ML18040A132: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:k'H.j.MML'.
{{#Wiki_filter:k'H.j.MML'.               'Y (ACCELERATED   BIDS P ROCESSI REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
'Y (ACCELERATED BIDS P ROCESSI REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9407150239 DOC.DATE: 94/07/11 NOTARIZED:
ACCESSION NBR:9407150239                 DOC.DATE:   94/07/11     NOTARIZED: NO           DOCKET FACIL:50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit                     2   Niagara Moha 05000410 AUTH. NAME             AUTHOR     AFFILIATION MCCORMICK,M.         Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Niagara Moha 05000410 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MCCORMICK,M.
RECIP.NAME             RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document               Control Desk)
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Forwards"Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EALs Rev Based on NUMARC NESP-007." Upgrade project involved listed plants.DISTRIBUTION CODE: AO45D COPIES RECEIUED: LTR 2 ENCL/SIZE:&400 TITLE: OR Submittal:
Forwards "Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EALs Rev Based on                     NUMARC NESP-007." Upgrade project involved listed plants.
Emergency Preparedness Plans, Implement'g Proce ures, C NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(12/22/72).
DISTRIBUTION CODE: AO45D             COPIES RECEIUED: LTR       2 ENCL     / SIZE:     &400 TITLE: OR Submittal: Emergency Preparedness Plans, Implement'g Proce ures, C NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(12/22/72).                         05000237 License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).                         05000244 RECIPIENT                 COPIES            RE    PIENT          COPIES ID CODE/NAME               LTTR ENCL            CO    NAME        LTTR ENCL PD1-1 PD                       1    1                                1    1 PD1-3 PD                       1    1      BRINKMAN,D                1    1 BRINKMAN,D.                     1    1      MENNING,J                  1    1 STANG,J                         1    1      CONICELLA,N.              1    1 JOHNSON.,A                     1    1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA/IRB                     1     1     NRI~RSSg PEPB              1     1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT                1     1     REG~~LE)           01     1     1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR                          1     1     NSIC                      1     1 g     Qu/@ex NOTE TO ALL"RIDS'ECIPIENTS:
05000237 License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE XYASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXI: 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTIONLISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                   15   ENCL     15
05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD PD1-3 PD BRINKMAN, D.STANG,J JOHNSON.,A INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA/IRB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RE PIENT CO NAME BRINKMAN,D MENNING,J CONICELLA,N.
NRI~RSSg PEPB REG~~LE)01 NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 g Qu/@ex NOTE TO ALL"RIDS'ECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE XYASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXI: 504-2083)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 15 ENCL 15  


t T NIAGARA U MOHAWK ONE AS1LE PONT NUCLEAR TRANNG CENTER I RD 01, BOX 1481OSWEGO
t T NIAGARA U MOHAWK ONE AS1LE PONT NUCLEAR TRANNG CENTER I RD 01, BOX 1481OSWEGO NEW YORK 13126/TELEPHONE ( 315 ) 349 -2080
~NEW YORK 13126/TELEPHONE (315)349-2080 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Nine Mile Point Nudear Power Station Unit 2 Docket No, 50-410 License No.NPF-69 July 11, 1994 NMP2L 1482
                                                                        ~
July 11, 1994 NMP2L 1482 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Nine Mile Point Nudear Power Station Unit 2 Docket No, 50-410 License No. NPF-69


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Emergency Action Levels Revision Based on NUMARC NESP-007 In accordance with the guidance provided by the NRC staff at recent NEI meetings, Niagara Mohawk is submitting for review and approval the enclosed Emergency Action Levels (EALs)for Nine Mile Point Nudear Station Unit 2.Niagara Mohawk, in accordance with 10CFR50,54 (q), has reviewed these EALs and determined that they represent an enhancement to the Nine Mle Point Emergency Plan, The EALs have been revised consistent with the NUMARC NESP407 methodology, and were developed as part of a joint project with all nudear utilities within New York State.In order to assist your review we have included a number of developmental documents in the endosed EAL Generation Package.The EAL Generation Package consists of the following:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Emergency Action Levels Revision Based on NUMARC NESP-007 In accordance with the guidance provided by the NRC staff at recent NEI meetings, Niagara Mohawk is submitting for review and approval the enclosed Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for Nine Mile Point Nudear Station Unit 2. Niagara Mohawk, in accordance with 10CFR50,54 (q), has reviewed these EALs and determined that they represent an enhancement to the Nine Mle Point Emergency Plan, The EALs have been revised consistent with the NUMARC NESP407 methodology, and were developed as part of a joint project with all nudear utilities within New York State. In order to assist your review we have included a number of developmental documents in the endosed EAL Generation Package.
~Plant-Specific EAL Guideline~EAL Technical Bases~Fission Product Barrier Evaluation
The EAL Generation Package consists of the following:
~Emergency Action Level Matrix~EAL Binning Document~Validation and Verification Report Attachment 1 provides an explanation of the contents of the EAL Generation Package.These EALs were developed as a joint project with the New York Power Authority, Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas and Electric, and Niagara Mohawk.This process ensures consistent emergency classification between all New York State nuclear utilities to the greatest extent possible, limited only by plant design differences.
  ~ Plant-Specific EAL Guideline                           ~ EAL Technical Bases
We believe that a coordinated review of all the New York State nuclear utility EAL revisions will promote this consistency and will result in the most advantageous use of time and resources.
  ~ Fission Product Barrier Evaluation                     ~ Emergency Action Level Matrix
Please contact Ms.Coleen Ware, Director of Emergency Preparedness, at 349-2066 should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this matter.Very truly yours, c MJM/JDJ/bh M.McCormick, Jr.Vice President-Nudear Safety Assessment and Support CC: Mr.B.S.Norris, Senior Resident Inspector Mr.M.L.Boyle, Acting Director, Project Directorate I-1, NRR Mr.D.S.Brinkman, Sr.Project Manager, NRR Mr.T.T.Martin, Regional Administrator, Region 1 9407 250239 9407>>1 PDR ADOCK 05000410 P P'DP pgyg (()
  ~ EAL Binning Document                                   ~ Validation and Verification Report Attachment     1 provides an explanation of the contents of the EAL Generation Package.
These EALs were developed as a joint project with the New York Power Authority, Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas and Electric, and Niagara Mohawk. This process ensures consistent emergency classification between all New York State nuclear utilities to the greatest extent possible, limited only by plant design differences. We believe that a coordinated review of all the New York State nuclear utility EAL revisions willpromote this consistency and willresult in the most advantageous use of time and resources.
Please contact Ms. Coleen Ware, Director       of Emergency Preparedness, at 349-2066 should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this matter.
Very truly yours, c
M       . McCormick, Jr.
Vice President-Nudear Safety Assessment and Support MJM/JDJ/bh CC:     Mr. B.S. Norris, Senior Resident Inspector Mr. M. L. Boyle, Acting Director, Project Directorate I-1, NRR Mr. D.S. Brinkman, Sr. Project Manager, NRR Mr. T. T. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region 1 9407 250239 9407>> 1 PDR       ADOCK 05000410 pgyg P                       P'DP
(()
 
ATTACHMENT 1 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 EAL GENERATION PACKAGE CONTENT  
ATTACHMENT 1 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 EAL GENERATION PACKAGE CONTENT  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
INTRODUCTION Prior to the acceptance by the NRC of NUMARC/NESP-007"Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels" as an acceptable alternative to the NUREG 0654 EAL guidance, the four nuclear utilities in the State of New York decided to perform a joint implementation of the new methodology.
 
This upgrade project involved the following plants: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1)-Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2)-Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation James A.FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant-New York Power Authority Indian Point Station 2-Consolidated Edison Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Station-New York Power Authority R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Station-Rochester Gas and Electric While the resulting upgraded EALs are site specific, an objective of the upgrade project was to ensure conformity and consistency between the sites to the extent possible.The following paragraphs describe the site specific EAL developmental documents which are included in the EAL review package.~~1 The PEG is the NMP2 Interpretation of the NUMARC methodology for developing EALs.The PEG identifies deletions from the NUMARC methodology by striking out words and phrases that are not applicable, additions are identified by underlining new words and phrases.The documents which provide the basis for these changes from NUMARC methodology are listed in the references section of the PEG.i nP B'r vl i The FPBE contains the evaluation of the NUMARC example EALs for each of the three fission product barriers.The result of this evaluation is a discrete set of quantifiable EALs which represent the NUMARC fission product barrier loss matrices.  
INTRODUCTION Prior to the acceptance by the NRC of NUMARC/NESP-007 "Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels" as an acceptable alternative to the NUREG 0654 EAL guidance, the four nuclear utilities in the State of New York decided to perform a joint implementation of the new methodology. This upgrade project involved the following plants:
,~
Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1) - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2) - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant - New York Power Authority Indian Point Station 2 - Consolidated Edison Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Station- New York Power Authority R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station - Rochester Gas and Electric While the resulting upgraded EALs are site specific, an objective of the upgrade project was to ensure conformity and consistency between the sites to the extent possible.
Based on the number o example EALs, and the number o oss and potential loss conditions, the set of conditions that can yield a given emergency classification can be determined.
The following paragraphs describe the site specific EAL developmental documents which are included in the EAL review package.
An evaluation of each condition or set of conditions was made to determine if it properly defines the appropriate threshold for the dassification.
                  ~ ~
If a condition or set of conditions was appropriate, a comment reflecting this conclusion was recorded in this document, If a condition or set of conditions is determined to be inappropriate, it is lined out and the reason for this conclusion is similarly recorded.P2E LB Since the format presented in NUMARC/NESP-007 is inadequate for implementation; the EALs.defined-by-the.PEG-and FPBE-must be binned into categories and subcategories which support ease of use.The binning document identifies where each PEG/FPBE Initiating Conditions (IC)is addressed within the presentation scheme, NMP2 EAL Technical Bases Document The EAL Technical Bases Document provides an explanation and rationale for each of the emergency action level (EALs)included in the EAL Upgrade Program.It is also intended to facilitate the review process of the NMP2 EALs and provide historical documentation for future reference.
1 The PEG is the NMP2 Interpretation of the NUMARC methodology for developing EALs. The PEG identifies deletions from the NUMARC methodology by striking out words and phrases that are not applicable, additions are identified by underlining new words and phrases. The documents which provide the basis for these changes from NUMARC methodology are listed in the references section of the PEG.
This document is also intended to be used by those individuals responsible for implementation of the NMP2 dassification procedure as a technical reference and aid in EAL interpretation.
i nP       B     'r vl     i The FPBE contains the evaluation of the NUMARC example EALs for each of the three fission product barriers. The result of this evaluation is a discrete set of quantifiable EALs which represent the NUMARC fission product barrier loss matrices.
NMP2 Emer en A ion Level Matrix The Emergency Action Level Matrix is the user level result of the EAL development project.This matrix will be incorporated in the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures and is used directly by operations personnel to classify an event.P2V r'li i The NMP2 Verification and Validabon Report documents the process conducted to verify and to validate the site specific EALs and supporting documentation, This document also includes the comments received during validation along with comment resolutions.
 
The verification process was performed to ensure the NMP2 EALs and classification procedures are technically correct.The NMP2 EAL verification was conducted prior to the EAL validation exercises.
, ~
The technical accuracy of the upgraded EALs were verified through tabletop reviews.  
Based on the number o example EALs, and the number o oss and potential loss conditions, the set of conditions that can yield a given emergency classification can be determined. An evaluation of each condition or set of conditions was made to determine if it properly defines the appropriate threshold for the dassification. If a condition or set of conditions was appropriate, a comment reflecting this conclusion was recorded in this document, If a condition or set of conditions is determined to be inappropriate, it is lined out and the reason for this conclusion is similarly recorded.
, 0 The validation process sures that the NMP2 EALs and c assification procedures are usable and correct, and ensures that emergency response personnel are able to arrive at consistent interpretations of EALs under similar conditions.
P2E LB Since the format presented in NUMARC/NESP-007 is inadequate for implementation; the EALs.defined-by-the.PEG-and FPBE-must be binned into categories and subcategories which support ease of use. The binning document identifies where each PEG/FPBE Initiating Conditions (IC) is addressed within the presentation scheme, NMP2 EAL Technical Bases Document The EAL Technical Bases Document provides an explanation and rationale for each of the emergency action level (EALs) included in the EAL Upgrade Program.
The EALs were validated through observation of emergency response organization personnel responding to simulated emergency events.The group of EALs selected for validation were sufficiently representative of all the EALs.
It is also intended to facilitate the review process of the NMP2 EALs and provide historical documentation for future reference. This document is also intended to be used by those individuals responsible for implementation of the NMP2 dassification procedure as a technical reference and aid in EAL interpretation.
OSSI 93-402A-10-NMP2 Docket f,'~-'ft~Accession 8 a z uz>Date~Of Lti'eguiatol I Do;l:.-t Filo ew or a e mer enc c ion eve ra e roec Nine Mile Point 1&2 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Generation Package Operations Support Services, Inc.233 Water Street 2nd Floor Plymouth, MA 02360 1t$r I ggqf't'ii w I$4+l+Pl II ,'.~ch I l'U~~~r}}
NMP2 Emer en         A ion Level Matrix The Emergency Action Level Matrix is the user level result of the EAL development project. This matrix will be incorporated in the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures and is used directly by operations personnel to classify an event.
P2V r'                 li   i The NMP2 Verification and Validabon Report documents the process conducted to verify and to validate the site specific EALs and supporting documentation, This document also includes the comments received during validation along with comment resolutions.
The verification process was performed to ensure the NMP2 EALs and classification procedures are technically correct. The NMP2 EAL verification was conducted prior to the EAL validation exercises. The technical accuracy of the upgraded EALs were verified through tabletop reviews.
 
, 0 The validation process     sures that the NMP2 EALs and c assification procedures are usable and correct, and ensures that emergency response personnel are able to arrive at consistent interpretations of EALs under similar conditions. The EALs were validated through observation of emergency response organization personnel responding to simulated emergency events. The group of EALs selected for validation were sufficiently representative of all the EALs.
 
OSSI 93-402A-10-NMP2 Docket f,'~-'ft~
Accession 8   a z     uz>
Date ~I   Do;l:.-t Filo Of Lti'eguiatol ew or                                         a e mer enc                                             c ion eve                                       ra e roec Nine Mile Point         1 &2 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Generation Package Operations Support Services, Inc.
233 Water Street 2nd Floor Plymouth, MA 02360
 
1t
              't'ii$r   I ggqf w
I $ 4 +l +       Pl II
                      ,   '.
                              ~ch I                   ~  ~
l'   U ~
r}}

Revision as of 21:56, 21 October 2019

Forwards Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EALs Rev Based on NUMARC NESP-007. Upgrade Project Involved Listed Plants
ML18040A132
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1994
From: Mccormick M
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17059A356 List:
References
NMP2L-1482, NUDOCS 9407150239
Download: ML18040A132 (10)


Text

k'H.j.MML'. 'Y (ACCELERATED BIDS P ROCESSI REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9407150239 DOC.DATE: 94/07/11 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Niagara Moha 05000410 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MCCORMICK,M. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards "Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EALs Rev Based on NUMARC NESP-007." Upgrade project involved listed plants.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: AO45D COPIES RECEIUED: LTR 2 ENCL / SIZE: &400 TITLE: OR Submittal: Emergency Preparedness Plans, Implement'g Proce ures, C NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(12/22/72). 05000237 License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RE PIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL CO NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-1 PD 1 1 1 1 PD1-3 PD 1 1 BRINKMAN,D 1 1 BRINKMAN,D. 1 1 MENNING,J 1 1 STANG,J 1 1 CONICELLA,N. 1 1 JOHNSON.,A 1 1 INTERNAL: AEOD/DOA/IRB 1 1 NRI~RSSg PEPB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 REG~~LE) 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 g Qu/@ex NOTE TO ALL"RIDS'ECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE XYASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXI: 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTIONLISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEEDI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 15 ENCL 15

t T NIAGARA U MOHAWK ONE AS1LE PONT NUCLEAR TRANNG CENTER I RD 01, BOX 1481OSWEGO NEW YORK 13126/TELEPHONE ( 315 ) 349 -2080

~

July 11, 1994 NMP2L 1482 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Nine Mile Point Nudear Power Station Unit 2 Docket No, 50-410 License No. NPF-69

SUBJECT:

Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Emergency Action Levels Revision Based on NUMARC NESP-007 In accordance with the guidance provided by the NRC staff at recent NEI meetings, Niagara Mohawk is submitting for review and approval the enclosed Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for Nine Mile Point Nudear Station Unit 2. Niagara Mohawk, in accordance with 10CFR50,54 (q), has reviewed these EALs and determined that they represent an enhancement to the Nine Mle Point Emergency Plan, The EALs have been revised consistent with the NUMARC NESP407 methodology, and were developed as part of a joint project with all nudear utilities within New York State. In order to assist your review we have included a number of developmental documents in the endosed EAL Generation Package.

The EAL Generation Package consists of the following:

~ Plant-Specific EAL Guideline ~ EAL Technical Bases

~ Fission Product Barrier Evaluation ~ Emergency Action Level Matrix

~ EAL Binning Document ~ Validation and Verification Report Attachment 1 provides an explanation of the contents of the EAL Generation Package.

These EALs were developed as a joint project with the New York Power Authority, Consolidated Edison, Rochester Gas and Electric, and Niagara Mohawk. This process ensures consistent emergency classification between all New York State nuclear utilities to the greatest extent possible, limited only by plant design differences. We believe that a coordinated review of all the New York State nuclear utility EAL revisions willpromote this consistency and willresult in the most advantageous use of time and resources.

Please contact Ms. Coleen Ware, Director of Emergency Preparedness, at 349-2066 should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this matter.

Very truly yours, c

M . McCormick, Jr.

Vice President-Nudear Safety Assessment and Support MJM/JDJ/bh CC: Mr. B.S. Norris, Senior Resident Inspector Mr. M. L. Boyle, Acting Director, Project Directorate I-1, NRR Mr. D.S. Brinkman, Sr. Project Manager, NRR Mr. T. T. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region 1 9407 250239 9407>> 1 PDR ADOCK 05000410 pgyg P P'DP

(()

ATTACHMENT 1 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 EAL GENERATION PACKAGE CONTENT

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION Prior to the acceptance by the NRC of NUMARC/NESP-007 "Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels" as an acceptable alternative to the NUREG 0654 EAL guidance, the four nuclear utilities in the State of New York decided to perform a joint implementation of the new methodology. This upgrade project involved the following plants:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP1) - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2) - Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant - New York Power Authority Indian Point Station 2 - Consolidated Edison Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Station- New York Power Authority R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station - Rochester Gas and Electric While the resulting upgraded EALs are site specific, an objective of the upgrade project was to ensure conformity and consistency between the sites to the extent possible.

The following paragraphs describe the site specific EAL developmental documents which are included in the EAL review package.

~ ~

1 The PEG is the NMP2 Interpretation of the NUMARC methodology for developing EALs. The PEG identifies deletions from the NUMARC methodology by striking out words and phrases that are not applicable, additions are identified by underlining new words and phrases. The documents which provide the basis for these changes from NUMARC methodology are listed in the references section of the PEG.

i nP B 'r vl i The FPBE contains the evaluation of the NUMARC example EALs for each of the three fission product barriers. The result of this evaluation is a discrete set of quantifiable EALs which represent the NUMARC fission product barrier loss matrices.

, ~

Based on the number o example EALs, and the number o oss and potential loss conditions, the set of conditions that can yield a given emergency classification can be determined. An evaluation of each condition or set of conditions was made to determine if it properly defines the appropriate threshold for the dassification. If a condition or set of conditions was appropriate, a comment reflecting this conclusion was recorded in this document, If a condition or set of conditions is determined to be inappropriate, it is lined out and the reason for this conclusion is similarly recorded.

P2E LB Since the format presented in NUMARC/NESP-007 is inadequate for implementation; the EALs.defined-by-the.PEG-and FPBE-must be binned into categories and subcategories which support ease of use. The binning document identifies where each PEG/FPBE Initiating Conditions (IC) is addressed within the presentation scheme, NMP2 EAL Technical Bases Document The EAL Technical Bases Document provides an explanation and rationale for each of the emergency action level (EALs) included in the EAL Upgrade Program.

It is also intended to facilitate the review process of the NMP2 EALs and provide historical documentation for future reference. This document is also intended to be used by those individuals responsible for implementation of the NMP2 dassification procedure as a technical reference and aid in EAL interpretation.

NMP2 Emer en A ion Level Matrix The Emergency Action Level Matrix is the user level result of the EAL development project. This matrix will be incorporated in the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures and is used directly by operations personnel to classify an event.

P2V r' li i The NMP2 Verification and Validabon Report documents the process conducted to verify and to validate the site specific EALs and supporting documentation, This document also includes the comments received during validation along with comment resolutions.

The verification process was performed to ensure the NMP2 EALs and classification procedures are technically correct. The NMP2 EAL verification was conducted prior to the EAL validation exercises. The technical accuracy of the upgraded EALs were verified through tabletop reviews.

, 0 The validation process sures that the NMP2 EALs and c assification procedures are usable and correct, and ensures that emergency response personnel are able to arrive at consistent interpretations of EALs under similar conditions. The EALs were validated through observation of emergency response organization personnel responding to simulated emergency events. The group of EALs selected for validation were sufficiently representative of all the EALs.

OSSI 93-402A-10-NMP2 Docket f,'~-'ft~

Accession 8 a z uz>

Date ~I Do;l:.-t Filo Of Lti'eguiatol ew or a e mer enc c ion eve ra e roec Nine Mile Point 1 &2 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Generation Package Operations Support Services, Inc.

233 Water Street 2nd Floor Plymouth, MA 02360

1t

't'ii$r I ggqf w

I $ 4 +l + Pl II

, '.

~ch I ~ ~

l' U ~

r