ML20005A028: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. . - . | {{#Wiki_filter:.. -. | ||
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION | FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 2M26 IN REf%Y REFER TO: | ||
WASHINGTON 2M26 IN REf%Y REFER TO: | June 18, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Acting Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cannission Washington, D.C. | ||
June 18, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Acting Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cannission Washington, D.C. 20555 | 20555 | ||
==Dear Mr. Miraglia:== | ==Dear Mr. Miraglia:== | ||
I am replying to your request of May 8, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draf t Environmental Impact Statement for the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3. | |||
I am replying to your request of May 8, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draf t Environmental Impact Statement for the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3. This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based. | This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based. | ||
This staf f concentrates its review of other agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken. | This staf f concentrates its review of other agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action. | ||
It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken. | |||
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement. | Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement. | ||
l Sincerely, | l Sincerely, | ||
'M ac M. Heinemann Advisor on Environmental Quality l | |||
L Q | |||
Goo? | i Goo? | ||
)4 | |||
k 8106290 R 13 | /C) k 8106290 R 13 | ||
;}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:17, 23 December 2024
| ML20005A028 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1981 |
| From: | Heinemann J FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| To: | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106290262 | |
| Download: ML20005A028 (1) | |
Text
.. -.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 2M26 IN REf%Y REFER TO:
June 18, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Miraglia Acting Chief, Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cannission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Miraglia:
I am replying to your request of May 8, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draf t Environmental Impact Statement for the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3.
This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
This staf f concentrates its review of other agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action.
It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
l Sincerely,
'M ac M. Heinemann Advisor on Environmental Quality l
L Q
i Goo?
)4
/C) k 8106290 R 13