ML20238F487: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 28: Line 28:


==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
1 I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day omment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CF'< Part 35.
1 I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}}, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day omment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CF'< Part 35.
I The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow                                                      '
I The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow                                                      '
for a S0-day comment period. As noted in the Federal Reaister on August 13,1998, the 90-day comment period now extends from August 13,1998 to November 12,1998. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
for a S0-day comment period. As noted in the Federal Reaister on August 13,1998, the 90-day comment period now extends from August 13,1998 to November 12,1998. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
Line 57: Line 57:


[
[
l am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998,' requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the taff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CFR Pad 35.                                                                                                                                ,
l am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}},' requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the taff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CFR Pad 35.                                                                                                                                ,
l The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment perbd. The 90-day comment period should extend from mid-August to mid-November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
l The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment perbd. The 90-day comment period should extend from mid-August to mid-November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
                                                                                           /
                                                                                           /
Line 77: Line 77:
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==


I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 35.
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}}, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 35.
The Commission has directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
The Commission has directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statement. The three public meetings are scheduled for August 19-20, in San Francisco, California; September 16-17, in Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22, in Rockville, Maryland. The last public workshop would bo held approximately three weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be posted on the Internet to provide interested parties with easy and timely access to these documents.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statement. The three public meetings are scheduled for August 19-20, in San Francisco, California; September 16-17, in Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22, in Rockville, Maryland. The last public workshop would bo held approximately three weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be posted on the Internet to provide interested parties with easy and timely access to these documents.
Line 102: Line 102:


==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension t the
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}}, requesting a 45-day extension t the
,                                                                      ? 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to rev'                                                                                                i 10 CFR Part 35.                                                                                                                                                                1 l                                                                        The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 ays to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend frotn early' August i to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public re "w and comment.
,                                                                      ? 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to rev'                                                                                                i 10 CFR Part 35.                                                                                                                                                                1 l                                                                        The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 ays to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend frotn early' August i to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public re "w and comment.
: The Nucisar Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetin to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statem                                                                                    . The three public        l
: The Nucisar Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetin to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statem                                                                                    . The three public        l
Line 129: Line 129:
President --
President --
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Society of Nuclear Medicine
                 .1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA 20190-5316 Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to r/ vise 10 CFR Part 35.
                 .1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA 20190-5316 Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}}, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to r/ vise 10 CFR Part 35.
The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period b 5 days to allow L for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should exte from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for publ' review and comment.
The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period b 5 days to allow L for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should exte from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for publ' review and comment.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public                                                        tings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy St ement. The three public
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public                                                        tings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy St ement. The three public
Line 162: Line 162:
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==
==Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:==


I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extens' n to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed rule to re se 10 CFR Part 35.
I am responding to your {{letter dated|date=June 23, 1998|text=letter dated June 23,1998}}, requesting a 45-day extens' n to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed rule to re se 10 CFR Part 35.
The proposed rule and medical policy statement are expected to be pu ished in early August, for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period will provi a 15-day extension to the proposed 75-day comment period, and will not adversely affec e staff's efforts to deliver the final rule and associated documents to the Commission, on hedule, by May 28,1999.
The proposed rule and medical policy statement are expected to be pu ished in early August, for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period will provi a 15-day extension to the proposed 75-day comment period, and will not adversely affec e staff's efforts to deliver the final rule and associated documents to the Commission, on hedule, by May 28,1999.
I trust this reply responds to your concern.
I trust this reply responds to your concern.

Revision as of 12:14, 9 March 2021

Responds to 980623 Ltr Requesting 45-day Extension to 75-day Comment Period Recommended by Staff for Proposed Rev to Revise 10CFR35.Commission Directed Staff to Extend Public Comment Period by 15 Days.Record Copy
ML20238F487
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/20/1998
From: Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Fletcher J, Meckelnburg R
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICIANS, SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Shared Package
ML20238F490 List:
References
NUDOCS 9809030394
Download: ML20238F487 (8)


Text

._

fs.

i% UNITED STATES 0 At NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Distribution:

j i

j WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

  • LJCallan o *~

WTravers k.***** p8 August 20, 1998 HThompson PNorry CHAMMAN JBlaha MKnapp, NMSS SJones, NMSS KCyr, 0GC GT980414 Robert L. Meckelnburg, M.D. ED0 r/f President American College of Nuclear Physicians James W. Fletcher, M.D.

President ,

Society of Nuclear Medicine 1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, Virginia 20190-5316

Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:

1 I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day omment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CF'< Part 35.

I The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow '

for a S0-day comment period. As noted in the Federal Reaister on August 13,1998, the 90-day comment period now extends from August 13,1998 to November 12,1998. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statement. The three public meetings are scheduled for August 19-20, in San Francisco, Califomia; September 16-17, in I

Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22, in Rockville, Maryland. The last public workshop would be held approximately three weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be posted on the Internet to provide interested parties with easy and timely access to these documents. Additional details on the l public meetings were published in the Federal Reaister on July 24,1998 (63 FR 39763).

I trust this responds to your concerns.

Sincerely, j i

Shirley Ann Jackson hN Originated by: [SJones,NMSS]

9909030394 990920 PDR COPMS NRCC F

(,b01 o (m O f/* 6 [ny1 - >

CORRESPONDENCE PDR .

g,s /

- gg_ bN h$ #

_m___._. m.m_--- -_--___m_a.._-._m ___m

c

.- o.' Angust 20, 1998 Robert L Mecketnburg, M.D.

President American College of Nuclear Physicians

/

James W. Fletcher, M.D.

President

[

Society of Nuclear Medicine '

1850 Samuel Morse Drive /

Reston, VA 20190-5316 ,'

Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:

[

l am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998,' requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the taff for the proposed revision to revise 10 CFR Pad 35. ,

l The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment perbd. The 90-day comment period should extend from mid-August to mid-November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.

/

The Nuclear Regulatory Commisslori has scheduled three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statement. The three public meetings are scheduled for Aug6st 19-20, in San Francisco, California; September 16-17, in Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22, in Rockville, Maryland. The last public workshop would be held approximately ree weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medi al Policy Statement will be posted on the Internet to provide interested parties with eas and timely access to these documents. Additional details on the public meetings were pu ished in the Federal Reaister on July 24,1998 (63 FR 39763).

I trust this responds t your concerns.

Sincerely, Shirley Ann Jackson J This correspondence addresses policy issues previously resolved by the i Commission, transmits factual information, or restates Commission policy. )

Distribution: G980414 RGordon/RF AThadani SECY-CRC- 98-0600 SBurns PDR l lMNS/ Central File PNorry PTressler NMSS R/F j JBlaha CPoland EDO/RF NRC Central File  !

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE l DocName: 0 jonesWdo414.si

$ CP/ PROOFED / AUGUST 5,1995 OFC RGB:IMNS TechEd RGB:IMNS RGB D:IMNS D:NHSS l

NAME *SJones:ce *EKraus *CHaney *PHolahan *FCombs *MKnapp

DATE 7/29/98 7/29/98 , 7/29/98 7/29/98 8/4/98 8/7/98 l / n/

OFC D "") EDO OCH OCA NAME s LJCalla SJackson DRathbun DATE 8/// /98 8/ 98 8/2%98 8/ /98 l

l t _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - ____

Robert L. M:ck:Inburg, M.D.

Pr:sident American College of Nuclear Physicians James W. Fletcher, M.D.

President Society of Nuclear Medicine 1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA 20190-5316

Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:

I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 35.

The Commission has directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 days to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public review and comment.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statement. The three public meetings are scheduled for August 19-20, in San Francisco, California; September 16-17, in Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22, in Rockville, Maryland. The last public workshop would bo held approximately three weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be posted on the Internet to provide interested parties with easy and timely access to these documents.

1 i trust this responds to your concems.  ;

Sincerely, Shirley Ann Jackson This correspondence addres:es policy issues previously resolved by the Commission, transmits factual information. or restates Commission policy.

TICKET NO. G980414 Distribution:

RGordon/RF AThadani SECY-CRC- 98-0600 SBurns PDR IMNS/ Central File PNorry PTressler NMSS r/f JBlaha CPoland EDO/rf NRC Central File

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE Doc Name: g:tjoneetodo414.sj OP/PftOOPED/ AUGUST 5,1EM OFC RGB:IMNS TechEd RG8:IMNS RG8 D:IMNS D:NMSS m j_ NME *SJones:ce *EKron *CHaney *PHolahan *FCombs

.DATE 7/29/98 7/29/98 7/29/98 7/29/98 8/4/98 8/ 7 /98 OFC EDR EDO 1CM OCA NME HLThonpson LJCallan SJackson DRathbun DATE 8/ /98 8/ /98 8/ /98 8/ /98 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY u_______--_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

E--____-__-_-_____ -

. .~ =. . .

Robert L M:cksinburg, M.D.' ,

L President .,

American College of Nucle'ar Physicians  !

li

" James W. Fletcher, M.D.

President 4

- Society of Nuclear Medicine ,

l

~ 1850 Samuel Morse Drivo j

- Reston, VA 20190-5316

)

Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:

I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension t the

,  ? 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to rev' i 10 CFR Part 35. 1 l The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period by 15 ays to allow for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should extend frotn early' August i to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for public re "w and comment.

The Nucisar Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public meetin to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy Statem . The three public l
; meetings are scheduled for August 19-20, in San Francisco, Californ ; September 16-17 in

!' Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22 in Rockville, Maryland.. last public workshop h 'would be held approximately three weeks prior to the close of the comment period. In addition,

the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be posted ondhe Internet to provide i interested parties with easy and timely access to these docume s.  !

I trust this responds to your concems.

t Sincerely, Lc Shirley An Jackson This correspondence / policy issues previously resolved by the .

ddresses Distribution: G980414 RGordon/RF AThadani SE -CRC 98-0600 SBurns IMNS/ Central File PNorry PT essler NMSS R/F

. JBlaha - CPoland E O/RF NRC Central File O fSee previous concurrence /

To receive s copy or one eocument. inee.ie in eie box "C - c.'py wHhout anachmentienclosure,"B" e copy with attachment / enclosure, "N"

  • No copy Ested by E. Kraus 7/29788 *SEE PREVIOUS CONCl,lRRENCE Slettece Doc Name: gioneeW14.ej . / : OP/PftOOPED/ AUGUST S,1995 -

OFC-- RGB:IMS TechEd Rh:IMNS RGB D:IP9fS D:NMSS NAPE *SJones:ce *EKraus [*CHaney *PHolahan *FCombs >Knapp m

-lDATE' 7/29/98 7/29/98 / 7/29/98 7/29/98 8/4/98 8/ /98 i

OFC - DEDR EDO ~  ! OCM - OCA

~

NADE ' HLThoupson LJCalla! SJackson: DRathbun

. /.

-8/ /98 8/ /9B , 8/ /98 DATE 8/ /98 OFFl& W

- - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - , - - _ _ - - - - _ - . - - - -- - - - - - _ - - .- -----.a -----------_--------..-

,- .: .- q .

Robert L. Meckelnburg,' M.D.,

President :

--American College of Nuclear Physicians James W. Fletcher,'M.D.,

President --

Society of Nuclear Medicine

.1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA 20190-5316 Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extension to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed revision to r/ vise 10 CFR Part 35.

The Commission directed the staff to extend the public comment period b 5 days to allow L for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period should exte from early August to early November. This schedule should allow sufficient time for publ' review and comment.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled three public tings to discuss the proposed rule and the proposed revision to the Medical Policy St ement. The three public

meetings are scheduled for August.19-20, in San Francisco, ifomia; September 16-17 in Kansas City, Missouri; and October 21-22 in Rockville, Maryl d. The last public workshop would be held approximately ttiree weeks prior to the closept the comment period. In addition, the proposed rule and Medical Policy Statement will be ted on the Intemet to provide

' interested parties with easy and timely access to these cuments. Ig '.

. I trust this responds to your concems.

i.

M l

Sin ely, QY. -

S irley Ann Jackson Y/y JY+ 1 Distritmtion:(gWWo414.s)) 0900414 -/ k dP y .'

RGonsonlRF AThadant ~ CRC NO: 4800 thlNetcentral File .

NRASS RlF PNorry

' JSiehe RASchig CP F.DO No. 900414 (for tickets only) ~

. Piressler

~ EDOIRF yA v m m Sturn

  • s previous concurrence - P [A

= copy with attachment # enclosure, "N"

.=ToNo receive copy a copyadtted of this by E.documat, Kraus 7/29798 indicate in the bon

  • SEE PREVIOUS *g* = copy without CONCURRENCE ' X*/ attachrnentienclosure 3

AI/ y k' "J"OAe CFFICE.N RGB:IPN3 Editor RGB:IMNS RGB NAE: *SJones:ce *EKraus *CHaney *PHolahan DATE: 7/ 29/98 7//29/98 7/29/98 7/ 29/98 mmmm-m . -

m 0FFICE: Dh / D:fMSS DEDR EDO NAE: 1 Pt(napp'- HLThonpson LJCallan DATE: k ' /98

! / /98"

-nummmmmmmmmmme umm ummmmmmmmmmmums

/~ '/98 -

/

/98 um 0FFICE: OCH ,! Y NAE: SJackson DATE: [ ' /98 '

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

'?

Robert L. Meckelnburg, M.D., President American College of Nuclear Physicians James W. Fletcher, M.D., President Society of Nuclear Medicine 1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA 20190-5316

Dear Drs. Meckelnburg and Fletcher:

I am responding to your letter dated June 23,1998, requesting a 45-day extens' n to the 75-day comment period recommended by the staff for the proposed rule to re se 10 CFR Part 35.

The proposed rule and medical policy statement are expected to be pu ished in early August, for a 90-day comment period. The 90-day comment period will provi a 15-day extension to the proposed 75-day comment period, and will not adversely affec e staff's efforts to deliver the final rule and associated documents to the Commission, on hedule, by May 28,1999.

I trust this reply responds to your concern.

Sin rely, Shirley Ann Jackson Distribution:(g:yorosWdo414.sf, G980414 RGordoVRF AThadani IMNE/ Central File PNorry NMSS R/F J81aha NRC Central File Spurns CPoland (for tickets only)

EDOIRF MBridgers EDO No. 980414 PTressler CRC NO: 98-060G To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in th I "C" a copy without attachment / enclosure, "B" = copy with attachment / enclosure, "N"

= No copy Edited by E. Kraus 7/29/98 r//,b/GP /*9, OFFICE: RGB:IMNS Edi r RG8:IMNS Jgr NAME: SJones M

  • raus CHaney N ahan DATE: 1 / 2 9 /98 !7/29/98 7/ 83 /98 7/.38 /98 0FFICE: D:IMNS  ! 0:NMSS DEDR E00 NAME: FCombs  ! HKnapp HLThompson LXallan DATE: / !98.' / /98 /, /98 / /98 0FFICE: OCM!

NAME: SJ kson DATE:  ; !/ /98 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 1

06/3Cv98 14:33 NO.011 D02 P

EDO Principal Correspondence Control' 9lib FRON: DUE: 07 /98 EDO CONTROL: G980414 DOC DT: 06/23/98 Robert L.!Meckelnburg FINAL REPLY:

American College of Nuclear Physicians M /86t>77 James W. Fletcher IM4 ' '78M8' M A

i ADDRESSEE: CHAIRMAN JACKSON LETTER DATE: Jur. 23 98 FILE CODE: IDER 14 PT. 35

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD --- 10 CFR PART 35 ACTION: Signature of Chairman DISTRIBUTION: CHAIRMAN, COMRS, OGC, RF SPECIAL HANDLING: SECY TO ACK CONSTITUENT:

NOTES: ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION, SECY 98-128) 14 DATE DUE: Jul ,14 98 SIGNATURE: .

DATE SIGNED:

AFFILIATION:

l I

l l

h k- EDO -- G980414 t

l-_ _--_---------- --------_------ ---_---- -------- --- - - --- ------------- ----- - ----------- ----- -------- - --- ---- - --- -

~~ ~- ~~'

.N P C ~ ~~-' id.011 004~  !

' ~

EP EI

~

American College of Nuclear Physicians / Society of Nuclear Medicine i

GOVEHNMENT RELATIONS OFFICE  !

-June 23,1998 The Honorable Shirley Ann Jackson Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conualssion )

Washington, DC 20555  ;

Re: Requent for Extension of Comment Period Dear Chairman Jackxxn

'lhe American Colle of Nuclear Physicians (ACNP) and the Society of Nuclear Medicine

-(SNM) have begun reviewing the draft proposed rule to revise 10 CFR Patt '45, which was  ;

submitted to the Commission (SECY-98-128) on June 4,1998. Due to the size of this j rulemaking and the major impact that It will have on the practice of nuclear medicine, we request that you accept the NRC's Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) recommendation and lengthen the proposed comment period by 45 days, j As proposed by the staff, the comment period would be 75 days. Assuming that the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register in mid-July, the comment penod would end in late  !

September.  :

  • nic ACNP and SNM would like to provide meaningful comments to the NRC on the many  :

important issues raised by this proposed rule. To do so, however, we will need adequate time to review, analyze, distribute, collect, and collate information related to this rulemaking and secure the approval of two goveming bodies. We are concerned that a 75 day comment period will not allow sufficient time for this process, especially since most of the comment period would occur ,

during the summer, when personal vacation schedules often make it difficult for membership i organizations to reach decisions promptly.

In addition, the NRC has tentatively scheduled three public workshops on the propn<ni, the last of which is potentially within a week of the end of the comment period. ACNP and SNM would like the opportunity to hear discussions from stakeholder at these workshops and then portatially modify our comments based on this input.  ;

, i i

i

' 1850 Samuel Morr,e Drive, Reston, Virg
nia 20190 5316. (7o3) 70s.9773 / Faw: (703) 708-9777

__h%-_

.g.

s For these reasons, we strongly urge you to extend the conunent period for an additional 45 days.

We do not believe that this extension would delay the publication of the final rule in June 1999, and a 1204y conunent period would provide sufficient time for all parties concemed to develop meaningful and constructive conunents to the Commission.

Thank you for consideration of this request. If you have any questions, feel fr contact Mr. l David Nichols, Director ofGovernment Relations at (703) 708 9773.

Sincerely, ,

Robert L. M ekelnburg, M.D. James- . Fletcher, M.D.

President President American College of Nuclear Physicians Society ofNuclear Medicine cc: The Honorable Greta Joy Dieus, Conunissioner The Honorable Edward McGaffigan, Jr., Commissioner The Honorable Nils J. Diaz, Commissioner RussellKnapp, Acting Director,NMSS Don Cool, Deputy Director,NMSS DCLXX;S: D0420.1 1

i l

l l

!