ML20056G622
| ML20056G622 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200001 |
| Issue date: | 09/01/1993 |
| From: | Fox J GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Poslusny C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9309030344 | |
| Download: ML20056G622 (2) | |
Text
'
)
GENucle:r Energy c,eesteve Cw;m
?b Cwer 4w%e, Sr:Jue CA 55125 September 1,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 1
Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Subject:
Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Structural Analysis Report for Turbine lluilding
Dear Chet:
i' Enclosed is a new SSAR Subsection 311.5.5, Structural Analysis Report for the Turbine Building.
Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Goutam Bagchi and Tom Cheng.
Sincerely, l
- k. b 4 Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Alan Beard (GE)
Gary Ehlert (GE)
Norman Fletcher (DOE)
-I i
031n o i
nw:si
)I w
9309030344 930901 y
i g
PDR ADOCK 05200001 "L
r PDR t
A 1:
r
.i l
<f l
{
r 311.5.5 Structural Analysis Report For The Turbine Building t
i i
A structural analysis report will be prepared. It will document the followmc activities associated to the construction materials and as-built dimensions of the building:
)
1.
Review of construction records for material properties used in construction f
i (i c., in-process testing of concrete properties and procurement specifications for structural steel and reinforcing bars).
I 2.
Inspection of as-built building dimensions.
For material properties and dimensions, assess compliance of the as-built structure with design requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and in Table 3.2-1 and paragraph 3.7.3.16.
Constmetion deviations and design changes will be assessed to determine appropriate j
disposition i
This disposition will be accepted "as-is." provided the following acceptance criteria are met:
The structural design meets the acceptance criteria and load combinations j
of the UBC code.
{
Depending upon the extent of the deviation or design changes, compliance with the acceptance criteria can be determined by either.
q i
Analyses or evaluations of construction deviations and design changes, or i
a.
i i
b.
The design basis analysis will be repeated using the as-built condition.
j
\\
I a
i
,