ML20058F949

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Special Rept:On 900929,discovered That Fire Barrier Penetration Inoperable
ML20058F949
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/1990
From: Denton R
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
CON-NRC-90-117 NUDOCS 9011090239
Download: ML20058F949 (4)


Text

.-

.[

l BALTIMORE :

GASAND EL2? TIC 4

CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX-1475

R E.DENTON GFNERAL MANAGER CALVERT CLIFFS 1

l November 5,1990
i

-1 1

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Washington,DC 20555

i ATTENTION:

Document Control Desk (

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant:

Unit No. 2; Docket No. 50-318 -

Fire Barrier Penetration Special Report ;

j Technical Soccification 3.7.12 ' CTION requirement a A

Gentlemen:

Per the requirements of Technical. Specification 3.7.12 ACTION requirement a, we hereby submit 1

the attached Special Report concerning an-inoperable fire barrier penetration, specifically.a gap between a ventilation duct penetrating the floor and wall between the Unit 2 45 taot and 27 foot elevation switchgear rooms made the fire barrier penetration inoperable for greater than 7 days.

. )

Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with

- i you.

Very truly'yours, -

M.

RED /CRS/bjd i

NRC 90-117 -

1 l

Attachment r3l$

A*

9011090239 901105 1

p j

PDR ADOCK 05000318 l

e eDC 3

s

e

!I..

Document ControlDcsk:

=

November 5,1990 -

4 Pagc 2-cc:

_ D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., NRC T. T. Martin, NRC

" 4 i

L E. Nicholson, NRC R. I. McIxan, DNR :

1 j

3 i

i

. 1 1i I

i 1

+

f i

4 l

i i

i j

l l

s '1 I

i v

.i -

1 i

.l si t

,if i

s

.t

A1TACIIMENT(ik PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER '

SfECIAL REPORT

?

BACKGROUND s

h On September 29,,1990 it was discovered that the' barrier between the Unit 2 45 foot Elevation j

Switchgear Room and'the Unit 2 27 foot Elevation Switchgear. Room was inopchabich Akmall gap.

(1/2 inch by 42 inches) was found between a ventilation duct ' penetrating the floor and the wall.-

i

-I Upon discovery of this condition it was reported to the Shift Supervisor. ACTION requirement a of :

Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.12 was entered immediately by verifying that fire detection was OPERABLE on at least one side of the barrier and instituting an ho'urly' fire watch patrol; AE temporary seal was provided in accordance with Calvert Cliffs Instructions I3 and the barrier was declared operable on October 8,19901The ACTION requirement was then exited..The barric' 'was r

considered inoperable for 9 days.

d 1

To fulfill the ACr10N requirement of TS 3.7.12 a Special Report is to =be prepared for the.

1 Commission when a barrier is inoperable for 7 days or more. This Special Report, pursuant to.

~

TS 6.9.2, is to outline actions taken, the cause of the inoperable penetration and plans and schedules l to restore the penetration to operable status. JIhe information contained in this document fulfills 1

i a

these requirements.

I EFFECT ON UNIT OPERATION l

.)

1

- Upon discovery that there was a small gap in the barrier between the two Unit 2 Switchgear Roon s j

t.,

the barrier was declared inoperab'.,.and the appropriate TS. ACTION requirement _wu entered.

. Unit 2 was defueled from the time the ACTION requirement 'was entered until the time il v.e 1

]

v y

exited.

L-While the barrier was inoperable the affect on fire protection was mitigated by ihe following:

1 Li

-j-i a

.._ n

._ ;l '

?

g 4

A*ITACllMENT (1) 3 j

PENETRATION FIRE BARRIER j

SPECIAL REPORT H

'j I

I

,p

,s l

4 Both sides of the barrier are protected with fire detection which provides early warning of a j

[ ire.

s Both sides of the barrier are protected by total flooding Halon System." The small size of? ~

,j

.a the gap should have resulted in little effect on the ability of the Halon System from achieving'

-:i. j an effective extinguishing concentreion.; In fact, it is likely. tiiatlthis gap was prescht when -

-a

,ii the Halon System was subjected to th e acceptance concentration test.

o

- -)

,$i ay TASKS TO ASSURE FUTURE COMPLIANCEI 1

i 1

The' gap between the: ventilation duct and the wall was found as parttof the Surveillance Test Ti Procedure (STP F-592-2) that fulfilt the surveillance requirements of'I1S "'t.7.12E This surveillance

}

is complete for' Unit 2'an$is to be; initiated for Unit:1 in'the near future. This surveillance is.

]

L a

p mtended to find items such as this gap. When similar items were discovered th'e appropriate actions :;

.l l.

were taken and the items repaired in less than 7 days.

L l

1

)

i[

l a

y a

\\

y

.{

v

}

-i'

+

I a

i)'-

11 a

F 6

I f

i

/ /f a-O b

/

,