ML18120A072: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Examination: 212612018 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c** | ||
Fermi 2 Date of Examination: | : a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. a tr *? | ||
212612018 Item Task Description | : b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled. | ||
ol ll-q 2. | * V Ø/1 V | ||
I T | |||
T | |||
: c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics 4- olr4 E | |||
[.s, -ro\rdrf'l | N | ||
: d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate. ol ll- q d rv v | |||
: 2. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients. | |||
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U | |||
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng at (br L | |||
A T | |||
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ff c-tl o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R | |||
quantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including | |||
$ 0r" ry overlap). | |||
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | |||
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form. | |||
(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form. | |||
A L | |||
K (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). | |||
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. | |||
0/ P- errT T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form. | |||
R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : | |||
U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. û- vv ry G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified. | |||
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations | |||
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of rP $.- | |||
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ry | |||
: 4. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. | |||
b l u-/ | |||
G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate. er..^ Ø7 N | |||
E | |||
: c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5. ^h aro/ | |||
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams fr' az^a A | |||
L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. rI fr- e7 | |||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or SRO) 1- l-- "ry Printed Date | |||
: a. Author A. ktí,nl /-t1) | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer (.) | |||
^) | |||
l -ún c, to/tolt7 d. | |||
NRC Chief Examiner (#) | |||
NRC Supervisor [.s, | |||
- | |||
-i;iu ro\rdrf'l | |||
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines. | |||
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required}} |
Revision as of 07:20, 21 October 2019
ML18120A072 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Fermi |
Issue date: | 04/26/2018 |
From: | Chuck Zoia Operations Branch III |
To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
Zoia C | |
Shared Package | |
ML17164A402 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML18120A072 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Examination: 212612018 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c**
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. a tr *?
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.
- V Ø/1 V
I T
T
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics 4- olr4 E
N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate. ol ll- q d rv v
- 2. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, nstrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng at (br L
A T
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ff c-tl o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
quantitatve criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including
$ 0r" ry overlap).
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.
(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
A L
K (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
0/ P- errT T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :
U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. û- vv ry G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of rP $.-
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ry
- 4. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examlnation insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
b l u-/
G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplinq is appropriate. er..^ Ø7 N
E
- c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are at least 2.5. ^h aro/
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams fr' az^a A
L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. rI fr- e7
- a. Author A. ktí,nl /-t1)
- b. Facility Reviewer (.)
^)
l -ún c, to/tolt7 d.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NRC Supervisor [.s,
-
-i;iu ro\rdrf'l
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required