ML19211C739

Forwards Preliminary Upgraded Emergency Plan,In Response to NRC .Description of Emergency Planning Activities Encl;Available in Central Files Only

ML19211C739
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	12/27/1979
From:	Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19211C740	List: ML19211C739
References
NUDOCS 8001140382
Download: ML19211C739 (10)

Text

h TOLEDO EDISON Docket No. 50-346 R,crs: P Cac_SE License No. NPF-3 y,,,,,,,,

%CtV

" 2"2 '

. Serial No. 559 December 27, 1979 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Acting Director Divisien of Operating Reactors United States Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

s The NRC letter dated October 10, 1979 indicated that upgraded emergency plans for certain facilities (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station being one) should be submitted by January 1, 1980.

Accordingly, the following documents are submitted:

- The preli=inary upgraded emergency plan for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

The Ohio Radiological Emergency Plan.

- Ottawa County Radiological Emergency Plan.

- Description of the proposed Emergency Planning Facilities.

The preliminary upgraded emergency plan has been developed utilizing NUREG-0610 (Draft Emergency Action Level Guidelines For Nuclear Pcwer Plants), Emergency Planning Review Guideline Number One - Revision One, Regulatory Guide 1.101 and the Toledo Edison Corporate Emergency Planning Task Force direction.

The preliminary upgraded emergency plan conforms to the spirit and intent of the guidance.

The plan is still being reviewed (by Toledo Edison) to ensure that available guidance, Company criteria and interfacing agency compatibility are being addressed.

Further revisior. is expected.

The review is expected to be completed by mid-January, 1980.

The NRC is requested to provide Toledo Edison any preliminary comments by January 25, 1980.

Toledo Edison will then try to resolve these comments prior to the Emergency Planning Review Team visit anticipated in mid-February 1980.

Upon resolution o f the comments from NRC's review and site visit, training h will be conductec' to ensure the appropriate degree of familiarity with the plan. Exeref.ses will then be conducted to demonstrate acceptable I(

knowledge. When these events are completed (probably late spring 1980) q 5

the upgraded plan will be considered implemented.

4g p'$/

8 0 01 i 4 0 3.Ba

.s The Ohio Radiological Emergency Plan (which includes the Ottawa County Radiological Emergency Plan) is currently being reviewed by the NRC.

Toledo Edison will continue to work closely with the State of Ohio to ensure compatability as changes to the respective plans occur.

The facilities being pursued for Emergency Planning are described in the Attachment and are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

The objectives which guided the selection of facilities are:

- The establishment and maintenance of positive central control in an emergency condition to protect Toledo Edison employees and the general public.

- To support public information flow with the requirs.d access to technical information and plant status.

The proposed facilities optimize the key criteria and concerns of Toledo Edison Corporate Management, the NRC's Lessons Learned Task Force, utility industry review groups and the President's Commission findings.

Also included is experience gained by the on-site review of the Three Mile Island (TMI) emergency planning problems.

That experience is reflected in the scope of the proposed facilities.

Much progress has already been made in the area of communications. Working with Ohio Bell (and AT&T) a new system has been installed to provide more reliable communications with technical and corporate management as well as public relations.

Toledo Edison is aggressively pursuing the development of emergency planning documents and facilities. While certain difficulties exist in the schedules for facility construction, material procurement and resolu-tion of concerns, every effort is being made to ensure the projected dates are met.

Should you have any questions, we are available at your request to discuss an/ aspect of emergency planning.

Very truly yours, flf

= '

db 1-2 cc:

Mr. Bill Axelson, w/a United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Olen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Jerry Martin, w/a Battelle Northwestern Laboratories P. O. Box 999 Richland, Washington 99352 1744 049

a bec:

P. M. Smart, Esq., w/a (less State & County plans)

G. Charnoff, Esq., w/a (less State & County plans)

D. H. Hauser, w/a (less State & County plans)

W. A. Johnson, w/o E. C. Novak, w/o C. R. Domeck, w/o W. C. Rowles, w/o T. J. Myers, w/o J. R. Dyer, w/o L. C. Phillips, w/o T. D. Murray, w/o 1744 050

ATTACHMENT 1 The emergency planning facilities now being pursued by Toledo Edison are described in Tables 1 (Emergency Planning Facilities) and 2 (Emergency Planning Support Facilities).

The Emergency Planning Facility location (in relation to other plant facilities) is shown in Figure 1.

A conceptual arrangement of the facility interior is shown in Figure 2.

Unencumbered personnel access between the combined emergency planning facilities and the control room is assured by having the facility within the control of station security.

The construction quality will be in accordance with sound engineering practice.

Radiological habitability criteria for the Technical Support Center is currently being planned for the entire emergency planning facility.

Details of the equipment and layout to support this facility are still in development; however the minimum criteria for the Technical Support Center includes:

1)

The capability to handle at least 20 Toledo Edison and 5 NRC representatives.

2)

A multi-looped emergency communication phone system independent of local area overloading.

3)

A real time display and transmission capability for key plant parameters.

1744 051

4)

Emergency power for data, consusication and lighting that will not degrade the station's current safety grade emergency power system.

5)

A document center for plant drawings and information.

Activity is now underway to provide this facility by January 1, 1981.

Current schedules are being finalized.

Some schedule problems are anticipated.

The major area of concern is that of plant data transmission and display.

Toledo Edison is evaluating information processing capa-bilities that will enhance plant conditions assessment. Whereas current technology provides such capabilities, plant specific development, equipment deliveries, installation and testing are expected to be critical path items. Schedule problem areas will be identified and reeolved as they are defined.

1744 052

EMERGENCY Pl.ANNING FACILITIES TAliLE I liRIEF DATA / EQUIPMENT FACILITY DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Technical Complex capable of Video display of vital plant Required by NRC (NUREG 0578).

Support holding at least 25 parameters.

liard copy capa-Must have an alternate facility.

Center persons which would be bility to plot plant parameters.

Interim TSC (5th floor of Davis-used to technically CCTV to Control room.

Besse offices) will become the assess plant conditions data transmission capabili-alternate upon completion of the and impact.

ties to and from AE & NSSS long term facility.

Facility Vendor.

Installed by 1/1/81.

Must be radiologically habitable and exceed uniform brilding code (but not seismic 1 category).

Emergency Complex for control of Meteorological display (visual),

Required by NRC (NUREG 0578).

Control off-site emergency hard copy data transmission and Present ECC will become the Center activities.

receipt, display of stack monitor alternate upon completion of and containment post accident long term facility.

ECC must radiation monitors.

be installed by 1/1/81.

Public A two office complex Phone conununications and hard Required by NRC (NUREG 0578).

Relations adjacent to a press-copy data.

Center brief area, used for press gatherings /

briefings.

4 4

CD Ul U

EMERCENCY PIANNINC FACil.lTIES TABI.E I (Continued)

BRIEF DATA / EQUIPMENT FACll.lTY DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Emergency Small office complex Weather and atmospheric conditions Required by NRC (NUREG 0578).

Operation that would house local from the ECC (could be by tele-Center and state government phone conununication) and voice /

assessment teams.

phone communications.

Fixed radiation monitors.

Operations Assembly point for plant Plant status and phone communi-Required by NRC (NUREG 0578).

Support personnel not on shift cation.

l.ccated on Turbine Deck outside Center o r no t immediately the Control Room to ensure required for plant timely response of personnel.

control.

Another assembly area for personnel will be located off-site (i.e., Lindsey or Construc-tion Office Building) with cooking facility, bunking and shower area.

db 4-5 4

4 CD LT1 4

EMERCENCY PLANNING SUPPORT FACILITIES TABLE 2 BRIEF LOCA110N DATA / EQUIPMENT FACILITY DESCRIPTION (ON/OFF-SITE) _

REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Off-Site Engineering Dept.

Off-Site 7th Voice and data links to Engineering expertise in the Engineering that would support Floor Plaza T"o and Control Room.

Power Engineering Department Support plant engineering would support plant opera-Center and recovery tions and recovery, operations.

Logistics 4 office complex On-Site Input from Plant Opera-Should be close to and Support where emergency (Construction tions (via telephone) as accessible to the plant.

Center logistics and Office Bu11 ding) to required people, security would be vehicles, equipment, etc.

performed.

Voice communication with plant and Edison Plaza, and hard copy data.

Access Control Station for On.21te Security computer terminal.

Current training area in Staging conducting indoctri-Automatic TLD processing Construction Office Areas nation training, and whole body counter.

Bu;lding. Capable of badging and dosimetry Voice communication.

processing hundreds of documentation.

people daily.

Agency Area dedicated to Off-Site A mobile phone branch Russell Road property.

Support about 20 trailers.

Exchange f or comunica-tions.

Transportation Boat dock and heli-Near-Site Communication La ECC.

Boat dock near plant on Facility pad capable of Toussaint River.

lleli-supporting emergency pad on Russell Road.

monitoring and evacuation.

s db 6 A

4 CD LJ'i LT1

s s

y s,, s e

g

~

j;.

c l

A 5%

- h

~,

3 1, w 1

g j

q c

w E

~

8 m'

% q

(

E

(

~

l

_N 3.iir

?

L i

o g

g t

e c

0.

a 8

o a

t v

r' s.

y So i

g a

i m-

g k

g g

o t

t p/g g

c ws

+

^

, y' 1

a o

i w

=

o,

'f 2

o W

,!\\

U N

ilE

~

~

~

r;

-u/

'e

{

t1I /-

),

\\

wTN y

n. p(

a t

1 1 r i(

1

,\\

1 mn

ti, F eC "

g C

nl Iof i

rM n

N,_ K S

n t

a n

~

E on C C P C o l

S A N i

O R E yyt E

T F c cc DY n nu

~

AT e er g gt 7

E O N r r s d

R O e en 1

$ i L

n n o C

T Dic I

}

AE l

y RS G

F. C li C. O.

P o

a

.~

v E Ec a.

a s

a a

e i

s 2 ht, a

A# c

j}

X l

I X

l TECHNICAL EQ UIP-PUBLIC RELATIONS BERTHING SUPPORT MENT NEWS BRitiFING ROOM.

CENTER ROOM DINING LAV.

LOBBY 5

2

[

V N

N N

N V

V V

LAV.

SECURITY CONFERENCE EMERGENCY EMERGENCY OFFICE OFFICE ROOM CONTROL OPERATING CENTER CENTER Storage X

N

% SECURITY EMERGENCY PLANNING A

BOUNDARY FACILITIES x

l Fig. No. 2 g

Ui x

I