JAFP-90-0800, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-333/90-17.Corrective Actions:Util Will Implement PORC Review of Radiation Protection Procedures

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-333/90-17.Corrective Actions:Util Will Implement PORC Review of Radiation Protection Procedures

ML20062D431
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	11/02/1990
From:	Fernandez W POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
JAFP-90-0800, JAFP-90-800, NUDOCS 9011130196
Download: ML20062D431 (2)

Text

'9 Jomos' A. PitaPettlek "

+

M-

~

. Nucleet Power Plant 3., J ' !

P a Box 41 -

c

4 coming. Ne

s od W33 v

316,W 3840 William Fernandez ll Resident Manager i

November 2, 1990 u

%i

.JAFP-90-0800-1 U!S.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Kall 9tation-P1-137

. Washington,:DC 20555 0

ATTENTION:

liocument Control Desk 3

SUBJECT:

RE3PONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION -'

.INJ2ECT10N NO. 90-17 (DOCKET 50-333)

L

References:

1.

USNRC letter dated October 2, 1990

Subject:

Inspection Report 50-333/90-17 g

!2.'

NYPA letter (JAFP-90-0517) datedi.Tuly 6,z1990

~

Response to Notice of Violation,.

Subject:

Inspection Report 50-333/90-17 3.

USN'RC letter dated June 6, 1990

Subject:

Inspection'. Report 50-333/90-17

[

1 -

iIniaccordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 20.201, the Authority a

iencloses ::.its;-response. to your letter l dated October 2,

1990 3,

l(Referen'ce 1 ) '..

cYour: sletters dated. June 6, -1990 (Reference 3)

Q"

~

transmitted ' Inspection Report 50-333/90 and its associated.

}

f 1Apnendix A Notice of_ Violation.

The: Authority responded ito the-

"6

'Noticeiand.di_ agreed with.the second violation (Reference'2).-

1 Iri yourfletter dated'. October 2, '1990 '.(Reference 1). you advised the

.'Authorityithat, T upon further review,. you would not withdraw - the i

o Lcontbsted' violation and thatithe' Authority was required to respond y~

u Lto the violation.

r m l

'TheLAuthority will--implement PORC review of radiation protection' M<

procedures referenced in Regulatory Guido 1.'33' dated Ncvember 1972.

? This. ? task. potentially. involves 130 procedures and will be a substantial burden ' for PORC.

The AuthorityJwill review the a

fradiological' procedures'against the criteria of Regulatory Guide l

1.33. to. determine which procedures specifica13

' require.PORC ireview.-

The PORC review of the ' maior. programmat1c radiological i

l

. procedures (e.g; -radiation work ' permits, radiological. surveys,

'i'g etc.') referenced:'in Regulatory Guide 1.33 will be completed by J

0

_ March-31, 1991.

The PORC review of-the remaining radiological j

l 0h

.$M13'o196901102 "i

^

7[i

POR ADOCK0500gg3 y

m,

. co.

l0 c

a ":g

!. ; h* - 9* -

TO :-

United States Nuclear November 2, 1990 Regulatory Commission JAFP-90-0800 Attention:' Document Control Desk Page,

'FROM:-

-William Fernandez

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO' NOTICE.OP-VIOIK ION -

INSPECTION NO. 90-17 (DOC'XET 50-3 3 3 )

procedures requiring PORC review will be implemented as each

_ procedure undergoes its next revision or biennial review.

This

• process will be-completed by October 31, 1992.

The Authority intends to request a

changa to Technical

[

. Specifications to clarify the requirement for PORC review of these procedures.

Lvery trul

yours, i

1 I

I-

. FERN [DbZ WF/GJV t

U--

g.

y, i

enclosure.,

m cc:. R.oBeedle,.-.WPO J... Gray, WPO "f..,

J J./Brons,cWPO '

J. Joyner,-NRC Region I, DRSS R..Liseno Document. Control Center G.

Vargo

'WPO Records Management NRC Sr. Resident Inspector, JAF i

l!

~

. CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED l'

Is 4

b v

+1

.' j:

.j^

i i

e h

e

'sf