ML18096A664: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:* CDC-92-076 Ref.: PSK-92-011-0 SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 11 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT J 1Jffi VERIFIED BY: J. S. Schmidt Core Design C 02-. a .
{{#Wiki_filter:*
R. A. Wiley () Core Design C 9205040299 920424 PDR ADOCK 05000272 P PDR Date: Date: 1 of 3
CDC-92-076 Ref.: PSK-92-011-0 SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 11 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT J 1Jffi J. S. Schmidt Core Design C             Date:
02- . a. c;,r~
VERIFIED BY:  R. A. Wiley     ()
Core Design C               Date:
1 of 3 9205040299 920424       ~
PDR ADOCK 05000272 P               PDR
* RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.9 of the Salem Unit 1 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.
* RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.9 of the Salem Unit 1 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.
The F limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for xy Cycle 11 shall be: 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods: < 2.28 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points xy -1 through 61, inclusive).
The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 11 shall be:
: 2. For all unrodded planes: < 1.67 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points xy -1 through 61, inclusive).
: 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods:
These F (z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xy channel factor FQ(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of: F ( ) < [2. 32] Q z p [K(z)] for P > 0.5 and, [K(z)] for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974. Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of lOCFRS0.46.
          ~TP xy -
See Figure 1 for a plot of [FQT . PRel] versus Axial Core Height. 2 of 3
                  < 2.28 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).
* * '.i < 2.4 LI 0.2.32 I I 6.2.32 I r-.. ....... Cc -i--.. -10.82.181 I -n 2.2 c _ .... " ., -' UC I" r a ll ... ... [ OL.J .., '-n c* -,_ 2.0 Cl n -.;;[ -\
: 2. For all unrodded planes:
* ID \ .., [ \ \ -Lj 1.8 ... 1 ,E-. ..... \ -1.6 ::II c \ \ ... \ 12.1.5 I 1.4 [] Cl 1.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET) FIGURE 1 MAXIMUM CFaT*PRELJ VS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3}}
          ~TP xy -
                  < 1.67 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).
These F (z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xy channel factor FQ(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:
FQ( z ) < [ 2. 32] [K(z)] for   P > 0.5 and, p
[K(z)] for P   < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974.
Therefore, these F       limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of lOCFRS0.46.
See Figure 1 for a plot of [FQT . PRel] versus Axial Core Height.
2 of 3
 
'.i <
                            *
* 2.4 LI 0.2.32 I                             I 6.2.32 I 2.2 Cc I
r-.. .......
                                                                                          - - -n i--..
10.82.181 c                   .... " ., - ...
                                                                                                                  '
_
ll ...
                          ~        UC I" r a                         [
                                                                      .., '- n c* -                     OL.J ,_
Cl n     *
                                                                                                    -.;;[
                                                                                                                - \
2.0      ..,                                                                     ID
                                                                                                                    \
[ \
      -. Lj 1.8
      ,E-
                                                                                                                      \
                                                                                                                    ...1
      .....                                                                                                             \
      -~
      ~
::II 1.6 c                                                                                                     \
                                                                                                                            \
                                                                                                                        ... \
12.1.5 I 1.4
[]                                                                                                         Cl 1.2 2             4                 6                       8               10                     12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET)
FIGURE 1 MAXIMUM CFaT*PRELJ VS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3}}

Revision as of 10:19, 21 October 2019

Cycle 11 Peaking Factor Limit Rept.
ML18096A664
Person / Time
Site: Salem 
Issue date: 03/18/1992
From: Jeffrey Schmidt, Wiley R
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML18096A663 List:
References
CDC-92-076, CDC-92-76, PSK-92-011-0, PSK-92-11, NUDOCS 9205040299
Download: ML18096A664 (3)
v • d • e


Text

CDC-92-076 Ref.: PSK-92-011-0 SALEM UNIT 1 CYCLE 11 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT J 1Jffi J. S. Schmidt Core Design C Date:

02- . a. c;,r~

VERIFIED BY: R. A. Wiley ()

Core Design C Date:

1 of 3 9205040299 920424 ~

PDR ADOCK 05000272 P PDR

  • RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.9 of the Salem Unit 1 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

The Fxy limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle 11 shall be:

1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods:

~TP xy -

< 2.28 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).

2. For all unrodded planes:

~TP xy -

< 1.67 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).

These F (z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot xy channel factor FQ(z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:

FQ( z ) < [ 2. 32] [K(z)] for P > 0.5 and, p

[K(z)] for P < 0.5 assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974.

Therefore, these F limits provide assurance that the initial xy conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of lOCFRS0.46.

See Figure 1 for a plot of [FQT . PRel] versus Axial Core Height.

2 of 3

'.i <

  • 2.4 LI 0.2.32 I I 6.2.32 I 2.2 Cc I

r-.. .......

- - -n i--..

10.82.181 c .... " ., - ...

'

_

ll ...

~ UC I" r a [

.., '- n c* - OL.J ,_

Cl n *

-.;;[

- \

2.0 .., ID

\

[ \

-. Lj 1.8

,E-

\

...1

..... \

-~

~

II 1.6 c \

\

... \

12.1.5 I 1.4

[] Cl 1.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 CORE HEIGHT (FEET)

FIGURE 1 MAXIMUM CFaT*PRELJ VS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT DURING NORMAL OPERATION 3 of 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18096A664&oldid=1939720"