L-78-108, Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for the Period: 1-01-77 to 12-31-77.: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:~L (RETS MASTER FILE 8N V-"/)FLORIDA POWER G LIGHT COMPANY St.Lucie Plant Unit No.1', License No.-DPR-67 Docket Vio.50-335 ANNUAL.EViVZRONHENTAL RADZOLOGZCAL HONZTORZViG REPORT for The Period: 1-01-77 to 12-31-77 Pre!ared 2-28-78 Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with St.Lucie Plant Technical Specifications'ection 5.6.1.b.All environmental samples were collected and analyzed during this reporting period in accordance with require-ments of St..Lucie Plant's Technical Specifications.
{{#Wiki_filter:~L                             (
The minimum frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclide species as required by these speci ications nave been met or exceeded.No harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage to the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding St.Lucie Plant have been detected by this monitoring program.Xn addition to the Envi onmental Radiological i4Ionitoring data, this report includes information about the semi-annual census for 500 ft gardens and milk-producing animals.The Nonitorin Pro ram Anal tical Res onsibilit Environmental radiological monitoring at St.Lucie Plant is carried out by the Orlando Radiological Laboratory of the Department of Health and Rehabili-tative Services of Florida (DHRS)personnel.
RETS MASTER FILE 8N V-"/)
Number of Sam les Anal zed..A"<otal,:of 1,594--analyses on:aamp3.es coll cted from 25 different locations were perrormed during tne period of this report.TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and range values of these analyses.S lit Sample Analyses At least 20 of the samples collected have been analyzed in the DHRS/ERDA Split-Sampling Program.Evaluation of Data Except as noted in TABLE 1, none of the sampling locations used in the environmental radiological monitoring program showed evidence of having significant concent at'ons of a particular radionuclide in a.spec'fic sample material much higher than the observed mean=or that radionucl'de at all sampling locations.
FLORIDA POWER   G LIGHT COMPANY St. Lucie Plant Unit No. 1 ',
inst of the data reported reflect concentration increases as a result of fallout from the Chinese bomb tests of 1977.Trend plotting or" our particulate and direct radiation data reveals no plant'-related variations.
License No. - DPR-67 Docket Vio. 50-335 ANNUAL .EViVZRONHENTAL RADZOLOGZCAL HONZTORZViG REPORT for The Period:   1-01-77 to 12-31-77 Pre!ared 2-28-78
Also, all data have been evaluated with respect to pre-operational data and have been found to be within the+2a limits observed for these pze-operational data.Comparative data obtained in the assay of control samples also appears in TABLE 1.Non-Routine Reported measurements Following the release of water from the Refueling Rater Storage Tank (RNST)to the Settling Basin (on site)on 4-12-77, a series of special samples were collected from the Indian River;the ocean east of the intake canal;the ocean east of the discharge canal;a well at a residence on indian River Drive, west of the plant;and a sample of soil alongside Highway AlA, east of the plant.These samples were analyzed by DHRS and the analytical results showed"no detectable" radionuclides of those that could have been associated with the RWST release.Following the September-October Chinese weapons tests, air particulate filters from 3 sampling locations and a milk sample were collected and analyzed.'Ce,'Ru, and'were detected and appeared to be from the Chinese weapons tests.Dair Herd, Goat, and Garden Census A dairy herd census was conducted in January and in August during this report period.The nearest dairy is west of the plant site (260';14 miles).Data obtained in the assays of samples collected at this location are reported in TABLE 1.One milk goat has been found at a location SVT oz the plant site (220';2.2 miles).Xt produces negligible amounts of milk.An aerial garden census in April, 1977 showed that there were several 500 ft~gardens within approximately 5 miles of St.Lucie Plant.Collard Greens were sampled at 7609 indian River Drive;NSW, 2 m'les.Results of these analyses appea in TABLE l.Conc'lusions During this period, tne environmental radiological monitoring program has found that the radiation levels around St.Lucie Unit No.1 aze much less than those which might contribute harmful effects or irreversible damage to either the environment or to the health and safety of individuals and population groups in the regions surrounding St.Lucie plant.
 
TABLE 1 ENVI!10ttHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 110tllTORING PROGRAH SUINARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY St.Lucio Plant Unit 1 DOCKET tlO.DP"-67 LOCATION OF FACILITY~CII~tt~aitllgg0pj REPORTING PERIOD 1-01-77 to 12-31-77 Ihetdiuin or Patte<ay Santpl ed Unt t Analysis for-Sites Number of All Indicator I.ocations Range Sampl es Analyses.Hean Location arith Ill hest Hean Sauiple Location Di s tance and Oi rec ti on Ilean Control Locations Range tlean Range Number of tlonroutine Reported Heasurements 1:0 AIR FILTERS 1.1 Air Particu-pCi/m 3 Te tee<<68 0.12~a~0.02-2.77 N-30: Residence, 7609 Ynnd an River'rive; ASH, 2 miles 0.16 0.03-2.77.13~b~0.03-2.<<o Heasurements cited in this report.1.1 Air Iodines 1.1 Ganuya Scan~rant1ly tom-posites of filters)1.1 Sr An~al~sis of Ft ter~to~moo tes 1.2 Oi rect Faadation pCi/m pCI/m pCi/m U Rem/h 44Sr 40Sr 108 36 72<<68 108 36 36 72 IID<c>IID~d1 ND 3-17 tlone None ttone tlone II-12: FPL Substation, Stuart, Florida;S, 12 miles 7(e)16-18 5<<-5 2.0 WATER 2.1.1 Oisch~ar e~pCi/I Cana I~SSr 12 12 12 775~"~12<200-a<<00 II-36: On sitet Dis.Canal, Itest of AIA;ESE, 0.19 miles 775<200-<<<<00 sos 12 12 ND Mediu.n or Pa tinny Sa noled Unit Analysis for Sites Huaher of Saa~ples Analyses All Indicator Locations Hean Control I.ocat ion(1 Samp)e Location Distance and Direction Range llean Range I4ean Location with Ill hest Hean Nuttier of Nonrnut,ine Reported 8easuretents 2.1.2.Ocean Mater PCi/1 ('f'l 1.e tataertee~
Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with St. Lucie Plant Technical Specifications'ection 5.6.1.b.
~ptt/1 Neater 2 Ground Mater pCI/1 eet t Hp 3 Potable Mate pCi/1 (g)s OSr GO-OS GD-IjOS GO-OS GO-IIDS 24~24 12 12 12 24 24 24 12 12 12<200 ND NO'200%00 NO HO%00 ND" NO None Hone None None Hone one Hone one one one 3.0 3.1 DDTTOII SHIIIIENTS Oisch~ar e Canal pCi/kg"Sr 90Sr"2r iiiCe s'Co 2 2 1.1 2 2 1 1*.,1 NO ND 170 300 240 140-200 250-350 220-260 Hone None II-36: On site, Ois.Canal, west of AIA;E.SE, 0.19 miles 170 300 240 40-20 50-35 20-26 I'.odium or pathway Sa.a~led I:nit Analysis for Number of Sites Samples Analyses titan Range All Indicator Locations Location with Ili hest fiean Sample Location Distance and Direction Ilean Aange Control I.ocation>>
All environmental samples were collected and analyzed during this reporting period in accordance with require-ments of St.. Lucie Plant's Technical Specifications.           The minimum frequency     of collection     and analyses for specific radionuclide species as required by these speci ications nave been met or exceeded.
)Vean Range IIu!!her of Nunroutine Reported IIeaSure!mntS 3.2 Ocean 3.3 Beach Sand 3.4 Es taurine 4.D AqNTJC BIO fA 4.1 Crustacea 4.2.1 Fish-Ca>ni-vore pCi/kg Ci/ig Ci/kg Ci/kg Ci/kg 4'Sr QDSr 9 sZr~9Sr soSr s 5Zr s$2r osSr ND 33 60 7D (9)HD-100 ND-140 HD-90 Hone Hone II-32: Entomology i.ab, Vero Beach, NNM, 19 mile Hone Hone II-32: Entomology I.ab Vero Beach, NNII, 19 mile H-]3;On site, North of Big Nud Creek at indian 06!le None Hone 110 70 NO(b)No(b)6o-loo Bo(")No(b)No(')80-140 110()HD-90 (i).0(b)60-100 80-140 4.2.2 Fish-Ilerbi-vore Ci/kg 5 0Sr 00S soSr No 12 NO-23 No-40 II-32: Entomology Lab, Vero Beach;NtN, 19 mile Hone II'-32: Entomology Lab;Vero Beach, HNM.19 mile 17(3)23(k)11-23 10()ND-23 ND(b)10-40
No harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage to the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding St. Lucie Plant have been detected by this monitoring program.
!!ediu:I!or Patlrvay Saafp1 ed 5.0 TER!IESTRIA~
Xn addition to the Envi onmental Radiological i4Ionitoring data, this report includes information about the semi-annual census for 500 ft gardens and milk-producing animals.
ofoYA Uni t Analysis for Sites Null'Ibis r 0 f All Indicator l.ocations Range SaaIpl es Analyses tlean Sample Location Distance and Direction Ilean Range Location with lli hest I'!ean I'.can Range Control Location(Numbe2 Of Iaonrou t 121 e Reported tiealSuref alen tS 5.1 Hi 1k PC I/1'7C 4$2.dr 90Sr ssli 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 18.4 NO ND-35 1.3-3.6 N0-1.5 II-40: Control-Davis 22'20-35 (1)D~ary, Boynton Beach, SSE, 55.0 adios None None None ND(l)3(1)2(l)20-35 NO-2 5.2.1 Food-Citrus UCi/kg 4sSr sOSr ND 27.5 11-46 None II-22;Lentz Groves, US 1;SSII, 5.5 miles II-23: Hontauk Groves, US 1;II, 4.7 miles II-24: Poster Gro'ves, US 1 TINII, 5.35 miles 38 37-39 46 45-47;41 40-42 5.3 Soil I2CI/Kg s ss Cs 5.2.2~Food-Leaf pCI/Ka'a'Cs~Ve stables 320(m)6 367 300-340 ND-1500 II-41: 7609 Indian River O~rve;llSII, 2 miles 320 300-400 II-32: Entomology.
The Nonitorin Pro     ram Anal   tical Res onsibilit Environmental radiological monitoring at St. Lucie Plant is carried out by the Orlando Radiological Laboratory of the Department of Health and Rehabili-tative Services of Florida (DHRS) personnel.
Lab, 420 Vero Beach;NNII;19 miles 390-450 II-08: FPL Substation, 1400 1300-Ifest of US 1;.NIII, 5.7 mi es 1500 420(b)390-450
Number   of Sam les Anal zed
!!odium or Pathway Sampled Unit Analysis for Sites ttunker of All Indicator Locations Range San@les Analyses tlean Control'l.ocation()Sample Location Distance and Directfon!lean Range Hean Range Location with Ilf hest Mean ltunber of Nonroutine Reported Neasurenxnts 5.3 Soil (cont'soCe s sZr~SSr soSr 125 195 ND 22 ND-900 II-08: FPL Substation,<<est of US 1;MIDI, 5.7 miles ND-690 II-08: FPL Substation,>>est of US 1;'llNII, 5.7 mlles H-09: FPL Substation, west of US 1;SSH, 7.3 miles tlone NO-160 Il-32: Entomology Lab, Vero Beach;ttttll, 19 miles 700 500-90 NO(")620 550-69 150()230 200-26 ND(b)120 80-160 120 100-200 80-160 N01'ES: (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)~(9)and Octob ehabilita during Ap nt of I!ca 1 stations nly compos is located il, Hay th and I Data b II-32: 0 All i d As]tnt.d Thts tto serve epart m fvfdup NO.5 s, nestor to 5.-detectab ctober sh natural r were noi tes of on/near e samples~samples Gamnatl spectr'analyses of thes of 3.II trent/hr.Gangue spectr 1 analyses of thes r influence fve Service e;only the wed evidenc dfoactivity by fal Entomo>>eokly'f rad deposit hoked the resence hoi<ed no dt tee tabl e out from hinese weapon tests tory, East of U.S.1, Ver f 10-16-77 gave a concent (s Zr, aiiCe sooRu), whi r monitors, other than co 9 mf tes+0.01 ve of C;t!NI!, of 0.16 indicattf ogy Labor omposlte onuclides Beacl.ation h are All oth~>trol, had a n an of 4 atural radioactivity, onl.qanma rad)ation.
    ..A "<otal,:of 1,594--analyses     on:aamp3.es coll cted from 25 different locations were perrormed during tne period of this report. TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and range values of these analyses.
Cf/m.inese wea 4 lirem/hr on tests and a range f'.edium or Path>cay Samp led Unit Analysis for Hunker of Sites Samples Analyses lkean Range All indicator Locations Location ivith Hi hest lkan Sample Location Distance and Direction Control'ocation(a)
S lit Sample   Analyses At least 20 of the samples collected have been analyzed in the DHRS/ERDA Split-Sampling Program.
Range I'ean Range fiuo4er of Nonroutine Reported Heasuremen's HOTES (cont'd)(h)~H prI.(i)Gaaum (j)One s~(k)Two s (l)Contr (m)Colla sent i spectr~mple o mples 1 samp d gree April-Jun l analysis ly;unclas f mullet.e is H-40, is.Oavi s iry, Ooyn only vi th a mean indicat s only na ified f sh'.Hone of 2500 pCi ural radioa detected in on Beach, S l and a tivitie a sampl f, 55.8 giles.range of 00-4400 pC1/l.of mulle.
Evaluation of Data Except as noted in TABLE 1, none of the sampling locations used in the environmental radiological monitoring program showed evidence of having significant concent at'ons of a particular radionuclide in       a. spec'fic sample material much higher than the observed         mean =or that radionucl'de at all   sampling locations. inst of the data reported
REGULATORY INFORl'lATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOt~iING NATERIAL 50-335 REC: ORE ILLY J P l'lRC ORG: UHR I 6 R E Fl PWR'~LIGHT O'.."'TYP: I ETTER  
 
reflect concentration increases       as a result of fallout from the Chinese     bomb tests of 1977.
Trend   plotting or" our particulate and direct radiation data reveals no   plant'-related   variations. Also, all data have been evaluated with respect to pre-operational data and have been found to be within the +2a limits observed for these pze-operational data. Comparative data obtained in the assay of control samples also appears in TABLE 1.
Non-Routine Reported measurements Following the release of water from the Refueling Rater Storage Tank (RNST) to the Settling Basin (on site) on 4-12-77, a series of special samples were collected from the Indian River; the ocean east of the intake canal; the ocean east of the discharge canal; a well at a residence on indian River Drive, west of the plant; and a sample of soil alongside Highway AlA, east of the plant.
These samples were analyzed by DHRS and the analytical results showed "no detectable" radionuclides of those that could have been associated with the RWST release.
Following the September-October Chinese weapons tests, air particulate filters from 3 sampling locations and a milk sample were collected and analyzed.
      '
                                                    'Ce, 'Ru, and         were detected and appeared to be     from the Chinese weapons   tests.
Dair Herd, Goat, and Garden Census A dairy herd census     was conducted in January and in August during this report period. The nearest dairy is west of the plant site (260'; 14 miles). Data obtained in the assays of samples collected at this location are reported in TABLE 1.
One milk goat has been found at a location SVT oz the plant site (220'; 2. 2 miles) . Xt produces negligible amounts of milk.
An aerial garden census in April, 1977 showed that there were several 500 ft~ gardens within approximately 5 miles of St. Lucie Plant. Collard Greens were sampled at 7609 indian River Drive; NSW, 2 m'les. Results of these analyses appea in TABLE l.
Conc'lusions During this period, tne environmental radiological monitoring program has found that the radiation levels around St. Lucie Unit No. 1 aze much less than those which might contribute harmful effects or irreversible damage to either the environment or to the health and safety of individuals and population groups in the regions surrounding St. Lucie plant.
 
TABLE   1 ENVI!10ttHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 110tllTORING PROGRAH SUINARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY   St. Lucio Plant Unit     1 DOCKET tlO. DP"-67 LOCATION OF FACILITY   ~CII~tt~aitllgg0pj                                   REPORTING PERIOD       1-01-77 to 12-31-77 arith All Indicator                Location          Ill hest Hean              Control        Number  of tlonroutine Ihetdiuin or Patte<ay             Analysis Number  of                  I.ocations              Sauiple Location                            Locations          Reported Santpl ed         Unt t     for     Sites     Sampl es   Analyses. Hean       Range    Di s tance and Oi rec   ti on   Ilean Range     tlean   Range   Heasurements 1:0 AIR     FILTERS 3
1.1   Air Particu-     pCi/m                                           <<68     0.12~a~ 0.02-2.77 N-30: Residence,           7609       0.16   0.03-   . 13~b~   0.03-2.<< Heasurements Te tee                                                                                        Ynnd  an  River'rive;      ASH,          2.77                    o cited in this 2  miles                                                              report.
1.1   Air Iodines     pCi/m                                          <<68      IID<c>              tlone 1.1   Ganuya   Scan   pCI/m                              108          108      IID~d1              None
      ~rant1ly tom-posites of filters) 1.1   Sr         An~al pCi/m      44Sr                                36                          ttone
      ~sis of Ft ter
      ~to~moo tes                 40Sr                    36          36        ND                tlone 1 .2   Oi rect Faadation       U Rem/h                             72          72                 3-17   II-12:   FPL Substation,         7(e)   16-18     5           <<-5 Stuart, Florida; S, 12 miles 2.0   WATER 2.1.1     Oisch~ar e~   pCi/I                               12           12     775~" ~     <200-   II-36: On sitet Dis.               775  <200-Cana I                                                                              a<<00  Canal, Itest of AIA;                       <<<<00
                                    ~
ESE, 0.19 miles SSr                  12          12 sos                    12           12       ND
 
Location with Ill hest Hean        Control      Nuttier of All Indicator                                                              Nonrnut,ine Mediu.n   or                     Analysis Huaher   of             Locations             Samp)e Location                    I.ocat ion( 1 Reported Pa tinny Sa noled            Unit    for  Sites  Saa~ples  Analyses  Hean                Distance and Direction llean Range     I4ean   Range 8easuretents
('f'l
: 2. 1.2. Ocean Mater     PCi/ 1                     24        24    <200              None 24      ND              Hone s OSr            ~
24        24      NO              None 1.e   tataertee~    ~
ptt/1                                       '200              None Neater 2     Ground Mater pCI/1                                           %00              Hone eet t Hp GO-OS                                NO                one GD-IjOS                              HO              Hone 3     Potable Mate       pCi/1                     12        12    %00                one (g)
GO-OS               12        12    ND"              one GO-IIDS             12        12     NO               one 3.0       DDTTOII SHIIIIENTS 3.1       Oisch~ar e       pCi/kg   "Sr               2         2   NO              Hone Canal                      90Sr              2         2   ND              None "2r                1         1   170     140-200 II-36: On site, Ois.         170    40-20 iiiCe                          1* 300      250-350 Canal, west of AIA;           300    50-35 E.SE, 0.19 miles             240   20-26 s'Co              .1        .,1  240      220-260
 
Location with Ili hest fiean           Control        IIu!!her of All Indicator                                                              )    Nunroutine I'.odium or pathway          Analysis Number  of            Locations            Sample Location                      I.ocation>>
Reported Sa.a~led        I:nit    for  Sites  Samples  Analyses titan    Range    Distance and Direction Ilean Aange        Vean    Range  IIeaSure!mntS 3.2     Ocean         pCi/kg  4'Sr                              ND            Hone                                        NO(b)
QDSr                                              Hone                                        No(b) 9 sZr                              33      HD-100 II-32: Entomology i.ab,              6o-loo Bo(")      60-100 Vero Beach, NNM, 19 mile 3.3      Beach Sand    Ci/ig   ~ 9Sr                                             Hone                                        No(b) soSr                                             Hone                                        No(')
s 5Zr                             60      ND-140 II-32: Entomology I.ab       110    80-140 110( )      80-140 Vero Beach, NNII, 19 mile 3.4      Es taurine    Ci/kg  s$
2r                              7D      HD-90  H-]3;   On site, North of     70  HD-90 Big Nud Creek at indian 06   !le 4.D      AqNTJC BIO fA 4.1      Crustacea      Ci/kg                                    (9)             None                                        (i) 4.2.1    Fish-Ca>  ni- Ci/kg    osSr                                              Hone                                        .0(b) vore 5 0Sr                                      NO-23 II-32: Entomology Lab,      17(3)   11-23 10( )     ND-23 Vero Beach; NtN, 19 mile 4.2.2   Fish-Ilerbi- Ci/kg     00S                               No            Hone                                        ND(b) vore soSr                               12       No-40 II'-32: Entomology Lab;     23(k)                    10-40 Vero Beach, HNM. 19 mile
 
Location with lli hest I'!ean            Control          Numbe2    Of All Indicator                                                                          Iaonrou t 121 e Null'Ibis r 0f              l.ocations              Sample Location                          Location(            Reported
!!ediu:I! or Patlrvay         Analysis Uni t     for Sites SaaIpl es    Analyses  tlean      Range     Distance and Direction Ilean Range           I'.can Range   tiealSuref alen tS Saafp1 ed 5.0      TER!IESTRIA~
ofoYA
                              '                                       18.4     ND-35     II-40: Control-Davis           22'(1) 20-35               20-35 5.1      Hi 1k        PC I/1     7C                36 D~ary, Boynton Beach, SSE, 55.0 adios 4$ 2                            36    NO                None                                           ND(l)
                                    .dr              36
: 1. 3-3. 6 None 3(1) 90Sr                36          36 ssli                  36          36              N0-1.5    None 2(l )     NO-2 Food-Citrus UCi/kg     4sSr                                   ND                 None 5.2.1 sOSr                                  27.5     11-46     II-22; Lentz Groves,   US 1;   38    37-39 SSII, 5.5 miles II-23: Hontauk Groves,           46    45-47 US 1; II, 4.7 miles II-24: Poster Gro'ves,   US 1 ; 41      40-42 TINII, 5.35 miles 5.2.2 ~Food-Leaf     pCI/Ka 'a'Cs                                 320(m)     300-340   II-41: 7609 Indian River       320    300-400
          ~Ve stables O~rve; llSII, 2 miles s ss Cs                          6    367      ND-1500    II-32: Entomology. Lab,       420   390-450 420(b)    390-450 5.3      Soil        I2CI/Kg Vero Beach; NNII; 19 miles II-08: FPL Substation,         1400   1300-Ifest of US 1;.NIII, 5.7 mi es       1500
 
Location with Ilf hest Mean              Control        ltunber  of All Indicator                                                                    )    Nonroutine ttunker of                    Locations                Sample Location                        'l.ocation(
!!odium or Pathway                 Analysis                                                                                                                              Reported Sampled           Unit       for     Sites     San@les   Analyses     tlean       Range      Distance and Directfon !lean Range           Hean     Range   Neasurenxnts 5.3     Soil (cont'soCe                                                                                                                           NO(")
125         ND-900 II-08:   FPL Substation,     700    500-90
                                                                                                    <<est   of US 1; MIDI, 5.7 miles s sZr                                        195        ND-690   II-08: FPL Substation,       620    550-69  150( )    100-200
                                                                                                    >>est of US 1; 'llNII, 5.7 mlles H-09: FPL Substation,         230    200-26 west of US 1; SSH, 7.3 miles
                                    ~ SSr                                          ND                tlone                                         ND(b) soSr                                          22        NO-160   Il-32: Entomology Lab,         120  80-160  120        80-160 Vero Beach; ttttll, 19 miles N01'ES:                  nestor (a)   Data    b serve  during Ap il, Hay and Octob  r  influence    by  fal out from hinese weapon tests (b)   II-32: 0 epart m nt of I!ca th and I ehabilita  fve Service    Entomo ogy Labor tory, East of U.S. 1,          Ver Beacl ; t!NI!, 9 mf tes (c)
(d)
(e)
All i d fvfdup 1 stations were noi -detectab As]tnt.d NO. 5 nly compos tes of ctober sh Thts tto s,
is located on/near natural r wed evidenc  'f e; only the >>eokly omposlte          f 10-16-77  gave a concent .ation of 0.16 + 0.01 Cf/m .
rad onuclides (s Zr, aiiCe sooRu), whi h are indicattf ve of C inese wea on tests dfoactivity deposit All oth~ r monitors, other than co >trol, had a n an of 4 4 lirem/hr and a range of 3.II to 5. trent/hr.
(f)   Gangue spectr 1 analyses of thes e samples      hoked the    resence                atural radioactivity, onl      .
~(9)            Gamnatl spectr'   analyses of thes samples
                                                    ~
hoi <ed no dt tee  tabl e qanma  rad)ation.
 
Location ivith Hi hest lkan          Control      fiuo4er of All indicator                                                          Nonroutine Hunker  of                Locations        Sample Location                    'ocation(a) f'.edium  or  Path>cay            Analysis                                                                                                            Reported Samp  led            Unit    for      Sites    Samples  Analyses    lkean    Range Distance and Direction          Range  I'ean  Range Heasuremen's HOTES    (cont'd)
(h)     ~H prI. sent i April-Jun only vi th a mean of 2500 pCi l and a range of 00-4400 pC1/l.
(i)     Gaaum  spectr~ l analysis indicat s only na ural radioa tivitie (j)          s~ mple o ly; unclas ified f One                                sh'. Hone detected in a sampl of mulle .
(k)      Two s mples    f mullet.
(l)      Contr 1 samp e is H-40, Oavi s    iry, Ooyn on Beach,  S f,  55.8 giles.
(m)      Colla d gree is.
 
REGULATORY INFORl'lATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOt~iING NATERIAL                          50-335 REC: ORE ILLY J P                    ORG:    UHR I 6 R E                ,  DOCDATE: 03/29/78 l'lRC                              Fl  PWR '~ LIGHT                 DATE RCVD:
9/io 7P, O'.." 'TYP: I ETTER                                                         COPIES RECEIVED


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
FORWARDING ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON MONITORING REPT OF FOR THE PERIOD JAN 1 TO DEC 31 1977., DOCDATE: 03/29/78 DATE RCVD: 9/io 7P, COPIES RECEIVED LTP.1 ENCL 17 SUBJECT FACILITY r LANT MANE: '=T LUCIE REVIEWER INITIAL: X Jt'1 DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL': DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS++++M s>>+>>+++>+>
LTP. 1    ENCL 17 FORWARDING ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON MONITORING REPT OF SUBJECT FACILITY FOR THE PERIOD JAN 1 TO DEC 31             1977.
ANNUAL ENVIRONNENTAL RPTS (OL STAGE).(DISTRIBUTION CODE A007)FOR ACTION: INTERNAL: EXTERNAL: BR CHIEF RFID+~~W/7 ENi'L-REG FILE~~W/ENCL I'.E+~W/2 ENCL BALLARD~'~W/ENCL KREGER++W/ENCL LPDR S FT PIERCE Fl+4~W/ENCL T I Cs>>W/ENCL NSIC~~W/ENCL ACRS CAT B4~~W/ENCL pa~PA~%fFENC.L GR INES++W/ENCL I.COLLINS++A/EtlCL KASTNER++W/ENCL DISTRIBUTION:
r LANT MANE: '= T LUCIE                                           REVIEWER   INITIAL:   X Jt'1 DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL':
SIiE: iP+r'P LTR 20 ENCL 20 CONTROL NBR: 780100038 P.O.BOX 629100 MIAMI, F LA 33152 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY March 29, 1978 L-78-108 ir~J ames P.0'ei1 ly, Director, Region ii Office of inspection and En"orcement U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1217 Atlanta, Georgia 30303  
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS ++++M s>>+>>+++>+>
ANNUAL ENVIRONNENTAL RPTS     (OL STAGE).
(DISTRIBUTION CODE   A007)
FOR ACTION:     BR CHIEF RFID+~~W/7 ENi'L-INTERNAL:        REG   FILE~~W/ENCL                 pa  ~PA~%fFENC.L I '. E+~W/2   ENCL                GR INES++W/ENCL BALLARD~'~W/ENCL                     I. COLLINS++A/EtlCL KREGER++W/ENCL                     KASTNER++W/ENCL EXTERNAL:        LPDR S FT PIERCE Fl +4~W/ENCL T I Cs>>W/ENCL NSIC~~W/ENCL ACRS     CAT B4~~W/ENCL DISTRIBUTION:         LTR 20       ENCL 20                         CONTROL NBR:     780100038 SIiE: iP+r'P
 
P.O. BOX 629100 MIAMI,F LA 33152 FLORIDA POWER   5 LIGHT COMPANY March 29, 1978 L-78-108 ir ~ J ames   P . 0 'ei1 ly, Director, Region ii Office of     inspection   and En"orcement U. S. Nuclear       Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree Street,       N.W., Suite 1217 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
 
==Dear  iver. O'eilly:==


==Dear iver.O'eilly:==
Re. St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Annual Radiological Environmental !monitor'ncI   Re ort Two copies of the -St. Lucie Unit 1 Annual Radio'og'cal Environmental Monitoring Report for the period of January 1 to December 31, 1977, are at-'ached.       This report is submitted in compliance with Environmental Technical Specification 5.6.l.b.
Re.St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Annual Radiological Environmental
Very   truly yours, Robert =. Uhrig Vice President REU/b1AS/mb Attachment cc:     Rober     Lowenstein, Esquire Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (17)
!monitor'ncI Re ort Two copies of the-St.Lucie Unit 1 Annual Radio'og'cal Environmental Monitoring Report for the period of January 1 to December 31, 1977, are at-'ached.
PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE}}
This report is submitted in compliance with Environmental Technical Specification 5.6.l.b.Very truly yours, Robert=.Uhrig Vice President REU/b1AS/mb Attachment cc: Rober Lowenstein, Esquire Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (17)PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE}}

Revision as of 08:13, 21 October 2019

Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for the Period: 1-01-77 to 12-31-77.
ML18113A492
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/1978
From: Robert E. Uhrig
Florida Power & Light Co
To: O'Reilly J
NRC/RGN-II
References
L-78-108
Download: ML18113A492 (11)


Text

~L (

RETS MASTER FILE 8N V-"/)

FLORIDA POWER G LIGHT COMPANY St. Lucie Plant Unit No. 1 ',

License No. - DPR-67 Docket Vio. 50-335 ANNUAL .EViVZRONHENTAL RADZOLOGZCAL HONZTORZViG REPORT for The Period: 1-01-77 to 12-31-77 Pre!ared 2-28-78

Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with St. Lucie Plant Technical Specifications'ection 5.6.1.b.

All environmental samples were collected and analyzed during this reporting period in accordance with require-ments of St.. Lucie Plant's Technical Specifications. The minimum frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclide species as required by these speci ications nave been met or exceeded.

No harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage to the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding St. Lucie Plant have been detected by this monitoring program.

Xn addition to the Envi onmental Radiological i4Ionitoring data, this report includes information about the semi-annual census for 500 ft gardens and milk-producing animals.

The Nonitorin Pro ram Anal tical Res onsibilit Environmental radiological monitoring at St. Lucie Plant is carried out by the Orlando Radiological Laboratory of the Department of Health and Rehabili-tative Services of Florida (DHRS) personnel.

Number of Sam les Anal zed

..A "<otal,:of 1,594--analyses on:aamp3.es coll cted from 25 different locations were perrormed during tne period of this report. TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and range values of these analyses.

S lit Sample Analyses At least 20 of the samples collected have been analyzed in the DHRS/ERDA Split-Sampling Program.

Evaluation of Data Except as noted in TABLE 1, none of the sampling locations used in the environmental radiological monitoring program showed evidence of having significant concent at'ons of a particular radionuclide in a. spec'fic sample material much higher than the observed mean =or that radionucl'de at all sampling locations. inst of the data reported

reflect concentration increases as a result of fallout from the Chinese bomb tests of 1977.

Trend plotting or" our particulate and direct radiation data reveals no plant'-related variations. Also, all data have been evaluated with respect to pre-operational data and have been found to be within the +2a limits observed for these pze-operational data. Comparative data obtained in the assay of control samples also appears in TABLE 1.

Non-Routine Reported measurements Following the release of water from the Refueling Rater Storage Tank (RNST) to the Settling Basin (on site) on 4-12-77, a series of special samples were collected from the Indian River; the ocean east of the intake canal; the ocean east of the discharge canal; a well at a residence on indian River Drive, west of the plant; and a sample of soil alongside Highway AlA, east of the plant.

These samples were analyzed by DHRS and the analytical results showed "no detectable" radionuclides of those that could have been associated with the RWST release.

Following the September-October Chinese weapons tests, air particulate filters from 3 sampling locations and a milk sample were collected and analyzed.

'

'Ce, 'Ru, and were detected and appeared to be from the Chinese weapons tests.

Dair Herd, Goat, and Garden Census A dairy herd census was conducted in January and in August during this report period. The nearest dairy is west of the plant site (260'; 14 miles). Data obtained in the assays of samples collected at this location are reported in TABLE 1.

One milk goat has been found at a location SVT oz the plant site (220'; 2. 2 miles) . Xt produces negligible amounts of milk.

An aerial garden census in April, 1977 showed that there were several 500 ft~ gardens within approximately 5 miles of St. Lucie Plant. Collard Greens were sampled at 7609 indian River Drive; NSW, 2 m'les. Results of these analyses appea in TABLE l.

Conc'lusions During this period, tne environmental radiological monitoring program has found that the radiation levels around St. Lucie Unit No. 1 aze much less than those which might contribute harmful effects or irreversible damage to either the environment or to the health and safety of individuals and population groups in the regions surrounding St. Lucie plant.

TABLE 1 ENVI!10ttHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL 110tllTORING PROGRAH SUINARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY St. Lucio Plant Unit 1 DOCKET tlO. DP"-67 LOCATION OF FACILITY ~CII~tt~aitllgg0pj REPORTING PERIOD 1-01-77 to 12-31-77 arith All Indicator Location Ill hest Hean Control Number of tlonroutine Ihetdiuin or Patte<ay Analysis Number of I.ocations Sauiple Location Locations Reported Santpl ed Unt t for Sites Sampl es Analyses. Hean Range Di s tance and Oi rec ti on Ilean Range tlean Range Heasurements 1:0 AIR FILTERS 3

1.1 Air Particu- pCi/m <<68 0.12~a~ 0.02-2.77 N-30: Residence, 7609 0.16 0.03- . 13~b~ 0.03-2.<< Heasurements Te tee Ynnd an River'rive; ASH, 2.77 o cited in this 2 miles report.

1.1 Air Iodines pCi/m <<68 IID<c> tlone 1.1 Ganuya Scan pCI/m 108 108 IID~d1 None

~rant1ly tom-posites of filters) 1.1 Sr An~al pCi/m 44Sr 36 ttone

~sis of Ft ter

~to~moo tes 40Sr 36 36 ND tlone 1 .2 Oi rect Faadation U Rem/h 72 72 3-17 II-12: FPL Substation, 7(e) 16-18 5 <<-5 Stuart, Florida; S, 12 miles 2.0 WATER 2.1.1 Oisch~ar e~ pCi/I 12 12 775~" ~ <200- II-36: On sitet Dis. 775 <200-Cana I a<<00 Canal, Itest of AIA; <<<<00

~

ESE, 0.19 miles SSr 12 12 sos 12 12 ND

Location with Ill hest Hean Control Nuttier of All Indicator Nonrnut,ine Mediu.n or Analysis Huaher of Locations Samp)e Location I.ocat ion( 1 Reported Pa tinny Sa noled Unit for Sites Saa~ples Analyses Hean Distance and Direction llean Range I4ean Range 8easuretents

('f'l

2. 1.2. Ocean Mater PCi/ 1 24 24 <200 None 24 ND Hone s OSr ~

24 24 NO None 1.e tataertee~ ~

ptt/1 '200 None Neater 2 Ground Mater pCI/1 %00 Hone eet t Hp GO-OS NO one GD-IjOS HO Hone 3 Potable Mate pCi/1 12 12 %00 one (g)

GO-OS 12 12 ND" one GO-IIDS 12 12 NO one 3.0 DDTTOII SHIIIIENTS 3.1 Oisch~ar e pCi/kg "Sr 2 2 NO Hone Canal 90Sr 2 2 ND None "2r 1 1 170 140-200 II-36: On site, Ois. 170 40-20 iiiCe 1* 300 250-350 Canal, west of AIA; 300 50-35 E.SE, 0.19 miles 240 20-26 s'Co .1 .,1 240 220-260

Location with Ili hest fiean Control IIu!!her of All Indicator ) Nunroutine I'.odium or pathway Analysis Number of Locations Sample Location I.ocation>>

Reported Sa.a~led I:nit for Sites Samples Analyses titan Range Distance and Direction Ilean Aange Vean Range IIeaSure!mntS 3.2 Ocean pCi/kg 4'Sr ND Hone NO(b)

QDSr Hone No(b) 9 sZr 33 HD-100 II-32: Entomology i.ab, 6o-loo Bo(")60-100 Vero Beach, NNM, 19 mile 3.3 Beach Sand Ci/ig ~ 9Sr Hone No(b) soSr Hone No(')

s 5Zr 60 ND-140 II-32: Entomology I.ab 110 80-140 110( )80-140 Vero Beach, NNII, 19 mile 3.4 Es taurine Ci/kg s$

2r 7D HD-90 H-]3; On site, North of 70 HD-90 Big Nud Creek at indian 06 !le 4.D AqNTJC BIO fA 4.1 Crustacea Ci/kg (9) None (i) 4.2.1 Fish-Ca> ni- Ci/kg osSr Hone .0(b) vore 5 0Sr NO-23 II-32: Entomology Lab, 17(3) 11-23 10( ) ND-23 Vero Beach; NtN, 19 mile 4.2.2 Fish-Ilerbi- Ci/kg 00S No Hone ND(b) vore soSr 12 No-40 II'-32: Entomology Lab; 23(k) 10-40 Vero Beach, HNM. 19 mile

Location with lli hest I'!ean Control Numbe2 Of All Indicator Iaonrou t 121 e Null'Ibis r 0f l.ocations Sample Location Location( Reported

!!ediu:I! or Patlrvay Analysis Uni t for Sites SaaIpl es Analyses tlean Range Distance and Direction Ilean Range I'.can Range tiealSuref alen tS Saafp1 ed 5.0 TER!IESTRIA~

ofoYA

' 18.4 ND-35 II-40: Control-Davis 22'(1) 20-35 20-35 5.1 Hi 1k PC I/1 7C 36 D~ary, Boynton Beach, SSE, 55.0 adios 4$ 2 36 NO None ND(l)

.dr 36

1. 3-3. 6 None 3(1) 90Sr 36 36 ssli 36 36 N0-1.5 None 2(l ) NO-2 Food-Citrus UCi/kg 4sSr ND None 5.2.1 sOSr 27.5 11-46 II-22; Lentz Groves, US 1; 38 37-39 SSII, 5.5 miles II-23: Hontauk Groves, 46 45-47 US 1; II, 4.7 miles II-24: Poster Gro'ves, US 1 ; 41 40-42 TINII, 5.35 miles 5.2.2 ~Food-Leaf pCI/Ka 'a'Cs 320(m) 300-340 II-41: 7609 Indian River 320 300-400

~Ve stables O~rve; llSII, 2 miles s ss Cs 6 367 ND-1500 II-32: Entomology. Lab, 420 390-450 420(b) 390-450 5.3 Soil I2CI/Kg Vero Beach; NNII; 19 miles II-08: FPL Substation, 1400 1300-Ifest of US 1;.NIII, 5.7 mi es 1500

Location with Ilf hest Mean Control ltunber of All Indicator ) Nonroutine ttunker of Locations Sample Location 'l.ocation(

!!odium or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled Unit for Sites San@les Analyses tlean Range Distance and Directfon !lean Range Hean Range Neasurenxnts 5.3 Soil (cont'soCe NO(")

125 ND-900 II-08: FPL Substation, 700 500-90

<<est of US 1; MIDI, 5.7 miles s sZr 195 ND-690 II-08: FPL Substation, 620 550-69 150( ) 100-200

>>est of US 1; 'llNII, 5.7 mlles H-09: FPL Substation, 230 200-26 west of US 1; SSH, 7.3 miles

~ SSr ND tlone ND(b) soSr 22 NO-160 Il-32: Entomology Lab, 120 80-160 120 80-160 Vero Beach; ttttll, 19 miles N01'ES: nestor (a) Data b serve during Ap il, Hay and Octob r influence by fal out from hinese weapon tests (b) II-32: 0 epart m nt of I!ca th and I ehabilita fve Service Entomo ogy Labor tory, East of U.S. 1, Ver Beacl ; t!NI!, 9 mf tes (c)

(d)

(e)

All i d fvfdup 1 stations were noi -detectab As]tnt.d NO. 5 nly compos tes of ctober sh Thts tto s,

is located on/near natural r wed evidenc 'f e; only the >>eokly omposlte f 10-16-77 gave a concent .ation of 0.16 + 0.01 Cf/m .

rad onuclides (s Zr, aiiCe sooRu), whi h are indicattf ve of C inese wea on tests dfoactivity deposit All oth~ r monitors, other than co >trol, had a n an of 4 4 lirem/hr and a range of 3.II to 5. trent/hr.

(f) Gangue spectr 1 analyses of thes e samples hoked the resence atural radioactivity, onl .

~(9) Gamnatl spectr' analyses of thes samples

~

hoi <ed no dt tee tabl e qanma rad)ation.

Location ivith Hi hest lkan Control fiuo4er of All indicator Nonroutine Hunker of Locations Sample Location 'ocation(a) f'.edium or Path>cay Analysis Reported Samp led Unit for Sites Samples Analyses lkean Range Distance and Direction Range I'ean Range Heasuremen's HOTES (cont'd)

(h) ~H prI. sent i April-Jun only vi th a mean of 2500 pCi l and a range of 00-4400 pC1/l.

(i) Gaaum spectr~ l analysis indicat s only na ural radioa tivitie (j) s~ mple o ly; unclas ified f One sh'. Hone detected in a sampl of mulle .

(k) Two s mples f mullet.

(l) Contr 1 samp e is H-40, Oavi s iry, Ooyn on Beach, S f, 55.8 giles.

(m) Colla d gree is.

REGULATORY INFORl'lATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOt~iING NATERIAL 50-335 REC: ORE ILLY J P ORG: UHR I 6 R E , DOCDATE: 03/29/78 l'lRC Fl PWR '~ LIGHT DATE RCVD:

9/io 7P, O'.." 'TYP: I ETTER COPIES RECEIVED

SUBJECT:

LTP. 1 ENCL 17 FORWARDING ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRON MONITORING REPT OF SUBJECT FACILITY FOR THE PERIOD JAN 1 TO DEC 31 1977.

r LANT MANE: '= T LUCIE REVIEWER INITIAL: X Jt'1 DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL':

DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS ++++M s>>+>>+++>+>

ANNUAL ENVIRONNENTAL RPTS (OL STAGE).

(DISTRIBUTION CODE A007)

FOR ACTION: BR CHIEF RFID+~~W/7 ENi'L-INTERNAL: REG FILE~~W/ENCL pa ~PA~%fFENC.L I '. E+~W/2 ENCL GR INES++W/ENCL BALLARD~'~W/ENCL I. COLLINS++A/EtlCL KREGER++W/ENCL KASTNER++W/ENCL EXTERNAL: LPDR S FT PIERCE Fl +4~W/ENCL T I Cs>>W/ENCL NSIC~~W/ENCL ACRS CAT B4~~W/ENCL DISTRIBUTION: LTR 20 ENCL 20 CONTROL NBR: 780100038 SIiE: iP+r'P

P.O. BOX 629100 MIAMI,F LA 33152 FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY March 29, 1978 L-78-108 ir ~ J ames P . 0 'ei1 ly, Director, Region ii Office of inspection and En"orcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 230 Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 1217 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear iver. O'eilly:

Re. St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Annual Radiological Environmental !monitor'ncI Re ort Two copies of the -St. Lucie Unit 1 Annual Radio'og'cal Environmental Monitoring Report for the period of January 1 to December 31, 1977, are at-'ached. This report is submitted in compliance with Environmental Technical Specification 5.6.l.b.

Very truly yours, Robert =. Uhrig Vice President REU/b1AS/mb Attachment cc: Rober Lowenstein, Esquire Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (17)

PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE