ML20065L184: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20065L184 | | number = ML20065L184 | ||
| issue date = 04/15/1994 | | issue date = 04/15/1994 | ||
| title = Provides Util Schedule for Responding to | | title = Provides Util Schedule for Responding to Re Calculation Method for Determining Changes in Transmitter Calibration Frequency | ||
| author name = Marsh W | | author name = Marsh W | ||
| author affiliation = SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. | | author affiliation = SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 9404200330 | | document report number = NUDOCS 9404200330 | ||
| title reference date = 02-15-1994 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 31 May 2023
| ML20065L184 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/1994 |
| From: | Marsh W SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9404200330 | |
| Download: ML20065L184 (1) | |
Text
,
.)*-;
. Southom Califomia E'dison Company l
.rw a.m n aniu r I inwm. crumn,u uu ni
)
I wu un c. uanc.n April 15,1994 u u . .<me j hAAf sAi>R H i sP M Jt' .4 4 AH Mr (RH Al()fu ty i Air 4 Al {7 4)454 4484 i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission !
Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Revised Calculational Method for Determining Changes in Transmitter Calibration San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3
Reference:
Letter from Mel B. Fields (NRC) to Harold B. Ray (SCE), dated February 15, 1994;
Subject:
Revised Calculational Method for Determining Changes in Transmitter Calibration This letter provides the Southern California Edison (SCE) schedule for responding to your letter of February 15, 1994 (Reference). The referenced letter stated that the SCE revised calculational method for determining changes in transmitter calibration is not acceptable for determining transmitter calibration frequency.
SCE has carefully considered the NRC position and the alternatives available and remains convinced the Edison method is technically sound and appropriate.
We are, therefore, preparing additional information to demonstrate the technical acceptability of our calculational methodology. This information will be provided to the NRC by July 8, 1994, and we would ask that a meeting be held shortly af ter submittal of the additional information to further discuss this issue.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, draeh ,
cc: L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV i J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 & 3 l M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 '
0 0,
94042cosso 94o415 PDR ADOCK 05000361 1 p PDR l'.Q
(