ML20212Q042: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:..
                    .
.
            ..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
                                                                    .
.
                                                                                              E
E
              *
*
    .
.
                  n                                                   UNITE 3 STATES
n
          /,a RUuq'o                                         NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
UNITE 3 STATES
        ["                     n                                        ~ REGION il
/,a RUuq'o
        g                       j                                 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
        *               's                                         ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
["
        %,...../
~ REGION il
      Report No.:                 50-424/86-61
n
      Licensee: Georgia Power Company
g
                        P. O. Box 4545
j
                        Atlanta, GA 30302
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
      Docket No.: 50-424                                                         License No.: CPPR-108
*
      Facility Name: Vogtle 1
's
      Inspections Conducted: May 19 - 22 and June 23 - July 2, 1986
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
      Inspector:                             f[/ 1 r1.d , m . J           -
%,...../
                                                                                                      7/Date30/%
Report No.:
                                                                                                              S1gned
50-424/86-61
                        M. D. Hunt
Licensee: Georgia Power Company
      Accompanying Personnel:                 T. F. McElhinney
P. O. Box 4545
                                                L. Magleby, EG&G
Atlanta, GA 30302
                                                M. Kline, EG&G
Docket No.: 50-424
                                                A. N. Chaston, EG&G
License No.:
                                                J. F. Jacobson, EG&G
CPPR-108
                                                C. G. Bruch, EG&G
Facility Name: Vogtle 1
      Approvedby:'/dv                     M / b f // '/?s//                                         F     /5%
Inspections Conducted: May 19 - 22 and June 23 - July 2, 1986
                                T. E. Con 166, Section Chief                   ' //                 4 ate 51gned
Inspector:
                                Plants System Section
f[/ 1 r1.d , m . J
                                Division of Reactor Safety
7/ 30/%
                                                                        SUMMARY
M. D. Hunt
        Scope:         This special, announced inspection was to coordinate the inspections
-
        required to review the Readiness Review Modules 6, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21J.
Date S1gned
        Results: One violation was identified - Failure to Maintain Control of QC
Accompanying Personnel:
        Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod. 17).
T. F. McElhinney
                        2 860320
L. Magleby, EG&G
      kD[0$ Dock
M. Kline, EG&G
      a                                 05000424
A. N. Chaston, EG&G
                                      PDR
J. F. Jacobson, EG&G
                                                                '
C. G. Bruch, EG&G
- -             -
Approvedby:'/dv
                                                                                                                    ,
M / b f // '/?s//
                        . _ . .
F
/5%
T. E. Con 166, Section Chief
' //
4 ate 51gned
Plants System Section
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
Scope:
This special, announced inspection was to coordinate the inspections
required to review the Readiness Review Modules 6, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21J.
Results:
One violation was identified - Failure to Maintain Control of QC
Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod. 17).
kD[0$ Dock 05000424
2 860320
'
a
PDR
- -
-
. _ . .
,


                                                                                                                - __
- __
        -
-
< ,
<
                                                                    REPORT DETAILS
,
    1.     Persons Contacted
REPORT DETAILS
            Licensee Employees
1.
          *P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Engineering
Persons Contacted
          *E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager
Licensee Employees
          *F. C. Warren, QC Supervisor
*P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Engineering
          *D. A. Strength, Electrical QC                             Supervisor
*E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager
          *B. C. Harbin, Manager, QC
*F. C. Warren, QC Supervisor
          *J. A. Rodgers, Asst. Project Compliance Coordinator
*D. A. Strength, Electrical QC Supervisor
          *P. T. Ciccanesi, Regulatory Compliance
*B. C. Harbin, Manager, QC
          *R. E. Hollands, Compliance Superintendent
*J. A. Rodgers, Asst. Project Compliance Coordinator
          *M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
*P. T. Ciccanesi, Regulatory Compliance
          *W. T. Nickerson, Asst. to Project                             Director
*R. E. Hollands, Compliance Superintendent
          *C W. Hayes, Vogtle QA Manager
*M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
            Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen,
*W. T. Nickerson, Asst. to Project Director
            engineers, technicians and office personnel.
*C
              Other Organizations
W. Hayes, Vogtle QA Manager
            *J. E. Miller, General QA/QC Manager, Pullman Power Products (PPP)
Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen,
            *B.                     L. Edwards, General Resident Contract Manager, PPP
engineers, technicians and office personnel.
            *D.                     K. Ferrier, Readin%s Review Electrical Design, Bechtcl Power Corp. (BCP)
Other Organizations
            *D.                     W. Strohman, Project. QA Engineer, BCP
*J. E. Miller, General QA/QC Manager, Pullman Power Products (PPP)
            *F.                     B. Marsh, Project Engineering Manager, BCP
*B. L. Edwards, General Resident Contract Manager, PPP
            *J. L. Haratyk, Electrical Engineer, BCP
*D. K. Ferrier, Readin%s Review Electrical Design, Bechtcl Power Corp. (BCP)
            *P. J. Kabre, C1vil/Structrual Engineer, BCP
*D. W. Strohman, Project. QA Engineer, BCP
            *R. C. Sommerfeld, Mechanical Readiness Review, BCP
*F. B. Marsh, Project Engineering Manager, BCP
              NRC Resident Inspectors
*J. L. Haratyk, Electrical Engineer, BCP
            *H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector
*P. J. Kabre, C1vil/Structrual Engineer, BCP
            *R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector
*R. C. Sommerfeld, Mechanical Readiness Review, BCP
            * Attended exit interview
NRC Resident Inspectors
      2.         Exit Interview
*H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector
                  The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 2,1986, with
*R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector
                    those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector describedNothe
* Attended exit interview
                    areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection                       findings.
2.
                                                                                              The following new
Exit Interview
                    dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 2,1986, with
                    items were identified during this inspection:
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
                                            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
The inspector described the
                                            Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
              - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                     ._
No
dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
The following new
items were identified during this inspection:
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
- - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
._


      '
'
.
.
                                            2
2
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, Examine Methods for
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, Examine Methods for
            Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Supports (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Supports (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
              Four Comitments (Mod.19), paragraph 5.
Four Comitments (Mod.19), paragraph 5.
                                                          ~
~
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in 6.1
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in 6.1
              (Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
(Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
            Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to Regulatory
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to Regulatory
            Guide (RG) 1.89, Rev. O versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
Guide (RG) 1.89, Rev. O versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
            Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 1500 PSI Pressure Ratings for
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 1500 PSI Pressure Ratings for
            LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07 Examine Separation Require-
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07 Examine Separation Require-
            ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20),
ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20),
              paragraph 5.
paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
            According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
              For M0V HV 2583 B. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
For M0V HV 2583 B. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
              (Mod. 6), paragraph 5.
(Mod. 6), paragraph 5.
            Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Comitment to IEEE
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Comitment to IEEE
            317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J),
317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J),
              paragraph 5.
paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
              for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddcwn Clips (Mod. 17), paragraph 5.
for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddcwn Clips (Mod. 17), paragraph 5.
              Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
            of Conduits IAE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17), paragraph 5.
of Conduits IAE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17), paragraph 5.
            Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
            Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), paragraph 6.
Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), paragraph 6.
        The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided
        to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
  3.   Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
3.
        This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
  4.   Unresolved Items
This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
  lnresolved items are matters about which more information is required to
4.
  determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.
Unresolved Items
  Three new unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in
lnresolved items are matters about which more information is required to
  paragraph 5.
determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.
      _
Three new unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in
paragraph 5.
_


    '
'
.
.
                                            3
3
  5.   Readiness Review Program
5.
      This report is to document the findings of inspections performed by NRC RII
Readiness Review Program
      and its consultants in accordance with the Readiness Review Program agreed
This report is to document the findings of inspections performed by NRC RII
      upon by Georgia Power Company and NRC. The inspections for each module will
and its consultants in accordance with the Readiness Review Program agreed
      be documented by separate reports which will be completed upon complete
upon by Georgia Power Company and NRC. The inspections for each module will
      evaluation of all records and data collected in the field and will be
be documented by separate reports which will be completed upon complete
      identified as follows:
evaluation of all records and data collected in the field and will be
        Module No.                 Title                       IE Report No.
identified as follows:
            17         Raceways                               50-424/86-16
Module No.
              6         Electrical Equipment                   50-424/86-46
Title
            12         Electrical Cables & Terminations       50-424/86-47
IE Report No.
            19         Electrical Supports                     50-424/86-48
17
            20         Instrumentation and Controls           50-424/86-49
Raceways
            21J       Equipment Qualification                 50-424/86-50
50-424/86-16
      In an effort to assure that prompt corrective actions are taken to correct
6
      various conditions identified during these inspections, the findings were
Electrical Equipment
      discussed with the licensee's representatives and identified for record
50-424/86-46
      purposes. These items with the exception of violation 50-424/86-61-13 will
12
      be documented and discussed in detail in the appropriate module report. The
Electrical Cables & Terminations
      following items have been identified during the inspection of the indicated
50-424/86-47
      module in the Readiness Review Program to date:
19
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
Electrical Supports
            Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19).
50-424/86-48
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, E amine Methods for
20
            Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Support:, (Mod.19).
Instrumentation and Controls
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
50-424/86-49
            FourCommitments(Mod.19).
21J
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in
Equipment Qualification
            Section 6.1 (Mod. 12).
50-424/86-50
            Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to RG 1.89, Rev. O
In an effort to assure that prompt corrective actions are taken to correct
            versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12).
various conditions identified during these inspections, the findings were
            Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 15C0 PSI Pressure Ratings for
discussed with the licensee's representatives and identified for record
            LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20).
purposes.
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07, Examine Separation Require-
These items with the exception of violation 50-424/86-61-13 will
            ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20).
be documented and discussed in detail in the appropriate module report. The
            Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
following items have been identified during the inspection of the indicated
            According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20).
module in the Readiness Review Program to date:
                                                                                    -
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, E amine Methods for
Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Support:, (Mod.19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
FourCommitments(Mod.19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in
Section 6.1 (Mod. 12).
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to RG 1.89, Rev. O
versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12).
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 15C0 PSI Pressure Ratings for
LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07, Examine Separation Require-
ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20).
-


  I
I
    ,
..
        ..
,
                                                  4
4
                  Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
                  For MOV HV 2583 8. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
For MOV HV 2583 8. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
                  (Mod. 6).
(Mod. 6).
                  Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Commitment to IEEE
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Commitment to IEEE
                  317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J).
317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J).
                  Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
                  for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddown Clips (Mod. 17).
for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddown Clips (Mod. 17).
                  Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
                  of Conduits 1AE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17).
of Conduits 1AE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17).
                  Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
                  Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), Paragraph 6.
Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), Paragraph 6.
      6.   Electrical Raceways
6.
            During a portion of the inspection of Raceways (Module 17) on May 21, 1986,
Electrical Raceways
            the inspector noted that the conduit support CS-7C4-102-068 for the 4"
During a portion of the inspection of Raceways (Module 17) on May 21, 1986,
            conduit 1BETC4RE034 in the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) room 102 had been
the inspector noted that the conduit support CS-7C4-102-068 for the 4"
            disassembled. At that time the status of the conduit support could not be
conduit 1BETC4RE034 in the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) room 102 had been
            determined. During the second inspection period records reviewed indicated
disassembled.
            that the support had been previously accepted and documented by QC inspec-
At that time the status of the conduit support could not be
            tion personnel. The AFW pump 1B had been released for testing. A main-
determined.
            tenance work order (MWO) No. 18607575 had been issued to rework (align) the
During the second inspection period records reviewed indicated
            pump coupling. However, the boundary of the MWO did not extend to the
that the support had been previously accepted and documented by QC inspec-
            conduit support. The MWO had been closed on April 10, 1986, and there was
tion personnel.
            no information available to support the as-found condition of the support.
The AFW pump 1B had been released for testing.
            This condition is identified as violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to
A main-
            Maintain Control of QC Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod.17).
tenance work order (MWO) No. 18607575 had been issued to rework (align) the
                                        .
pump coupling.
However, the boundary of the MWO did not extend to the
conduit support.
The MWO had been closed on April 10, 1986, and there was
no information available to support the as-found condition of the support.
This condition is identified as violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to
Maintain Control of QC Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod.17).
.
l
l
[
[
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:11, 4 December 2024

Insp Rept 50-424/86-61 on 860519-22 & 0623-0702.Violation Noted:Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod 17)
ML20212Q042
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle 
Issue date: 08/12/1986
From: Conlon T, Hunt M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20212Q016 List:
References
50-424-86-61, NUDOCS 8609030382
Download: ML20212Q042 (5)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000424/1986061

Text

..

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

E

.

n

UNITE 3 STATES

/,a RUuq'o

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON

["

~ REGION il

n

g

j

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

's

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

%,...../

Report No.:

50-424/86-61

Licensee: Georgia Power Company

P. O. Box 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302

Docket No.: 50-424

License No.:

CPPR-108

Facility Name: Vogtle 1

Inspections Conducted: May 19 - 22 and June 23 - July 2, 1986

Inspector:

f[/ 1 r1.d , m . J

7/ 30/%

M. D. Hunt

-

Date S1gned

Accompanying Personnel:

T. F. McElhinney

L. Magleby, EG&G

M. Kline, EG&G

A. N. Chaston, EG&G

J. F. Jacobson, EG&G

C. G. Bruch, EG&G

Approvedby:'/dv

M / b f // '/?s//

F

/5%

T. E. Con 166, Section Chief

' //

4 ate 51gned

Plants System Section

Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

Scope:

This special, announced inspection was to coordinate the inspections

required to review the Readiness Review Modules 6, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21J.

Results:

One violation was identified - Failure to Maintain Control of QC

Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod. 17).

kD[0$ Dock 05000424

2 860320

'

a

PDR

- -

-

. _ . .

,

- __

-

<

,

REPORT DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

  • P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Engineering
  • E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager
  • F. C. Warren, QC Supervisor
  • D. A. Strength, Electrical QC Supervisor
  • B. C. Harbin, Manager, QC
  • J. A. Rodgers, Asst. Project Compliance Coordinator
  • P. T. Ciccanesi, Regulatory Compliance
  • R. E. Hollands, Compliance Superintendent
  • M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
  • W. T. Nickerson, Asst. to Project Director
  • C

W. Hayes, Vogtle QA Manager

Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen,

engineers, technicians and office personnel.

Other Organizations

  • J. E. Miller, General QA/QC Manager, Pullman Power Products (PPP)
  • B. L. Edwards, General Resident Contract Manager, PPP
  • D. K. Ferrier, Readin%s Review Electrical Design, Bechtcl Power Corp. (BCP)
  • D. W. Strohman, Project. QA Engineer, BCP
  • F. B. Marsh, Project Engineering Manager, BCP
  • J. L. Haratyk, Electrical Engineer, BCP
  • P. J. Kabre, C1vil/Structrual Engineer, BCP
  • R. C. Sommerfeld, Mechanical Readiness Review, BCP

NRC Resident Inspectors

  • H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector
  • R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector
  • Attended exit interview

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 2,1986, with

those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The inspector described the

areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.

No

dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

The following new

items were identified during this inspection:

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit

Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.

- - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

._

'

.

2

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, Examine Methods for

Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Supports (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on

Four Comitments (Mod.19), paragraph 5.

~

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in 6.1

(Mod. 12), paragraph 5.

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to Regulatory

Guide (RG) 1.89, Rev. O versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12), paragraph 5.

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 1500 PSI Pressure Ratings for

LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07 Examine Separation Require-

ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20),

paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed

According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation

For M0V HV 2583 B. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator

(Mod. 6), paragraph 5.

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Comitment to IEEE 317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J),

paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification

for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddcwn Clips (Mod. 17), paragraph 5.

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation

of Conduits IAE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17), paragraph 5.

Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted

Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), paragraph 6.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided

to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

This subject was not addressed in the inspection.

4.

Unresolved Items

lnresolved items are matters about which more information is required to

determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.

Three new unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in

paragraph 5.

_

'

.

3

5.

Readiness Review Program

This report is to document the findings of inspections performed by NRC RII

and its consultants in accordance with the Readiness Review Program agreed

upon by Georgia Power Company and NRC. The inspections for each module will

be documented by separate reports which will be completed upon complete

evaluation of all records and data collected in the field and will be

identified as follows:

Module No.

Title

IE Report No.

17

Raceways

50-424/86-16

6

Electrical Equipment

50-424/86-46

12

Electrical Cables & Terminations

50-424/86-47

19

Electrical Supports

50-424/86-48

20

Instrumentation and Controls

50-424/86-49

21J

Equipment Qualification

50-424/86-50

In an effort to assure that prompt corrective actions are taken to correct

various conditions identified during these inspections, the findings were

discussed with the licensee's representatives and identified for record

purposes.

These items with the exception of violation 50-424/86-61-13 will

be documented and discussed in detail in the appropriate module report. The

following items have been identified during the inspection of the indicated

module in the Readiness Review Program to date:

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit

Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, E amine Methods for

Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Support:, (Mod.19).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on

FourCommitments(Mod.19).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in

Section 6.1 (Mod. 12).

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to RG 1.89, Rev. O

versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12).

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 15C0 PSI Pressure Ratings for

LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07, Examine Separation Require-

ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed

According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20).

-

I

..

,

4

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation

For MOV HV 2583 8. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator

(Mod. 6).

Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Commitment to IEEE 317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification

for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddown Clips (Mod. 17).

Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation

of Conduits 1AE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17).

Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted

Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), Paragraph 6.

6.

Electrical Raceways

During a portion of the inspection of Raceways (Module 17) on May 21, 1986,

the inspector noted that the conduit support CS-7C4-102-068 for the 4"

conduit 1BETC4RE034 in the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) room 102 had been

disassembled.

At that time the status of the conduit support could not be

determined.

During the second inspection period records reviewed indicated

that the support had been previously accepted and documented by QC inspec-

tion personnel.

The AFW pump 1B had been released for testing.

A main-

tenance work order (MWO) No. 18607575 had been issued to rework (align) the

pump coupling.

However, the boundary of the MWO did not extend to the

conduit support.

The MWO had been closed on April 10, 1986, and there was

no information available to support the as-found condition of the support.

This condition is identified as violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to

Maintain Control of QC Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod.17).

.

l

[

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20212Q042&oldid=3994551"