ML20212Q042
| ML20212Q042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 08/12/1986 |
| From: | Conlon T, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212Q016 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-86-61, NUDOCS 8609030382 | |
| Download: ML20212Q042 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000424/1986061
Text
..
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
E
.
n
UNITE 3 STATES
/,a RUuq'o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
["
~ REGION il
n
g
j
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
's
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
%,...../
Report No.:
50-424/86-61
Licensee: Georgia Power Company
P. O. Box 4545
Atlanta, GA 30302
Docket No.: 50-424
License No.:
CPPR-108
Facility Name: Vogtle 1
Inspections Conducted: May 19 - 22 and June 23 - July 2, 1986
Inspector:
f[/ 1 r1.d , m . J
7/ 30/%
M. D. Hunt
-
Date S1gned
Accompanying Personnel:
T. F. McElhinney
L. Magleby, EG&G
M. Kline, EG&G
A. N. Chaston, EG&G
J. F. Jacobson, EG&G
C. G. Bruch, EG&G
Approvedby:'/dv
M / b f // '/?s//
F
/5%
T. E. Con 166, Section Chief
' //
4 ate 51gned
Plants System Section
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
Scope:
This special, announced inspection was to coordinate the inspections
required to review the Readiness Review Modules 6, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21J.
Results:
One violation was identified - Failure to Maintain Control of QC
Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod. 17).
kD[0$ Dock 05000424
2 860320
'
a
- -
-
. _ . .
,
- __
-
<
,
REPORT DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
- P. D. Rice, Vice President, Project Engineering
- E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager
- F. C. Warren, QC Supervisor
- D. A. Strength, Electrical QC Supervisor
- B. C. Harbin, Manager, QC
- J. A. Rodgers, Asst. Project Compliance Coordinator
- P. T. Ciccanesi, Regulatory Compliance
- R. E. Hollands, Compliance Superintendent
- M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
- W. T. Nickerson, Asst. to Project Director
- C
W. Hayes, Vogtle QA Manager
Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen,
engineers, technicians and office personnel.
Other Organizations
- J. E. Miller, General QA/QC Manager, Pullman Power Products (PPP)
- B. L. Edwards, General Resident Contract Manager, PPP
- D. K. Ferrier, Readin%s Review Electrical Design, Bechtcl Power Corp. (BCP)
- D. W. Strohman, Project. QA Engineer, BCP
- F. B. Marsh, Project Engineering Manager, BCP
- J. L. Haratyk, Electrical Engineer, BCP
- P. J. Kabre, C1vil/Structrual Engineer, BCP
- R. C. Sommerfeld, Mechanical Readiness Review, BCP
NRC Resident Inspectors
- H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector
- R. J. Schepens, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 2,1986, with
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No
dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
The following new
items were identified during this inspection:
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
- - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
._
'
.
2
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, Examine Methods for
Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Supports (Mod. 19), paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
Four Comitments (Mod.19), paragraph 5.
~
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in 6.1
(Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to Regulatory
Guide (RG) 1.89, Rev. O versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12), paragraph 5.
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 1500 PSI Pressure Ratings for
LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07 Examine Separation Require-
ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20),
paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20), paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
For M0V HV 2583 B. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
(Mod. 6), paragraph 5.
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Comitment to IEEE 317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J),
paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddcwn Clips (Mod. 17), paragraph 5.
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
of Conduits IAE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17), paragraph 5.
Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), paragraph 6.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided
to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
4.
Unresolved Items
lnresolved items are matters about which more information is required to
determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.
Three new unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in
paragraph 5.
_
'
.
3
5.
Readiness Review Program
This report is to document the findings of inspections performed by NRC RII
and its consultants in accordance with the Readiness Review Program agreed
upon by Georgia Power Company and NRC. The inspections for each module will
be documented by separate reports which will be completed upon complete
evaluation of all records and data collected in the field and will be
identified as follows:
Module No.
Title
IE Report No.
17
Raceways
50-424/86-16
6
Electrical Equipment
50-424/86-46
12
Electrical Cables & Terminations
50-424/86-47
19
Electrical Supports
50-424/86-48
20
Instrumentation and Controls
50-424/86-49
21J
Equipment Qualification
50-424/86-50
In an effort to assure that prompt corrective actions are taken to correct
various conditions identified during these inspections, the findings were
discussed with the licensee's representatives and identified for record
purposes.
These items with the exception of violation 50-424/86-61-13 will
be documented and discussed in detail in the appropriate module report. The
following items have been identified during the inspection of the indicated
module in the Readiness Review Program to date:
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-01, Examine the Conduit
Longitudinal Bracing Program (Mod. 19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-02, E amine Methods for
Controlling 31 inch Tube Steel Conduit Support:, (Mod.19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-03, Incomplete Verification on
FourCommitments(Mod.19).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-04, Review Discrepancies in
Section 6.1 (Mod. 12).
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-05, Review Commitments to RG 1.89, Rev. O
versus RG 1.89, Rev. 1 (Mod. 12).
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-06, Review 15C0 PSI Pressure Ratings for
LT-459, LT-460, and LT-461 (Mod. 20).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-07, Examine Separation Require-
ments for PT-405, PT-457, and LT-462 Sensing Lines (Mod 20).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-08, PI-0977 Is Not Installed
According to ISO Drawings (Mod. 20).
-
I
..
,
4
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-09, Review Conduit Installation
For MOV HV 2583 8. for Interference With Valve Position Indicator
(Mod. 6).
Unresolved Item 50-424/86-61-10, Review FSAR Commitment to IEEE 317-1976 for Chemical Spray of Electrical Penetrations (Mod. 21J).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-11, Review Testing Justification
for Low Torque Values on Raceway Holddown Clips (Mod. 17).
Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-61-12, Review Inadequate Separation
of Conduits 1AE 423 RS 021 & INE 423 RX 019 (Mod.17).
Violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to Maintain Control of QC Accepted
Conduit Support CS-7C4 102-068 (Mod. 17), Paragraph 6.
6.
Electrical Raceways
During a portion of the inspection of Raceways (Module 17) on May 21, 1986,
the inspector noted that the conduit support CS-7C4-102-068 for the 4"
conduit 1BETC4RE034 in the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) room 102 had been
disassembled.
At that time the status of the conduit support could not be
determined.
During the second inspection period records reviewed indicated
that the support had been previously accepted and documented by QC inspec-
tion personnel.
The AFW pump 1B had been released for testing.
A main-
tenance work order (MWO) No. 18607575 had been issued to rework (align) the
pump coupling.
However, the boundary of the MWO did not extend to the
conduit support.
The MWO had been closed on April 10, 1986, and there was
no information available to support the as-found condition of the support.
This condition is identified as violation 50-424/86-61-13, Failure to
Maintain Control of QC Accepted Conduit Support CS-7C4-102-068 (Mod.17).
.
l
[