ML20065G711

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Status as of 901002
ML20065G711
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  
Issue date: 10/05/1990
From: Russell L
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Boger B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9010230064
Download: ML20065G711 (14)
v • d • e


Text

,

l

. M, 3,-

P' BALTIMORE GAS AND.

ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER

  • P.0, BOX 1475 e BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203-1475 LEON B. RUSSELL WAh4GER l

NUCLE AR SAFETY & PLANhiNO DiPARTMENT h{Qk[

}

1 i

Document Control Desk US Nuclear Regulatory L0mmission 1

Washington, DC 20555 Attention:

Mr. Bruce R. Boger Mail Stop 14A2

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Performance Improvement Plan Update.

Enclosed pleas.: find a copy of the Performance Improvement Plan'Impicmentation Program (PIP-IP) Schedule Stutus as of October 2,1991.:To date,13: Action Plans have been verified as

-(

implemented, ( are pending verificatica, and 27 remain active. Attached is a brief synopsis of our.

activities. Also ettached is an updated '.ist of key Action Plan information, including verification.

status.

~

~

Please contact me (260-6680) or Ruh Olsoii (260-3771)ih'ould you have any questions.

6 Sincerely, 9

M r\\ '

(M.

Leon B. Russell

.i j

Attachments 2

1 l

7* * } "[ jj f' T 0\\

9 9010230064 901005

{ ' ('

PDR ADOCK 05000317 '

P PNV

"~

1 Mr. Bruce R. Boger October 5,1990 Page 2 I

l bec:

Messrs.

G. C. Creel (w/ synopsis)

C. H. Cruse (w/ synopsis)

R. E Denton (w/ synopsis) l R. P. Heibel (w/synopis)

I J. R. Lemons (w/synopis)

G. L Detter (w/all)

B. S. Montgomery (w/all)

R. C. L Olson (w/ synopsis)

R. F. Lewis (w/ synopsis) t J. S. Fuoto (w/ synopsis) 1 1

i i

l I

l l

I i

i I

i i

1

I CALVERT CLEFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT I

PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN l

SCHEDULE STATUS AS OF October 2,1990-1 4

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY i

~.

.4-

.aM-a

+

u

,s

-.,,,s-

,,ana

_m,,4s, ay4_g a

a w

,,a,.;

.,,_ a e-

,+

a,.,_a.,

p.,--_,.----,

g J

e t

l; e'

e i

g 1

l l

t s

CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES-t

')

e

{

6 e

^

-l j

l PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1

l CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS.

L OCTOBER 5, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE

'I TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR MILESTONES.

WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN l

NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE SO IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

l l

  • 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NEGATIVE

-39 DAYS.

5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS NEGATIVE

~16' DAYS

  • 2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MGMT PROJECT NEGATIVE. -13 DAYS 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS NEGATIVE. -10 DAYS 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE

~~4 DAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ANALYSES FOR THE OCTOBER 2, 1990 DATA,DATE:

  • 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS KEVIN

-39 DAYS PROCEDURE REVISIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF REPLACEMENT ITEMS TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGN BASIS INTEGRITY OF THE PLANT IS. CURRENTLY -39 DAYS NEGATIVE.'THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE FINAL. RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS FOR NEW AND EXISTING TECHNICAL PROCEDURES..

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

A RECOVERY PLAN FOR THIS ACTION PLAN.HAS BEEN' FORMULATED BY THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER. A CHANGE REQUEST WHICH REAFFIRMS GOALS-AND! OIk7ECTIVES AND RESOLVES SCHEDULE DEFICIENCIES WILL'BE INITIATED TO' REVISE THE EXISTING SCHEDULE COMPLETION DATE BY OCTOBER 18, 1990.

5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS BROWN, LARRY

-16 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS DAYS NEGATIVE...THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CONTPACT RESTRAINTS AND REPRIORITIZATION OF NUCLEIS COMPUTER TASK IMPLEMENTATION.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE' ACTION **

A RECOVERY PLAN HAS BEEN. INITIATED BY THE ACTION PLAN, MANAGER AND. PLAN-NING. A CHANGE REQUEST TO:RETARGET THIS ACTION PLAN WILL BE' INITIATED BY OCTOBER 18, 1990.;A FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULE REVIEW MEETING IS PLANNED FOR-OCTOBER 8, 1990 TO EXPEDITE THIS PROCESS.

2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MGMT PROJECT MANN, BRIAN-

-13 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS NOW -12 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE' NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE DELAY OF CONTRACT AWARD FOR TASK 2,'" LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEM". ONCE AGAIN, THE AWARD.0F CONTRACT CONTINUES TO:

BE THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR FOR THIS ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY.

INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ONJCRITICALLPATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.

i l

00 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

CURRENTLY THE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TASK 2 IS SCHEDULED TO COMMENCE ON OCTOBER 5, 1990. TASK 2 SCHEDULE WILL BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE AWARD OF CONTRACT DATE.

5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM

-10 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -10 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE BOTTLE NECK IN WORD PROCESSING. CURRENTLY THE FINAL TECHNICAL REVIEW IS SCHEDULED TO COMPLETE ON OCTOBER 5, 1990.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

N/A l

5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM SHERANKO, BOB

-4 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -4 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE REPRIORITIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST BY THE VP-NED TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY l

PROCEDURES IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THIS ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE IS CURRENTLY BEING REVISED TO INCORPORATE AND ACCOMODATE THE COMMITMENT TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES APPRO-VED AND ISSUED BY-DECEMBER 31, 1990, WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE PRESENT SCHEDULE.

?

APPENDIX A I

t EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT LEGEND:

1

% COMPLETE PIP BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY RELATED TO COMPLETION OF THE ACTION PLAN OR MILESTONES.

l

% COMPLETE ALL BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES l

INCLUDING ONGOING AS A RESULT OF PIP ACTIVITIES OR.

MILESTONES.

I TOTAL FLOAT THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT STATUS.

NEGATIVE VALUES - INDICATE ONE OR MORE OF THE -

l MILESTONE IS LATE BY THE INDICATED.

NUMBER OF WORKDAYS.

t L

POSITIVE VALUES -

INDICATE THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF l

SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OFTHE ACTIVITIES AND THE MILESTONE MILESTONES.

ZERO VALUE -

INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE AND

- ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED ON r

TIME TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE.

IMPLE VERIF COMPLETE "YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OFTHE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.

" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OFTHEIMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE

~. ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED.

ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION.

"N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO '

IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.

't

.a

4 I

I PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ALL IMPLEMENT.

' DATA DATE 20CI9e EMECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT TOTAL

% COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL MILESTONES VERIFICT*90 SUN DATE 830CT90 1931HR$

. ACT PLAN e ~

/

T I'T L E PLAN MANAGER MANHOURS PIP / ALL DATE DATE FLOAT COMPLETE COMPLE1E 1

(

HAgeAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS 2.02.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MARKONSKI,etINE 1958 100 les 13JUL89 9AUG9e e

VES

~2.e2.2 CoseRJNICATIONS PLAge DONOseOE, Ages 19950 les les 12JAge89 SeMAR9e e

VES 2.03.s tePP ISSUES BASED PLAseIIIeG TIETJE98, KEst 775 99 99 SJUNe9 SNOV98 e

VES 2.05.1 CofWIITNENT TRACKIteG SYSTEM MARKONSKI, MIKE 27u les les 21APR89 SJust99 e

VES VES 87268 1

1 letAR99 6000V92

-15 2.C5.2 REGULATORY CosetITNEttT egeGeseT PROCES MAese, BRI Age MARKONSKI, MIKE N/A lee les 8JA9896 12APR9e e

VES VES 2.C5.3 ACCOUptTABILITY ISEPROWEteENTS-ORGANIZATIOseAL DVIIAMICS IMPROUEMEWYS s a s s==s s s======= sa ss s ssss ss s s s s s s ss s s s = = = = s s = = = = s s s s== =

1120 les les 26JUse89 21SEP99 e

VES 3.82.0 MAseACites ORGANIZATIONAL 8 PGet CHAgeG MARKONSKI, MIKE 3.05.8 LEADERSIIIP CoseFEREleCES MARK 00eSKI, MIKE 516 les les 12Juge89 2escove9 e

VES VES 3.04.8 TEAM 900RK 8 INTEseFACES MARKeefSKI, MIKE 1956 82-82 29JUL89 2eMAR91 e

3.05.0 PROJECT stateAGEMEleT ZUMesALT, ERIC 2610 100 100 leJJL89 12SEP9e e

VES i

3.06.e DAILY a'0UTAGE tIORK C0esTROL T980RP, Joest 4822 les les 22Juse89 26FEB99 e

N/A N/A l

3.01.1 SITE INTEGRATED ScleEDULIteG' DOSesELL, JOE 14529 4e 4e leJUL89 6SEP91 e

s a 299 88' 88 '1FEB89 31DEC99 e

f L

stAYDEst, JOHN s

4

- 3.96.2 MAINTEteAseCE NORK CONTROL 3.C6.3 OPERATICIe5 IDEPROWE9EENT PLAN TesORP, Joest 12314 26. 21 1FEB89 7APR95 e

3.07.8 ENGI9eEERIIIG PLAgetIgeG 9tARIIIARI, DAN 5568 let les 3JAle89 29 JAM 98 e

VES VES

' 3.08.e SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEWE-4899 lee. les 280eov88. 9 MAR 99 8

VES VES 3.09.9 GUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDesARDS, Aset.

13950 -les

.37 148t4989 2JAst92 e

VES i

--ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROUEMEleTS ss=======ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss=ss===sssssss==sssssssss====sss===sassassamm PIERIssGER, PAUL N/A N/A 90/A.31JUL89 31JUL89 8

YES YES 4.6e.8 POEAC

. 4.01.1 OPERATIteG EXPERIEseCE REVIEN PIERIOGGER, PAUL 8424 74 74 15JAfe99 3SEP91 e

200ceEY, KEN M280 86 82 IJUN89 21DEC99 e

4.C2.0 GC It' PROVE 9ENTS 4.05.e 94 INTER 9eAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS AfeUJE, Asea

.11496 les les 1990AV89 2JAfe9e e

VES YES 27852 79 80 15Juge88 200EC99 e

.4.C5.8 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE -

2484 97 97 estAYS9 28FE391 e

. i 4.04.0 IteEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATIces UstIT 'PIERIIIGER, PAUL

'4.06.0 WOOT CAUSE.AseALYSIS IMPROVE 9 TENTS' DAVIS, STEVE-2560s 99 99 IJUeOS8 11FES91 e

CARROLL, J0est 1570 10e 99 1Juge89 90CT9J e

YES I

MIEteeIKI, MIME 1229 let les 2eJAsuS9 25JAN#4 e

' YES VES

.4.C7.8 POSRC 4.69.0 WISITItes OTetER PLAseTS.

CAMPO, GENE' 13M ' lee les 3JUL89 29JUN98 8

YES YES 4.08.8 OSSRC -

i DOSesELL, JOE 14688 18 18-19tAV98 194UG91 e

4.10.0 ISSUES geannacsggENT SYSTEMACTIVITY COIITROL IstPROWEteENTS ss==ss assa ss as sssssssssssssss sansassa ssssssssssssssssssssssssmas l

N/A N/A N/A 5JUL89 5JUL89 e

YES YES l

5.01.e AURILIARY SYSTEsts EDIGIseEERIteG UseIT / TUCKER, LARRY 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAtt '

PRITCHETT, T000 665983 99 37 1FEB89 31DEC92 e

5.02.2 $URVEILLAgeCE TEST PROGRAM DUNKERLY, CNARLIE 62497 83 12 IJUIIS9 25DEC92 e

HAYDEN, J0006 '

3988 les lee 1FEB89 150CY89 e

VES YES 5.02.3 POST MAINTENAsetE TESTING D.03.1 PitoCUREstEssi PROGRAst PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIts 49258 87 87 SSEPe9 14DEC99

-39 i

5.05.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PtteG SYS BeeteN, LARRY

'74588 78 55 190AR89 ' 21JUpp91

- f '6

(-~

5.93.5 TECtetICAL MA98UAL IMPRowEIWesTS ROY, T000 M18 99 99 29FES88 60eow99 '

-le 22SEP94

-15 5.05.4 DESIGee BASIS CansuM IDATIOpt PERES, PAUL 179352 99

'le 1 star 88~ le0CT96 e

5.05.5 RECORDS geannaassgEteT/ DOCUMENT CopeTROL V0 GEL, Asse '

^ 5FES9e 4201.

99 99

'13346 -

6e 6e IFE39e 9AUG91 e

I 5.C3.6 IteFORMATIces RESOURCE 880G098T PROJECT SARTM, AL l

j -

5.83.7 DRAMIteG IMPROWE9EENT PROJECT SURDSALL, G.

N/A st/A - N/A e.

_ YES YES 5.04.1 SYSTEM EDIGIIIEER TRAINIstG -

YOE, JIM -

13802.

lee ' les> 58tAY89 4JAstte e

MIRAseA, TONY

~ 7748.

71 "

~71-21AUG89 4 JAM 91 0

5.04.2 MIseOR st0DIFICATIcess

~

GREE 90E, KEN.

14789 7e 71 3esEP88 15AUG91 e

~5.04.3 RELIABILITY CENTERED teAINTEleasetE P IP VERIF ICAT ION PROCESSES a s a s s = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = s = = = = = = =

  • s = = = = = = = = = s s = = = = = = = = = s s s = = = = s = = = = =

6.81.0 PIP 19tPLEgeENTATICII VERIFICATI0pt PMIFER, JERRY 898 ~

34 31 7JUL89 275EP91 e

4>.e5.0 PIP EFFECTIVEleESS VERIFICATI0It PteIFER, JERRY 6648 36 36 SFES9e 290C191 e

l 1422132 75 41 29FEB88 22SEP94

-39 T3TALS

-.;........a.............

[

/

_~. C._

- ~ -

~

.x 2,ma-a.

m A

4 m

4 0.

6 4

e MILESTONE OVERVIEW-C 4

l 1

i 1

i

.)

i

^

. +

i STATUS AS OF OCTOBER 2,1990 MILE 5T0NE OVERVIEW TOTAL NUMBER SCHEDULED VS ACTUAL e SCHEDULED

'r ACTION PLAN e / D E S C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER MILESTONES COMPLETE COMPLETE IPREVIOUS 2 WKS) MENT 2 WKS MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS====================s================================================================================

2.82.1 PERFORMANCE STA9 WARDS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2

2 COMPLETE l

2.C2.2 C0petUMICATIONS PLAN DON 0000E, Asse 11 11 COMPLETE i

2.03.0 NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 6

6 COMPLETE l

2.05.1 CopetITNENT TRACKING SYSTEM ptARK0WSKI, MIKE 4

4 COMPLETE 2.85.2 REGULATORY CosetITMENT MeeGDesi PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 16 2

2/1 1

t l

2.C5.5 ACCOUNTABILITY IftPROWEMENTS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2

2 COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DY9eAftICS IMPROVEMENTS================================================================================================ -

I 3.02.e MAseAGIteG ORGANIZATIOte & PGet CleAteGE 9tARK0WSKI, MIKE 3

3 1/1 COMPLETE 3.05.0 LEADERSHIP COpeFEREfeCES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 2

2 COMPLETE 3.04.0 TEAMeIORK & INTERFACES-MARKONSKI, MIKE 5

3 e/e e

3.65.s PROJECT MANAGEstENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 9

9 e/0 e

l 3.C6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCleEDULING DOSesELL, JOE 14 3

0/e e

3.06.2 MAINTENAteCE se0RK CopeTROL

-- etAYDEN, J0000 5

4 1/1 e

3.06.5 OPERATIoses IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

T980RP, JOHN 5

1 e/e e

3.07.0 EpeGIteEERI98G PLAestiseG MARIMARI, DAN 4

4 COMPLETE

.j 3.e8.8 SYSTEtt CIRCLES

' DAVIS, STEVE 6

6 COMPLETE e

.3.09.8 guALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EgetARDS, AMBe 8

8 1/1 COMPLETE t.SSESSMENT CAPASILITY IMPROVEMENTS==================================================================================================

N/A POEAC PIERIIeGER, PAUL 4

4 C00tPLETE 4.81.1 OPERATING EMPERIEleCE REVIEW PIERIteGER, PAUL 4

e e/8 e

s 4.82.0 GC IMPROVEftENTS RosesEY, KEN

.8 5

e/e e

i 4.05.8 OA INTERIeAL ASSESSMENT 19tPROWEMENTS AleUJE, Asea 9

9 CostPLETE

'Ii 4.04.0 IteDEPEleDENT SAFETY EVALUATIO90 PIERIteGER, PAUL 7

1 e/e e

4.C5.0 SAFETY ASSESSMEleT KATZ, PETE le 8

9/e e

4.06.e ROOT CAUSE A90ALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE 5

4 e/e e

4.C7.0 POSRC.

CARROLL, JOHN 5

5 COMPLETE 4.C8.8 OSSRC MIERNICKI, MIME 6

6 COMPLETE I

-4.09.0 VISITIteG OTitER PLANTS

' CAMPO, GEteE 5

5 COMPLETE 4.1s.8 ISSUES MAseAGEttENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE 25 3

e/e e

ACTIVITY CopeTROL IMPROWEMENTS===53==================================================================================================

j' 5.31.0 AUMILIARY SYSTEtts EteGIIEEERING UseIT TUCKER, LARRY 2

2 C00tPLE TE

5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAlt LATNAM, DAN 15 12 0/e e

' 5.C2.2'SURVEILLAseCE TEST PROGRAM DusetERLY, CMARLIE 11 ~

le e/e e

5.02.3 POST MAINTEleaseCE TESTItes NAYDEN, JOHN 4

4 COMPLETE 5.c3.1 PROCURE 90E9ef PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 9

3 2/0 1

5.C3.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /MAINT PLeeG SYS BR0eRe, LARRY.

.le' 6

1/e e

5.03.3 TECeseICAL MateUAL IMPROWEMENTS.

.ROY, TOM le 9

e/e e

S.C3.4 DESIGN BASIS C00eSOLIDATICBI PERKS, PAUL 10 5

e/e e

' 5.83.5 RECORDS ItA8eAGEMENT/ DOCUMENT CONTROL WOGEL, Aged 3'

2 e/e g

5.05.619eFOR9tATIOfe RESOURCE teeGesef PROJECT SARTH, AL '

4' e

e/e g

5.03.7 DRANIteG IMPtowEMENT PROJECT-SURSSALL, G.

e e

e/e e

'4 4

COMPLETE 5.e4.1 SYSTEM E90GIeqEER TRAINIleG YOE, J1M 12 7

2/2 e

5.e4.2 Mit00R MODIFICATI000$

MIRAfSA, TONY 5.04.3 NELIABILITY CENTER MAINTE90AleCE GREEleE, KEN

'le 5

8/e

'e

===========================================================s============================================================
sTCTALS, 294 189 e64%9 le / 6 3
========================================================================================================================

TOTAL VERIF.

98 UMBER DUE NUMBER ACTIOle PLAN 5 / D E S C R I P T I O N.

SCHEDULED TO START IM '_

COMPLETE I

E IteCL.REVERIF l.

OCTOBER 4 ACTION PLANS 9 PIP VERIFICATI000 PROCESSES 6.1.s IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION OVERVIEW PHIFER, JERRY 41 2

'12 i

6.3.0 PIP EFFECTIVE 9eESS VERIFICATION

.PHIFER, JERRY 4

e 1 0F 4 SLICE VERIF. COMPLETE I

c. -

~-

a

,_mg_

a o

.n.-

-._us s

w---

m- - -

g e

4

. i e

e 4

4 9

e CHANGE CONTROL.

l 1

OVERVIEW 1

)

J t

5 t

l-

' ~

^

r-M=

w-

  1. ._y,

STATUS AS OF OCTOBER 2, 1990 CHANGE C 0 se T R 0 L 0VERVIEW

~

TOTAL CHANGE CHANGE REQUESTS CHANGE REQUESTS DISAPPROVED i

ACTION PLAN e / D E $ C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER REQUESTS WRITTEM AWAITING APPROVAL APPV/ INCORPORATED CHANGE REQUESTS i

MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROWEMENTS 2.82.1 PERFORMANCE STAteAROS MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 5

e 5

e 2.82.2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAtt DONONOE, ANN 5

e 3

8

{

2.85.0 MPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 3

4 5

e t

2.e5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARK 0WSKI, MIKE 1

0 1

e t

2.e5.2 WEGULATORY C0eseITMENT teeGesef PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 2

e 2

e i

2.C5.5 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE IMPR0wE9EENTS MARK 0wSKI, MIKE 1

8 1

e l

l ORG ANIZA TIONAL DYleAstICS IMPROVEMEteTS s u s s s = = s s = = = = s s s s s s s ss s = = === = = = ===== = = = = = = = ss s = = = s = = s s s== = = s s = s e s s s ss s= = = = = s a s s = = = = s s = = s a s s = =

3.02.0 MAseAGIssG ORGAteIZATION S PGet CHAssGE MARK 0wSKI, MIKE S

e e

e 5.e5.8 LEADERSHIP C000FEREpeCES MARK 0NSEI, MINE 1

e 1

8

-5.04.0 TEAMNOR9C S IteTERFACES MARK 0WSKI, MIKE; 2

e 2

e

.5.65.e PROJECT ttANAGEffENT ZUMNALY, ERIC 5'

8 5

e i

5.06.9 DAILY E OUTAGE teORet CoseTROL THORP, JOHet.

I e

1 e

5.05.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCitEDULIses DOSNELL, JOE 5

0 5

e 5.85.2 MAINTEMAseCE 100Rst CostTROL HAYDEst, Joies 1

e I

e 5.05.5 OPERATIcee$ ItePROUEMENT PLAN -

Tet0RP, J0000 2

e 2

e 5.07.0 EteGIteEERIteG PLAIS0198G MARIteARI, DAM 1

0 1

8

[

5.08.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEVE 8

e e

e 5.09.0 gUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDesARDS, Asse 1

e 1

e l

l ASSESSMENT CAPASILITY IMPROUE9EENTS====ss============ssssss===========================================================sms=====sss==

i C*./ A POEAC

-PIERIsIGER, PAUL e

e e

e 4.01.1 OPERATIIIS EXPERIEteCE REVIEN PIERIIIGER, PAUL 2

e' 2

e 4.02.8 GC IMPROWEMENTS RosesEY, EEN 5

1 4

e 4.05.s OA INTEResAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVE 9EENTS AIIUJE, A00A 8

e e

e 4.04.0 19eDEPEteDENT SAFETY EVALUATIose -

' PIERIstGER, PAut.

1, e

1 e

4.C5.e SAFETY ASSES $ STENT KATZ, PETE 1

9 I

e 4.06.e ROOT CAUSE AseALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE 1

e I

e 4.07.e POSRC CARROLL, J000N 2

e 2

e 4.08.8 OSSRC MIEReeICKI, MIKE e

e e

e 4.07.0 VISITIteG OTieER PLAseTS CAMPO, GEseE 5

8 5

e 4.10.9 ISSUES MAseAGEMENT SYSTEM DOSesELL, JOE 5

e 5

e

' AC T IVI TY Coset ROL IMPROWEMENT S s s = = = = = = s = = = = = = = = = = = = s s = = = = = = === = s = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = s : s = = = = = =

5.01.0 AUKILIARY SYSTEtts EssGIteEERiteG UseIT TUCKER, LARRY e

e e

e 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM LAfteAM, DAse 5

e 5

e 5.02.2 SURwEILLAsetE TEST PROGRAtt

. DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 4

e 4

e i

l 5.02.5 POST ftAINTEteAseCE TESTIIIS HAYDEN, Joest e

e e

e 5.05.1 PROCUREttENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIts 5

e 5

e 5.05.2 EGUIPteENT DATABASE /MAINT PLteG SYS.

BReese, LARRY.

5 e

5 e

5.05.5 TECtes! CAL MAteUAL ItertowEMENTS

. ROY, Test e

e e

e f

5.05.4 DESIGet BASIS CONSOLIDATIcss

PERKS, PAUL.

2 9

1 3

5.05.5 RECORDS ttAseAGElefteT/DoctRIENT CONTROL WOGEL, 4000 2

e 2

e 2 5.G5.6 IseFORftATIOle RESOURCE 9eeGeesi PROJECT BARTH, AL -

1 e

1 e

5.05.7 DRAWIteG ItertowEteEleT PROJECT SURSSALL, G.

e e

e e

J5.04.1 SYSTEM EteGIseEER TRAINIteG YOE, JItt 2

e 2

e 5.04.2 Mite 0R IIODIFICATIose$

'MIRANDA, 1000Y 4

e 4

e 1

5.e4.5 RELIABILITY CEteTER MAINTEteaseCE' GREEleE, KEN 3

e 5

e PteIFER, JERRY

. 2 8

2 e

6.C1.0 IMPLE90ENTATIcee WERIFICATIose s s s s s = = s s s s s s s ss s s ss== = =sz z= sa z = ss=s s z z =s s s s ss=== ss== s ss = = = = = s sz = = =u s = === = s as s = =sz z z z = =s = ====== = s s==== === = = s a z = =sas s,s = =,s s = = e s s.

-81 1

79 3

T3 tat s.

=====ss====sassazzz==zzassass=s===s==sssss=================saz===ssassass==sas=sazzzz====zzs=================ss====ss========s=sss e

s 1

_m

~

~ _ _

c SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS I

For the period September 18 - October 2,1990 l

i Imolementation Verification:

I Verification of Action Plan 2.3, NPP Issues Based Planning was completed 10/4S0.

The schedules for Action Plans 2.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.5, 3.9, and 4.7 show all activities complete and implementation verifications are being conducted.

Effectiveness Verification:

u The 2nd Effectiveness Verification Assessment Report is expected to be issued the week of October 15.

PIP IP Revision 5 to the PIP-IP is underway. We have revised our planned submittal for this to October 29th,1990.

l i

(

?

I

l MASTER LISI DE ACTION PLANS ARQ &E MANAGERS 10/05/90 STATUS 6Et

&E HQR PHONE TITLZ a

2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards a

2.2 A. Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan v

2.3 K. Tietjen 4120 NPP Issues Based Planning 2.4 Resource Allocation s

v 2.5.1 M. Markowski. 4479 Cmtat Tracking System 2.5.2 B. Hann 6517 Reg Cmtat Mgmt Process-v 2.5.3 M. Markowski 4479 Perform. Object. Improvements i

3.1 Organizational Improvements a

3.2 M. Markowski 4479 Managing Org & Pgm Change v

3.3 H. Markowski-4479 Leadership Conferences-

-3.4 M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork & Interfaces a

3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements 3.6.1 J. Doswell 3506 Site Integrated Scheduling 3.6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp

-4427 Operations Improvement Plan v

3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning y

3.8 S. Davis 4612 System' Circles a

3.9 A. Edwards 6611' Quality Circles Program-v 4.1(old) 4.1(new)

P. Pieringer 4060- Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QC Improvements v

4.3 A. Anuj e 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4 P. Pieringer 4060 Indep Safety Eval:

4.5 P. Katz 4160 Safety Assessment 4.6 S. Davis-4612 Root Cause Analysis a

4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC v

4.8 M. Hiernicki OSSRC (#159-5450) v 4.9 G. Campo 4360 Visiting Other Plants-4.10 J. Doswell 3506 ' Issues Mgmt System' y

5.1 L. Tucker 4724 Aux Sys Eng_ Unit-5.2.1 T. Pritchett 4968 Procedures Upgrade Program.

j i

5.2.2 C. Dunkerly-4854 Surveillance Test Program j

v 5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 Post Maintenance Testing.

i 5.3.1 K. Cellars

-4828 Procurement Program Project 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387. ETD/MPS 5.3.3 C. Roy 3612 ' Technical Manual. Improvements-5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design BasisLConsolidation a

5.3.5 A. Vogel 4481-Records Management / Document Control l

5.3.6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources' Mgmt Project,

l 5.3.7 C. Burdsall 6906 Drawing Improvement Program v

5.4,1 J. Yoe 4499; System Engineer Training

(

5.4.2 T. Miranda 4709 -Minor Modifications l-5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Centered Maintenance a-All scheduled activities complete, but not verified, v-Implementation Verification done.

  • - Not an " Action Plan," per se

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20065G711&oldid=4438816"