ML15236A413: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the matter of         Pacific Gas and Electric Company   Docket Nos. 50-275-LR Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant             50-323-LR Units 1 and 2   SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW   Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.323, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ("SLOMFP") seeks an extension of time to file a petition for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Memorandum and Order (Denying Motions to File New Contentions) (Aug. 6, 2015). Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.341, the petition for review is due August 31, 2015. SLOMFP requests an extension of time to file its petition for review until September 14, due to an unexpected and serious illness in undersigned counsel's immediate family, which requires her full attention for an uncertain period. SLOMFP does not have other counsel to prepare the petition for review.      Counsel for SLOMFP has been authorized to state that PG&E and the NRC Staff do not oppose this motion.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Docket Nos. 50
Respectfully submitted, [Electronically signed by]   Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, L.L.P. 1726 M Street N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 202-328-3500 E-mail:  dcurran@harmoncurran.com August 24, 2015}}
-275-LR Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant
 
50-323-LR Units 1 and 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.3 23, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ("SLOMFP") seeks an extension of time to file a petition for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Memorandum and Order (Denying Motions to File New Contentions) (Aug. 6, 2015). Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.  
§ 2.341, the petition for review is due August 31, 2015.
SLOMFP requests an extension of time to file its petition for review until September 14, due to an unexpected and serious illness in undersigned counsel's immediate family, which requires her full attention for an uncertain period. SLOMFP does not have other counsel to prepare the petition for review
.      Counsel for SLOMFP has been authorized to state that PG&E and the NRC Staff do not oppose this motion.  
 
Respectfully submitted,
[Electronically signed by]
Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, L.L.P.
1726 M Street N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036
 
202-328-3500 E-mail:  dcurran@harmoncurran.com
 
August 24, 2015}}

Revision as of 21:54, 30 June 2018

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review
ML15236A413
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/2015
From: Curran D
Harmon, Curran, Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML15236A412 List:
References
50-275-LR, 50-323-LR, ASLBP 10-900-01-LR-BD01, RAS 28199
Download: ML15236A413 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company Docket Nos. 50

-275-LR Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

50-323-LR Units 1 and 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.3 23, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ("SLOMFP") seeks an extension of time to file a petition for review of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Memorandum and Order (Denying Motions to File New Contentions) (Aug. 6, 2015). Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.

§ 2.341, the petition for review is due August 31, 2015.

SLOMFP requests an extension of time to file its petition for review until September 14, due to an unexpected and serious illness in undersigned counsel's immediate family, which requires her full attention for an uncertain period. SLOMFP does not have other counsel to prepare the petition for review

. Counsel for SLOMFP has been authorized to state that PG&E and the NRC Staff do not oppose this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

[Electronically signed by]

Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, L.L.P.

1726 M Street N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036

202-328-3500 E-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com

August 24, 2015