ML16257A472: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Goetz, SujataSent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AMTo:Jason R HaasCc:Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Goetz, Sujata Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AM To:Jason R Haas Cc:Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)By letter dated July 25, 2016 (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, "Inservice Testing Program," to remove requirements duplicated in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code),
Acceptance Review for License Amendmen t to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5  
 
Testing (CAC No. MF8262)
By letter dated July 25, 2016 (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, "Inservice Testing Program," to remove requirements duplicated in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code),
Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency." Also a new defined term, "INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM," is added to TS Section 1.1, "Definitions."  
Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency." Also a new defined term, "INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM," is added to TS Section 1.1, "Definitions."  


The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the  
 
plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in  
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  


If you have any questions, please contact me. Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1 08C10 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (fax) 301.415.3313 (fax) Mail Stop 08D15 Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  3052  Mail Envelope Properties  (Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov20160913105400)  
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1  
 
08C10 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (fax) 301.415.3313 (fax) Mail Stop 08D15  
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  3052  Mail Envelope Properties  (Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov20160913105400)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)
Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)
Sent Date:  9/13/2016 10:54:37 AM  Received Date:  9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM From:    Goetz, Sujata Created By:  Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov Recipients:    "Billerbeck, John" <John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Tilton, Caroline" <Caroline.Tilton@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Jason R Haas" <haasj@dteenergy.com>
Sent Date:  9/13/2016 10:54:37 AM  Received Date:  9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM From:    Goetz, Sujata Created By:  Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    2149      9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
 
Recipients:    "Billerbeck, John" <John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Tilton, Caroline" <Caroline.Tilton@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Jason R Haas" <haasj@dteenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    2149      9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 03:08, 30 June 2018

2016/09/13 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)
ML16257A472
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/13/2016
From: Sujata Goetz
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Jonathan Haas
DTE Energy Services
References
MF8262
Download: ML16257A472 (2)


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Goetz, Sujata Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:55 AM To:Jason R Haas Cc:Billerbeck, John; Tilton, Caroline; Wrona, David

Subject:

Acceptance Review for License Amendmen t to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5

Testing (CAC No. MF8262)

By letter dated July 25, 2016 (ADAMS accession No. ML16207A433), DTE electric company, submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Fermi 2. The proposed LAR would eliminate the Technical Specifications (TS), Section 5.5, "Inservice Testing Program," to remove requirements duplicated in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code),

Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency." Also a new defined term, "INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM," is added to TS Section 1.1, "Definitions."

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to a llow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the

plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in

sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Sujata Goetz Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC/NRR/DORL/LP3-1

08C10 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (o) 301.415.8004 (fax) 301.415.3313 (fax) Mail Stop 08D15

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3052 Mail Envelope Properties (Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov20160913105400)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for License Amendment to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC No. MF8262)

Sent Date: 9/13/2016 10:54:37 AM Received Date: 9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM From: Goetz, Sujata Created By: Sujata.Goetz@nrc.gov

Recipients: "Billerbeck, John" <John.Billerbeck@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Tilton, Caroline" <Caroline.Tilton@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Wrona, David" <David.Wrona@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Jason R Haas" <haasj@dteenergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2149 9/13/2016 10:54:00 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: