ML20150A780

QA Program for Michigan State Univ Div of Engineering Research

ML20150A780
Person / Time
Site:	07105957, 07100655
Issue date:	06/15/1988
From:	Galonsky A, Matthew Mitchell, Wilkinson B MICHIGAN STATE UNIV., EAST LANSING, MI
To:
Shared Package
ML20150A774	List: ML20150A771 ML20150A780
References
24442, NUDOCS 8807080224
Download: ML20150A780 (22)

Text

'

\\

i tilCHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REVIEW AND APPROVALS ORIGINAL ISSUE DATED JUNE 15, 1988 R.S.C. MEMBERS SIGNATURE DATE lu 11, ik& 2,,e 4 b7 A10 $ -

dbi,I-f-2 m (1,,I L 1 4 ~

LwaLL.-

c /,da

m. w. m,k &tl WEJ/CEdn(f-lirles_

$. G, c (na-, L/

bOsu b~ I S~# #

a v

.1 lc, til>a A REVISION DATED:

REVISION DATED:

PAGE 1 OF 20

%R' M M @ PNU%It C

s MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH EAST LANSING, MICHIGAN PAGE 2 oF 20

p MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION P_Ajl A

1.0 INTRODUCTIDE 1.1 PURPOSE 1

1.2 APPLICABILITY 1

1.3 SAFETY RELATED ITEMS 1

1.4 REFERENCES

1 2.0 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 2.1 RESPONSIBILITl 1

2.2 ORGANIZATION 4

2.3 DOCUMENTATION 5

2.4 DESIGN CONTROL 6

2.5 PROCUREMENT CONTROL 7

2.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL 8

2.7 MATERIAL CONTROL 8

2.8 PROCESS CONTROL 9

2.9 INSPECTIONS 9

2.10 TEST CONTROL 10 2.11 MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 10 2.12 NONCONFORMING MATERIAL AND PARTS 11 2.13 CORRECTIVE ACTION 11 2.14 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 11 2.15 AUDITS 12 3.0 FIGURES 4.0 FORMS PAGE 3 OF 20 l

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 l

l

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGING, CONDUCTING, AND AUDITING THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY (MSU).

1.2 APPLICABILITY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM APPLIES TO REPLACEMENT OF AND MODIFICATIONS TO SAFETY RELATED ITEMS SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION AND TO THOSE QUALITY AFFECTING ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SHIPPING PACKAGES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS.

QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE FACILITY AS BUILT AND FOR SAFETY RELATED CHANGES MADE PRIOR TO PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.

THIS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ONLY APPLIES TO THE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY TRIGA REACTOR FACILITY.

1.3 SAFETY RELATED ITEMS SAFETY RELATED ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MSU FACILITY ARE THE REACTOR POOL SYSTEM, RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM, NUCLEAR FUEL, CONTROL ROD DRIVE SYSTEM, VENTILATION SYSTEM, AND THE INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM.

1.4 EEFERENCES 1.4.1 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD INSTITUTE (ANSI)

N402-1976, QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESEARCH REACTORS.

1.4.2 10CFR71, SUBPART H.

PAGE 4 0F 20

s

'I' MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE-PROGP.AM i

J JUNE 15, 1988 2.0 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 2.1 RESPONSIBILITY THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE (R.S.C.) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING THE FACILITY'S QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICIES, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES. THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR RETAINS OVERALL AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM.

2.1.1 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE CHARTER 2.1.1.1 THE R.S.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY REACTOR. THEY SHALL ALSO MAKE RECOMMENDATION?

u RELATING TO QUALITY ASSURANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGULATIONS AS WELL AS OTHER RULES AND REGULATIONS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE.

RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL NORMALLY BE MADE TO THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR OR THE DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, BUT IF THE COMMITTEE BELIEVES APPROPRIATE, THEY SHALL BE MADE TO THE PR0v0ST OF THE UNIVERSITY.

2.1.1.2 THE R.S.C, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A PROPOSED CHANGE, TEST OR EXPERIMENT WOULD CONSTITUTE A CHANGE IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OR AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION AS DEFINED IN 10 CFR 50. THE COMMITTEE SHALL APPROVE ANY DEVIATION FROM ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS RELATING TO ADDITIONS, MODIFICATIONS OR MAINTENANCE OF CORE, SUPPORT STRUCTURE, POOL STRUCTURE, ROD DRIVE MECHANISMS, AND REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS.

THE R.S.C. WILL APPOINT A PROCEDURES SUBCOMMITTEE CONSISTING OF THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR AND AT LEAST ONE OTHENS/ MEMBER (PREFERABLY A LICENSED OPERATOR) WHO SERVES AS THE QUALITY ASSURANCE MEMBER / AUDITOR. THEY SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE OPERATING AND CALIBRATION PROCEDURES FOR THE REACTOR FACILITY.

ANY CHANGES APPROVED BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENTIRE R.S.C. FOR INFORMATION/ APPROVAL PURPOSES.

THE SUBCOMMITTEE MAY SEEK CONSULTATION AND ADVISE FROM OTHER KNOWLEDGEABLE PARTIES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR NORMAL OPERATIONS, AS DEFINED IN THE REACTOR RULES AND REGULATIONS, WILL REST WITH THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

PAGE 5 0F 20

l MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.1.1.3 THE R.S.C SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO TEMPORARILY SUSFEND REACTOR OPERATIONS TO CONSIDER THE NUCLEAR SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF ANY INCIDENT, EXPERIMENT, OR PROCEDURE.

2.1.1.4 THE R.S.C. SHALL MEET QUARTERLY AT PERIODS NOT TO EXCEED FOUR MONTHS TO REVIEW IN DETAIL THE REACTOR OPERATIONS DURING THE PREVIOUS PERIOD.

THE COMMITTEE MAY BE CONVENED AT ANY TIME BY ANY MEMBER.

2.1.1.5 MEMBERSHIP OF THE R.S.C SHALL CONSIST OF THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR, THE UNIVERSITY RADIATION SAFETY OFFICER, AND AT LEAST THREE OTHER STAFF OR FACULTY MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY.

AT LEAST TWO OF THE FACULTY / STAFF MEMBERS SHALL BE FROM A COLLEGE OTHER THAN ENGINEERING.

2.1.1.6 THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR SHALL SERVE AS CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY OF THE R.S.C.

2.1.1.7 THE NONSPECIFIED MEMBERS SHALL BE APPOINTED BY THE PROVOST OF THE UNIVERSITY TO SERVE FOR THREE-YEAR TERMS.

TERM OF 0FFICE SHALL BEGIN ON JANUARY l AND TERMINATE ON DECEMBER 31.

APPOINTMENTS MAY BE j

RENEWED.

2.1.1.8 A Qu0KuM OF THE R.S.C. SHALL CONSIST OF NO LESS THAN ONE LESS THAN THE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP.

2.1.1.9 TAE SECRETARY WILL PREPARE MINUTES OF EACH MEETING FOR DISTRIBUTION TO MEMBER AND TO OTHERS AS REQUIRED BY THE UNIVERSITY AND BY LAW.

2.1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE APPROVAL / RESPONSIBILITY l

2.1.2.1 THIs QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AS WELL AS ANY FUTURE REVISIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE R.S.C..

THE APPROVAL SHALL BE BY SIGNATURE OF EACH COMMITTEE MEMBER ON THE APPROVAL AND REVIEW SHEET.

i 2.1.2.2 ACTIVITIES AS OUTLINED IN THIS QUALITY ASSURANCE l

PROGRAM MAY BE SUBCONTRACTED, HOWEVER THE l

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ACTIVITIES REMAINS THAT OF THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

t PAGE 6 0F 20

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.1.3 REACTOR SUPERVISOR THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

A) ASSIGNING QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL.

B) ASSURING THAT QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE BEEN PROPERLY TRAINED AND QUALIFIED TO PERFORM SPECIFIC TASKS, AS ASSIGNED.

C) SCHEDULING REACTOR ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING QUALITY INSPECTIONS AND AUDITS.

D) ASSIGNING DRAWING AND DOCUMENT NUMBERS AS REQUIRED.

E) SUBMITTING SAFETY ANALYSIS AND PROJECT DESIGN TO THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR APPROVAL.

F) PREPARING LICENSE AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENTS FOR SUBMISSION TO THE NRC AS REQUIRED.

G) RESOLVING DISPUTES INVOLVING QUALITY ARISING FROM DIFFERENCES OF OPINION BETWEEN QUALITY ASSURANCE /

QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL AND PERSONNEL PERFORMING THE WORK BEING VERIFIED.

ISSUES THAT CANNOT BE RESOLVED BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE R.S.C. FOR FINAL RESOLUTION.

H) MAINTAIN A PROJECT FILE THAT CONTAINS COPIES OF ALL RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT.

I) MAINTAINING MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT PROPERLY CALIBRATED.

2.1.4 DESIGN ENGINEER THE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

A) PERFORMING A SAFETY ANALYSIS INCLUDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS.

B) DEVELOPING THE REQUIRED DESIGN.

C) PREPARING INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS.

D) CONTROLLING PROCURED MATERIAL UPON ARRIVAL AT THE FACILITY.

PAGE 7 0F 20 L

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 l

E) PREPARING PROCEDURES FOR INSTALLATION AND TESTS.

F) COMPLETING DRAWINGS, SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS, PROCEDURES, REGULATIONS, AND CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND I.ICENSE AS REQUIRED.

j G) MAINTAINING A COMPLETE FILE WITH THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR OF ALL WORK RELATED TO ANY MODIFICATION.

2.1.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER IHE QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

A) VERIFICATION OF DESIGN ADEQUACY.

B) DISPOSITION OF NONCONFORMING MATERIALS AND PARTS.

C) VERIFICATION OF TESTS.

2.1.1 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR THE QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

A) PERFORMING INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY PROCEDURES.

2.1.Z QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITOR WILL PERFORM ANNUALLY AN AUDIT OF EACH SAFETY RELATED PROJECT BEGUN, IN PROGRESS, OR COMPLETED DURING THE YEAR.

2.2 ORGANIZATION 2.2.1 REFER TO FIGURE 1 FOR THE MICHIGAN STATE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION.

i 2.2.2 THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTING THE QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROGRAM.

THIS INCLUDES ASSURANCE THAT ADEQUATELY TRAINED AND QUALIFIED PERSONNEL ARE ASSIGNED TO FILL THE QUALITY ASSURANCE POSITIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION.

REFER TO FIGURE 2.

l l

l PAGE 8 0F 20 l

l

=

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.3 DOCUMENTATION ALL ACTIVITIES AFFECTING SAFETY RELATED ITEMS WILL BE FORMALLY IDENTIFIED AND DOCUMENTED.

DOCUMENTATION WILL INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE PROCEDURES, REVIEWS, AND OTHER MEASURES TO BE APPLIED.

2.3.1 DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FACILITY DRAWINGS, PROCEDURES, AND REGULATIONS WILL BE COMPLETED AND UPDATED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A FACILITY MODIFICATION.

ALL OR PART OF THE DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS DESCRIBED BELOW MAY BE REQUIRED AS DETERMINED AT A DESIGN REVIEW (AT THE DISCRETION OF THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR).

2.3.2 FACILITY DRAWING INDEX NEW DRAWINGS WILL BE ADDED TO THE FACILITY DRAWING INDEX AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ANY MODIFICATION.

2.3.4 SXIJEM DESCRIPTION A BRIEF BUT COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE MODIFICATION STATING ITS PURPOSE, FUNCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.

2.3.5 BLOCK DIAGRAM A BASIC LOGIC BLCCK DIAGRAM THAT INDICATES THE MAJOR MECHANZCAL OR INSTRUMENTATION COMPONENTS.

2.3.6 DETAILED SYSTEM OR CIRCUIT SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS MECHANICAL OR INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO PERFORM MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.

2.3.7 DESIGN NQIgs DESIGN NOTES SHALL BE KEPT BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER CONTAINING ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS, DATA, OBSERVATIONS AND SKETCHES.

(

PAGE 9 0F 20

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.4 DESIGN CONTROL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF SAFETY RELATED ITEMS AND EXPERIMENTS.

DESIGN ADEQUACY WILL BE VERIFIED BY DESIGN REVIEW, ALTERNATE CALCULATIONS, OR A TEST PROGRAM.

VERIFICATION SHOULD INCLUDE CHECKS OF SUCH CHARACTERISTICS AS COMPATIBILITY OF MATERIALS; SUITABILITY OF APPLICATION OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND PROCESSES; ACCESSIBILITY FOR IN-SERVICE INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR; PROPER INTERFACING OF SUBSYSTEMS; AND COMPLETENESS OF ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.

2.4.1 PROVISIONS WILL BE ESTABLISHED ON A PROJECT BASIS WHICH CLEARLY DELINEATE THE SEQUENCE OF ACTIONS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE PREPARATION, REVIEW APPROVAL, AND CONTROL OF INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS.

2.4.2 THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE WILL REVIEW AND CONCUR WITH INSPECTION, TEST, CALIBRATION, SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS AND CHANGES THERETO OR ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVES.

2.4.3 THE REVIEW, APPROVAL, AND ISSUANCE OF DOCUMENTS AND CHANGES THERETO, PRIOR TO RELEASE WILL BE PROCEDURALLY CONTROLLED TO ASSURE THEY ARE ADEQUATE AND THE QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.

2.4.4 CHANGES TO DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE.

2.4.5 APPROVED CHANGES WILL OE INCLUDED IN INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, DRAWINGS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHANGE.

i 2.4.6 DOCUMENTS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE LOCATION WHERE l

THE ACTIVITY WILL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.

2.4.7 A MASTER LIST OR EQUIVALENT WILL BE ESTABLISHED TO IDENTIFY THE CUkRENT REVISION NUMBER OF INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS, AND PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS.

THE LIST WILL BE UPDATED AND DISTRIBUTED TO THE PREDETERMINED, RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL TO PRECLUDE USE OF SUPERSEDED DOCUMENTS.

i PAGE 19 0F 20

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY l.

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.5 PROCUREMENT CONTR,QL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS.

TO THE EXTENT DETERMINED BY THE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FINAL SYSTEM, PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL REQUIRE CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE QUALITY ASSURANCE CONTROLS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, FUNCTIONS SUCH AS INSPECTIONS, TESTS, AND CONTROLS OVER MATERIALS, PROCESSES, AND NONCONFORMANCES.

2.5.1 PROCEDURES WILL BE ESTABLISHED ON A PROJECT BASIS THAT CLEARLY DELINEATE THE SEQUENCE OF ACTIONS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, APPROVAL, AND CONTROL OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS.

CHANGES TO PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL BE SUBJECT TO CONTROLS COMMENSURATE WITH THOSE FOR THE ORIGINAL PROCUREMENTS.

2.5.2 A REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE OF THE ADEQUACY OF QUALITY REQUIREMENTS STATED IN PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

THE REVIEW WILL DETERMINE THAT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ARE CORRECTLY STATED, INSPECTABLE, AND CONTROLLABLE; THAT THERE ARE ADEQUATE ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION CRITERIA; AND THE PkOCUREMENT DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH QUALITYkSSURANCEPROGRAMREQUIREMENTS.

2.5.3 THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL BE DOCUMENTED PRIOR TO RELEASE AND AVAILABLE FOR VERIFICATION.

2.5.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL IDENTIFY THE APPLICASLE 10 CFR 71, SUBPART H REQUIREMENTS WHICH MUST BE COMPLIED WITH AND DESCRIBED IN THE SUPPLIER'S QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM.

THE SUPPLIER'S QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM OR APPLICABLE PORTIONS THEREOF WILL BE REVIEWED AND CONCURRED WITH BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR PRIOR TO INITIATION OF ACTIVITIES AFFECTED BY THE PROGRAM.

2.5.5 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL CONTAIN OR REFERENCE THE DESIGN BASIS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING THE APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, MATERIAL AND COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, CODES AND INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS, TEST AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS, AND SPECIAL PROCESS INSTRUCTIONS.

l l

PAGE 11 0F 20 i

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.5.6 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL IDENTIFY THE DOCUMENTATION (E.G.,

DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, PROCEDURES, INSPECTION AND FABRICATION PLANS, INSPECTION AND TEST RECORDS, PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURE QUALIFICATIONS, AND CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL TEST I

RESULTS OF MATERIAL) TO BE PREPARED, MAINTAINED, AND SUBMITTED TO THE FACILITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2.5.7 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL IDENTIFY THOSE RECORDS TO BE RETAINED, CONTROLLED, AND MAINTAINED BY THE SUPPLIER, AND THOSE DELIVERED TO THE FACILITY PRIOR TO USE OR INSTALLATION OF THE HARDWARE.

2.5.8 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS WILL CONTAIN THE FACILITY'S RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE SUPPLIER'S FACILITIES AND RECORDS FOR SOURCE INSPECTION AND AUDIT.

2.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL ONLY DOCUMENTS LISTED ON THE MASTER LIST AND CURRENT REVISION SHALL BE USE TO PERFORM ANY REPLACEMENT, MODIFICATION, OR REPAIRS.

(REFERENCE 2.4.7) 2.6.1 THE MASTER LIST SHALL BE AT THE WORK LOCATION.

2.7 MATERIAL CONTROL CONTROL OF THE IDENTIFICATION, HANDLING, STORAGE, SHIPPING, CLEANING, AND PRESERVATION OF MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT WILL BE 5

ESTABLISHED AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

2.7.1 NDNCONFORMING MATERIAL AND PARTS NONCONFORMING MATERIAL AND PARTS WILL BE IDENTIFIED, SEGREGATED, AND DISPOSED OF.

DISPOSITION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AFTER A REVIEW BY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER, AND CONCURRENCE OF THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR. DISPOSITION WILL BE ACCEPTANCE, REPAIR, REWORK, OR R2JECTION.

2.7.2 SPECIAL HANDLING, PRESERVATION, STORAGE, CLEANING, PACKAGING, AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED AND ACCOMPLISHED BY QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PREDETERMINED WORK AND INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS.

2.7.3 ALL NECESSARY SHIPPING PAPERS WILL BE PREPARED AS REQUIRED.

PAGE 12 0F 20

.L

--4 J

.u-..

m

.AA A

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.7.4 ALL CONDITIONS OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PACKAGE APPROVAL AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SHIPMENT.

J 2.7.5 DEPARTURE TIME, ARRIVAL TIME, AND DESTINATION OF A PACKAGE WILL BE ESTABLISHED AND MONITORED TO A DEGREE CONSISTENT WITH SAFE TRANSPORTATION OF THE PACKAGE.

2.8 E!RACESS CONTROL PROCESSING OF MATERIALS WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTROLS WILL BE APPLIED TO THE EXTENT APPROPRIATE, WITH Pl.ATICULAR EMPHASIS ON THOSE FOR SPECIFIC PROCESSES, SUCH AS CRIMPING, SOLDERING, WELDING, HEAT TREATING, CLEANING AND NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION.

PROCEDURES, EQUIPMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL WILL BE DEFINED FOR THOSE SPECIAL PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY EXISTING CODES OR STANDARDS.

2.8.1 SPECIAL PROCESSES SUCH AS WELDING, HEAT TREATING, NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, AND CLEANING WILL BE PROCEDURALLY CONTROLLED.

[

2.3.2 IDENTIFICATION Or THE INSPF.CTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS WILL BE CONTROLLED 50 THAT THEY ARE KNOWN THROUGHOUT THE MANUFACTURING AND INSTALLATION PROCESS.

2.8.3 APPLICATION AND REMOVAL OF INSPECTION AND WELDING STAMPS AND STATUS INDICATORS SUCH AS TAGS, LABELS, AND STAMPS WILL BE PROCEDURALLY CONTROLLED.

2.9 INSPECTIONS INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO PROCUREMENTS, CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION, MAINTENANCE, AND EXPERIMENTS EQUIPMENT FABRICATION, AND WILL INCLUDE, TO THE APPLICABLE EXTENT, THE FOLLOWING:

A) INSPECTION PROCEDURES, SPECIFYING THE CHARACTERISTICS TO BE INSPECTED, SAMPLING PLANS, AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.

l PAGE 13 0F 20 i

~

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 l

l B) DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS MONITORING ACTION FOR THOSE SITUATIONS IN WHICH INSPECTION IS IMPOSSIBLE OR DISADVANTAGEOUS.

C) SPECIFICATION'0F MANDATORY INSPECTION HOLD POINTS.

D) Pn0CEDURES FOR IDENTIFYING INSPECTION AND TEST STATUS, 50 THAT ONLY ITEMS THAT HAVE PASSED THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND TESTS ARE USED, INSTALLED, OR OPERATED.

NONCONFORMING ITEMS WILL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED.

E) PROCEDURES FOR REQUIRED IN-SERVICE INSPECTION OF COMPLETED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, AND COMPONENTS.

2.9.1 AN INSPECTION PROGRAM WHICH CERTIFIES CONFORMANCE OF QUALITY AFFECTING ACTIVITIES WITH REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED, DOCUMENTED, AND ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WRITTEN CONTROLLED PROCEDURES.

2.9.2 INSPECTION PERSONNEL WILL BE INDEPENDENT FROM THE INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING THE ACTIVITY BEING INSPECTED.

2.9.3 MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN AND DOCUMENTED TO DETERMINE THE VALIDITY OF PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS PERFORMEU WHEN MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT IS FOUND TO BE OUT OF CALIBRATION.

2.10 TEST CONTROL THE TEST PROGRAM WILL COVER REQUIRED TEST, INCLUDING l

PROTOTYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS, PROOF TESTS PRIOR TG l

INSTALLATION, AND FUNCTIONAL TESTS.

TEST PROCEDURES WILL SPECIFY APPROPRIATE PREREQUISITE AND l

MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, EQUIPMENT TO BE USED, PERSONNEL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, SUITABLE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS FOR DATA ACQUISITION AND DOCUMENTATION AS APPLICABLE.

2.11 MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT TOOLS, GAGES, INSTRUMENTS, AND OTHER MEASURING AND TESTING DEVICES USED IN ACTIVITIES AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF SAFETY RELATED ITEMS WILL BE AVAILABLE, PROPERLY CONTROLLED, PROPERLY CALIBRATED, AND ADJUSTED AT THE REQUIRED INTERVALS.

PAGE 14 0F 20 1

l

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVF.RSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM f

JUNE 15, 1988 2.12 NONCONFORMING MATERIAL AND PARTS ALL NONCONFORMING SAFETY RELATED MATERIAL, PARTS, STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED, AND SEGREGATED FROM ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL, PARTS, STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS.

2.12.1 A NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) FORM SHALL BE COMPLETED FOR ALL NONCONFORMING MATERIAL.

(REFER FORM-1) 2.12.2 THE NCR SHALL BE DISPOSITIONED BY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER, AND CONCURRENCE OBTAINED FROM THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

2.13 CORRECTIVE ACTION SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO QUALITY OF SAFETY RELATED ITEMS, SUCH AS FAILURE, MALFUNCTIONS, AND DEFICIENCILS, SHALL BE PROMPTLY IDENTIFIED, THE CAUSE i

DETERMINED, AND CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO PRECLUDE REPETITION.

2.13.1 COPIES OF ALL NCR'S SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR THEIR INFORMATION AND REVIEW.

2.14 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM IS BASED UPON DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OF ALL ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY OF SAFETY RELATED ITEMS.

l l

RECORDS MAINTAINED SHALL INCLUDE AS MINIMUM:

0.A. REPORTS, LOGS, INSPECTION AND TEST RESULTS, RESULTS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEWS, MONITORING ACTIONS AUDITS, MATERIAL t

ANALYSES, PROCEDURES USED IN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM RECORDS, MODIFICATION RECORDS, AND RECORDS OF PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN QUALITY RELATED ACTIVITIES.

2.14.1 ALL RECORDS SHALL BE IDENTI/IED AND RETRIEVABLE.

l 2.14.2 THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE 0. A.

RECORDS.

2.14.3 THE RETENTION PERIOD FOR AS-BUILT RECORDS SHALL BE FOR THE LIFE OF THE SYSTEM.

ALL OTHER RETENTION PERIODS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

PAGE 15 0F 20

MICHICAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 2.15 AUDITS AUDITS SHALL BE PERFORMED AT LEAST ANNUALLY. THE AUDIT RESULTS SHALL BE REPORTED ON THE AUDIT REPORT FORM.

(FORM-2)

THE REPORT SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR, WITH COPIES TO THE REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE.

2.15.1 DEFICIENT AREAS WILL BE NOTED AND CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN.

DEFICIENT AREAS WILL BE REAUDITED ON A TIMELY BASIS TO VERIFY IMPLEMENTATION OR CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO MINIMIZE REOCCURRENCE OF DEFICIENCIES.

PAGE 16 OF 20 1

MICH7.GAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT PROVOST AND V.P. FOR I

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS I

I I

V.P. FOR RESEARCH I

DEAN OF ENGINEERING AND I

GRADUATE STUDIES I

l I

I REACTOR SAFETY l

COMMITTEE OFFICE OF RADIATION, I

-l CHEMICAL AND l

BIOLOGICAL SAFETY l

I I

I I

I DIRECTOR - D.E.R.

I I

I I

I ADVISORY l

I DIv. ENGINEERING RESEARCH l

COMMITTEE FOR 1

I RADIATION, I

l CHEMICAL AND I

I BIOLOGICAL l

l SAFETY l----

REACTOR SUPERVISOR I

NUCLEAR REACTOR LABORATORY SENIOR OPERATORS ADVISORY OPERATORS DIRECT FIGURE 1 PAGE 17 OF 20

~ '

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM J

JUNE 15, 1988

~,'

FIGURE 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE QB_GANIZATION REACTOR SAFETY COMMITTEE REACTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPERVISOR MEMBER OF R.S.C.

I QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITORS ENGINEERS QUALITY CONTROL ADVISORY INSPECTORS DIRECT THIS ORGANIZATION MAY BE SUPPLEMENTED TO MEET SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE REACTOR SUPERVISOR.

FIGURE 2 PAGE 18 0F 20 1

,5 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 r

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT NCR NO.

DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMING CONDITION:

DwG./ SPEC. NO.

REv.NO.

REPORT DATE:

/

/

ITEM / SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION:

VENDOR / CONTRACTOR:

NONCONFORMANCE:

1, L ;V, REPORTED BY:

DISPOSITION:

REPAIR R EW0'<K

{-) ACCEPT

{j') REJECT

[3 CORRECTIVE ACTION TO BE TAKEN:

QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER:

DATE:

/

/

REINSPECTION REQUIRED:

REACTOR SUPERVISOR:

DATE:

/

/

YES__.. NO CSRRECTIVE ACTION HAS BEEN C0hPLETED AND FCUNb TO BE:

CCEPTABLE REMARKS:

UNACCEPTABLE INSPECTOR:

DATE:

/

/

FORM-1 PAGE 19 Or 20

~

, L'., #,

4 -

l 4

i t!

DOCKET N0.

ll-bO87 CONTROL N0. __ d N_

DATE OF 000. _

LM o N.3 399b g

DATE RCVD. __

Md.t._20, b9M FCUF PDR

/

FCAF LPDR l & E REF. _/

S A. f 3 a MJs FCTC CitiLR - _. _ _ _

DATE b) 8.3bhINmat m

i i

MICHIGAN STATE UN2VERSITY s-o QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM JUNE 15, 1988 MICHIGAN SIATE UN.IVER1 Ul Q.A. AUDIT REPDRT AUDIT REPORT NO.

DATEt

/

/

CRITERIA BEING AUDITED:

AUDIT PLAN:

PERSONNEL CONTACTED:

AUDIT TEAM MEMBERS:

AUDIT FINDINGS:

NoNCONFORMANCE REPORTS ISSUED AS A RESULT OF AUDIT: (LIST REPORT NUMBERS AND ATTACH COPIES)

Follow-UP AUDIT REQUIRED:

YES NO

/

/

AUDIT TEAM LEADER /DATE REACTOR SUPERVISOR /DATE FORM-2 PAGE 20 oF 20 L