registration of Evacuees Criterion 6.a. 1: The reception center/emergency worker facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees and/or emergency workers (NUREG-0654, J. 10.h, 12; K.5.a.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Out of Sequence Activities column.

6.b. Monitoring and Decontamination of EW Equipment Criterion 6.b. 1: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources for the accomplishment of monitoring and decontamination of EW equipment, including vehicles (NUREG-0654, K.5.b).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Emergency Worker Decontamination Site will be done Out of Sequence (OOS) 6.c. Temporary Care of Evacuees Criterion 6.c.1: Managers of congregate care facilities will demonstrate that the centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with American Red Cross planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the procedures l through discussion to assure that evacuees have been monitored for contamination and have been decontaminated as appropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities (NUREG-0654, J. 10.h, 12.). I EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Congregate care will be demonstrated, out-of- sequence, at the following locations (See table below). The shelter will be staffed with I trained personnel, and at least six (6) monitoring demonstrations will be accomplished.

6.d. Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals I

AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 51

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Criterion 6.d. 1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals (NUREG-0654, F.2; H.10; K.5.a, b; L. 1, 4.).

EXTENT-OF-PLAY - Demonstrated out-of-sequence activity as MS-1 Drill on August 24 A sand 27 1th GRADED OUT-OF- SEQUENCE ACTIVITIES by date:

SHELTERS LOCATON DATE Hamilton County Shelter Brainerd High School October 21, 2010 -

1:00 PM Hamilton County Shelter Chattanooga High School October 22, 2010 -

9:00 AM Hamilton County Shelter Dalewood Middle School October 22, 2010 -

1:00 PM EW Decontamination LOCATION DATE Site Hamilton County Red Bank High School October 21, 2010 -

EW/Equipment 9:00 AM Decontamination Site ENDANGERED LOCATION DATE SCHOOLS Hamilton County Hixson Middle School November 3, 2010 -

8:00 AM Hamilton County Sequoyah Vocation School November 3, 2010 -

9:30 AM Hamilton County Daisy Elementary School November 3, 2010 -

10:45 AM Hamilton County McConnell Elementary November 3, 2010 -

School 1:00 PM Hamilton County Ooltewah High School November 4, 2010 -

8:00 AM Hamilton County Brown Middle School November 4, 2010 -

9:30 AM Hamilton County Harrison Elementary School November 4, 2010 -

10:45 AM MS-1 DRILL LOCATION DATE Hamilton County Parkridge Hospital August 24, 2010 AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 52

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Hamilton County Memorial Hospital IAugust 27, 2010 Note: Escort provided by the Hamilton/Bradley County EMA FNF staff officers to the FEMA (REP) Evaluators.

AAR Appendix 2010 SQN REP Exercise 53

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise Appendix F: Acronyms Acronym I Meaning g Cl,/m Micro Curies per Gram AAC After Action Conference AAR After Action Report ARC American Red Cross ARCA Area Requiring Corrective Action ARES Amateur Radio for Emergency Services CECC Central Emergency Coordination Center CFR Code of Federal Regulations DACO Direction and Control Officer DEI Dose Equivalent Iodine DHS Department of Homeland Security DOF Tennessee Division of Forestry DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter DRH Department of Radiological Health EAL Emergency Action Level EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EEG Exercise Evaluation Guide EM Emergency Management EMD Emergency Management Director EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EPZ Emergency Planning Zone ERC Emergency Response Coordinator ESF Emergency Support Function EST Eastern Standard Time EWD Emergency Worker and Vehicle Monitoring and Decontamination EXPLAN Exercise Plan FCC Field Coordination Center FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMT Field Monitoring Team FNF Fixed Nuclear Facility AAR Appendix F: Acronyms 2010 SQN REP Exercise 54

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise I I Acronym FOUO

ý Meaning For Official Use Only I

GE GIS General Emergency Geographic Information System I HAZMAT Hazardous Materials HCHD Hamilton County Health Department HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation ICS Program Incident Command System I

IOF Initial Operating Facility IP Improvement Plan I IPZ Ingestion Pathway Zone JIC JIS Joint Information Center Joint Information System I

KI LOCA Potassium Iodide Loss of Coolant Accident I LP- 1 Local Primary -A MAC Multi-Agency Coordination I MACC Multi-Agency Coordination Center MCC MJRERP Mission Control Center Multi-Jurisdictional Radiological Emergency I

Response Plan MOU Memorandum of Understanding mR milliroentgen mR/h NAWAS milliroentgen per hour National Warning System I

NGO NIMS Non-Governmental Organization National Incident Management System I

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric NOUE Administration Notification of Unusual Event I

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG- NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria 0654 for Preparationand Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants,"Noveinber 1980 AAR Appendix 55 2010 SQN REP Exercise I

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise OOS Out-of-Sequence ORO Offsite Response Organization PAD Protective Action Decision PAG Protective Action Guide PAR Protective Action Recommendation PIO Public Information Officer PNS Prompt Notification System PPE Personal Protective Equipment PRD Permanent Record Dosimetry R Roentgen R/h Roentgen(s) per hour RAC Regional Assistance Committee RACES Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service RCO Radiation Control Officer RCP Reactor Coolant Pump REM Roentgen Equivalent Man REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness REPP Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RMC Radiological Monitoring Coordinator RMCC Radiological Monitoring Coordination Center RO Radiological Officer SAE Site Area Emergency SEID State Emergency Information Director SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SIP Shelter-in-Place S-JICD State JIC Director SOG Standard Operating Guide SOP Standard Operating Procedure SQN Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant SRD Self-Reading Dosimeter TCL Target Capabilities List TCP Traffic Control Point TDEC Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 56

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)

I AAR 2010 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant REP Exercise I I Acronym TEMA

ý Meaning Tennessee Emergency Management Agency I

TLD TVA Thermoluminescent dosimeter Tennessee Valley Authority I TVA-JICD TVA JIC Director UTL VOAD Universal Task List Voluntary Organizations Active in Disasters I

VSRS Volunteer State Rescue Service I

I I

I I

I I

I This page intentionally left blank I I

I I

I AAR Appendix 2010 SON REP Exercise 57 1