ML13189A222: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000315 | | docket = 05000315 | ||
| license number = DPR-058 | | license number = DPR-058 | ||
| contact person = Wengert T | | contact person = Wengert T | ||
| case reference number = TAC MF0875 | | case reference number = TAC MF0875 | ||
| package number = ML13189A226 | | package number = ML13189A226 | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 1 of 4 Status: (4/11/13 @ 1700 hrs) | {{#Wiki_filter:Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 1 of 4 Status: (4/11/13 @ 1700 hrs) | ||
Bobbin Exam % | Bobbin HL CL Overall Exam % TTS% TTS% % | ||
SG 11 84.8 0 0 58.4 SG 12 83.9 92.5 0 71.3 SG 13 77.3 98.8 0 67.5 SG 14 75.7 91.1 0 65.8 | |||
: 1. Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle. | : 1. Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle. | ||
R1: No primary-to-secondary leakage has been detected since the steam generators were replaced in 2000. This includes the recently completed cycle of operation. | R1: No primary-to-secondary leakage has been detected since the steam generators were replaced in 2000. | ||
: 2. Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results. | This includes the recently completed cycle of operation. | ||
: 2. Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results. | |||
R2: No steam generator secondary side pressure tests were planned or performed during the outage. | R2: No steam generator secondary side pressure tests were planned or performed during the outage. | ||
: 3. Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines. R3: | : 3. Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines. | ||
R3: No exceptions have been taken to the EPRI Steam Generator Guidelines (inclusive of the examination, integrity, insitu, leak or water chemistry guidelines) or the NEI 97-06 Steam Generator Program Guidelines. | |||
: 4. For each SG, provide a description of the inspections performed including the areas examined and the probes used (e.g., dents/dings, sleeves, expansion-transition, U-bends with a rotating probe), the scope of the inspection (e.g., 100 percent of dents/dings greater than 5 volts and a 20 percent sample between 2 and 5 volts), and the expansion criteria. | : 4. For each SG, provide a description of the inspections performed including the areas examined and the probes used (e.g., dents/dings, sleeves, expansion-transition, U-bends with a rotating probe), the scope of the inspection (e.g., 100 percent of dents/dings greater than 5 volts and a 20 percent sample between 2 and 5 volts), and the expansion criteria. | ||
R4: Exam | R4: | ||
Freespan Wear Probe Bobbin X-probe +Point +Point +Point +Point +Point All SGs | Exam Full HL/CL Special SI - SI - SI - SI - | ||
Length TTS Interest - Foreign New Dents & Proximity & | |||
Lattice Objects Bobbin Dings Freespan Grids Wear Fan Bars Probe Bobbin X-probe +Point +Point +Point +Point +Point All SGs 100% ~21% All wear All All I-codes & Historical All | |||
> 20% PLPs/ FO new bobbin bobbin indications Wear, signals > 2 volts of proximity | |||
& freespan Affected wear historical FO locations, New FO Id by FOSAR Expansion N/A Min. 1 N/A Min. 1 EPRI EPRI EPRI Criteria tube tube bound C-1, C-2, C-1, C-2, C-1, C-2, bound C-3 criteria C-3 criteria C-3 criteria | |||
R5: SG | Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 2 of 4 | ||
: 5. For each area examined (e.g., tube supports, dent/dings, sleeves, etc), provide a summary of the number of indications identified to-date for each degradation mode (e.g., number of circumferential primary water stress corrosion cracking indications at the expansion transition). | |||
For the most significant indications in each area, provide an estimate of the severity of the indication (e.g., provide the voltage, depth, and length of the indication). In particular, address whether tube integrity (structural and accident induced leakage integrity) was maintained during the previous operating cycle. In addition, discuss whether any location exhibited a degradation mode that had not previously been observed at this location at this unit (e.g., observed circumferential primary water stress corrosion cracking at the expansion transition for the first time at this unit). | |||
R5: | |||
SG Fan Bar Lattice Grid Foreign Object Wear Wear Wear SG 11 658 6 0 SG 12 480 9 0 SG 13 426 2 0 SG 14 789 9 0 Totals 2353 26 0 Fan Bar Significant Indications | |||
* SG 11 - R78/C62 - 32% fan bar 4 Lattice Grid Significant Indications | * SG 11 - R78/C62 - 32% fan bar 4 Lattice Grid Significant Indications | ||
* SG 11 - R34/C46 - 18% fan bar Foreign Object Wear Significant indications | * SG 11 - R34/C46 - 18% fan bar Foreign Object Wear Significant indications | ||
* None Based upon our ongoing condition monitoring assessment tube integrity (both structural and accident induced leakage integrity) was maintained during the previous operating cycle. | * None Based upon our ongoing condition monitoring assessment tube integrity (both structural and accident induced leakage integrity) was maintained during the previous operating cycle. | ||
No new degradation mechanisms have been identified during the course of the inspection and no locations along the tube exhibited a degradation mode that had not previously been observed at this location at this unit. | |||
No new degradation mechanisms have been identified during the course of the inspection and no locations along the tube exhibited a degradation mode that had not previously been observed at this location at this unit. | |||
: 6. Describe repair/plugging plans. | : 6. Describe repair/plugging plans. | ||
R6: | R6: Tube repairs will be limited to mechanical plugging and stabilization (if required). Based upon results to date, 0 tubes are projected to require plugging. This is based on a projected operating duration of one cycle and a 36 TW% repair criteria. | ||
: 7. Describe in-situ pressure test and tube pull plans and results (as applicable and if available). | : 7. Describe in-situ pressure test and tube pull plans and results (as applicable and if available). | ||
R7: Insitu screenings are in progress as the remaining data is being reviewed by our tube integrity engineer; however no insitu testing is expected. No conditions have been detected which would suggest a tube pull will be required during this inspection. | R7: Insitu screenings are in progress as the remaining data is being reviewed by our tube integrity engineer; however no insitu testing is expected. No conditions have been detected which would suggest a tube pull will be required during this inspection. | ||
Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 3 of 4 | Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 3 of 4 | ||
: 8. Discuss the following regarding loose parts: | : 8. Discuss the following regarding loose parts: | ||
* what inspections are performed to detect loose parts | * what inspections are performed to detect loose parts | ||
* a description of any loose parts detected and their location within the SG (including the source or nature of the loose part, if known) | * a description of any loose parts detected and their location within the SG (including the source or nature of the loose part, if known) | ||
* if the loose parts were removed from the SG | * if the loose parts were removed from the SG | ||
* indications of tube damage associated with the loose parts | * indications of tube damage associated with the loose parts R8: Loose part inspections include: | ||
R8: Loose part inspections include: | |||
* Visual inspections at the top of the hot and cold leg tubesheets o Divider lane o Bundle periphery o Historical loose part locations | * Visual inspections at the top of the hot and cold leg tubesheets o Divider lane o Bundle periphery o Historical loose part locations | ||
* X-probe examination is being performed on the hot and cold leg peripheral tubes from the tube end to the first support. Tube selection is based on a 3 tube pattern (diagonally or along the Y-axis) as depicted below. | * X-probe examination is being performed on the hot and cold leg peripheral tubes from the tube end to the first support. Tube selection is based on a 3 tube pattern (diagonally or along the Y-axis) as depicted below. | ||
* Bobbin coil examination of the tube bundle is being performed using a turbo mix has been noted as enhancing bobbin probe detection of foreign object wear at the top of tubesheet | * Bobbin coil examination of the tube bundle is being performed using a turbo mix has been noted as enhancing bobbin probe detection of foreign object wear at the top of tubesheet The following table summarizes the loose parts detected, tube damage and retrieval status: | ||
SG Description Location Retrieved Source Tube Damage | |||
The following table summarizes the loose parts detected, tube damage and retrieval status: | (%TW) | ||
SG | SG 12 3 x 0.25 Wire Screen (rectangular) R81/C49 HL Yes Oct. 2012 No deg, +pt pending 0.5 x0.5 Wire Screen (tri-shaped) R59/C33 HL Yes MFP Strainer No deg, +pt pending 0.25 x 0.25 Wire Mesh (square) R64/C26 HL Yes Failure No deg, +pt pending SG 13 Object from SSI (retrieval pending) R54/C16 HL No Unknown No deg, +pt pending SG 14 2.5x 0.5Banding wire R1/C65 CL Yes Unknown No deg, +pt pending 1x 0.5 Banding wire R71/C69 HL Yes Unknown No deg, +pt pending 1.25x0.25 Wire Screen (crumpled) R44/C10 CL Yes Strainer Failure No deg, +pt pending ECT PLP - Nothing found R5/C91 HL NA NA No deg, +pt pending | ||
R10: None | Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 4 of 4 | ||
: 9. Discuss the scope and results of any secondary side inspection and maintenance activities (e.g., in-bundle visual inspections, feedring inspections, sludge lancing, assessing deposit loading, etc). | |||
R9: Secondary side activities include top of the tube sheet visual inspections as discussed previously. No abnormal conditions were noted during these inspections; with the exception of the foreign objects summarized above. | |||
No steam drum or water lancing activities are scheduled this outage. Deposit mapping will be performed using eddy current data post outage to trend bundle loading. | |||
: 10. Discuss any unexpected or unusual results. | |||
R10: None | |||
: 11. Provide the schedule for steam generator-related activities during the remainder of the current outage. | : 11. Provide the schedule for steam generator-related activities during the remainder of the current outage. | ||
R11: | R11: Eddy current inspection complete: 4/14/13 Nozzle dam removal: 4/20/13 Reinstall primary manways: 4/21/13}} |
Latest revision as of 04:27, 6 February 2020
ML13189A222 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 04/12/2013 |
From: | Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
To: | |
Wengert T | |
Shared Package | |
ML13189A226 | List: |
References | |
TAC MF0875 | |
Download: ML13189A222 (4) | |
Text
Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 1 of 4 Status: (4/11/13 @ 1700 hrs)
Bobbin HL CL Overall Exam % TTS% TTS% %
SG 11 84.8 0 0 58.4 SG 12 83.9 92.5 0 71.3 SG 13 77.3 98.8 0 67.5 SG 14 75.7 91.1 0 65.8
- 1. Discuss any trends in the amount of primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed cycle.
R1: No primary-to-secondary leakage has been detected since the steam generators were replaced in 2000.
This includes the recently completed cycle of operation.
- 2. Discuss whether any secondary side pressure tests were performed during the outage and the associated results.
R2: No steam generator secondary side pressure tests were planned or performed during the outage.
- 3. Discuss any exceptions taken to the industry guidelines.
R3: No exceptions have been taken to the EPRI Steam Generator Guidelines (inclusive of the examination, integrity, insitu, leak or water chemistry guidelines) or the NEI 97-06 Steam Generator Program Guidelines.
- 4. For each SG, provide a description of the inspections performed including the areas examined and the probes used (e.g., dents/dings, sleeves, expansion-transition, U-bends with a rotating probe), the scope of the inspection (e.g., 100 percent of dents/dings greater than 5 volts and a 20 percent sample between 2 and 5 volts), and the expansion criteria.
R4:
Exam Full HL/CL Special SI - SI - SI - SI -
Length TTS Interest - Foreign New Dents & Proximity &
Lattice Objects Bobbin Dings Freespan Grids Wear Fan Bars Probe Bobbin X-probe +Point +Point +Point +Point +Point All SGs 100% ~21% All wear All All I-codes & Historical All
> 20% PLPs/ FO new bobbin bobbin indications Wear, signals > 2 volts of proximity
& freespan Affected wear historical FO locations, New FO Id by FOSAR Expansion N/A Min. 1 N/A Min. 1 EPRI EPRI EPRI Criteria tube tube bound C-1, C-2, C-1, C-2, C-1, C-2, bound C-3 criteria C-3 criteria C-3 criteria
Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 2 of 4
- 5. For each area examined (e.g., tube supports, dent/dings, sleeves, etc), provide a summary of the number of indications identified to-date for each degradation mode (e.g., number of circumferential primary water stress corrosion cracking indications at the expansion transition).
For the most significant indications in each area, provide an estimate of the severity of the indication (e.g., provide the voltage, depth, and length of the indication). In particular, address whether tube integrity (structural and accident induced leakage integrity) was maintained during the previous operating cycle. In addition, discuss whether any location exhibited a degradation mode that had not previously been observed at this location at this unit (e.g., observed circumferential primary water stress corrosion cracking at the expansion transition for the first time at this unit).
R5:
SG Fan Bar Lattice Grid Foreign Object Wear Wear Wear SG 11 658 6 0 SG 12 480 9 0 SG 13 426 2 0 SG 14 789 9 0 Totals 2353 26 0 Fan Bar Significant Indications
- SG 11 - R78/C62 - 32% fan bar 4 Lattice Grid Significant Indications
- SG 11 - R34/C46 - 18% fan bar Foreign Object Wear Significant indications
- None Based upon our ongoing condition monitoring assessment tube integrity (both structural and accident induced leakage integrity) was maintained during the previous operating cycle.
No new degradation mechanisms have been identified during the course of the inspection and no locations along the tube exhibited a degradation mode that had not previously been observed at this location at this unit.
- 6. Describe repair/plugging plans.
R6: Tube repairs will be limited to mechanical plugging and stabilization (if required). Based upon results to date, 0 tubes are projected to require plugging. This is based on a projected operating duration of one cycle and a 36 TW% repair criteria.
- 7. Describe in-situ pressure test and tube pull plans and results (as applicable and if available).
R7: Insitu screenings are in progress as the remaining data is being reviewed by our tube integrity engineer; however no insitu testing is expected. No conditions have been detected which would suggest a tube pull will be required during this inspection.
Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 3 of 4
- 8. Discuss the following regarding loose parts:
- what inspections are performed to detect loose parts
- a description of any loose parts detected and their location within the SG (including the source or nature of the loose part, if known)
- if the loose parts were removed from the SG
- indications of tube damage associated with the loose parts R8: Loose part inspections include:
- Visual inspections at the top of the hot and cold leg tubesheets o Divider lane o Bundle periphery o Historical loose part locations
- X-probe examination is being performed on the hot and cold leg peripheral tubes from the tube end to the first support. Tube selection is based on a 3 tube pattern (diagonally or along the Y-axis) as depicted below.
- Bobbin coil examination of the tube bundle is being performed using a turbo mix has been noted as enhancing bobbin probe detection of foreign object wear at the top of tubesheet The following table summarizes the loose parts detected, tube damage and retrieval status:
SG Description Location Retrieved Source Tube Damage
(%TW)
SG 12 3 x 0.25 Wire Screen (rectangular) R81/C49 HL Yes Oct. 2012 No deg, +pt pending 0.5 x0.5 Wire Screen (tri-shaped) R59/C33 HL Yes MFP Strainer No deg, +pt pending 0.25 x 0.25 Wire Mesh (square) R64/C26 HL Yes Failure No deg, +pt pending SG 13 Object from SSI (retrieval pending) R54/C16 HL No Unknown No deg, +pt pending SG 14 2.5x 0.5Banding wire R1/C65 CL Yes Unknown No deg, +pt pending 1x 0.5 Banding wire R71/C69 HL Yes Unknown No deg, +pt pending 1.25x0.25 Wire Screen (crumpled) R44/C10 CL Yes Strainer Failure No deg, +pt pending ECT PLP - Nothing found R5/C91 HL NA NA No deg, +pt pending
Preliminary Information from Ongoing U1C25 Activities 4/12/13 NRC Questions Page 4 of 4
- 9. Discuss the scope and results of any secondary side inspection and maintenance activities (e.g., in-bundle visual inspections, feedring inspections, sludge lancing, assessing deposit loading, etc).
R9: Secondary side activities include top of the tube sheet visual inspections as discussed previously. No abnormal conditions were noted during these inspections; with the exception of the foreign objects summarized above.
No steam drum or water lancing activities are scheduled this outage. Deposit mapping will be performed using eddy current data post outage to trend bundle loading.
- 10. Discuss any unexpected or unusual results.
R10: None
- 11. Provide the schedule for steam generator-related activities during the remainder of the current outage.
R11: Eddy current inspection complete: 4/14/13 Nozzle dam removal: 4/20/13 Reinstall primary manways: 4/21/13