|
|
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | page count = 1 | | | page count = 1 |
| }} | | }} |
| | |
| | =Text= |
| | {{#Wiki_filter:PRM-50-104 (77FR25375) |
| | DOCKETED USNRC II Rulemaking Comments From: Sent: To: |
| | |
| | ==Subject:== |
| | Carol Savary [carol@carolsavary.com] |
| | Wednesday, May 16, 2012 3:55 PM Rulemaking Comments Expand Nuclear Emergency Evacuation Zones May 23, 2012 (11:45 am)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF The nuclear disasters at Fukushima and Chernobyl provide real-world and plain evidence that the current 10-mile emergency evacuation zones in the U.S. are simply too small, and cannot adequately protect the public from the possibility of acute radiation exposures. |
| | Moreover, as we have learned in recent months and years, women and children are more susceptible to radiation than men: regulations must protect the most vulnerable in society.At both Fukushima and Chernobyl, actual evacuations took place far beyond 10 miles. And at Fukushima (as at Three Mile Island in 1979) far more people than those who were told to evacuate actually did evacuate--about one-third of the Fukushima evacuees left areas that were not part of the evacuation zones.Carol Savary Kings Beach, CA 94131 US TEMPLATE = SECY-067 DS 10}} |
Revision as of 02:54, 2 August 2018
|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML20119A5382020-04-27027 April 2020 Comment from Secretary Patrick Mcdonnell on the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML14001A0212013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00751) of Christopher Calnan on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML12200A2972012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (206) of Linda Griggs on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3212012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (221) of Priscilla Bradley on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3192012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (219) of Rachel Herbener on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3142012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (217) Robert Tohe on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (216) of Frank Snapp on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3092012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (213) of Troy Lynn Hamzy on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3082012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (212) of Charlene Woodcock on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3042012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (208) of Oleh Sydor on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2982012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (207) of Lewis Patrie on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0352012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (268) of Maureen Headington on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2962012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (205) of Tara Hands on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2932012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (203) of Jeanne Raymond on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Evacuation Planning Zone ML12200A2922012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (202) of Steve Patton on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2902012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (200) of Leonard Goodisman on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2892012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (199) of Joe Weatherby on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2882012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (198) of Tim Brainerd on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2572012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (178) of Leonard Wheeler Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12202A0362012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (223) of Pete Mcnally, on Behalf of Polk County Emergency Management, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3342012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (188) of Doug Brown Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0152012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (248) of Loren Olson PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0132012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (246) of Mary Madigan on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (245) of Gary Shaw on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0112012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (244) of Sally Shaw on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0092012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (242) of Quinn Montana on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0082012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (241) of Richard Mathews on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0072012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (240) of Carol Letson on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A4122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (227) of Ken Deshaies on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3432012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (197) of Anne Bingham PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3412012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (195) of Jan Clarridge on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3392012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (193) of William Collins on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3382012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (192) of John D. Calandrelli Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3372012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (191) of Richard Kranzdorf Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3352012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (189) of Lynn Crandall Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3222012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (222) of Robert Heron on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12195A2662012-07-11011 July 2012 Comment (162) Karen Fuller, on Behalf Tompkins County Legislature, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5392012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (3) of Stephan Donovan on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5412012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (5) of John Papandrea on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5472012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (11) of Carol Savary on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7172012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (32) of Robert Cerello on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7272012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (41) of Thomas Meacham on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7162012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (31) of Jordan Van Voast on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML11175A3502011-06-21021 June 2011 Comment (28) of Harvey Reading Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-96, Regarding NRC Amends Its Regulations Regarding the Domestic Licensing of Special Material ML1033402502010-11-24024 November 2010 2010/11/24-Comment (3) of Aladar Stolmar, on New England Coalition PRM-50-95 Requesting the NRC to Order Vermont Yankee to Lower the Licensing Basis Peak Cladding Temperature in Order to Provide a Necessary Margin of Safety in the Event of NRC-2010-0080, Comment (48) of Henry Tamanini on Behalf of Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, on NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Supplement 3, Guidance for Protective Action Recommendations for General Emergencies2010-08-17017 August 2010 Comment (48) of Henry Tamanini on Behalf of Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, on NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Supplement 3, Guidance for Protective Action Recommendations for General Emergencies ML1011801752010-04-27027 April 2010 Comment (19) of David Lochbaum, on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists, on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-93, Regarding NRC Revise Its Regulations Based on Data from Multi-Rod (Assembly) Severe Fuel Damage Experiments. ML1010301422010-04-12012 April 2010 Comment (15) of Paul Gunter on Behalf of Beyond Nuclear on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-93 Regarding NRC Revise Its Regulations Based on Data from multi-rod (Assembly) Severe Fuel Damage Experiments ML0929302762009-10-17017 October 2009 2009/10/17-Comment (24) of Scott D. Portzline, on Behalf of Three Mile Island Alert, on Proposed Rule Pr 50 and 52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations ML0726705742007-09-24024 September 2007 Comment (13) of Lisa Rainwater on Behalf of Riverkeeper on Epstein'S PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line 2020-04-27
[Table view] |
Text
PRM-50-104 (77FR25375)
DOCKETED USNRC II Rulemaking Comments From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Carol Savary [carol@carolsavary.com]
Wednesday, May 16, 2012 3:55 PM Rulemaking Comments Expand Nuclear Emergency Evacuation Zones May 23, 2012 (11:45 am)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF The nuclear disasters at Fukushima and Chernobyl provide real-world and plain evidence that the current 10-mile emergency evacuation zones in the U.S. are simply too small, and cannot adequately protect the public from the possibility of acute radiation exposures.
Moreover, as we have learned in recent months and years, women and children are more susceptible to radiation than men: regulations must protect the most vulnerable in society.At both Fukushima and Chernobyl, actual evacuations took place far beyond 10 miles. And at Fukushima (as at Three Mile Island in 1979) far more people than those who were told to evacuate actually did evacuate--about one-third of the Fukushima evacuees left areas that were not part of the evacuation zones.Carol Savary Kings Beach, CA 94131 US TEMPLATE = SECY-067 DS 10