ML20056G622: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20056G622 | | number = ML20056G622 | ||
| issue date = 09/01/1993 | | issue date = 09/01/1993 | ||
| title = Forwards New | | title = Forwards New SSAR Subsection 3H.5.5, Structural Analysis Rept for Turbine Bldg | ||
| author name = Fox J | | author name = Fox J | ||
| author affiliation = GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. | | author affiliation = GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:' | {{#Wiki_filter:' | ||
) | |||
GENucle:r Energy c,eesteve Cw;m | GENucle:r Energy c,eesteve Cw;m | ||
?b Cwer 4w%e, Sr:Jue CA 55125 September 1,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 1 | |||
Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Structural Analysis Report for Turbine lluilding | Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Structural Analysis Report for Turbine lluilding | ||
==Dear Chet:== | ==Dear Chet:== | ||
i' Enclosed is a new SSAR Subsection 311.5.5, Structural Analysis Report for the Turbine Building. | |||
i Enclosed is a new SSAR Subsection 311.5.5, Structural Analysis Report for the Turbine Building. | |||
Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Goutam Bagchi and Tom Cheng. | Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Goutam Bagchi and Tom Cheng. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, l | ||
: k. b 4 Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Alan Beard (GE) | : k. b 4 Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Alan Beard (GE) | ||
Gary Ehlert (GE) | Gary Ehlert (GE) | ||
Norman Fletcher (DOE) | Norman Fletcher (DOE) | ||
031n o | -I i | ||
031n o i | |||
nw:si | |||
9309030344 930901 | )I w | ||
A | 9309030344 930901 y | ||
i g | |||
PDR ADOCK 05200001 "L | |||
r PDR t | |||
A 1: | |||
r | r | ||
.i l | |||
<f l | |||
{ | { | ||
r 311.5.5 | r 311.5.5 Structural Analysis Report For The Turbine Building t | ||
i i | |||
A structural analysis report will be prepared. It will document the followmc activities associated to the construction materials and as-built dimensions of the building: | |||
associated to the construction materials and as-built dimensions of the building: | ) | ||
1. | |||
Review of construction records for material properties used in construction f | |||
I | i (i c., in-process testing of concrete properties and procurement specifications for structural steel and reinforcing bars). | ||
I 2. | |||
For material properties and dimensions, assess compliance of the as-built structure with design requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and in Table 3.2-1 and | Inspection of as-built building dimensions. | ||
paragraph 3.7.3.16. | For material properties and dimensions, assess compliance of the as-built structure with design requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and in Table 3.2-1 and paragraph 3.7.3.16. | ||
Constmetion deviations and design changes will be assessed to determine appropriate | Constmetion deviations and design changes will be assessed to determine appropriate j | ||
disposition i | |||
This disposition will be accepted "as-is." provided the following acceptance criteria are met: | |||
The structural design meets the acceptance criteria and load combinations j | |||
of the UBC code. | |||
{ | { | ||
Depending upon the extent of the deviation or design changes, compliance with the acceptance criteria can be determined by either. | Depending upon the extent of the deviation or design changes, compliance with the acceptance criteria can be determined by either. | ||
q i | |||
i | Analyses or evaluations of construction deviations and design changes, or i | ||
a. | |||
i i | |||
b. | |||
The design basis analysis will be repeated using the as-built condition. | |||
j | |||
\\ | |||
I a | I a | ||
i | i | ||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:55, 17 December 2024
| ML20056G622 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 09/01/1993 |
| From: | Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309030344 | |
| Download: ML20056G622 (2) | |
Text
'
)
GENucle:r Energy c,eesteve Cw;m
?b Cwer 4w%e, Sr:Jue CA 55125 September 1,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 1
Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Subject:
Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Structural Analysis Report for Turbine lluilding
Dear Chet:
i' Enclosed is a new SSAR Subsection 311.5.5, Structural Analysis Report for the Turbine Building.
Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Goutam Bagchi and Tom Cheng.
Sincerely, l
- k. b 4 Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Alan Beard (GE)
Gary Ehlert (GE)
Norman Fletcher (DOE)
-I i
031n o i
nw:si
)I w
9309030344 930901 y
i g
PDR ADOCK 05200001 "L
r PDR t
A 1:
r
.i l
<f l
{
r 311.5.5 Structural Analysis Report For The Turbine Building t
i i
A structural analysis report will be prepared. It will document the followmc activities associated to the construction materials and as-built dimensions of the building:
)
1.
Review of construction records for material properties used in construction f
i (i c., in-process testing of concrete properties and procurement specifications for structural steel and reinforcing bars).
I 2.
Inspection of as-built building dimensions.
For material properties and dimensions, assess compliance of the as-built structure with design requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and in Table 3.2-1 and paragraph 3.7.3.16.
Constmetion deviations and design changes will be assessed to determine appropriate j
disposition i
This disposition will be accepted "as-is." provided the following acceptance criteria are met:
The structural design meets the acceptance criteria and load combinations j
of the UBC code.
{
Depending upon the extent of the deviation or design changes, compliance with the acceptance criteria can be determined by either.
q i
Analyses or evaluations of construction deviations and design changes, or i
a.
i i
b.
The design basis analysis will be repeated using the as-built condition.
j
\\
I a
i
,