ML12355A059

SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 11

ML12355A059
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Stewart W Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2268 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A059 (94)

Text

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: YE] NZ UT'-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area' TORUS (BAY 1)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ductingappear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There is a support for a conduit feeding cable to lights in Bay 1 which is not attached to the conduit (see photograph 1). The southern end of the conduit is not screwed into the condulet which continues to the light (see photograph 2). The weight of the conduit is small and will not cut the cable under its self weight and vertical seismic accelerations are low at this elevation. However, the conduit support should be secured to support the conduit and the condult is to be properly attached to ensure long term functionality of the lights. CR 525296 has been written to resolve this issue.

A conduit which starts from the junction box servicing I T48-NOO9A goes to the west wall and continues south. There is one support (CS-25-80) in Bay 1 and another (CS-25-79) on the north end of Bay 16 (just beyond Bay 1) that are not supported by the struts on the wall (see photographs 3 and 4). The conduit is resting on the support intended to only support the light (see photograph 5). The weight of the conduit is small and will not adversely affect the support for the light. However, the conduit will move laterally during a seismic event as it is unsupported for approximately 25 feet. The conduit is judged to provide adequate protection to the cable, during impact with the wall.

CR 525303 has been written to support the conduit on the struts as intended.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y0 N[-] UC] N/AE]

YER NEI UE] N/Ar1 YEI] N UIE] N/AE]

YZ NEI UE] N/AE1 1 If the room in whichithe SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 118 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y[-] NE U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area, TORUS (BAY 1)

.5. Does it appear that the area is. free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U'- N/AEI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the. area is free.of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YS. NC UEI N/AO YO NEI UD N/AD

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions.of the equipment, in the area?

Yl NEI U-1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcaa Date: 09/27/2012 Patrick Kellv 09/27/2012 Page 119 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: Yfl NO U[:]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area' TORUS (BAY 1)

Photographs 1: Conduit Not Supported at Hook (Torus 87' Bay 1)

Page 120 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 7 2: Conduit for Lights Detached From Condulet (Toms 87' Bay 1)

Page 121 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

)f 7 3: Conduit From IT48-NO09A JB Unsupported (Toms 87' Bay 1)

Page 122 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 7 4: Conduit From 1T48-NO09A JB Unsupported (Torus 87' Bay 16)

Page 123 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 7 of 7 5: Conduit From IT48-NO09A IB Resting on Light Support (Torus 87' Bay 1)

Page 124 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y[Z NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 114 Room, Area1 Unit 1 NE Diagonal Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist.may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be Used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse, seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YZ NEI UEI N/AE

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NO UE" N/A[J degraded conditions?

There is mild surface oxidation on the bolts for several conduit supports on the ceiling. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the bolts are not degraded Therefore, judged not to be a concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g,, condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NfI UEI N/AD

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NE) Ui' N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (eg., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 125 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF-] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El, 114 Room, Area1 Unit 1 NE Diagonal

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could, cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear-that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the aria?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YN NEI Ui N/AEl YZ NEI UF" N/AE-YM NEI UC-N/AD

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that co uld Y

N-- U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There are three Unistrut supports for a conduit attached to the IE1I1-F068B RHR Heat Exchanger Discharge Valve that are ihstalledwith an anchor bolt at the top of the support and no other anchors. The supported conduit is light and the supports are only designed to resist vertical loads. The existing anchor bolt is capable of resisting the tension and bending loads on the supports from gravity loads. The vertical seismic loads' at this, elevation will not exceed 1.0, so upwards vertical loads willnot experienced by the supports. It appears that the supports are installed as designed and that the design is adequate.

Therefore, there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/26/2012 Jeff Horton 09/26/2012 Page 126 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI u-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 114 Room, Area' Unit 1 NE Diagonal Photographs Figure 1 - Mild Oxidation on Bolts (Unit I NE Diagonal)

Page 127 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 - Two Supports with One Anchor Bolt (Unit I NE Diagonal)

Page 128 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - One Support with One Anchor Bolt (Unit 1 NE Diagonal)

Page 129 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 Between Grids R2-R5 and RJ-RL Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NE U-N/AE

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y9 NE] UCI N/A[]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and, fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptablelimits)?

YN NE UD1 N/Afl

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NEI U'

N/A' interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 130 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NE] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area' Between Grids R2-R5 and RJ-RL_

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that couldcause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YN NEI U-] N/AE]

YO, NE Ut] N/Ar-YED NEI Ut] N/AO

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0K NEI UEr adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date: 9/10/2012 Wesley Wifllfias, 9/10/2012 Page 131 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN ND-U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 Between Grids R2-R5 and RJ-RL Photographs None.

Page 132 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NF] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area' 2R103 Instructions for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YO NEI UEI.N/A[l

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN N[n U-1 N/Al]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y0 NEI Ul-N/Al]

YN NE U[:] N/Al]

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should bebased on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 133 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[I NM U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area1 2R103

5. Does it appear that the areais free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could' cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the areais free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Two foreign objects are stored on the channel support for transformer 1RI 1-S029 (see photograph 1). These objects are not located over any equipment and are not a seismic concern.

YZ NE U[-I N/AF YZ NEI. UI-N/A[]

YO NI3 UE-N/A-I

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UEr adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There is a missing washer on the north side of transformer cabinet 1B31-SOO2AA. The missing washer does not adversely affect the panel being secured to the equipment and is not a seismic concern.

CompLents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcava Date: 09/18/2012 Patrick Kelly 09/18/2012 Page 134 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y] Nr-I Uli]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area, 2R103 Photographs 1: Foreign Objects Located on 1RI 1-S029 Support (Reactor 130 2R103)

Page 135 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 2: Missing Washer on Panel Screw for 1B3 I-SO02AA (Reactor 130 2R103)

Page 136 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status; YZ NR UI-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Area, Area around Unit 1 Nitrogen Tank Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NEI U-N/AC

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN. NEI UI] N/AC degraded conditions?

Some surface corrosion on the nearby pipe supports was observed.

These were judged to be seismically adequate by SWEs due to very light loads. However, CR525156 was initiated for this purpose to cover the corrosion issue in the area.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NCI UC N/AC]

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NC UC-N/ACI interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 137 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NF1. U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Area' Area around Unit 1 Nitrogen Tank

5. Does it appear thatthe area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[:] N/ALi interactions that could cause flooding or spray.in the area?

6. Does itfappear that the. area is free of potentially.adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable.

equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead.

shielding)?

Y0 NDI U[D N/AD YN ND UD-N/AD

.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND U-'

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali

,4 2

Date: 9/26/2012 Wesley Williams 9/26/2012 Page 138 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YM N[-

U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Areae Area around Unit I Nitrogen Tank Photographs Page 139 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: V[* NE-] U[-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 Day Tank 1C Room Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NiO Ut] N/At]

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NiO Ut] N/At degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YZ NE] Ut] N/At]

YU Nt] Ut] N/At IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 140 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[E u[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130, Room, Area1 Day Tank IC Room

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI Nil Ui N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in thearea?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does itappear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NDI UD-N/AD YZ ND UD1 N/ADl

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be. added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: WesleyWilliams

-/

Date: 9/12/2012 Kursat Kinali 9/12/2012 Page 141 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS

.NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

NE] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area; Day Tank 1 C Room Photographs None.

Page 142 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NM U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg, REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 RL-R9 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each.of the following questions may be used to recordthe results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of' potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YZ NEI U-N/AEI

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area-appear to be free of significant Y0 NO UC N/A-degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways andHVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequateand fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YZ NEI UC N/AC Y0 NEI UC N/AC

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order ofabout 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 143 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Fl6or El. 130 Room, Area' RL-R9

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding oruspray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y0 NEI U-- N/AD YN NEI UD-N/AD YM NDI UD-N/AD

8. Have you looked forand found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages. may be added as necessary)

There is a drip pail for the Fire Protection Drain Catch at the entry to the SE Diagonal that is not tied off to anything (there is a second pail immediately adjacent that is tied off correctly). There is:no sensitive equipment in the vicinity of the pail, and the pipe extends into the pail, providing sliding resistance. Since the pail is light and not close to any sensitive equipment, it is judged not to be a potentially adverse seismic condition. Area Walk-By was performed from Column Line R 5 to R13 and from RH to RL Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/06/2012 Jeff Horton 09/0612012 Page 144 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

NE] u[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 RL-R9 Photographs Figure 1 - Unrestrained Drip Pail (Unit 1 RB, EL 130, RL-R9)

Page 145 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YE NI U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 180'

. Room, Area1 Control Bldg Roof Instrudions for Completing CheckliSt This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NEI UD' N/AD

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN ND UEI N/AD]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

A support for cable tray TQA 704 has a missing bolted connection southeast of air handling unit 1Z41-BOO3A (See Figures 3, and 4). The support is-able to resist gravity loads and the tray is adequately supported at the adjacent supports to prevent lateral translation. It is judged to be seismically adequate. CR 524541 has been written to install the missing bolted connection; for the tray.

4, Does it appear that the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatial

.interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YU ND UD-- N/AD-YI NDI UD N/AD-If the room in which the.SWEL itemis located is verylarge (e.g.,.Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g;, on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL itern.

Page 146 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YM N-] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 180' Room, Area, Control Bldg Roof

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions.that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic.

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable

.equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Loose ladders tools and equipment on top of Tool Box. The Tool.Box is unechocked but tied off. Also, there is a Cart that is un-chocked but tied off at the same location as the Tool Box. The SWE's have determined the cart, Tool Box, ladders and equipment are seismically acceptable.

YM NEI UE1 N/AE YZ NE UE N/AE Y0. NEI UE-N/AE

8. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could YN NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland

• Date: 9/26/12 Jeff Horton 9/26/12 Page 147 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N-L Uf Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 180' Room, Areaw Control Bldg Roof Photographs:

Figure 1 Loose Ladders Page 148 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 1/

F r

U Figure 2: Un-chocked Tool Box with Loose Equipment on top and Cart.

Page 149 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 3 Missing Bolt on Cable Tray Support Page 150 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 4: Cable Tray Equipment ID Page 151 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 6 Status: Y[

ND U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg& REACTOR Floor El. 95 Room, Area' SE Diagonal Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentingother comments.

I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

A wall channel column appears to be missing one anchor.

There are no conduits attached to the channel, and it is well, supported There are numerous additional anchors and the channel is tied into the floor andprovides support to a platform as well. Therefore, it isjudged to be seismically adequate.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from-the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NEI UEI N/AE YZ NO! UEI N/AE YZ NEI U[I N/AE]

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI U1E-N/AE-interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 152 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ N-l] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 95 Room, Area' SE Diagonal

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7; Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A testing rig was discovered tied off to a conduit along the south wall near Instrument 1E21-NOO3A. The rig was chained to a nearby conduit and has a stable base. There are several small valves near the testing rig, but out of the fall zone of the rig. Therefore, it is judged to be seismically adequate.

YS NEIl UE N/AEI1 YU NEIr UI-N/AF]

YN NEI UI-N/All

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 153 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YE NRJ U['-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 95 Room, Area1 SE Diagonal Photographs Figure 1 - Wall Channel with Missing Bolts (Reactor Bldg. El. 95, SE Diagonal)

Page 154 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Figure 2 - Wall Channel Ceiling Restraint (Reactor Bldg. El. 95, SE Diagonal)

Page 155 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 kmeactor mag. ru. Y:), = magonap Page 156 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

,t 6 of 6 Figure 4 - Test Rig Restraint (Reactor Bldg. El. 95, SE Diagonal)

Page 157 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YN N-] UE-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR FloorEl. 87 Room, Area' SE Diagonal Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additionalspace is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse* seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NEI U0 N/AE1

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to befree of significant YZ NEI UEI N/A[

degraded conditions?

3. Based on.a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse.

seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling.tiles and lighting)?

Y0 NE UE1 N/AEI YZ N[3 UE N/AE I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, eýg., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 158 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YE N-- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR FloorEl. 87 Room, Area' SE Diagonal

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage. of portable equipment, and'temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YE NEI U-N/AE YZ N-U-

N/AO Y2. NE U[ N/A[

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y0 NO U-

.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/06/2012 Jeff Horton 09/06/2012

//I Page 159 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

N[-M U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area, SE Diagonal Photographs N/A Page 160 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 164:

Room, Area' Unit 1 Control Room Instructions, for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Visible anchors of adjacent cabinets were found to be properly installed and in accordance with the typical configuration.

YO ND U0 N/AD

2. Does anchorage of equipment in thearea appear to be free of significant YZ NDI UiD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to: be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Ladder was used and permission was obtained to view area above the the hung ceiling. The ceiling was rod hung and tied into rigid structures. HVAC and electrical components In the overhead were properly restrained. See 1HI 1.-P602 SWC for more details.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the:area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YN NOI U-1 N/AD YN NO UD-N/AD If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 161 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZJ Nn-U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 164 Room, Area. Unit 1 Control Room

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.. Does 'it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that thearea is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable, equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NE UE" N/AO Y0 N-l Ufi N/AQ YS NEI UD N/AEI

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YZ NEI UO-Comments (Additional pages may beadded as necessary)

None.

Page 162 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NEI U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 164 Room, Area, Unit 1 Control Room Photographs None.

Page 163 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: YE] No UI"]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 130 Room, Areal C-114 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space: is provided at the end of this checklist: for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Base plates for Unistrut conduit support along north wall of Room C-114 have holes drilled for three anchors, but only two are utilized. The Unistrut member and supported conduits are small, so the two anchors in the ceiling and the two anchors in the floorare judged to be sufficient for~seismic restraint (see Figures 4, 5 and 6).

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3, Based on a visual inspection from the floor,, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YIN NEI UL" N/AU YZ NEI ULE] N/A[

YO NEI U0' N/AU YJ NEI UU-N/A--

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 164 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: Y-- NZ U-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 130 Room, Area, C-114

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in, the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A small step ladder was discovered in Room C-114 between Battery Chargers 1R42-SO26 and 1R42-S027 (see Figure 1)., The unrestrained ladder was leaning against one of the battery chargers and has the potential to impact both pieces of equipment during a seismic event. A hand cart was discovered in Room C-114 behind Switchgear 1R22-S016. The cart was restrained to a vertical conduit with a flimsy piece of rope, but the wheels were not chocked (see Figures 2 and 3). During a seismic event, the cart has the potential to roll and rotate around the restraint point, allowing the cart corner to impact the switchgear. In addition, several pieces of heavy equipment are stored on top of the cart and could be dislodged during, a seismic event, potentially impacting the switchgear (see CR 513335)S

8. Have, you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YE NEI UED N/AD YZ NEI U[-- N/AE YEI NO UD' N/AE1 Y[

NEI U[-

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/06/2012 Jeff Horton 09/06/2012 Page 165 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 8 Status: Y[-'] No UL--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. CONTROL FloorEl. 130 Room, Area1 C-114 Photoeraphs Figure 1 - Ladder Between Battery Chargers (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-W", Room C-1 14)

Page 166 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 8 Figure 2 - Cart in Room C-114 (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-0", Room C-114)

Page 167 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 8 Figure 3 - Restraint of Cart in Room C-114 (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-0", Room C-114)

Page 168 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 8 Figure 4 - Ceiling Base Plate for Unistrut Support (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-0", Room C-1 14)

Page 169 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 7 of 8 Figure 5 - Floor Base Plate for Unistrut Support (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-4", Room C-1 14)

Page 170 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 8 of 8 Figure 6 -Unistrut Support Plan View (Control Bldg. EL. 130'-0", Room C-1 14)

Page 171 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YE9 N[] un[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 130' Room, Area, Room C123 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist. may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklistifor documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear tobe free of Y2 NEI U[i N/Ai]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NEI Ul N/Al]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Unit 2 Control Building above Battery Charger 1R42-SO52, there are two loose nuts on the frame around the penetration at the wall for Cable Tray TEN7-01, out of a total offour bolts. There is a cable tray support immediately adjacent to the wall penetration that is in good condition. The frame is abandoned in place and is not supporting any load. The remaining two bolts are judged adequate to support the small loads on the abandoned frame from its own dead weight, so there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YN NOI Ul] N/Al]

Y9 NEI Ul] N/Al]

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 172 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ N[] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 130' Room, Area1 Room C123

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentiaily adverse seismic Y0 NO) UE-N/Af]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YI NEI UEI N/AE)

YO NEI UE) N/AE)

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE) adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in: the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

In the Unit 2 Control Building above Battery Charger 1R42-S052, there is a nylon rope tied to a pair of conduits that appears to have been abandoned (See CR 524313). The rope is tied off above the conduits to a support that is not visible from thefloor. The conduits are both attached to the wall immediately adjacent to the tie-off location, so the rope is not being used for support. The rope is small and light, and is not free to swing, so there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/25/2012 Jeff Horton 09/25/2012 Page 173 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN N[ ul-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 130' Room, Area' Room C123 Photographs:

Figure 1 Cable Tray Wall Support with Loose Bolt Page 174 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Figure 2 Cable Tray Wall Support With Loose Nuts Page 175 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 PFNIFTPATIfnm Figure 3 Cable Tray ID with Wall Support in the Background Page 176 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 4 Nylon String Attached to Conduits Page 177 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[

N-- u[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR FloorEl. 130 Room, Area' Torus Room Bay 3 Instructions, for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be usedto record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

L. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

IYZ NEI UO] N/AEIJ

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI U[] N/AEJ degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways. and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

There. is a vertical to horizontal cable tray connection across from the ESS Air ACC 1P52-AO01 that is full and disorganized (CR 519475). The cable tray does not appear to be overfilled and the cables are tied to the rungs of the vertical cable tray section at numerous places. It is judged that there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YZ NEI UE3 N/A[J YZ NO U-t N/AI-If the room in'which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 178 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NMl] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area, Torus Room Bay 3

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ: NiE UEI N/AE-YN NEI UF" N/AE YN NEI UE] N/AE

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditionsthat could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YN NEI U-Comments (Additionalpages, may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/17/2012 Jeff Horton 09/17/2012 Page 179 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] N[] Ur-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 Torus Room Bay 3 Photographs Figure 1 -Disorganized Cable Tray (Unit 1 Torus Room Bay 3)

Page 180 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YF" NE U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 228 Room, Area, Refueling Floor on Unit 1 side Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visiblewithout necessarily opening cabinets)?

Fire suppression line support framing base plates near column RK-R5 have no grout and the gap under the base plates is greater than X". A CR was initiated for this purpose (CR519650).

Equipment ID21-NOO2E is not attached to the floor, a CR was initiated for this purpose (CR519655).

YEI NZ ULI N/AE]

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UE] N/AE]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays, appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

HVAC duct base support has 4 deficient anchors (total of 20 anchors present). Three of the anchors have loose nuts and one anchor is bent.

A CR was initiated for this purpose (CR519644).

YE] N' UE] N/AE]

4. Does it appear that the area is. free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Ys NE] UE] N/AE]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling'tiles and lighting)?

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 181 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[] NZ U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 228 Room, Area1 Refueling Floor on Unit I side

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or sprayin the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladders in the area are stored vertically near the condenser outlet nozzle and not secured to the wall or floor. A CR was initiated for this purpose (CR519657).

Y0 NEI U0- NIAE]

YZ NE] UE N/AF']

YEI] NZ UE] N/A[l

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

None.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date: 9/18/2012 Wesley Williams /.4i~,-e

/

9/18/2012 Page 182 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Yr-NM UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 228 Room, Area, Refueling Floor on Unit I side Photographs Page 183 of 184

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 184 of 184

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-001, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 5 UNIT 1 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-01 This attachment contains Appendix H from the report entitled, "Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Individual Plant Examination of External Events - Seismic" Page 1 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0

SUMMARY

OF IPEEE EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS PLANT HATCH UNIT 1 contains a summary of all Safe Shutdown Equipment List components which require a modification to achieve a HCLPF capacity of at least 0.3 g pga. This appendix contains the following information, sorted by equipment identification number.

Column Heading Equipment Identification Number Equipment Class Equipment Description Equipment Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Modification Status Description Equipment identification number Equipment class (see table I of this appendix)

Brief description of equipment Building and elevation where equipment is located Brief description of outliers Brief description of outlier resolution If an outlier is being resolved by a plant modification, this column gives the Design Change Request (DCR) number or states that a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) will be used.

The status of the modification is shown as "pending" or "complete."

Page 2 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE EQUIPMENT CLASS DESIGNATIONS Equipment Class (Column 2)

Description 01 Motor control centers 02 Low-voltage switchgear 03 Medium-voltage switchgear 04 Transformers 05 Horizontal pumps 06 Vertical pumps 07 Fluid-operated valves 08A Motor-operated valves 08B Solenoid-operated valves 09 Fans 10 Air handlers 11 Chillers 12 Air compressors 13 Motor generators 14 Distribution panels 15 Batteries on racks 16 Battery chargers and inverters 17 Engine generators 18 Instruments on racks 19 Temperature sensors 20 Instrumentation and control panels and cabinets 21 Tanks and heat exchangers Page 3 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS Equipment Equip.

Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status B31-F023A 8A Motor-operated valve Reactor Building Potential interaction with platform beam.

Move platform beam to Completed drywell el 117 ft provide adequate clearance.

11/02/1991 DCR 89-205.

G 1 -F003 7 Fluid-operated valve Reactor Building Potential interaction between solenoid valve Modify conduit routing to Pending el 125 ft and fire-wrapped conduit.

avoid interaction.

MWO.

Hi 1-P603 20 Control room panels Control Building Potential interaction with control room light Tie up light fixtures to Completed HI 1-P606 el 164 ft fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 H11-P608 DCR 90-010.

HI I-P609 HI l-P610 H" l-P611 H I1-P612 HI 1-P613 HI1-P617 HI I-P618 Hi1-P622 HI 1-P623 H11-P626 Hi1-P627 H 11-P628 HI 1-P650 HI I-P651 H 11-P652 Hi I-P700 2H1 I-P652 H11-P620 20 Control room panel Control Building I.Missing door latching bars.

1. Repair door latch.

1. Complete el 164 ft MWO.

2.Potential interaction with control room

2. Tie up light fixtures to

2. Completed light fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR 90-010 Page 4 of 8

0 ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS (Cont.)

Equipment Equip.

Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status H11-P654 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Broken door latch.

1. Repair door latch.

1. Complete el 164 ft MWO.

2. Potential interaction with control room

2. Tie up light fixtures to

2. Completed light fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR

3. Potential interaction with adjacent panel

3. Modify anchorage for 90-010.

HI 1-P663 on vibration isolators.

panel H 11-P663.

3. Completed 07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

HI 1-P657 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Potential interaction with control room

1. Tie up light fixtures to

1. Completed el 164 ft light fixtures, prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR

2. Potential interaction with adjacent panel

2. Modify anchorage for 90-010.

H 11-P663 on vibration isolators.

panel H 11-P663.

2. Completed 07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

H 11-P691 2 0

Analog signal Control Building

1. SRT could not confirm that equipment

1. Add brace at top of panel

1. Completed conversion/isolation el 164 ft pad has reinforcing and adequate load to alleviate uplift at the 10/30/1991 panel path to the floor slab.

base.

DCR 89-206.

2. Potential interaction with control room

2. Tie up light fixtures to

2. Completed light fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR

3. Potential interaction with adjacent panels

3. Modify anchorage for 90-010.

HI 1-P670 through HI 1-P681 on panels HI 1-P670 through

3. Completed vibration isolators.

H 11-P681.

07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

HI 1-P925 20 Control room panels Control Building Potential interaction with adjacent panels Modify anchorage for panels Completed Hi1-P926 el 164 ft HI 1-P670 through HI 1-P681 mounted on H 11-P670 through H I -

07/29/1996 vibration isolators.

P681.

DCR 93-055.

H21-P173 2 0

Shutdown instrument Reactor Building Interaction concern from unsecured file Move and secure file cabinet.

Complete panel el 130 ft cabinet next to panel Panel contains essential MWO.

relays.

II Page 5 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS (Cont.)

Equipment Equip.

Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status H21-P202 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator

1. Bolt bending concern due to gap between

1. Modify anchorage.

1. Completed H21-P232 panels Building el 130 ft base of panel and equipment pad.

09/30/1991 DCR

2. Potential impact between adjacent panels

2. Connect panels together to 90-015.

containing essential relays.

prevent impact.

2. Completed 09/30/1991 DCR 90-015.

H21-P230 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator Potential impact between panels containing Connect panels together to Completed H21-P231 panels Building el 130 ft essential relays.

prevent impact.

09/30/1991 DCR 90-015.

H21-P256 20 MOV and fuel pump Diesel Generator Potential impact between wall mounted panel Modify anchorage.

Completed control panel 1B Building el 130 ft containing essential relays and wall due to 09/30/1991 I

missing anchor bolts.

DCR 90-015.

P41-N200A 18 Plait service water Intake structure Anchor bolt nuts are corroded.

Modify anchorage.

Completed P41-N200B strainer differential el 89 ft 10/28/1991 pressure switches DCR 90-148.

P41-N520 18 Instrument on rack Control Building Corroded bolts.

Repair or modify anchorage.

Completed P41-N521 el 180 ft 07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

R24-S002 1

Motor control center Control Building Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed R24-S003 el 180 ft criteria.

07/29/1996 R24-S029 DCR 93-055.

R24-S031 R24-S009 1 6 00/208V motor Intake structure Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed R24-SOIO control center el 111 ft criteria.

10/15/1991

____________________________DCR 90-012.

R24-S025 1 6 00/208V motor Diesel Generator Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed R24-S026 control center Building el 130 ft criteria.

10/25/1991 R24-S027 DCR 88-334.

Page 6 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS (Cont.)

Equipment Equip.

Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status R42-S0O1A 15 125/250V station Control Building Potential interaction with overhead light Tie up light fixtures to Completed R42-SOO1B 15 service batteries el 112 ft fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR 90-0 10.

R42-S002A 15 12 5V diesel system Diesel Generator

1. Bolt bending concern due to gap between

1. M odify anchorage.

1. Completed R42-SO02B batteries Building el 130 ft base of support members and floor.

10/17/1991 R42-SO02C DCR

2. Potential interaction with overhead light 89-261.

fixtures.

2. Tie up light fixtures to

2. Completed prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR 90-010.

R42-S032A 16 125V battery charger Diesel Generator Circuit cards inside battery charger not Install circuit card restraining Complete Building el 130 ft restrained, bracket.

MWO.

R43-POO1A 20 Diesel generator control Diesel Generator Potential interaction with overhead light Tie up light fixtures to Completed R43-POO1B 20 panel Building el 130 ft fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 R43-POO1C 20 DCR 90-010.

R43-SOO1A 17 Diesel generator Diesel Generator Springs on the vibration isolation mounts for Replace vibration isolation Completed R43-SOO1B Building el 130 ft the engine gauge panel are bent. The engine mounts with new mounts of a 10/21/1991 R43-SOO1C gauge panel is mounted on the diesel different design.

DCR 88-172.

generator skid.

R44-S003 16 DC/AC inverter Control Building Potential interaction with overhead light Tie up light fixtures to Completed el 147 ft fixtures.

prevent falling.

10/11/1991 DCR 90-010.

SI1-SO12 4 4160/600V station Diesel Generator Missing anchor bolt.

Modify anchorage.

Completed service tansformer Building el 130 ft 10/11/1991 DCR 90-011.

T41-BO02A 1 RHR/Core spray pump Reactor Building Bolt bending concern due to gap between Modify anchorage.

Completed room cooler el 107 ft base of cooler support member and steel 09/24/1991 support beam.

DCR 89-202.

T41-BO03B I RHR/Core spray pump Reactor Building

1. Bolt bending concern due to gap between

1. Modify anchorage.

1. Completed room cooler el 95 ft base of cooler support member and steel 09/24/1991 support beam.

DCR

2. Bolts on isolation mounts are not tight.

2. Tighten bolts.89-202.

2. Completed 09/24/1991 DCR 89-202.

Page 7 of 8

ATTACHMENT 5 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION SNCH082-RPT-01, VER. 1.0 IPEEE DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS (Cont.)

Equipment Equip.

Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status X41-RH R elays Potter & Brumfield Diesel Generator Essential relays not verified for chatter. Replac relays Pending DCR.

PRI IDY relays located Building el 130 ft in panels X43-PO06A, P006B, and P006C X43-PO06B 20 Relay panel Diesel Generator Anchor bolt will not tighten.

Replace bolt.

Pending Building el 130 ft MWO.

Z41-B003A 10 Air handling unit Control Building Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed Z41-BO03C el 180 ft criteria.

07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

Z41-BO03B 10 Air handling unit Control Building

1. Anchorage does not meet GIP screening

1. Modify anchorage.

1. Completed el 180 ft criteria.

07/29/1996 DCR

2. Bolt bending concern due to gap between

2. Modify anchorage.93-055.

base of panel and equipment pad.

2. Completed 07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

Z41-BO08A 11 Co ndensing unit Control Building Poor installation detail caused poor load path Grout in bolt sleeves.

Complete Z41-BO08C el 180 ft which could induce bolt bending.

MWO.

Z41-BO08B 1 Condensing unit Control Building

1. Poor installation detail caused poor load

1. Grout in bolt sleeves.

1. Complete el 180 ft path which could induce bolt bending.

MWO.

2. Potential interaction with pipe insulation.

2. Remove insulation.

2. Pending MWO.

Z41-FO09B 7

Air-actuated damper Control Building Air line support inadequate.

Add supports.

Completed el 180 ft 07/29/1996 DCR 93-055.

2H21-P231 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator Potential impact between panels containing Connect panels together to Completed panel Building el 130 ft essential relays.

prevent impact.

04/04/1991 DCR 90-149.

2R22-S006 3

4160V switchgear Diesel Generator Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed emergency bus 2F Building el 140 ft criteria.

04/23/1991 DCR 90-013.

Page 8 of 8

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 6 UNIT 1 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01 Page 1 of 16

ACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NNO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIONOO Page 2 of 16

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0 0O NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE Certificate of Completion Robert W. Ashworth Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 - Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 3, 2012 Date Caroline S. Schlaseman, P.E.

Instructor Page 3 of 16

A 6

ATTACHMENT 6& SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION.0 Page 4 of 16

PVACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIOINP.

~~~C ert ific a te o f C o m ple t io n

• i~iiis hereby granted to jef Horto

~T 4

ft w~

ifor successful completon of i

K. ::TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDO WNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 In Mt Arlington, NJ Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 5 of 16

• ACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIONPO N E RC CON Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Patrick Kelly for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown.Engineer Alexandria, VA-6/20/2012 Page 6 of 16

9 TACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NNO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION*

Certificate of Completion Kursat Kinali Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity Page 7 of 16

0 0

0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Johna athom McFarl nd for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA

]~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~..........

."i Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Alexiand ria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 8 of 16

4TACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NNO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION

.00 Cert has aznd-Sei Page 9 of 16

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0

NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 10 of 16

9 ACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIONOO Certificate of Completion Winston Stewart Training. on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

. Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 21 2012 Date I/1$JA4dAý Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manage, Strucual.Reliatiiy& Unegrity Page 11 of 16

• TACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIO 9

NO

X:e"leac"e

'vr

,i0 Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Jnan Vizcaya for succesSful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 12 of 16

A ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 15-II~

Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 21, 2012 010K

.d Date Robert K. Kassewara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & inegrty A

AI Ai Page 13 of 16

9 TACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01 VERSION00

'Presents this Cert ica te chIiievenmen t To Certify 'That has Comp(etedtheSQVG lWalkdown Screening andSeimic Evaluation Training Course Hefd A4plf6t-10t, 1992 David A. Freed, MPR Associates SQUG Training Coordinator Neil P. Smith. Commonwealth Edisow.

SQUG Chairman Robert P, Kassawara, EPRI SQUG Program Manager

i

____31 Page 14 of 16

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION00 ki This is to Certify that 4,:iiI neL Lk-rh~o X

has Compkted the E6PKIAdd-On Seismic IEEE Training Course.

Jfefdifovemfber 2 n through 4t hi 119921 David A-Freed, MPR Associates Robert TIraining Coordinator Progra P. Kassawara, EPRI m Manager I

Page 15 of 16

AATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS O0 NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 E ~CTRIC POWER~

RESEARCH INSTuTUIE Certificate of Completion Wesley Williams Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity Page 16 of 16

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012 Commitment Table to NL-12-2268 Type Scheduled Commitment One-Time Continuing Completion Date Action Compliance (If Required)

Complete the remaining NTTF 2.3 X

120 days from Seismic Walkdowns for inaccessible the end of 1 R26 areas and provide the walkdown outage, currently report to the NRC. These scheduled for inaccessible areas are listed in Table March 14, 2014 7-1 and Table 7-2 of the Hatch Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report (Enclosure 1 of this letter). These inaccessible areas and scope are shown below:

Table 7-1. Inaccessible Equipment per Original Walkdown Scope Item No.

Description Remaining Walkdown Scope 1

1 R23-S.03 600V SWGR EMERGENCY BUS 1C &

SWC and AWC 4160-600V XFMR

2.

600V SWGR EMERGENCY BUS 1D &

SWC and AWC 4160-600V XFMR 1 R22-S016 250V DC BATTERY DIV 1 SWGR 1A SWC and AWC 4.1 R22-S05 4160V SWGR EMERGENCY BUS 1 E SWC and AWC 1 R22-S006 4160V SWGR EMERGENCY BUS 1F SWC and AWC 6.1 R22-S007 4160V SWGR EMERGENCY BUS 1G SWC and AWC 1P41-F043B PSW DW AIR CLR 7B IN AOV SWC and AWC 8.1 P41 -F045A PSW DW AIR CLR 8A IN AOV SWC and AWC 1 El 1 -F060A RHR INJECTION VLV SWC and AWC

10.

1E11-F009 RHR SD CLG INBOARD MOV SWC and AWC

11.

1T47-B007B DW Cooling System Unit SWC and AWC

12.

1T47-B009B DW Cooling System Unit SWO and AWO

13.

1T47-B008A DW Cooling System Unit SWC and AWC E2 - 1 to NL-12-2268 Table 7-1. Inaccessible Equipment per Original Walkdown Scope Item No.

Description Remaining Walkdown Scope

15.

1 R25-SO01 125V DC DIV 1 CAB 1A SWC and AWC

16.

1 R25-S002 125V DC DIV 2 CAB 1 B SWC and AWC

17.

1 R25-S004 125V DC CAB 1 D SWC and AWC

18.

1 R25-S005 125V DC CAB 1 E SWC and AWC

19.

1 R25-S036 120/208V AC ESS CAB 1 B SWC and AWC

20.

1R25-S105 125V DC CAB 1D ESS DIV 1 SWC and AWC

21.

1 R25-S1 25 120/208V AC ESS DIV 1 CAB SWC and AWC

22.

120/208V AC VITAL CAB 1A INSTR SWC and AWC 1 R25-S064 BSl BUS 1A 2.1 R25-Sl116 120/208V AC ESS DIV 2 CAB SWC and AWC Table 7-2. Inaccessible Equipment Resulting from Guidance on Opening Cabinets to Inspect for Other Adverse Conditions Item No.

Description Remaining Walkdown Scope

1.

1 R24-S009 600/208V MCC 1A Inspect Internals

2.

1 R24-SO1 1 600V ESS DIV 1 MCC 1 C Inspect Internals

3.

1R24-S025 600/208V ESS DIV 1 MCC 1A Inspect Internals

4.

1R24-S012 600V ESS DIV 2 MCC 1B Inspect Internals

5.

1 R24-S022 125/250V DC ESS DIV 2 MCC 1 B Inspect Internals

6.

1 R24-S027 600/208V ESS DIV 2 MCC 1 C Inspect Internals

7.

1 R24-S048 DG BLDG 600/208V MCC 1 D Inspect Internals

8.

1Rll-S004 575-120/208VAC XFMR 1D Inspect Internals E2 - 2