ML20056G622

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards New Ssar Subsection 3H.5.5, Structural Analysis Rept for Turbine Bldg
ML20056G622
Person / Time
Site: 05200001
Issue date: 09/01/1993
From: Fox J
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To: Poslusny C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9309030344
Download: ML20056G622 (2)


Text

'

)

GENucle:r Energy c,eesteve Cw;m

?b Cwer 4w%e, Sr:Jue CA 55125 September 1,1993 Docket No. STN 52-001 .

1 Chet Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Standardization Project Directorate Associate Directorate for Advanced Reactors and License Renewal Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Subject:

Submittal Supporting Accelerated ABWR Schedule - Structural Analysis Report for Turbine lluilding ,

Dear Chet:

i Enclosed is a new SSAR Subsection 311.5.5, Structural Analysis Report for the Turbine Building.

Please provide a copy of this transmittal to Goutam Bagchi and Tom Cheng.

Sincerely, l

k. b 4 Jack Fox Advanced Reactor Programs cc: Alan Beard (GE) -

Gary Ehlert (GE) ,

Norman Fletcher (DOE) -I i

031n o ,

i nw:si

)I w '

9309030344 930901 y i g PDR ADOCK 05200001 , "L r

A PDR t 1:

r

.i l

<f . l

{

r 311.5.5 Structural Analysis Report For The Turbine Building  ;

t i

i A structural analysis report will be prepared. It will document the followmc activities  !

associated to the construction materials and as-built dimensions of the building:  ;

)

1. Review of construction records for material properties used in construction fi (i c., in-process testing of concrete properties and procurement specifications for structural steel and reinforcing bars).

I

2. Inspection of as-built building dimensions.

For material properties and dimensions, assess compliance of the as-built structure with design requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and in Table 3.2-1 and  ;

paragraph 3.7.3.16. ,

Constmetion deviations and design changes will be assessed to determine appropriate j disposition i This disposition will be accepted "as-is." provided the following acceptance criteria are met: I The structural design meets the acceptance criteria and load combinations j of the UBC code.

{

Depending upon the extent of the deviation or design changes, compliance with the acceptance criteria can be determined by either. q i

a. Analyses or evaluations of construction deviations and design changes, or i i

i

b. The design basis analysis will be repeated using the as-built condition. j

\

I a

l l

i

,