ML20125E072: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
.l     ~                     .
.l
F -p  . A % .,%
~
                                    =                                                                                         l t              .
F. A %.,%
f                                             L.TJITE o ST ATEs                                                         l
-p t
                +e                     NUCL E AR R EGU LATORY COi,7.11SSION                                                 l w Asse.c rcN. o c. 20sss ks ,h.}c'j'+             ,f l7
=
  !                  E                                                                                                      l
f L.TJITE o ST ATEs
  *U       ~~ '                                   November 7, 1979 l
+e NUCL E AR R EGU LATORY COi,7.11SSION
            ....s                                               '
!k,h.}c'j'+,f l7 E
OcFICE OF THE COY /tS0 LONER MEMORANDUM FOR:           Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Onerations W 73.
w Asse.c rcN. o c. 20sss
FROM:                     Peter A. Bradford                                                                       I
*U s
~~ '
November 7, 1979
%,....s OcFICE OF THE COY /tS0 LONER MEMORANDUM FOR:
Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Onerations W 73.
FROM:
Peter A. Bradford I


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SECY-79 448 - 10 CFR PART 21, ANALYSIS OF C0". MENT LETTERS It nas cc e to my attention that there may not be any regulation, code or st3r.dard recuiring vendors of ccm ercial-grade items to notify higner tier purchasers of any deviation from the purchase specification discovered :ubsecuent to delivery of the item.                 Since this infornation may be critical to ensuring the safety of cperating reactors, please ansv.er the follov:ing cuestions:
SECY-79 448 - 10 CFR PART 21, ANALYSIS OF C0". MENT LETTERS It nas cc e to my attention that there may not be any regulation, code or st3r.dard recuiring vendors of ccm ercial-grade items to notify higner tier purchasers of any deviation from the purchase specification discovered :ubsecuent to delivery of the item.
: 1)     Are vendors of commercial-grade items (as defined in 10 CFR Part 21) obligated to notify their purchaser of any deviations from the purchase specification v;hich are dis-covered by the vendor subsequent to delivery of the item?
Since this infornation may be critical to ensuring the safety of cperating reactors, please ansv.er the follov:ing cuestions:
: 2)     If so, pursuant to what regulation, code, standard or legal theory does such an obligation arise?
1)
: 3)     What is the current industry practice in this regard?
Are vendors of commercial-grade items (as defined in 10 CFR Part 21) obligated to notify their purchaser of any deviations from the purchase specification v;hich are dis-covered by the vendor subsequent to delivery of the item?
: 4)     What changes in NRC's regulations viould be necessary to ensure that all such information is passed on to a Part 21 vendor throughout the anticipated service life of the item so that the safety significance can be properly assessed?
2)
: 5)     Are these changes necessary?
If so, pursuant to what regulation, code, standard or legal theory does such an obligation arise?
cc:     Chairman Hendrie Conmissioner Gilir. sky Commissioner Kennedy Conmissioner Ahearne                                                                                     -
3)
L. Bickwit, OGC A. Kenneke, OPE                                                                                         -
What is the current industry practice in this regard?
: 5. Chilk, SECY T   .
4)
i     / ' / f/ 7 L . . . . . .,.
What changes in NRC's regulations viould be necessary to ensure that all such information is passed on to a Part 21 vendor throughout the anticipated service life of the item so that the safety significance can be properly assessed?
                                                                                            '.'        /Ml; /
5)
8 0012 50 Nb}}
Are these changes necessary?
cc:
Chairman Hendrie Conmissioner Gilir. sky Commissioner Kennedy Conmissioner Ahearne L. Bickwit, OGC A. Kenneke, OPE
: 5. Chilk, SECY T
i
/ ' / f/ 7 L......,.
/Ml;
/
8 0012 50 Nb
-}}

Latest revision as of 20:33, 12 December 2024

Raises Questions Re Lack of Regulation,Code or Std Requiring Vendors of commercial-grade Items to Notify Purchasers of Any Deviation from Purchase Specs Discovered Subsequent to Delivery
ML20125E072
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/07/1979
From: Bradford P
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Gossick L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20125E070 List:
References
TASK-OS, TASK-RS-519-1 SECY-79-448, NUDOCS 8001250436
Download: ML20125E072 (1)


Text

.

.l

~

F. A %.,%

-p t

=

f L.TJITE o ST ATEs

+e NUCL E AR R EGU LATORY COi,7.11SSION

!k,h.}c'j'+,f l7 E

w Asse.c rcN. o c. 20sss

  • U s

~~ '

November 7, 1979

%,....s OcFICE OF THE COY /tS0 LONER MEMORANDUM FOR:

Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Onerations W 73.

FROM:

Peter A. Bradford I

SUBJECT:

SECY-79 448 - 10 CFR PART 21, ANALYSIS OF C0". MENT LETTERS It nas cc e to my attention that there may not be any regulation, code or st3r.dard recuiring vendors of ccm ercial-grade items to notify higner tier purchasers of any deviation from the purchase specification discovered :ubsecuent to delivery of the item.

Since this infornation may be critical to ensuring the safety of cperating reactors, please ansv.er the follov:ing cuestions:

1)

Are vendors of commercial-grade items (as defined in 10 CFR Part 21) obligated to notify their purchaser of any deviations from the purchase specification v;hich are dis-covered by the vendor subsequent to delivery of the item?

2)

If so, pursuant to what regulation, code, standard or legal theory does such an obligation arise?

3)

What is the current industry practice in this regard?

4)

What changes in NRC's regulations viould be necessary to ensure that all such information is passed on to a Part 21 vendor throughout the anticipated service life of the item so that the safety significance can be properly assessed?

5)

Are these changes necessary?

cc:

Chairman Hendrie Conmissioner Gilir. sky Commissioner Kennedy Conmissioner Ahearne L. Bickwit, OGC A. Kenneke, OPE

5. Chilk, SECY T

i

/ ' / f/ 7 L......,.

/Ml;

/

8 0012 50 Nb

-