ML20199F196: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. .-. . -             -   -.                       .   . - - . - - . _ .           -.-
{{#Wiki_filter:. .-. . -
  *'
-
l    f
-.
                                                                                                        l
.
                                                                                                        l
. - - . - - . _ .
                                                                                                        i
-.-
i                                              January 13,1999
*'
l
l
f
l
l
l
l
l      Mr. J. E. Cross
        President
;      Generation Group
        Duquesne Light Company
l      Post Office Box 4
      Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077
      SUBJECT:        NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10
      Dear Mr. Cross:
      The WRC conducted an inspection of the Beaver Valley Power Station f acilities from
      Nove nber 15 to December 26,1998. The enclosed report presents the results of that
      inc .ection.                                                                                      I
      During the 6-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at
      the Berier Val!ey Power Station facilities was characterized by safe maintenance and
      operat        activities. Operators were alert and demonstrated questioning attitudes during
      routine pant activities. On two occasions, poor work planning challenged your operations
      staff. On both oc asions, operators' careful scrutiny of the planned work activities prior to    i
      authorization, precluded conditions not permitted by tec1nical specifications and potential
      reactor plant transien's.
                                                                                                        i
      Within the area of plant support, we found that you continued to implemant effective
      Radiological Environmental Monitoring and Meteorological Monitoring Programs (REMP and
      MMP). You demonstrated good performance regarding maintenance and calibration of the              '
      meteorologicalinstrumentation. Your environmental 12,boratcry for sample analyses and
      quality assurance / quality control was effective. Quelity Services Unit (OSU) audits were of
      sufficient depth to assess the implementation of the REMP and MMP.
      Overall, the Fire Protecticn Program is functioning well and OSU audits of the program
      have been effective in idantifying deficienciea and areas for improvement. However, we
      are concerned that eng'aeer;ng support, in the resolucion of deficiencies in the post-fire
      shutdown procedures he w 1 slow. Your QSU has identified deficiencies in your post-
      fire shutdown procedures in every audit conducted since 1995. The fact that the program
      audits continue to find these deficiencies indicates that corrective actions may not have
      been fully effective in identifying the extent of the problem. We note that you plan to
      conduct the Engineering review of the Fire Protection Program during the first quarter of
      calendar year 1999.
i
i
January 13,1999
l
l
l
l
Mr. J. E. Cross
President
;
Generation Group
Duquesne Light Company
l
Post Office Box 4
Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077
SUBJECT:
NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10
Dear Mr. Cross:
The WRC conducted an inspection of the Beaver Valley Power Station f acilities from
Nove nber 15 to December 26,1998. The enclosed report presents the results of that
inc .ection.
During the 6-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at
the Berier Val!ey Power Station facilities was characterized by safe maintenance and
operat
activities. Operators were alert and demonstrated questioning attitudes during
routine pant activities. On two occasions, poor work planning challenged your operations
staff. On both oc asions, operators' careful scrutiny of the planned work activities prior to
i
authorization, precluded conditions not permitted by tec1nical specifications and potential
reactor plant transien's.
i
Within the area of plant support, we found that you continued to implemant effective
Radiological Environmental Monitoring and Meteorological Monitoring Programs (REMP and
MMP). You demonstrated good performance regarding maintenance and calibration of the
'
'
                                                                                                  i
meteorologicalinstrumentation. Your environmental 12,boratcry for sample analyses and
                                                                                                      I
quality assurance / quality control was effective. Quelity Services Unit (OSU) audits were of
                      210022                                                           s i         t
sufficient depth to assess the implementation of the REMP and MMP.
        9901210246 990113
Overall, the Fire Protecticn Program is functioning well and OSU audits of the program
                                          -
have been effective in idantifying deficienciea and areas for improvement. However, we
                                                                                      jr
are concerned that eng'aeer;ng support, in the resolucion of deficiencies in the post-fire
        PDR       ADOCK 05000334
shutdown procedures he w 1 slow. Your QSU has identified deficiencies in your post-
        G                       PDR
fire shutdown procedures in every audit conducted since 1995. The fact that the program
audits continue to find these deficiencies indicates that corrective actions may not have
been fully effective in identifying the extent of the problem. We note that you plan to
conduct the Engineering review of the Fire Protection Program during the first quarter of
calendar year 1999.
i
i
'
I
210022
s
i
t
jr
-
9901210246 990113
PDR
ADOCK 05000334
G
PDR


                                                . . _ . . _ .
. . _ . . _ .
'
'
                                                                                              i
i
    Mr. J. E. Cross                                         2
Mr. J. E. Cross
    in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
2
    and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
    No reply to this letter is necessary. Your cooperation is appreciated.
and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
                                                                Sincerely,
No reply to this letter is necessary. Your cooperation is appreciated.
                                                                Original Signed By:
Sincerely,
                                                                Peter W. Eselgroth, Chief
Original Signed By:
                                                                Reactor Projects Branch No. 7
Peter W. Eselgroth, Chief
                                                                Division of Reactor Projects
Reactor Projects Branch No. 7
    Docket Nos. : 50-334,50-412
Division of Reactor Projects
    License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73
Docket Nos. : 50-334,50-412
    Enclosure (s):
License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73
    1. Inspection Report 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10
Enclosure (s):
    2. Slides from November 16,1998 Management Meeting
1. Inspection Report 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10
    cc w/ encl (s):
2. Slides from November 16,1998 Management Meeting
    S. Jain, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Services Group
cc w/ encl (s):
    K. Ostrowski, 'Jice President, IJuclear Operations Group and Plant Manager
S. Jain, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Services Group
    R. Brandt, VMe Press.3nt, Operations Support Group
K. Ostrowski, 'Jice President, IJuclear Operations Group and Plant Manager
    B. Tuite, General Manager, Nuclear Operations Unit
R. Brandt, VMe Press.3nt, Operations Support Group
    W. Kline, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
B. Tuite, General Manager, Nuclear Operations Unit
    J. Macdonald, Manager, System and Performance Engineering
W. Kline, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
    M. Pearson, Manager, Quality Services Unit
J. Macdonald, Manager, System and Performance Engineering
    M. Ackerman, Manager, Safety & Licensing Department
M. Pearson, Manager, Quality Services Unit
    J. Hultz, Manager, Projects and Support Services, FirstEnergy
M. Ackerman, Manager, Safety & Licensing Department
    M. Clancy, Mayor, Shippingport, PA
J. Hultz, Manager, Projects and Support Services, FirstEnergy
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
M. Clancy, Mayor, Shippingport, PA
    State of Ohio
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    State of West Virginia
State of Ohio
  .     .
State of West Virginia
    .     .
.
                  .
.
                                        ..
.
                                                                        .
.
                                                                            ..
.
                    _
..
.
..
_


'
'
    t
t
  ,
,
l
l
l
                                                                          3
3
Distribution w/ encl (s):
Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
PUBLIC
NRC Resident inspector
H. Miller, RA/J. Wiggins, DRA
P. Eselgroth, DRP
N. Perry, DRP
C. O'Daniell, DRP
Distribution w/encls (VIA E-MAIL):
G. Shear, OEDO
S. Bajwa, PDI-1, NRR
D. Collins, PM, PDI-1, NRR
V. Nerses, PDI-1, NRR
R. Correia, NRR
DOCDESK
Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)
DOCUMENT NAME:G:\\ BRANCH 7\\BV\\lR98-10.WPD
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the boa:
"C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure
"E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure
'N' = No copy
(
OFFICE
Rl/DRP
g Rl/DRP
lg
/
l
l
      Distribution w/ encl (s):
NAME
      Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)
Kern /al pfg74.r
      Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
Eselgroth
      PUBLIC
DATE
      NRC Resident inspector
1/4ilf{/99
      H. Miller, RA/J. Wiggins, DRA
i//7/ff
      P. Eselgroth, DRP
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
      N. Perry, DRP
      C. O'Daniell, DRP
      Distribution w/encls (VIA E-MAIL):
      G. Shear, OEDO
      S. Bajwa, PDI-1, NRR
      D. Collins, PM, PDI-1, NRR
      V. Nerses, PDI-1, NRR
      R. Correia, NRR
      DOCDESK
      Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)
      DOCUMENT NAME:G:\ BRANCH 7\BV\lR98-10.WPD
      To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the boa: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure
      'N' = No copy
(      OFFICE          Rl/DRP                      g    Rl/DRP              lg                                  /
l      NAME          Kern /al pfg74.r                   Eselgroth
        DATE           1/4ilf{/99                         i//7/ff
                                                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 07:49, 10 December 2024

Forwards Insp Repts 50-334/98-10 & 50-412/98-10 on 981115-1226.No Violations Noted.Informs That Overall Fire Protection Program Functioning Well
ML20199F196
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/13/1999
From: Eselgroth P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Cross J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20199F199 List:
References
50-334-98-10, 50-412-98-10, NUDOCS 9901210246
Download: ML20199F196 (3)


See also: IR 05000334/1998010

Text

. .-. . -

-

-.

.

. - - . - - . _ .

-.-

  • '

l

f

l

l

i

January 13,1999

l

l

l

l

Mr. J. E. Cross

President

Generation Group

Duquesne Light Company

l

Post Office Box 4

Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077

SUBJECT:

NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10

Dear Mr. Cross:

The WRC conducted an inspection of the Beaver Valley Power Station f acilities from

Nove nber 15 to December 26,1998. The enclosed report presents the results of that

inc .ection.

During the 6-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at

the Berier Val!ey Power Station facilities was characterized by safe maintenance and

operat

activities. Operators were alert and demonstrated questioning attitudes during

routine pant activities. On two occasions, poor work planning challenged your operations

staff. On both oc asions, operators' careful scrutiny of the planned work activities prior to

i

authorization, precluded conditions not permitted by tec1nical specifications and potential

reactor plant transien's.

i

Within the area of plant support, we found that you continued to implemant effective

Radiological Environmental Monitoring and Meteorological Monitoring Programs (REMP and

MMP). You demonstrated good performance regarding maintenance and calibration of the

'

meteorologicalinstrumentation. Your environmental 12,boratcry for sample analyses and

quality assurance / quality control was effective. Quelity Services Unit (OSU) audits were of

sufficient depth to assess the implementation of the REMP and MMP.

Overall, the Fire Protecticn Program is functioning well and OSU audits of the program

have been effective in idantifying deficienciea and areas for improvement. However, we

are concerned that eng'aeer;ng support, in the resolucion of deficiencies in the post-fire

shutdown procedures he w 1 slow. Your QSU has identified deficiencies in your post-

fire shutdown procedures in every audit conducted since 1995. The fact that the program

audits continue to find these deficiencies indicates that corrective actions may not have

been fully effective in identifying the extent of the problem. We note that you plan to

conduct the Engineering review of the Fire Protection Program during the first quarter of

calendar year 1999.

i

i

'

I

210022

s

i

t

jr

-

9901210246 990113

PDR

ADOCK 05000334

G

PDR

. . _ . . _ .

'

i

Mr. J. E. Cross

2

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

No reply to this letter is necessary. Your cooperation is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Original Signed By:

Peter W. Eselgroth, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch No. 7

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos. : 50-334,50-412

License Nos.: DPR-66, NPF-73

Enclosure (s):

1. Inspection Report 50-334/98-10,50-412/98-10

2. Slides from November 16,1998 Management Meeting

cc w/ encl (s):

S. Jain, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Services Group

K. Ostrowski, 'Jice President, IJuclear Operations Group and Plant Manager

R. Brandt, VMe Press.3nt, Operations Support Group

B. Tuite, General Manager, Nuclear Operations Unit

W. Kline, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department

J. Macdonald, Manager, System and Performance Engineering

M. Pearson, Manager, Quality Services Unit

M. Ackerman, Manager, Safety & Licensing Department

J. Hultz, Manager, Projects and Support Services, FirstEnergy

M. Clancy, Mayor, Shippingport, PA

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

State of Ohio

State of West Virginia

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

..

_

'

t

,

l

l

3

Distribution w/ encl (s):

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident inspector

H. Miller, RA/J. Wiggins, DRA

P. Eselgroth, DRP

N. Perry, DRP

C. O'Daniell, DRP

Distribution w/encls (VIA E-MAIL):

G. Shear, OEDO

S. Bajwa, PDI-1, NRR

D. Collins, PM, PDI-1, NRR

V. Nerses, PDI-1, NRR

R. Correia, NRR

DOCDESK

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

DOCUMENT NAME:G:\\ BRANCH 7\\BV\\lR98-10.WPD

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the boa:

"C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure

"E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure

'N' = No copy

(

OFFICE

Rl/DRP

g Rl/DRP

lg

/

l

NAME

Kern /al pfg74.r

Eselgroth

DATE

1/4ilf{/99

i//7/ff

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY