ML20065G711

Forwards Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Status as of 901002

ML20065G711
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	10/05/1990
From:	Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	Boger B NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9010230064
Download: ML20065G711 (14)

Text

_ . . _ . __ . - . . , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _

l  :>

. M, 3,-

P' BALTIMORE GAS AND.

ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER

• P.0, BOX 1475 e BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203-1475  ;

LEON B. RUSSELL WAh4GER ..

l NUCLE AR SAFETY & PLANhiNO DiPARTMENT h{Qk[ }

1 i

Document Control Desk US Nuclear Regulatory L0mmission 1 Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Mr. Bruce R. Boger Mail Stop 14A2

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Performance Improvement Plan Update.

Enclosed pleas.: find a copy of the Performance Improvement Plan'Impicmentation Program (PIP-  :

IP) Schedule Stutus as of October 2,1991.:To date,13: Action Plans have been verified as -(

implemented, ( are pending verificatica, and 27 remain active. Attached is a brief synopsis of our .

activities. Also ettached is an updated '.ist of key Action Plan information, including verification .

~ ~

status. >

• Please contact me (260-6680) or Ruh Olsoii (260-3771)ih'ould you have any questions. ,

' 6

. Sincerely, 9 ,

(M .

M r\ '

Leon B. Russell

.i j

Attachments 2 1

l 7* * } "[ jj f' T 9 0\

9010230064 901005 PDR P ADOCK 05000317

{ ' (' "

PNV

"~

1 Mr. Bruce R. Boger October 5,1990  ;

Page 2 I

l bec: Messrs. G. C. Creel (w/ synopsis)

C. H. Cruse (w/ synopsis) ,

R. E Denton (w/ synopsis) l' R. P. Heibel (w/synopis)

I J. R. Lemons (w/synopis)  :

G. L Detter (w/all)  ;

B. S. Montgomery (w/all)

R. C. L Olson (w/ synopsis)

R. F. Lewis (w/ synopsis) .

t J. S. Fuoto (w/ synopsis) 1 1

i i l

I l

l I

i i

I i

i 1

I CALVERT CLEFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ,

I PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN l .

SCHEDULE STATUS ,

! AS OF October 2,1990-1<

4 BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY  !

i

~. .-- . . . - - - . - - . . . . . . . _ _ _ . - . . - . . . - - . - .

--. .4- .aM-a + u ,s -.,,,s- ,,ana .

_m,,4s, ay4_g a a w ,,a,.; ., ,_ a e- ,+ a,.,_a., p .,--_,.----, - - - - - - - - - - , - ,

g .

. J e .

t l; e' e

i g

1 l

l t

s CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES-t

')

e

{

6

^

1

, . * -l j

l 1

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN l CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS.

L OCTOBER 5, 1990 i

A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE ' 'I TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR MILESTONES.

WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN l NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE SO IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

l l

• 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NEGATIVE -39 DAYS.

5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS NEGATIVE ~16' DAYS

• 2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MGMT PROJECT NEGATIVE. -13 DAYS 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS NEGATIVE. -10 DAYS 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE ~~4 DAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ANALYSES FOR THE OCTOBER 2, 1990 DATA,DATE:

• 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS KEVIN -39 DAYS PROCEDURE REVISIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF REPLACEMENT ITEMS TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGN BASIS INTEGRITY OF THE PLANT IS. CURRENTLY -39 DAYS NEGATIVE.'THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE FINAL. RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING TECHNICAL PROCEDURES..

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **  ;

! A RECOVERY PLAN FOR THIS ACTION PLAN.HAS BEEN' FORMULATED BY THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER. A CHANGE REQUEST WHICH REAFFIRMS GOALS- AND! OIk7ECTIVES  !

AND RESOLVES SCHEDULE DEFICIENCIES WILL'BE INITIATED TO' REVISE THE EXISTING SCHEDULE COMPLETION DATE BY OCTOBER 18, 1990.

5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS BROWN, LARRY -16 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS DAYS NEGATIVE...THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CONTPACT RESTRAINTS AND REPRIORITIZATION OF NUCLEIS COMPUTER TASK IMPLEMENTATION.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE' ACTION **

A RECOVERY PLAN HAS BEEN. INITIATED BY THE ACTION PLAN, MANAGER AND. PLAN- "

NING. A CHANGE REQUEST TO:RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN WILL BE' INITIATED BY OCTOBER 18, 1990.;A FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULE REVIEW MEETING IS PLANNED FOR-OCTOBER 8, 1990 TO EXPEDITE THIS PROCESS.

2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MGMT PROJECT MANN, BRIAN- -13 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS NOW -12 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE' NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE DELAY OF CONTRACT AWARD FOR TASK 2,'" LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEM". ONCE AGAIN, THE AWARD.0F CONTRACT CONTINUES TO:

BE THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR FOR THIS ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY.

"*" INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ONJCRITICALLPATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.

i l

00 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

CURRENTLY THE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TASK 2 IS SCHEDULED TO COMMENCE ON OCTOBER 5, 1990. TASK 2 SCHEDULE WILL BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE i l

AWARD OF CONTRACT DATE.  : 1 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM -10 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -10 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE BOTTLE NECK IN WORD PROCESSING. CURRENTLY THE FINAL TECHNICAL REVIEW IS SCHEDULED TO COMPLETE ON OCTOBER 5, 1990.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

N/A l

5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM SHERANKO, BOB -4 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -4 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE REPRIORITIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST BY THE VP-NED TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY l PROCEDURES IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THIS ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE IS CURRENTLY BEING REVISED TO INCORPORATE AND ACCOMODATE THE COMMITMENT TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES APPRO-VED AND ISSUED BY-DECEMBER 31, 1990, WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE PRESENT SCHEDULE.

l

?  ; . '

l 1

l APPENDIX A I t

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT LEGEND: 1

% COMPLETE PIP BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY RELATED TO COMPLETION OF THE ACTION PLAN  :

OR MILESTONES.

l  % COMPLETE ALL BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES l

INCLUDING ONGOING AS A RESULT OF PIP ACTIVITIES OR .

MILESTONES.

I TOTAL FLOAT THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT STATUS.

NEGATIVE VALUES - INDICATE ONE OR MORE OF THE -

l MILESTONE IS LATE BY THE INDICATED .

t NUMBER OF WORKDAYS.

L POSITIVE VALUES - INDICATE THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF ,

l SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OFTHE ACTIVITIES AND THE MILESTONE MILESTONES.

ZERO VALUE - INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE  ;

EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE AND  !

- ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED ON r' TIME TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE.

IMPLE VERIF COMPLETE .

"YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OFTHE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.

" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OFTHEIMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE

~. ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED .

ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION.

"N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO '

IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.

't

- . _ _ .a

4 I

I PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ALL IMPLEMENT.  ;

' DATA DATE 20CI9e '

EMECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT MILESTONES VERIFICT*90

.- SUN DATE 830CT90 1931HR$ TOTAL  % COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL DATE DATE FLOAT COMPLETE COMPLE1E  ;

/ T I'T L E PLAN MANAGER MANHOURS PIP / ALL .......... ..........

. ACT PLAN e ~ .................. ........ .... --.. ---....- ........ .....

, ......................................... 1 HAgeAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS les 13JUL89 9AUG9e e VES MARKONSKI,etINE 1958 100 2.02.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS les 12JAge89 SeMAR9e e VES ,

DONOseOE, Ages 19950 les

~2.e2.2 CoseRJNICATIONS PLAge 775 99 99 SJUNe9 SNOV98 e VES TIETJE98, KEst VES 2.03.s tePP ISSUES BASED PLAseIIIeG les 21APR89 SJust99 e VES MARKONSKI, MIKE 27u les 2.05.1 CofWIITNENT TRACKIteG SYSTEM 87268 1 1 letAR99 6000V92 -15 2.C5.2 REGULATORY CosetITNEttT egeGeseT PROCES MAese, BRI Age lee les 8JA9896 12APR9e e VES VES .-

MARKONSKI, MIKE N/A  !

2.C5.3 ACCOUptTABILITY ISEPROWEteENTS-ORGANIZATIOseAL DVIIAMICS IMPROUEMEWYS s a s s 1120 ==s s les s== == les === 26JUse89 sa ss s ssss ss ses s s sVES 21SEP99 s ss s s s = = = = s s = = = = s s s s == ,

3.82.0 MAseACites ORGANIZATIONAL 8 PGet CHAgeG MARKONSKI, MIKE les 12Juge89 2escove9 e VES VES ,

MARK 00eSKI, MIKE 516 les '

3.05.8 LEADERSIIIP CoseFEREleCES 82 29JUL89 2eMAR91 e MARKeefSKI, MIKE 1956 82-3.04.8 TEAM 900RK 8 INTEseFACES 100 100 leJJL89 12SEP9e e VES ZUMesALT, ERIC 2610 N/A 3.05.0 PROJECT stateAGEMEleT 4822 les les 22Juse89 26FEB99 e N/A T980RP, Joest l i 3.06.e DAILY a'0UTAGE tIORK C0esTROL DOSesELL, JOE 14529 4e 4e leJUL89 6SEP91 e s

3.01.1 SITE INTEGRATED ScleEDULIteG' L stAYDEst, JOHN as 299 88' 88 '1FEB89 31DEC99 e f 4 - 3.96.2 MAINTEteAseCE NORK CONTROL 1FEB89 7APR95 e TesORP, Joest 12314 26 . 21 3.C6.3 OPERATICIe5 IDEPROWE9EENT PLAN les 3JAle89 29 JAM 98 e VES VES 9tARIIIARI, DAN 5568 let 3.07.8 ENGI9eEERIIIG PLAgetIgeG 8 VES VES

! DAVIS, STEWE- 4899 lee. les 280eov88 . 9 MAR 99  ;

' 3.08.e SYSTEM CIRCLES EDesARDS, Aset . 13950 -les .37 148t4989 2JAst92 e VES 3.09.9 GUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM i

--ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROUEMEleTS PIERIssGER, ss=======ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss=ss===sssssss==sssssssss====sss===sassassamm PAUL N/A N/A 90/A.31JUL89 31JUL89 8 YES YES 4.6e.8 POEAC PIERIOGGER, PAUL 8424 74 74 15JAfe99 3SEP91 e

. . 4.01.1 OPERATIteG EXPERIEseCE REVIEN 200ceEY, KEN M280 86 82 IJUN89 21DEC99 e

4.C2.0 GC It' PROVE 9ENTS les 1990AV89 2JAfe9e e VES YES 4.05.e 94 INTER 9eAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS AfeUJE, Asea .11496 les e

27852 79 80 15Juge88 200EC99 4.04.0 IteEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATIces UstIT 'PIERIIIGER, PAUL .i 2484 97 97 estAYS9 28FE391 e

' KATZ, PETE - ,

.4.C5.8 SAFETY ASSESSMENT .

99 99 IJUeOS8 11FES91 e DAVIS, STEVE- 2560s  ;

' '4.06.0 WOOT CAUSE.AseALYSIS IMPROVE 9 TENTS' CARROLL, J0est 1570 10e 99 1Juge89 90CT9J e YES I

.4.C7.8 POSRC MIEteeIKI, MIME 1229 let les 2eJAsuS9 25JAN#4 e ' YES VES 4.08.8 OSSRC - CAMPO, GENE' 13M ' lee les 3JUL89 29JUN98 8 YES YES i

4.69.0 WISITItes OTetER PLAseTS. DOSesELL, JOE 14688 18 18- 19tAV98 194UG91 e l :4.10.0 ISSUES geannacsggENT SYSTEMACTIVITY COIITROL IstPROWEteENTS ss==ss assa 5JUL89 ss as sssssssssssssss e YES sansassa YES ssssssssssssssssssssssssmas '

, N/A N/A N/A 5JUL89 5.01.e AURILIARY SYSTEsts EDIGIseEERIteG UseIT / TUCKER, LARRY 1FEB89 31DEC92 e l PRITCHETT, T000 665983 99 37

! 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAtt ' DUNKERLY, CNARLIE 62497 83 12 IJUIIS9 25DEC92 e

5.02.2 $URVEILLAgeCE TEST PROGRAM 1FEB89 150CY89 e VES YES

' HAYDEN, J0006 ' 3988 les lee 5.02.3 POST MAINTENAsetE TESTING CELLARS, KEVIts 49258 87 87 SSEPe9 14DEC99 -39

• i D.03.1 PitoCUREstEssi PROGRAst PROJECT '74588 78 55 190AR89 ' 21JUpp91 - f '6 5.05.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PtteG SYS BeeteN, LARRY 99 29FES88 60eow99 ' -le

(-~ 5.93.5 TECtetICAL MA98UAL IMPRowEIWesTS ROY, T000 PERES, PAUL M18 179352 99 99 'le 22SEP94 -15 5.05.4 DESIGee BASIS CansuM IDATIOpt 99 ^ 1 star 88~ le0CT96 e 5.05.5 RECORDS geannaassgEteT/ DOCUMENT CopeTROL V0 GEL, Asse ' 4201. 99 5FES9e

'13346 - 6e 6e IFE39e 9AUG91 e I 5.C3.6 IteFORMATIces RESOURCE 880G098T PROJECT SARTM, AL - -

e. l SURDSALL, G. N/A st/A - N/A j - 5.83.7 DRAMIteG IMPROWE9EENT PROJECT 13802. lee ' les> 58tAY89 4JAstte e _ YES YES YOE, JIM -

5.04.1 SYSTEM EDIGIIIEER TRAINIstG - MIRAseA, TONY ~ 7748 . 71 " ~71- 21AUG89 4 JAM 91 0 5.04.2 MIseOR st0DIFICATIcess ~

GREE 90E, KEN . 14789 7e 71 3esEP88 15AUG91 e

~5.04.3 RELIABILITY CENTERED teAINTEleasetE P IP VERIF ICAT ION PROCESSES a s a sPMIFER, s = = =JERRY

= = = = = = =898 ==~ = = 34s = =31= = 7JUL89 = = = *275EP91 s = = = = = = e= = = s s = = = = = = = = = s s s = = = = s = = = =

6.81.0 PIP 19tPLEgeENTATICII VERIFICATI0pt SFES9e 290C191 e PteIFER, JERRY 6648 36 36 l 4>.e5.0 PIP EFFECTIVEleESS VERIFICATI0It

- - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . .75. . . . 41 . . 29FEB88

. . . . . - . 22SEP94

. . . . . . . . . . -39 1422132

T3TALS ........-....... .....--...........-....<.-....- --..--....- -...____...............

...........--........ -.;........a............. /

[

_~ . C ._ <- . , -- - - ~ - ~ -- - - -- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - -

.x 2,ma- a. m A - 4 m 4

0 .

6 4

e MILESTONE OVERVIEW-C 4

l l

1 1

i 1

l i

.)

1 i

^

. +

i STATUS AS OF OCTOBER 2,1990 MILE 5T0NE OVERVIEW -

TOTAL NUMBER SCHEDULED VS ACTUAL e SCHEDULED ' 'r '

ACTION PLAN e / D E S C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER MILESTONES COMPLETE COMPLETE IPREVIOUS 2 WKS) MENT 2 WKS MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS ====================s================================================================================

MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2 2 COMPLETE l 2.82.1 PERFORMANCE STA9 WARDS 2.C2.2 C0petUMICATIONS PLAN DON 0000E, Asse 11 11 COMPLETE i 2.03.0 NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 6 6 COMPLETE l 2.05.1 CopetITNENT TRACKING SYSTEM ptARK0WSKI, MIKE 4 4 COMPLETE '

2/1 1 t 2.85.2 REGULATORY CosetITMENT MeeGDesi PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 16 2 l 2.C5.5 ACCOUNTABILITY IftPROWEMENTS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2 2 COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DY9eAftICS IMPROVEMENTS ================================================================================================

3.02.e MAseAGIteG ORGANIZATIOte & PGet CleAteGE 9tARK0WSKI, MIKE 3 3 1/1 COMPLETE - I 3.05.0 LEADERSHIP COpeFEREfeCES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2 2 COMPLETE MARKONSKI, MIKE 5 3 e/e e .

3.04.0 TEAMeIORK & INTERFACES-ZUMWALT, ERIC 9 9 e/0 e 3.65.s PROJECT MANAGEstENT  :

3.C6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCleEDULING DOSesELL, JOE 14 3 0/e e '

3.06.2 MAINTENAteCE se0RK CopeTROL -- etAYDEN, J0000 5 4 1/1 e T980RP, JOHN 5 1 e/e e 3.06.5 OPERATIoses IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

3.07.0 EpeGIteEERI98G PLAestiseG MARIMARI, DAN 4 4 COMPLETE .j 3.e8.8 SYSTEtt CIRCLES ' DAVIS, STEVE 6 6 COMPLETE

' .3.09.8 guALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EgetARDS, AMBe 8 8 1/1 COMPLETE  !

t.SSESSMENT CAPASILITY IMPROVEMENTS ==================================================================================================

N/A POEAC PIERIIeGER, PAUL 4 4 C00tPLETE ,

PIERIteGER, PAUL 4 e e/8 e s 4.81.1 OPERATING EMPERIEleCE REVIEW RosesEY, KEN .8 5 e/e e i 4.82.0 GC IMPROVEftENTS 4.05.8 OA INTERIeAL ASSESSMENT 19tPROWEMENTS AleUJE, Asea 9 9 CostPLETE 'I i

4.04.0 IteDEPEleDENT SAFETY EVALUATIO90 PIERIteGER, PAUL 7 1 e/e e 4.C5.0 SAFETY ASSESSMEleT KATZ, PETE le 8 9/e e DAVIS, STEVE 5 4 e/e e 4.06.e ROOT CAUSE A90ALYSIS 4.C7.0 POSRC .

CARROLL, JOHN 5 5 COMPLETE 4.C8.8 OSSRC MIERNICKI, MIME 6 6 COMPLETE -

I

-4.09.0 VISITIteG OTitER PLANTS _

' CAMPO, GEteE 5 5 COMPLETE 4.1s.8 ISSUES MAseAGEttENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE 25 3 e/e e '

ACTIVITY CopeTROL IMPROWEMENTS ===53==================================================================================================

j' 5.31.0 AUMILIARY SYSTEtts EteGIIEEERING UseIT TUCKER, LARRY -

2 2 C00tPLE TE LATNAM, DAN 15 12 0/e e

5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAlt

' 5.C2.2'SURVEILLAseCE TEST PROGRAM DusetERLY, CMARLIE 11 ~ le e/e e 5.02.3 POST MAINTEleaseCE TESTItes NAYDEN, JOHN 4 4 COMPLETE 5.c3.1 PROCURE 90E9ef PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 9 3 2/0 1

. 5.C3.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /MAINT PLeeG SYS BR0eRe, LARRY . .le' 6 1/e e 5.03.3 TECeseICAL MateUAL IMPROWEMENTS. .ROY, TOM le 9 e/e e ,

PERKS, PAUL 10 5 e/e e S.C3.4 DESIGN BASIS C00eSOLIDATICBI -

' 5.83.5 RECORDS ItA8eAGEMENT/ DOCUMENT CONTROL WOGEL, Aged 3' 2 e/e g 5.05.619eFOR9tATIOfe RESOURCE teeGesef PROJECT SARTH, AL ' 4' e e/e g 5.03.7 DRANIteG IMPtowEMENT PROJECT- SURSSALL, G. e e e/e e 5.e4.1 SYSTEM E90GIeqEER TRAINIleG YOE, J1M .

'4 4 COMPLETE 5.e4.2 Mit00R MODIFICATI000$ MIRAfSA, TONY 12 7 2/2 e

'e

• 5.04.3 NELIABILITY CENTER MAINTE90AleCE GREEleE, KEN 'le 5 8/e

===========================================================s============================================================

. sTCTALS, _

294 189 e64%9 le / 6 3

========================================================================================================================

TOTAL VERIF. 98 UMBER DUE NUMBER TO START IM '_ COMPLETE ACTIOle PLAN 5 / D E S C R I P T I O N . SCHEDULED .

I

...-----........-----.. -...--......- E IteCL.REVERIF l . OCTOBER 4 ACTION PLANS 9 PIP VERIFICATI000 PROCESSES 6.1.s IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION OVERVIEW PHIFER, JERRY 41 2 '12 i

.PHIFER, JERRY 4 e 1 0F 4 SLICE VERIF. COMPLETE 6.3.0 PIP EFFECTIVE 9eESS VERIFICATION I  !

c. - .

- ~- - . . . ,... , , , . ,. ._ . -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ .-_ _

a _ ,_mg_ a o .n.- -._us s ,--- - - - - - - - - - - . - -- - -----------w--- --- - - - - - - - - - - - m- - -

g e

4

• . i e

e 4

4 9

e l

CHANGE CONTROL.

1 OVERVIEW 1

)

J t

5 t

l-

._ ' ~ ^ w- #._y,

STATUS AS OF OCTOBER 2, 1990 CHANGE C 0 se T R 0 L 0VERVIEW ~

TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE REQUESTS CHANGE REQUESTS DISAPPROVED , i i

ACTION PLAN e / D E $ C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER REQUESTS WRITTEM AWAITING APPROVAL APPV/ INCORPORATED CHANGE REQUESTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROWEMENTS e MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 5 e 5 2.82.1 PERFORMANCE STAteAROS 3 8 DONONOE, ANN 5 e {

2.82.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAtt e TIETJEN, KEN 3 4 5 t 2.85.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING e t MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1 0 1 2.e5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM 2 e 2.e5.2 WEGULATORY C0eseITMENT teeGesef PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 2 e i MARK 0wSKI, MIKE 1 8 1 e l 2.C5.5 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE IMPR0wE9EENTS l ORG ANIZA TIONAL DYleAstICS IMPROVEMEteTS s u s s s = = s s = = = = s s s s s s s ss s = = = == = = = = == == = = = = = = = ss s = = = s = = s s s == = = s s = s e s s s ss s= e ====sass====ss==sass==

MARK 0wSKI, MIKE S e e

3.02.0 MAseAGIssG ORGAteIZATION S PGet CHAssGE 8 5.e5.8 LEADERSHIP C000FEREpeCES MARK 0NSEI, MINE 1 e 1 MARK 0WSKI, MIKE; 2 e 2 e ,

-5.04.0 TEAMNOR9C S IteTERFACES e ZUMNALY, ERIC 5' 8 5 i

.5.65.e PROJECT ttANAGEffENT e  !

THORP, JOHet . I e 1 5.06.9 DAILY E OUTAGE teORet CoseTROL  !

DOSNELL, JOE 5 0 5 e 5.05.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCitEDULIses e HAYDEst, Joies 1 e I 5.85.2 MAINTEMAseCE 100Rst CostTROL e Tet0RP, J0000 2 e 2 5.05.5 OPERATIcee$ ItePROUEMENT PLAN - 8 MARIteARI, DAM 1 0 1 5.07.0 EteGIteEERIteG PLAIS0198G e DAVIS, STEVE 8 e e 5.08.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES e 5.09.0 gUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDesARDS, Asse 1 e 1 l l

ASSESSMENT CAPASILITY IMPROUE9EENTS ====ss============ssssss===========================================================sms=====sss== e i

-PIERIsIGER, PAUL e e e C*./ A POEAC .

4.01.1 OPERATIIIS EXPERIEteCE REVIEN PIERIIIGER, PAUL 2 e' 2 e RosesEY, EEN 5 1 4 e 4.02.8 GC IMPROWEMENTS e e 4.05.s OA INTEResAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVE 9EENTS AIIUJE, A00A 8 e

' PIERIstGER, PAut. 1, e 1 e 4.04.0 19eDEPEteDENT SAFETY EVALUATIose - e KATZ, PETE 1 9 I 4.C5.e SAFETY ASSES $ STENT e DAVIS, STEVE 1 e I 4.06.e ROOT CAUSE AseALYSIS e CARROLL, J000N 2 e 2 4.07.e POSRC e e 4.08.8 OSSRC MIEReeICKI, MIKE e e CAMPO, GEseE 5 8 5 e 4.07.0 VISITIteG OTieER PLAseTS 5 e DOSesELL, JOE 5 e 4.10.9 ISSUES MAseAGEMENT SYSTEM

' AC T IVI TY Coset ROL IMPROWEMENT S s s = = = = = = s = = = = = = = = = = = = s s = = = = = = = == = s = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = e

= = = = = = = = = = = =e = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = s : s = = = =

TUCKER, LARRY e e 5.01.0 AUKILIARY SYSTEtts EssGIteEERiteG UseIT e LAfteAM, DAse 5 e 5 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM 4 e

. DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 4 e i 5.02.2 SURwEILLAsetE TEST PROGRAtt e e HAYDEN, Joest e e l 5.02.5 POST ftAINTEteAseCE TESTIIIS 5 e CELLARS, KEVIts 5 e 5.05.1 PROCUREttENT PROGRAM PROJECT BReese, LARRY. 5 e 5 e 5.05.2 EGUIPteENT DATABASE /MAINT PLteG SYS. e e

. ROY, Test e e 5.05.5 TECtes! CAL MAteUAL ItertowEMENTS 1

PERKS, PAUL. 2 9 3 f 5.05.4 DESIGet BASIS CONSOLIDATIcss 2 5.05.5 RECORDS ttAseAGElefteT/DoctRIENT CONTROL WOGEL , 4000 2 e e 2 5.G5.6 IseFORftATIOle RESOURCE 9eeGeesi PROJECT BARTH, AL - 1 e 1 e SURSSALL, G. e e e e 5.05.7 DRAWIteG ItertowEteEleT PROJECT 2 e J5.04.1 SYSTEM EteGIseEER TRAINIteG YOE , JItt .

2 e

'MIRANDA, 1000Y 4 e 4 e 5.04.2 Mite 0R IIODIFICATIose$ 5 e 1 5.e4.5 RELIABILITY CEteTER MAINTEteaseCE' GREEleE, KEN 3 e PteIFER, JERRY . 2 8 2 e

6.C1.0 IMPLE90ENTATIcee WERIFICATIose .

s s s s s = = s s s s s s s ss s s ss == = =sz z= sa z = ss=s s z z =s s s s ss= == ss== s ss = = = = = s sz = = =u s = = == = s as s = =sz z z z = =s = = == === = s s == == = == = = s a z = =sas s,s = =,s s = = e s s.

-81 1 79 3 T3 tat s . .

e =====ss====sassazzz==zzassass=s===s==sssss=================saz===ssassass==sas=sazzzz====zzs=================ss====ss========s=sss

' s 1

_m _ - . _ ._. ~ . _ _ _ - _ . - ~ _ _ _-

. c SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS I

l For the period September 18 - October 2,1990 l i I

Imolementation Verification: 1 I

Verification of Action Plan 2.3, NPP Issues Based Planning was completed 10/4S0.

The schedules for Action Plans 2.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.5, 3.9, and 4.7 show all activities

)

I complete and implementation verifications are being conducted. ,

1 l

Effectiveness Verification:

u The 2nd Effectiveness Verification Assessment Report is expected to be issued the week of October 15. ,

PIP IP Revision 5 to the PIP-IP is underway. We have revised our planned submittal for this to October 29th,1990.

l i

(

?

I

l -

MASTER LISI DE ACTION PLANS ARQ &E MANAGERS 10/05/90 STATUS 6Et &E HQR PHONE TITLZ a 2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards a 2.2 A. Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan v 2.3 K. Tietjen 4120 NPP Issues Based Planning

• 2.4 Resource Allocation s v 2.5.1 M. Markowski . 4479 Cmtat Tracking System  !

2.5.2 B. Hann 6517 Reg Cmtat Mgmt Process-v 2.5.3 M. Markowski 4479 Perform. Object. Improvements i

• 3.1 Organizational Improvements a 3.2 M. Markowski 4479 Managing Org & Pgm Change v 3.3 H. Markowski- 4479 Leadership Conferences-

-3.4 M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork & Interfaces a 3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements 3.6.1 J. Doswell 3506 Site Integrated Scheduling 3.6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp -4427 Operations Improvement Plan v 3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning y 3.8 S. Davis 4612 System' Circles a 3.9 A. Edwards 6611' Quality Circles Program-v 4.1(old) 4.1(new) P. Pieringer 4060- Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QC Improvements v 4.3 A. Anuj e 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4 P. Pieringer 4060 Indep Safety Eval:

4.5 P. Katz 4160 Safety Assessment 4.6 S. Davis- 4612 Root Cause Analysis a 4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC v 4.8 M. Hiernicki # OSSRC (#159-5450) v 4.9 G. Campo 4360 Visiting Other Plants-4.10 J. Doswell 3506 ' Issues Mgmt System' y 5.1 L. Tucker 4724 Aux Sys Eng_ Unit-5.2.1 T. Pritchett 4968 Procedures Upgrade Program. j i 5.2.2 C. Dunkerly- 4854 Surveillance Test Program j v 5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 Post Maintenance Testing. i 5.3.1 K. Cellars -4828 Procurement Program Project 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387. ETD/MPS , _

5.3.3 C. Roy 3612 ' Technical Manual. Improvements-5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design BasisLConsolidation a 5.3.5 A. Vogel 4481- Records Management / Document Control l 5.3.6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources' Mgmt Project ,

• l 5.3.7 C. Burdsall 6906 Drawing Improvement Program v 5.4,1 J. Yoe 4499; System Engineer Training

( 5.4.2 T. Miranda 4709 -Minor Modifications l- 5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Centered Maintenance a- All scheduled activities complete, but not verified, v- Implementation Verification done. *- Not an " Action Plan," per se

-