ML18213A073: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Joint EPRI/NRC | {{#Wiki_filter:Module III - Fire Analysis Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Joint EPRI/NRC-RES Fire PRA Workshop August 6-10, 2018 A Collaboration of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) & U.S. NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) | ||
-RES Fire PRA | |||
Task 13 - Seismic Fire Interactions Scope of this Task Task 13 covers the Seismic Fire Interactions review | |||
-Little has changed compared to the guidance available in the IPEEE days-The review remains a qualitative, walk | - Little has changed compared to the guidance available in the IPEEE days | ||
-down based approach to identify and address potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses | - The review remains a qualitative, walk-down based approach to identify and address potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses | ||
-The procedure does not recommend any quantitative work in this | - The procedure does not recommend any quantitative work in this area The main goal of the outlined methodology is to verify that the the risk associated with seismically induced fires is low. | ||
2 | |||
-Seismic Fire | |||
-SF Objective (per the PRA Standard):To qualitatively assess the potential risk implications of seismic/fire interaction issues | Corresponding PRA Standard Element Task 13 maps to element SF - Seismic Fire | ||
-Pipes and storage tanks containing flammable liquids or gases | - SF Objective (per the PRA Standard): | ||
-Electrical | To qualitatively assess the potential risk implications of seismic/fire interaction issues 3 | ||
-5088, 1989)The conclusion of that study was: | SF HLRs (per the PRA Standard) | ||
HLR- SF-A: The Fire PRA shall include a qualitative assessment of potential seismic/fire interaction issues in the Fire PRA (5 SRs) | |||
-seismic safe shutdown-Review your seismic | HLR-SF-B: The Fire PRA shall document the results of the seismic/fire interaction assessment in a manner that facilitates Fire PRA applications, upgrades, and peer review (1 SR) 4 | ||
-related procedures and identify key equipment (components and cables) and any required manual actions | |||
-To the extent possible, map equipment to compartments | Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Seismically Induced Fires A severe seismic event may cause fires inside or outside an NPP by damaging . . . | ||
-Identify the associated compartments and focus efforts on these | - Pipes and storage tanks containing flammable liquids or gases | ||
-Induced | - Electrical equipment An EPRI study and NPPs experiencing earthquakes have demonstrated that these events are rare. | ||
-Unanchored electrical equipment such as that where motion during seismic event might cause a fire | 5 | ||
-Unanchored gas cylinders | |||
-Flammable gas piping | Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions | ||
-Flammable liquid piping or storage | |||
-A1 | ===Background=== | ||
-Installed systems and features; assess potential for seismic | Seismic Fire Interactions originated with the Fire Risk Scoping Study (NUREG/CR-5088, 1989) | ||
-induced | The conclusion of that study was: | ||
-A2 | It would appear that this is an issue which is more easily corrected than quantified. A series of simple steps was outlined which if implemented on a plant specific basis would significantly reduce the potential impact of such considerations. | ||
-especially smoke | This conclusion remains valid today. | ||
-You | 6 | ||
-Have you identified the issue in your response procedures? | |||
-Have you (can you) prioritize your response based on the important compartments?Consider potential procedural enhancements to recognize and deal with this | Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Key Compartments The review should focus on those compartments that house equipment and cables needed to support post-seismic safe shutdown | ||
-A2 and SF-A3 | - Review your seismic-related procedures and identify key equipment (components and cables) and any required manual actions | ||
-Got any of those mercury switches left? | - To the extent possible, map equipment to compartments | ||
-How about a non | - Identify the associated compartments and focus efforts on these compartments Areas/compartments housing the key equipment (components and cables) | ||
-seismic deluge valve? | Areas where a manual action takes place Access paths for manual actions 7 | ||
-What happens if a sprinkler head is damaged or a pipe breaks? | |||
-Are storage tanks for gaseous suppressants seismically robust?If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes to reduce likelihood of spurious suppressant release.Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF | Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Seismically-Induced Fires Potential sources: | ||
-A4 | - Unanchored electrical equipment such as that where motion during seismic event might cause a fire | ||
-could something block the path and are there alternative paths?Required fire fighting assets | - Unanchored gas cylinders | ||
-will assets remain available after an earthquake? | - Flammable gas piping | ||
-Especially fire water system and fire | - Flammable liquid piping or storage tanks If any significant sources are identified, consider potential plant modifications to minimize potential hazard. | ||
-A5 | Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A1 8 | ||
5 13.3.4 and 13.6.6 B The Fire PRA shall document the results of the seismic/fire interaction assessment in a manner that facilitates Fire PRA applications, upgrades, and peer review 1 13.6.7 6850/1011989 provides minimal discussions on documenting SF}} | |||
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Degradation of FP Systems and Features Review: | |||
- General plant practice related to seismic restraints for fire protection systems and features | |||
- Installed systems and features; assess potential for seismic-induced failure Assess potential significance of system or feature failure to post-seismic event operations. | |||
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes to reduce likelihood of failure. | |||
Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A2 9 | |||
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Spurious Detection Signals A seismic event will likely trigger activation of various fire detection systems - especially smoke detectors Consider how the operators will respond to multiple fire detection signals | |||
- You cant ignore them even though many may be false | |||
- Have you identified the issue in your response procedures? | |||
- Have you (can you) prioritize your response based on the important compartments? | |||
Consider potential procedural enhancements to recognize and deal with this issue Corresponding PRA Standard SRs: SF-A2 and SF-A3 10 | |||
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Spurious Suppression Actuation/Release Review the fixed fire protection systems in key areas for the potential that they might spuriously operate | |||
- Got any of those mercury switches left? | |||
- How about a non-seismic deluge valve? | |||
- What happens if a sprinkler head is damaged or a pipe breaks? | |||
- Are storage tanks for gaseous suppressants seismically robust? | |||
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes to reduce likelihood of spurious suppressant release. | |||
Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A4 11 | |||
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Manual Fire Fighting Access pathways to key areas - could something block the path and are there alternative paths? | |||
Required fire fighting assets - will assets remain available after an earthquake? | |||
- Especially fire water system and fire hoses Do post-seismic response procedures allow for manual fire fighting needs and responsibilities? | |||
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A5 12 | |||
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Summary Seismic fire interaction is considered a low risk phenomenon NPP and other industry experiences partly verify this premise A qualitative approach is suggested for verifying that plant specific conditions confirm low risk notion Systemic or procedural upgrades are recommended for identified potential vulnerabilities 13 | |||
Mapping HLRs & SRs for the PP Technical Element to NUREG/CR-6850, EPRI 1011989 Technical HLR SR 6850 Sections Comments Element SF A The Fire PRA shall include a qualitative assessment of potential seismic/fire interaction issues in the Fire PRA 1 13.3.1 and 13.6.2 2 13.3.2, 13.3.3, 13.6.3, 13.6.4, and 13.6.5 3 13.3.2, 4 13.3.1, 13.3.2, Although 6850/1011989 does not explicitly 13.3.3, 13.6.3, reference seismic response procedures, the 13.6.4, and 13.6.5 suggested guidance implies review of such procedures. | |||
5 13.3.4 and 13.6.6 B The Fire PRA shall document the results of the seismic/fire interaction assessment in a manner that facilitates Fire PRA applications, upgrades, and peer review 1 13.6.7 6850/1011989 provides minimal discussions on documenting SF 14}} |
Latest revision as of 20:23, 20 October 2019
ML18213A073 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 07/31/2018 |
From: | Tammie Rivera NRC/RES/DRA/FRB, Electric Power Research Institute |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML18213A072 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML18213A073 (14) | |
Text
Module III - Fire Analysis Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Joint EPRI/NRC-RES Fire PRA Workshop August 6-10, 2018 A Collaboration of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) & U.S. NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES)
Task 13 - Seismic Fire Interactions Scope of this Task Task 13 covers the Seismic Fire Interactions review
- Little has changed compared to the guidance available in the IPEEE days
- The review remains a qualitative, walk-down based approach to identify and address potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses
- The procedure does not recommend any quantitative work in this area The main goal of the outlined methodology is to verify that the the risk associated with seismically induced fires is low.
2
Corresponding PRA Standard Element Task 13 maps to element SF - Seismic Fire
- SF Objective (per the PRA Standard):
To qualitatively assess the potential risk implications of seismic/fire interaction issues 3
SF HLRs (per the PRA Standard)
HLR- SF-A: The Fire PRA shall include a qualitative assessment of potential seismic/fire interaction issues in the Fire PRA (5 SRs)
HLR-SF-B: The Fire PRA shall document the results of the seismic/fire interaction assessment in a manner that facilitates Fire PRA applications, upgrades, and peer review (1 SR) 4
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Seismically Induced Fires A severe seismic event may cause fires inside or outside an NPP by damaging . . .
- Pipes and storage tanks containing flammable liquids or gases
- Electrical equipment An EPRI study and NPPs experiencing earthquakes have demonstrated that these events are rare.
5
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions
Background
Seismic Fire Interactions originated with the Fire Risk Scoping Study (NUREG/CR-5088, 1989)
The conclusion of that study was:
It would appear that this is an issue which is more easily corrected than quantified. A series of simple steps was outlined which if implemented on a plant specific basis would significantly reduce the potential impact of such considerations.
This conclusion remains valid today.
6
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Key Compartments The review should focus on those compartments that house equipment and cables needed to support post-seismic safe shutdown
- Review your seismic-related procedures and identify key equipment (components and cables) and any required manual actions
- To the extent possible, map equipment to compartments
- Identify the associated compartments and focus efforts on these compartments Areas/compartments housing the key equipment (components and cables)
Areas where a manual action takes place Access paths for manual actions 7
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Seismically-Induced Fires Potential sources:
- Unanchored electrical equipment such as that where motion during seismic event might cause a fire
- Unanchored gas cylinders
- Flammable gas piping
- Flammable liquid piping or storage tanks If any significant sources are identified, consider potential plant modifications to minimize potential hazard.
Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A1 8
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Degradation of FP Systems and Features Review:
- General plant practice related to seismic restraints for fire protection systems and features
- Installed systems and features; assess potential for seismic-induced failure Assess potential significance of system or feature failure to post-seismic event operations.
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes to reduce likelihood of failure.
Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A2 9
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Spurious Detection Signals A seismic event will likely trigger activation of various fire detection systems - especially smoke detectors Consider how the operators will respond to multiple fire detection signals
- You cant ignore them even though many may be false
- Have you identified the issue in your response procedures?
- Have you (can you) prioritize your response based on the important compartments?
Consider potential procedural enhancements to recognize and deal with this issue Corresponding PRA Standard SRs: SF-A2 and SF-A3 10
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Spurious Suppression Actuation/Release Review the fixed fire protection systems in key areas for the potential that they might spuriously operate
- Got any of those mercury switches left?
- How about a non-seismic deluge valve?
- What happens if a sprinkler head is damaged or a pipe breaks?
- Are storage tanks for gaseous suppressants seismically robust?
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes to reduce likelihood of spurious suppressant release.
Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A4 11
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Manual Fire Fighting Access pathways to key areas - could something block the path and are there alternative paths?
Required fire fighting assets - will assets remain available after an earthquake?
- Especially fire water system and fire hoses Do post-seismic response procedures allow for manual fire fighting needs and responsibilities?
If any potential vulnerabilities are identified, consider fixes Corresponding PRA Standard SR: SF-A5 12
Task 13: Seismic Fire Interactions Summary Seismic fire interaction is considered a low risk phenomenon NPP and other industry experiences partly verify this premise A qualitative approach is suggested for verifying that plant specific conditions confirm low risk notion Systemic or procedural upgrades are recommended for identified potential vulnerabilities 13
Mapping HLRs & SRs for the PP Technical Element to NUREG/CR-6850, EPRI 1011989 Technical HLR SR 6850 Sections Comments Element SF A The Fire PRA shall include a qualitative assessment of potential seismic/fire interaction issues in the Fire PRA 1 13.3.1 and 13.6.2 2 13.3.2, 13.3.3, 13.6.3, 13.6.4, and 13.6.5 3 13.3.2, 4 13.3.1, 13.3.2, Although 6850/1011989 does not explicitly 13.3.3, 13.6.3, reference seismic response procedures, the 13.6.4, and 13.6.5 suggested guidance implies review of such procedures.
5 13.3.4 and 13.6.6 B The Fire PRA shall document the results of the seismic/fire interaction assessment in a manner that facilitates Fire PRA applications, upgrades, and peer review 1 13.6.7 6850/1011989 provides minimal discussions on documenting SF 14