ML18120A072: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                     Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                     Form ES-201-2 Facility: Fermi 2                                                                       Date of Examination: 212612018 lnitials Item                                                   Task Description a   b*     c**
Fermi 2 Date of Examination:
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.         a   tr       *?
212612018 Item Task Description lnitials a b*c**R I T T E N a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.a tr*?b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.*VØ/1 c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics 4-V olr4 d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate.
: b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R            Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.
ol ll-q 2.S I M U L A T o R Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
* V     Ø/1 V
drv v b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.ff (br c-tl c.To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).$0r" ry 3.W A L K T H R o U G H a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.(5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.0/P-errT b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
I T
û-vv ry c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.rP$.-ry 4.G E N E R A L Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.b lu-/b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate.
T
^er..^Ø7 c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5.h aro/d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams fr'az^a e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.rI fr-e7 f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO)1-l--"ry Printed Date/-t1)-únto/tolt7-i;iua. Author b. Facility Reviewer (.)c, NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisor
: c. Assess     whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics               4-           olr4 E
[.s, -ro\rdrf'l^)A.ktí,nll. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required}}
N
: d. Assess     whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate.       ol   ll-     q d rv v
: 2.           Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S            transients.
I M      b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng at               (br L
A T
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.               ff           c-tl o      c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
quantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including
                                                                                                                      $   0r"     ry overlap).
: 3.     a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W                  among the safety functions as specified on the form.
(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
A L
K (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
0/ P-        errT T            (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H                  tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R o      b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1   :
U            (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.                               û- vv ry G            (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H            (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of       rP $.-
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                                             ry
: 4.           Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
b   l u-/
G E      b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate.                               er..^   Ø7 N
E
: c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5.             ^h           aro/
R        d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams                           fr' az^a A
L      e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                         rI fr- e7
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO)                                       1- l-- "ry Printed                                                     Date
: a. Author                                                                                              A. ktí,nl        /-t1)
: b. Facility Reviewer (.)
                                                        ^)
l                                                      -ún c,                                                                                                                       to/tolt7 d.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NRC   Supervisor [.s,
                                        -
                                                                                                                          -i;iu ro\rdrf'l
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required}}

Revision as of 07:20, 21 October 2019

2018 Fermi Ile Outline Files Form ES-201-2
ML18120A072
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2018
From: Chuck Zoia
Operations Branch III
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML17164A402 List:
References
Download: ML18120A072 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Examination: 212612018 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c**

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. a tr *?
b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.
  • V Ø/1 V

I T

T

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics 4- olr4 E

N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate. ol ll- q d rv v
2. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng at (br L

A T

least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ff c-tl o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including

$ 0r" ry overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.

(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

A L

K (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

0/ P- errT T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1  :

U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. û- vv ry G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of rP $.-

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ry

4. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b l u-/

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate. er..^ Ø7 N

E

c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5. ^h aro/

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams fr' az^a A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. rI fr- e7

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO) 1- l-- "ry Printed Date
a. Author A. ktí,nl /-t1)
b. Facility Reviewer (.)

^)

l -ún c, to/tolt7 d.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Supervisor [.s,

-

-i;iu ro\rdrf'l

. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required