ML20063K955: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:.- | ||
e T . ' | |||
Docket Nos. 50-528/529/530 50.55(e) Report qn , | |||
6 u I | |||
a N NE@ fEME21Td\73@E@ MMM STA. 3003 p.o. sox mises - psoenix, ARIZONA 8503s I' August 19, 1982 - | |||
] ;, | |||
.. hj ANPP-21652-GHD/BSK/ g 3> 103 | |||
-, ' c., . | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3 N | |||
Region V Creekside Oaks Office Park & | |||
'~ | |||
1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief Reactor Construction Projects Branch | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Interim Report, Revision 1 - DER 82-17 A 50.55(e) Potentially Reportable Deficiency Relating to Bechtel Supplier Document Register Errors May Allow Outdated C.E. Procedures to be Used for Unit 1 Instrument Calibration. | |||
File: 82-019-026 D.4.33.2 | |||
==Reference:== | |||
(A) Telephone Conversation between T. Bishop and G. Duckworth on April 21, 1982 (B) ANPP-21019 dated May 21, 1982 (Interim Report) | |||
==Dear Sir:== | |||
The NRC was notified of a potentially reportable deficiency in Reference (A) and an Interim Report was transmitted by Reference (B) . | |||
At that time, it was estimated that a Final Report would be available by August 20, 1982. | |||
; Due to the extensive investigation and evaluation required, a revised Interim Report is attached. It is now expected that this information will be finalized by October 20, 1982, at which time a complete report will be submitted. | |||
Very truly yours, EFM ALLL E. E. Van Brunt, Jr. | |||
APS Vice President 8209080562 820819 Nuclear Projects DRADOCK05000y ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/GHD:db-Enclosure cc: See Attached Page 2 | |||
]} | |||
i Q/ | |||
~ | |||
U. S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 19, 1982 Attention: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief ANPP-21652-GHD/BSK Page 2 cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory . Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 T. G. Woods, Jr. | |||
J. A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht- | |||
:G. C. Andognini A. C. Rogers B. S. Kuplan W. E. Ide J.'Vorees J. A. Brand A. C. Gehr W. J. Stubblefield W. C. Bingham R. L. Patterson | |||
:R. W. Welcher R. M. Grant D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen C. A. Fiorelli Lynne Bernabei, Esq. | |||
Harmon & Weiss 4 | |||
1725 "I" Street, NW ' . | |||
Suite 506 Washington, D. C. 20006 R. L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 4 | |||
-REVISION 1-INTERIM REPORT - DER 82-17 POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS) | |||
T PVNGS UNIT 1 | |||
: l. POTENTIAL PROBLEM , | |||
i Arizona Public Service Company quality assurance activity found that , | |||
Combustion Engineering supplied documents for instrumentation calibration ~! | |||
are not always updated in the Bechtel Supplier Document Register because . | |||
of the following conditions: | |||
: a. The original submittal in the SDR was logged without the dashes in i the C-E drawing number, while the resubmittal was logged with the . | |||
dashes in the CE number. i i | |||
: b. Some of the subsequent revisions submitted by C-E against the Instrument Class document (14273-ICE-0005 50) were not recognized as such by Bechtel and were given a different control number. , | |||
: c. Combustion Engineering may not have provided Bechtel with all the latest revisions of one or more required documents due to oversight. | |||
The above condition may have. caused some C-E supplied instruments to be miscalibrated; however, Bechtel Construction has coordinated this activity i directly with the C-E representatives at the jobsite. | |||
II. APPROACH TO AND STATUS OF PROPOSED RESOLUTION r Bechtel has transmitted the Supplier Document Register to C-E for review. | |||
This review will aid in determining which documents are not correctly i statused for calibration purposes in the register. Once this information , | |||
is known, an evaluation of the condition can be made and any necessary , | |||
rework will be identified. | |||
Bechtel has received the data from the first review by C-E. The evaluation of this partial package indicates that no omissions or duplications which , | |||
could potentially impact design or construction htve'co far been found. I I | |||
III. PROJECTED COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND SUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL REPORT Evaluation of this condition and submittal of the Final Report is 3 forecast to be completed by.0ctober 20, 1982. ; | |||
b e}} | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 31 March 2020
| ML20063K955 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 08/19/1982 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Bishop T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, ANPP-21652-GHD, DER-82-17, NUDOCS 8209080562 | |
| Download: ML20063K955 (3) | |
Text
.-
e T . '
Docket Nos. 50-528/529/530 50.55(e) Report qn ,
6 u I
a N NE@ fEME21Td\73@E@ MMM STA. 3003 p.o. sox mises - psoenix, ARIZONA 8503s I' August 19, 1982 -
] ;,
.. hj ANPP-21652-GHD/BSK/ g 3> 103
-, ' c., .
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3 N
Region V Creekside Oaks Office Park &
'~
1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief Reactor Construction Projects Branch
Subject:
Interim Report, Revision 1 - DER 82-17 A 50.55(e) Potentially Reportable Deficiency Relating to Bechtel Supplier Document Register Errors May Allow Outdated C.E. Procedures to be Used for Unit 1 Instrument Calibration.
File: 82-019-026 D.4.33.2
Reference:
(A) Telephone Conversation between T. Bishop and G. Duckworth on April 21, 1982 (B) ANPP-21019 dated May 21, 1982 (Interim Report)
Dear Sir:
The NRC was notified of a potentially reportable deficiency in Reference (A) and an Interim Report was transmitted by Reference (B) .
At that time, it was estimated that a Final Report would be available by August 20, 1982.
- Due to the extensive investigation and evaluation required, a revised Interim Report is attached. It is now expected that this information will be finalized by October 20, 1982, at which time a complete report will be submitted.
Very truly yours, EFM ALLL E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
APS Vice President 8209080562 820819 Nuclear Projects DRADOCK05000y ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/GHD:db-Enclosure cc: See Attached Page 2
]}
i Q/
~
U. S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 19, 1982 Attention: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Chief ANPP-21652-GHD/BSK Page 2 cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory . Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 T. G. Woods, Jr.
J. A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht-
- G. C. Andognini A. C. Rogers B. S. Kuplan W. E. Ide J.'Vorees J. A. Brand A. C. Gehr W. J. Stubblefield W. C. Bingham R. L. Patterson
- R. W. Welcher R. M. Grant D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen C. A. Fiorelli Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
Harmon & Weiss 4
1725 "I" Street, NW ' .
Suite 506 Washington, D. C. 20006 R. L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 4
-REVISION 1-INTERIM REPORT - DER 82-17 POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS)
T PVNGS UNIT 1
- l. POTENTIAL PROBLEM ,
i Arizona Public Service Company quality assurance activity found that ,
Combustion Engineering supplied documents for instrumentation calibration ~!
are not always updated in the Bechtel Supplier Document Register because .
of the following conditions:
- a. The original submittal in the SDR was logged without the dashes in i the C-E drawing number, while the resubmittal was logged with the .
dashes in the CE number. i i
- b. Some of the subsequent revisions submitted by C-E against the Instrument Class document (14273-ICE-0005 50) were not recognized as such by Bechtel and were given a different control number. ,
- c. Combustion Engineering may not have provided Bechtel with all the latest revisions of one or more required documents due to oversight.
The above condition may have. caused some C-E supplied instruments to be miscalibrated; however, Bechtel Construction has coordinated this activity i directly with the C-E representatives at the jobsite.
II. APPROACH TO AND STATUS OF PROPOSED RESOLUTION r Bechtel has transmitted the Supplier Document Register to C-E for review.
This review will aid in determining which documents are not correctly i statused for calibration purposes in the register. Once this information ,
is known, an evaluation of the condition can be made and any necessary ,
rework will be identified.
Bechtel has received the data from the first review by C-E. The evaluation of this partial package indicates that no omissions or duplications which ,
could potentially impact design or construction htve'co far been found. I I
III. PROJECTED COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND SUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL REPORT Evaluation of this condition and submittal of the Final Report is 3 forecast to be completed by.0ctober 20, 1982. ;
b e