ML18139B737: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:v' .,* e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND,.
{{#Wiki_filter:.,*
VIRGINIA 2 3 2 61 R. H. LEA.SBUBG Vxon PRESXDENT NUCLE4R OPERATIONS Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555  
v' e
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND,. VIRGINIA 2 3 2 61 R. H. LEA.SBUBG Vxon PRESXDENT NUCLE4R OPERATIONS February 8, 1982 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director                                 Serial No. 065 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                       FR/CTS:ceb Attn: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief                           Docket No.: 50-281 Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing                             License No.: DPR-37 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
SURRY POWER STATION February 8, 1982 Serial No. 065 FR/CTS:ceb Docket No.: 50-281 License No.: DPR-37 UNIT 2,. CYCLE 6 STARTUP PHYSICS ROD SWAP RESULTS In our letter to you dated January 16, 1982 {Serial No. 023), we stated our intention to submit a test results summary report to the NRC within 45 days after the first use of rod swap for each unit. The control rod reactivity worth testing, using the rod swap technique, was completed on December 31, 1981 for Surry Unit 2,. Cycle 6. Attachment 1 summarizes the measured rod swap test results, and shows that all measured values were within the established review criteria.
 
Should you have any questions on these test results, do not hesitate to contact us. Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region II ('8202190177 820208 /: J:>DR ADOCK 05000281 >-,P. * ' . PDR Very.'AAtr, y .r ou~s, JJ!l ,' /!fll r' R. H. Leasburg 
SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2,. CYCLE 6 STARTUP PHYSICS ROD SWAP RESULTS In our letter to you dated January 16, 1982 {Serial No. 023),
-----------------~
we stated our intention to submit a test results summary report to the NRC within 45 days after the first use of rod swap for each unit. The control rod reactivity worth testing, using the rod swap technique, was completed on December 31, 1981 for Surry Unit 2,. Cycle 6. Attachment 1 summarizes the measured rod swap test results, and shows that all measured values were within the established review criteria.
e e ATTACHMENT 1 SURRY UNIT 2, CYCLE 6 MEASURED ROD SWAP REACTIVITY WORTH Reference Bank Test Bank D C A SB SA Total Measured Worth (pcm) 1371 Measured Worth (pcm) 1115 793 595 848 1134 5856 Predicted Worth (pcm) 1355 Predicted Worth (pcm) 1156 836 562 906 1057 5872 Difference
Should you have any questions on these test results, do not hesitate to contact us.
+1. 2% Difference
Very.'AAtr, y .r ou~s, JJ!l          ,'
-3.5% -5.1% 33 pcm -6.4% +7.3% -0.3% Review Criterion
                                                                                  /!fll R. H. Leasburg r'
+10% Review Criteria +15% +15% 100 pcm +15% +15% +10% -----------j}}
Attachment cc:   Mr. James P. O'Reilly Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region II
('8202190177 820208
  /: J:>DR ADOCK 05000281
  >-,P. *               '     . PDR
 
e                               e ATTACHMENT 1 SURRY UNIT 2, CYCLE 6 MEASURED ROD SWAP REACTIVITY WORTH Measured        Predicted                    Review Reference Bank     Worth (pcm)     Worth (pcm)     Difference    Criterion 1371              1355          +1. 2%          +10%
Measured        Predicted                     Review Test Bank          Worth (pcm)     Worth (pcm)     Difference    Criteria D                1115              1156           -3.5%         +15%
C                793              836          -5.1%         +15%
A                595              562          33 pcm         100 pcm SB                848              906          -6.4%         +15%
SA              1134              1057          +7.3%           +15%
Total                5856              5872          -0.3%         +10%}}

Revision as of 02:05, 21 October 2019

Forwards Summary of Cycle 6 Measured Rod Swap Test Results. All Measured Values within Established Review Criteria
ML18139B737
Person / Time
Site: Surry 
Issue date: 02/08/1982
From: Leasburg R
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Harold Denton, Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
065, 65, NUDOCS 8202190177
Download: ML18139B737 (2)


Text

.,*

v' e

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND,. VIRGINIA 2 3 2 61 R. H. LEA.SBUBG Vxon PRESXDENT NUCLE4R OPERATIONS February 8, 1982 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director Serial No. 065 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FR/CTS:ceb Attn: Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Docket No.: 50-281 Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing License No.: DPR-37 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Sir:

SURRY POWER STATION UNIT 2,. CYCLE 6 STARTUP PHYSICS ROD SWAP RESULTS In our letter to you dated January 16, 1982 {Serial No. 023),

we stated our intention to submit a test results summary report to the NRC within 45 days after the first use of rod swap for each unit. The control rod reactivity worth testing, using the rod swap technique, was completed on December 31, 1981 for Surry Unit 2,. Cycle 6. Attachment 1 summarizes the measured rod swap test results, and shows that all measured values were within the established review criteria.

Should you have any questions on these test results, do not hesitate to contact us.

Very.'AAtr, y .r ou~s, JJ!l ,'

/!fll R. H. Leasburg r'

Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region II

('8202190177 820208

/: J:>DR ADOCK 05000281

>-,P. * ' . PDR

e e ATTACHMENT 1 SURRY UNIT 2, CYCLE 6 MEASURED ROD SWAP REACTIVITY WORTH Measured Predicted Review Reference Bank Worth (pcm) Worth (pcm) Difference Criterion 1371 1355 +1. 2% +10%

Measured Predicted Review Test Bank Worth (pcm) Worth (pcm) Difference Criteria D 1115 1156 -3.5% +15%

C 793 836 -5.1% +15%

A 595 562 33 pcm 100 pcm SB 848 906 -6.4% +15%

SA 1134 1057 +7.3% +15%

Total 5856 5872 -0.3% +10%