ML20151D923: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:y | {{#Wiki_filter:y auum28-2f'8 | ||
_m. | |||
, [ | .,,uo cetermine its typ6E*u au | ||
, [ | |||
)$p ' | |||
fp | eficiency Syndrome. | ||
pJ-j 6 | |||
If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local | N | ||
. diseases, such as Acquired Immu6ts n ser) l[ | |||
ergenii | d 8843 M 21J fp smo pM4 N-Plant Rule Changem o The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was; to publish in the Federal Register today ith,js | ||
.;. r proposed change in emergency planning regulations, starting the clock on the 60-day period set for public comment. | |||
If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local governments refuse to approve or partici-pate in emergency planning. Such plants would no longer have to demonstrate that emergency plans showed a "reasonable as-surance" that the public health and safety could be protected. The safety standards for those plants would not be as tough as for g* | |||
NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu | plants with local-and state-supported A | ||
change was proposed because of the refusal | f | ||
of New York and Suffolk County to partici- | / | ||
The proposal has already proved contro- | 51 ergenii '1 ans7 - | ||
yThe NRC is considering the change to red Od/ | |||
7 move a possible veto power by state and lo-(cal governments over plant licensing. | |||
NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu e | |||
change was proposed because of the refusal n | |||
e I > | |||
of New York and Suffolk County to partici- | |||
[ | |||
pate in emergency planning for Shoreham. | |||
N The proposal has already proved contro-N r(*5 versial. Three governors and a group of con-Qgig gressmen spoke against the change at a meeting last month. | |||
N f uMJ Those wishing to~c5mment-should virite' | |||
[ | |||
to<the Secretary of the Commission, Nucle- ) | |||
ar Regulatory Commission, Washington, | |||
\\ | |||
D.C., 20555, attention docketing and ser-Qce branch. | |||
gg7aoga92070a13 gyo g | |||
50 52FR6980 PDR n | |||
>= | |||
nwurir n_._ _ | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:51, 11 December 2024
| ML20151D923 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1987 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC |
| References | |
| FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 52FR6980-00021, 52FR6980-21, NUDOCS 8807250292 | |
| Download: ML20151D923 (1) | |
Text
y auum28-2f'8
_m.
.,,uo cetermine its typ6E*u au
, [
)$p '
eficiency Syndrome.
pJ-j 6
N
. diseases, such as Acquired Immu6ts n ser) l[
d 8843 M 21J fp smo pM4 N-Plant Rule Changem o The Nuclear Regulatory Commission was; to publish in the Federal Register today ith,js
.;. r proposed change in emergency planning regulations, starting the clock on the 60-day period set for public comment.
If adppted, the change would ease emer-gency planning requirements for nuclear plants, like Shoreham, when state and local governments refuse to approve or partici-pate in emergency planning. Such plants would no longer have to demonstrate that emergency plans showed a "reasonable as-surance" that the public health and safety could be protected. The safety standards for those plants would not be as tough as for g*
plants with local-and state-supported A
f
/
51 ergenii '1 ans7 -
yThe NRC is considering the change to red Od/
7 move a possible veto power by state and lo-(cal governments over plant licensing.
NRC en diveder Vi;;tcr Stclle Wu e
change was proposed because of the refusal n
e I >
of New York and Suffolk County to partici-
[
pate in emergency planning for Shoreham.
N The proposal has already proved contro-N r(*5 versial. Three governors and a group of con-Qgig gressmen spoke against the change at a meeting last month.
N f uMJ Those wishing to~c5mment-should virite'
[
to<the Secretary of the Commission, Nucle- )
ar Regulatory Commission, Washington,
\\
D.C., 20555, attention docketing and ser-Qce branch.
gg7aoga92070a13 gyo g
50 52FR6980 PDR n
>=
nwurir n_._ _
-