ML20137T549: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.,                         -                                                                  -
{{#Wiki_filter:.,
M V NIAGARA
M V NIAGARA
          ' RUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 -
' RUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 -
l 4
4 December 2, 1985 Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attention: Mr.-Uldis Potapovs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:
December 2, 1985 Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attention: Mr.-Uldis Potapovs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220 DPR-63
Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220 DPR-63


==Dear Mr. Zwolinski:==
==Dear Mr. Zwolinski:==
Our letters of September 30, 1985 and November 15, 1985 provided information fregarding the status of. identified deficiencies, unresolved and open items
Our letters of September 30, 1985 and November 15, 1985 provided information fregarding the status of. identified deficiencies, unresolved and open items
    -resulting from an Environmental Qualification Audit held during August 1985.
-resulting from an Environmental Qualification Audit held during August 1985.
An action item resulting from the audit involved additional reviews-of
An action item resulting from the audit involved additional reviews-of
_ performance specifications against acceptance criteria to ensure equipment
_ performance specifications against acceptance criteria to ensure equipment
    ' perfonnance-in the event of a design basis accident and to enhance existing documentation, if appropriate. Our {{letter dated|date=November 15, 1985|text=November 15, 1985 letter}} indicated additional documentation was being accumulated for the remaining open items.
' perfonnance-in the event of a design basis accident and to enhance existing documentation, if appropriate. Our {{letter dated|date=November 15, 1985|text=November 15, 1985 letter}} indicated additional documentation was being accumulated for the remaining open items.
  'The open items included instruments which must function within a given accuracy or tolerance to ensure proper function.
'The open items included instruments which must function within a given accuracy or tolerance to ensure proper function.
The following information supplements and clarifies our current status as discussed with Mr. John A. Zwolinski, Project Director, BWR Project
The following information supplements and clarifies our current status as discussed with Mr. John A. Zwolinski, Project Director, BWR Project
    -Otrectorate Number 1 on November- 29 and 30,1985. - As of' November 30, 1985,
-Otrectorate Number 1 on November-29 and 30,1985. - As of' November 30, 1985,
    -our technical review of the remaining open items from the November .15,1985 letter was completed. .Tne documentation associated _with the technical review was' included in our Environmental Qualification Records, and these records were considered to be complete to the best of our knowledge in providing additional documentation on the open items.
-our technical review of the remaining open items from the November.15,1985 letter was completed..Tne documentation associated _with the technical review was' included in our Environmental Qualification Records, and these records were considered to be complete to the best of our knowledge in providing additional documentation on the open items.
The technical information was provided to our Eouipment Qualification Vendor this- date for incorporation into a formal report on this subject. Minor revisions _to tne Environmental. Qualification File may result from this effort
The technical information was provided to our Eouipment Qualification Vendor this-date for incorporation into a formal report on this subject. Minor revisions _to tne Environmental. Qualification File may result from this effort
  -but are not expected to change the conclusion of our technical review. The formal . report is scheduled to be issued in December to further enhance existing documentation.
-but are not expected to change the conclusion of our technical review. The formal. report is scheduled to be issued in December to further enhance existing documentation.
Sincerely, 8512090047 B51202 DR       ADOCK 050     2O                       NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION                         (MA CW Senior Vice President AN g
Sincerely, A
CVM/djm
8512090047 B51202 DR ADOCK 050 2O NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION (M
                                                    ,,        .e- - ,-      -        - , , - -      ,}}
CW AN g
Senior Vice President CVM/djm
.e-
,}}

Latest revision as of 21:15, 11 December 2024

Informs That Technical Review of Remaining Open Items from Aug 1985 Environ Qualification Audit Completed on 851130,per Util .Formal Rept Scheduled to Be Issued in Dec 1985
ML20137T549
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point 
Issue date: 12/02/1985
From: Mangan C
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8512090047
Download: ML20137T549 (1)


Text

.,

M V NIAGARA

' RUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 -

4 December 2, 1985 Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attention: Mr.-Uldis Potapovs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220 DPR-63

Dear Mr. Zwolinski:

Our letters of September 30, 1985 and November 15, 1985 provided information fregarding the status of. identified deficiencies, unresolved and open items

-resulting from an Environmental Qualification Audit held during August 1985.

An action item resulting from the audit involved additional reviews-of

_ performance specifications against acceptance criteria to ensure equipment

' perfonnance-in the event of a design basis accident and to enhance existing documentation, if appropriate. Our November 15, 1985 letter indicated additional documentation was being accumulated for the remaining open items.

'The open items included instruments which must function within a given accuracy or tolerance to ensure proper function.

The following information supplements and clarifies our current status as discussed with Mr. John A. Zwolinski, Project Director, BWR Project

-Otrectorate Number 1 on November-29 and 30,1985. - As of' November 30, 1985,

-our technical review of the remaining open items from the November.15,1985 letter was completed..Tne documentation associated _with the technical review was' included in our Environmental Qualification Records, and these records were considered to be complete to the best of our knowledge in providing additional documentation on the open items.

The technical information was provided to our Eouipment Qualification Vendor this-date for incorporation into a formal report on this subject. Minor revisions _to tne Environmental. Qualification File may result from this effort

-but are not expected to change the conclusion of our technical review. The formal. report is scheduled to be issued in December to further enhance existing documentation.

Sincerely, A

8512090047 B51202 DR ADOCK 050 2O NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION (M

CW AN g

Senior Vice President CVM/djm

.e-

,