ML12340A590: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Dr. JORAM HOPENFELD Demonstration of Flawed Presentation of CHECWORKS DataFigure 1: A plotselected at random
*from an Entergy CHECWORKS Report, showing how the data is presented by Entergy:                                       
*Excerpted from RIV00016A (CSI Technologies, Inc., Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS FAC Model, Calculation No. 050714b-01, Revision 1, September 12, 2006, Batestamp IPEC00168480).
RIV000111 Submitted: June 29, 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of
: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
ASLBP #:07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #:05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:
Identified:
Admitted: Withdrawn:
Rejected: Stricken: Other: RIV000111-00-BD01 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 2 l Page Figure 2a:The non-conservative area of Figure 1 is re-plotted for comparison with Figure 3b below. Predicted wear on the y axis, measured wear on the X-axis. Top line is the LCF=1.060 line:LCF Line-50% Predicted wear (mils 3 l Page Figure 2bShowing how many more non-conservative points are not bounded by the  50%  when the  measured data is plotted on the Y axis and the predicted data on the x axis:Measured wear (mils) 50% LCF Line 
* ..,; /. " * * '" .. ,,/ /" '00 I ...... y y--.......-:::l o """" o '"}}

Revision as of 18:29, 1 August 2018

Official Exhibit - RIV000111-00-BD01 - Hopenfeld, Demonstration of Flawed Presentation of Checworks Data
ML12340A590
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/2012
From: Hopenfeld J
Riverkeeper
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22866, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12340A590 (3)


Text

Dr. JORAM HOPENFELD Demonstration of Flawed Presentation of CHECWORKS DataFigure 1: A plotselected at random

  • from an Entergy CHECWORKS Report, showing how the data is presented by Entergy:
  • Excerpted from RIV00016A (CSI Technologies, Inc., Indian Point Unit 2 CHECWORKS FAC Model, Calculation No. 050714b-01, Revision 1, September 12, 2006, Batestamp IPEC00168480).

RIV000111 Submitted: June 29, 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

ASLBP #:07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #:05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:

Identified:

Admitted: Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken: Other: RIV000111-00-BD01 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 2 l Page Figure 2a:The non-conservative area of Figure 1 is re-plotted for comparison with Figure 3b below. Predicted wear on the y axis, measured wear on the X-axis. Top line is the LCF=1.060 line:LCF Line-50% Predicted wear (mils 3 l Page Figure 2bShowing how many more non-conservative points are not bounded by the 50% when the measured data is plotted on the Y axis and the predicted data on the x axis:Measured wear (mils) 50% LCF Line

  • ..,; /. " * * '" .. ,,/ /" '00 I ...... y y--.......-:::l o """" o '"