ML20138D621: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:..
{{#Wiki_filter:..
  a
a
    l
l
                                                  FEB 101993
FEB 101993
          Docket Nos. 50-334
Docket Nos. 50-334
                          50-412
50-412
          Mr. J. D. Sieber
Mr. J. D. Sieber
          Senior Vice President
Senior Vice President
          Chief Nuclear Officer
Chief Nuclear Officer
          Duquesne Light Company
Duquesne Light Company
          Post Office Box 4
Post Office Box 4
          Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077
Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077
          Dear Mr. Sieber:
Dear Mr. Sieber:
          SUBJECT: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27
SUBJECT: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27
          This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted by Mr. R. Paolino of this office
This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted by Mr. R. Paolino of this office
          on December 15-18,1992 at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 in
on December 15-18,1992 at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 in
          Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Mr. Paolino discussed the findings of the inspection with senior
Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Mr. Paolino discussed the findings of the inspection with senior
          staff members of Duquesne Light Company, on December 18, 1992.
staff members of Duquesne Light Company, on December 18, 1992.
          The purpose of the inspection was to assess the adequacy of the engineering and technical
The purpose of the inspection was to assess the adequacy of the engineering and technical
          support provided for the operation of .ne Beaver Valley Power Station. Within these areas,
support provided for the operation of .ne Beaver Valley Power Station. Within these areas,
          the inspection focused on issues important to public health and safety, and consisted of
the inspection focused on issues important to public health and safety, and consisted of
          selective examinations of relevant procedures, representative records, plant design changes,
selective examinations of relevant procedures, representative records, plant design changes,
          modifications, and observations by the inspector. Areas inspected are discussed in the
modifications, and observations by the inspector. Areas inspected are discussed in the
          enclosed report.
enclosed report.
          The inspector concluded that overall engineering and technical support to the plant was of
The inspector concluded that overall engineering and technical support to the plant was of
          good quality and was adequate to support plant operations. Supervisory staff additions in the
good quality and was adequate to support plant operations. Supervisory staff additions in the
          electrical and instrument / control group areas of corporate engineering staff appeared to have
electrical and instrument / control group areas of corporate engineering staff appeared to have
          enhanced the design control process and support to plant operations.
enhanced the design control process and support to plant operations.
          Within the scope of this inspection, no violations were identified.
Within the scope of this inspection, no violations were identified.
      930223o022 930210         4
930223o022 930210
        DR   ADOCK 0500
DR
                                                                                                          d i
ADOCK 0500
4
d
i


  ,
                                              FEB 101993
    Mr. J. D. Sieber                              2
    No reply to this letter is required. Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
                                                        Sincerely,
                                                          ofigi e.1 si c:3.1 By t'
                                                          Jec que P. N2T.
                                                        Jacque P. Durr, Chief
                                                        Engineering Branch
                                                        Division of Reactor Safety
    Enclosure: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27
    cc w/ encl:
    G. S. Thomas, Vice President, Nuclear Services
    N. R. Tonet, Manager, Nuclear Safety
    T. P. Noonan, General Manager, Nuclear Operations
    K. D. Grada, Manager, Quality Service Unit
i  H. R. Caldwell, General Superintendent, Nuclear Operations
;  K. Abraham, PAO (2)
    Public Document Room (PDR)
    Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
,
,
    Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
FEB 101993
Mr. J. D. Sieber
2
No reply to this letter is required. Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
ofigi e.1 si c:3.1 By t'
Jec que P. N2T.
Jacque P. Durr, Chief
Engineering Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27
cc w/ encl:
G. S. Thomas, Vice President, Nuclear Services
N. R. Tonet, Manager, Nuclear Safety
T. P. Noonan, General Manager, Nuclear Operations
K. D. Grada, Manager, Quality Service Unit
i
H. R. Caldwell, General Superintendent, Nuclear Operations
;
K. Abraham, PAO (2)
Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
,
NRC Resident Inspecar
'
'
    NRC Resident Inspecar
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
State of Ohio
    State of Ohio
bec w/ encl:
    bec w/ encl:
Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)
    Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)
DRS/EB SALP Coordinator
    DRS/EB SALP Coordinator
J. Linville, DRP
    J. Linville, DRP
W. Lazarus, DRP
    W. Lazarus, DRP
L. Rossbach, SRI - Beaver Valley
    L. Rossbach, SRI - Beaver Valley
SRI, Perry, Region III
    SRI, Perry, Region III
W. Butler, NRR
    W. Butler, NRR
G. Edison, NRR
    G. Edison, NRR
V. McCree, OEDO
    V. McCree, OEDO


  .
.
  p.
FEB 101993
                                  FEB 101993
p.
    Mr. J. D. Sieber                   3
Mr. J. D. Sieber
  !
3
    El: RS           RI:DRS         RI:DRS
!
    P.     ,
El: RS
                      R     -       Durr
RI:DRS
      1/4f93         2/1/93         2fC/93
RI:DRS
                              OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
P.
R
Durr
-
,
1/4f93
2/1/93
2fC/93
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
I
I
                                    A:BV.RP
A:BV.RP
l
l
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:49, 11 December 2024

Forwards Insp Repts 50-334/92-28 & 50-412/92-27 on 921215- 18.No Violations Noted
ML20138D621
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 02/10/1993
From: Durr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20138D624 List:
References
NUDOCS 9302230022
Download: ML20138D621 (3)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000334/1992028

Text

..

a

l

FEB 101993

Docket Nos. 50-334

50-412

Mr. J. D. Sieber

Senior Vice President

Chief Nuclear Officer

Duquesne Light Company

Post Office Box 4

Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077

Dear Mr. Sieber:

SUBJECT: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27

This letter transmits the report of the inspection conducted by Mr. R. Paolino of this office

on December 15-18,1992 at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 in

Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Mr. Paolino discussed the findings of the inspection with senior

staff members of Duquesne Light Company, on December 18, 1992.

The purpose of the inspection was to assess the adequacy of the engineering and technical

support provided for the operation of .ne Beaver Valley Power Station. Within these areas,

the inspection focused on issues important to public health and safety, and consisted of

selective examinations of relevant procedures, representative records, plant design changes,

modifications, and observations by the inspector. Areas inspected are discussed in the

enclosed report.

The inspector concluded that overall engineering and technical support to the plant was of

good quality and was adequate to support plant operations. Supervisory staff additions in the

electrical and instrument / control group areas of corporate engineering staff appeared to have

enhanced the design control process and support to plant operations.

Within the scope of this inspection, no violations were identified.

930223o022 930210

DR

ADOCK 0500

4

d

i

,

FEB 101993

Mr. J. D. Sieber

2

No reply to this letter is required. Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

ofigi e.1 si c:3.1 By t'

Jec que P. N2T.

Jacque P. Durr, Chief

Engineering Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure: Combined Inspection Report Nos. 50-334/92-28 and 50-412/92-27

cc w/ encl:

G. S. Thomas, Vice President, Nuclear Services

N. R. Tonet, Manager, Nuclear Safety

T. P. Noonan, General Manager, Nuclear Operations

K. D. Grada, Manager, Quality Service Unit

i

H. R. Caldwell, General Superintendent, Nuclear Operations

K. Abraham, PAO (2)

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

,

NRC Resident Inspecar

'

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

State of Ohio

bec w/ encl:

Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)

DRS/EB SALP Coordinator

J. Linville, DRP

W. Lazarus, DRP

L. Rossbach, SRI - Beaver Valley

SRI, Perry, Region III

W. Butler, NRR

G. Edison, NRR

V. McCree, OEDO

.

FEB 101993

p.

Mr. J. D. Sieber

3

!

El: RS

RI:DRS

RI:DRS

P.

R

Durr

-

,

1/4f93

2/1/93

2fC/93

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

I

A:BV.RP

l

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138D621&oldid=4202031"