ML20058F949: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:.- | {{#Wiki_filter:.- | ||
.[ | |||
l BALTIMORE : | l BALTIMORE : | ||
GASAND EL2? TIC | GASAND EL2? TIC 4 | ||
CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX-1475 | |||
* BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 | * BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 l | ||
:l November 5,1990 | R E.DENTON GFNERAL MANAGER CALVERT CLIFFS 1 | ||
:l November 5,1990 | |||
:i | |||
-1 1 | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - | U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - | ||
Washington,DC 20555 | Washington,DC 20555 | ||
:i ATTENTION: | :i ATTENTION: | ||
Document Control Desk ( | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant: | Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant: | ||
Unit No. 2; Docket No. 50-318 - | |||
Fire Barrier Penetration Special Report ; | Fire Barrier Penetration Special Report ; | ||
Per the requirements of Technical. Specification 3.7.12 ACTION requirement a, we hereby submit | j Technical Soccification 3.7.12 ' CTION requirement a A | ||
Gentlemen: | |||
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with | Per the requirements of Technical. Specification 3.7.12 ACTION requirement a, we hereby submit 1 | ||
i you. | the attached Special Report concerning an-inoperable fire barrier penetration, specifically.a gap between a ventilation duct penetrating the floor and wall between the Unit 2 45 taot and 27 foot elevation switchgear rooms made the fire barrier penetration inoperable for greater than 7 days. | ||
. ) | |||
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with | |||
- i you. | |||
Very truly'yours, - | Very truly'yours, - | ||
M. | |||
RED /CRS/bjd | RED /CRS/bjd i | ||
NRC 90-117 - | |||
1 l | |||
Attachment r3l$ | |||
A* | A* | ||
9011090239 901105 | 9011090239 901105 1 | ||
p j | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000318 l | |||
e eDC 3 | |||
s | s | ||
e | e | ||
!I.. | |||
Document ControlDcsk: | Document ControlDcsk: | ||
November 5,1990 - | = | ||
Pagc 2-cc: | November 5,1990 - | ||
J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC | 4 Pagc 2-cc: | ||
T. T. Martin, NRC | _ D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC T. T. Martin, NRC | ||
:" 4 i | |||
R. I. McIxan, DNR : | L E. Nicholson, NRC R. I. McIxan, DNR : | ||
1 j | |||
3 i | |||
i | i | ||
. 1 1i I | |||
i 1 | i 1 | ||
+ | |||
f | f i | ||
4 l | |||
l | |||
i i | i i | ||
j l | i j | ||
l l | |||
i | s '1 I | ||
i v | |||
.i - | |||
1 i | |||
.l si t | |||
,if i | |||
s | |||
.t | |||
A1TACIIMENT(ik PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER ' | A1TACIIMENT(ik PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER ' | ||
SfECIAL REPORT | SfECIAL REPORT | ||
? | |||
BACKGROUND | BACKGROUND s | ||
s | |||
h On September 29,,1990 it was discovered that the' barrier between the Unit 2 45 foot Elevation j | h On September 29,,1990 it was discovered that the' barrier between the Unit 2 45 foot Elevation j | ||
Switchgear Room and'the Unit 2 27 foot Elevation Switchgear. Room was inopchabich Akmall gap . | Switchgear Room and'the Unit 2 27 foot Elevation Switchgear. Room was inopchabich Akmall gap. | ||
(1/2 inch by 42 inches) was found between a ventilation duct ' penetrating the floor and the wall.- | (1/2 inch by 42 inches) was found between a ventilation duct ' penetrating the floor and the wall.- | ||
i | |||
Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.12 was entered immediately by verifying that fire detection was OPERABLE on at least one side of the barrier and instituting an ho'urly' fire watch patrol; AE temporary seal was provided in accordance with Calvert Cliffs Instructions I''3 and the barrier was declared operable on October 8,19901The ACTION requirement was then exited. .The barric' | -I Upon discovery of this condition it was reported to the Shift Supervisor. ACTION requirement a of : | ||
d 1 | Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.12 was entered immediately by verifying that fire detection was OPERABLE on at least one side of the barrier and instituting an ho'urly' fire watch patrol; AE temporary seal was provided in accordance with Calvert Cliffs Instructions I''3 and the barrier was declared operable on October 8,19901The ACTION requirement was then exited..The barric' 'was r | ||
To fulfill the ACr10N requirement of TS 3.7.12 a Special Report is to =be prepared for the . | considered inoperable for 9 days. | ||
d 1 | |||
Commission when a barrier is inoperable for 7 days or more. This Special Report, pursuant to. | To fulfill the ACr10N requirement of TS 3.7.12 a Special Report is to =be prepared for the. | ||
TS 6.9.2, is to outline actions taken, the cause of the inoperable penetration and plans and schedules l | 1 Commission when a barrier is inoperable for 7 days or more. This Special Report, pursuant to. | ||
to restore the penetration to operable status. JIhe information contained in this document fulfills | ~ | ||
TS 6.9.2, is to outline actions taken, the cause of the inoperable penetration and plans and schedules l to restore the penetration to operable status. JIhe information contained in this document fulfills 1 | |||
i a | |||
these requirements. | these requirements. | ||
I EFFECT ON UNIT OPERATION | I EFFECT ON UNIT OPERATION l | ||
.) | |||
1 | 1 | ||
- Upon discovery that there was a small gap in the barrier between the two Unit 2 Switchgear Roon s j | |||
: t. , | : t., | ||
the barrier was declared inoperab'.,.and the appropriate TS. ACTION requirement _wu entered. | the barrier was declared inoperab'.,.and the appropriate TS. ACTION requirement _wu entered. | ||
. Unit 2 was defueled from the time the ACTION requirement 'was entered until the time il v.e 1 | |||
] | |||
v y | |||
exited. | |||
L-While the barrier was inoperable the affect on fire protection was mitigated by ihe following: | L-While the barrier was inoperable the affect on fire protection was mitigated by ihe following: | ||
1 | 1 Li | ||
-j-i a | |||
.._ n | |||
._ ;l ' | |||
4 A*ITACllMENT (1) | ? | ||
g 4 | |||
A*ITACllMENT (1) 3 j | |||
PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER j | |||
SPECIAL REPORT H | |||
'j I | |||
I | |||
[ ire | ,p | ||
s | ,s l | ||
4 Both sides of the barrier are protected with fire detection which provides early warning of a j | |||
[ ire. | |||
s Both sides of the barrier are protected by total flooding Halon System." The small size of? ~ | |||
,j | |||
.a the gap should have resulted in little effect on the ability of the Halon System from achieving' | |||
-:i. j an effective extinguishing concentreion.; In fact, it is likely. tiiatlthis gap was prescht when - | |||
-a | |||
,ii the Halon System was subjected to th e acceptance concentration test. | |||
o | |||
- -) | |||
,$i ay TASKS TO ASSURE FUTURE COMPLIANCEI 1 | |||
i 1 | i 1 | ||
The' gap between the: ventilation duct and the wall was found as parttof the Surveillance Test | The' gap between the: ventilation duct and the wall was found as parttof the Surveillance Test Ti Procedure (STP F-592-2) that fulfilt the surveillance requirements of'I1S "'t.7.12E This surveillance | ||
} | |||
is complete for' Unit 2'an$is to be; initiated for Unit:1 in'the near future. This surveillance is. | |||
] | |||
L a | |||
p mtended to find items such as this gap. When similar items were discovered th'e appropriate actions :; | |||
l 1 | .l l. | ||
were taken and the items repaired in less than 7 days. | |||
L l | |||
1 | |||
) | |||
i[ | i[ | ||
l | l a | ||
a | y a | ||
\ | \\ | ||
y | y | ||
.{ | |||
v | v | ||
} | |||
-i' | |||
+ | |||
I a | |||
i)'- | |||
11 a | |||
F 6 | F 6 | ||
I f | I f | ||
i a- | i | ||
/ /f a-O b | |||
/ | |||
,}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:20, 17 December 2024
| ML20058F949 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs |
| Issue date: | 11/05/1990 |
| From: | Denton R BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-90-117 NUDOCS 9011090239 | |
| Download: ML20058F949 (4) | |
Text
.-
.[
l BALTIMORE :
GASAND EL2? TIC 4
CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX-1475
- BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 l
R E.DENTON GFNERAL MANAGER CALVERT CLIFFS 1
- l November 5,1990
- i
-1 1
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -
Washington,DC 20555
- i ATTENTION:
Document Control Desk (
SUBJECT:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant:
Unit No. 2; Docket No. 50-318 -
Fire Barrier Penetration Special Report ;
j Technical Soccification 3.7.12 ' CTION requirement a A
Gentlemen:
Per the requirements of Technical. Specification 3.7.12 ACTION requirement a, we hereby submit 1
the attached Special Report concerning an-inoperable fire barrier penetration, specifically.a gap between a ventilation duct penetrating the floor and wall between the Unit 2 45 taot and 27 foot elevation switchgear rooms made the fire barrier penetration inoperable for greater than 7 days.
. )
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with
- i you.
Very truly'yours, -
M.
RED /CRS/bjd i
1 l
Attachment r3l$
A*
9011090239 901105 1
p j
PDR ADOCK 05000318 l
e eDC 3
s
e
!I..
Document ControlDcsk:
=
November 5,1990 -
4 Pagc 2-cc:
_ D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC T. T. Martin, NRC
- " 4 i
L E. Nicholson, NRC R. I. McIxan, DNR :
1 j
3 i
i
. 1 1i I
i 1
+
f i
4 l
i i
i j
l l
s '1 I
i v
.i -
1 i
.l si t
,if i
s
.t
A1TACIIMENT(ik PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER '
SfECIAL REPORT
?
BACKGROUND s
h On September 29,,1990 it was discovered that the' barrier between the Unit 2 45 foot Elevation j
Switchgear Room and'the Unit 2 27 foot Elevation Switchgear. Room was inopchabich Akmall gap.
(1/2 inch by 42 inches) was found between a ventilation duct ' penetrating the floor and the wall.-
i
-I Upon discovery of this condition it was reported to the Shift Supervisor. ACTION requirement a of :
Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.12 was entered immediately by verifying that fire detection was OPERABLE on at least one side of the barrier and instituting an ho'urly' fire watch patrol; AE temporary seal was provided in accordance with Calvert Cliffs Instructions I3 and the barrier was declared operable on October 8,19901The ACTION requirement was then exited..The barric' 'was r
considered inoperable for 9 days.
d 1
To fulfill the ACr10N requirement of TS 3.7.12 a Special Report is to =be prepared for the.
1 Commission when a barrier is inoperable for 7 days or more. This Special Report, pursuant to.
~
TS 6.9.2, is to outline actions taken, the cause of the inoperable penetration and plans and schedules l to restore the penetration to operable status. JIhe information contained in this document fulfills 1
i a
these requirements.
I EFFECT ON UNIT OPERATION l
.)
1
- Upon discovery that there was a small gap in the barrier between the two Unit 2 Switchgear Roon s j
- t.,
the barrier was declared inoperab'.,.and the appropriate TS. ACTION requirement _wu entered.
. Unit 2 was defueled from the time the ACTION requirement 'was entered until the time il v.e 1
]
v y
exited.
L-While the barrier was inoperable the affect on fire protection was mitigated by ihe following:
1 Li
-j-i a
.._ n
._ ;l '
?
g 4
A*ITACllMENT (1) 3 j
SPECIAL REPORT H
'j I
I
,p
,s l
4 Both sides of the barrier are protected with fire detection which provides early warning of a j
[ ire.
s Both sides of the barrier are protected by total flooding Halon System." The small size of? ~
,j
.a the gap should have resulted in little effect on the ability of the Halon System from achieving'
-:i. j an effective extinguishing concentreion.; In fact, it is likely. tiiatlthis gap was prescht when -
-a
,ii the Halon System was subjected to th e acceptance concentration test.
o
- -)
,$i ay TASKS TO ASSURE FUTURE COMPLIANCEI 1
i 1
The' gap between the: ventilation duct and the wall was found as parttof the Surveillance Test Ti Procedure (STP F-592-2) that fulfilt the surveillance requirements of'I1S "'t.7.12E This surveillance
}
is complete for' Unit 2'an$is to be; initiated for Unit:1 in'the near future. This surveillance is.
]
L a
p mtended to find items such as this gap. When similar items were discovered th'e appropriate actions :;
.l l.
were taken and the items repaired in less than 7 days.
L l
1
)
i[
l a
y a
\\
y
.{
v
}
-i'
+
I a
i)'-
11 a
F 6
I f
i
/ /f a-O b
/
,