ML033650110: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:


==Dear Mr. Bradley:==
==Dear Mr. Bradley:==
The purpose of this letter is to transmit the summary of a meeting with the Industry representatives on Risk Management Technical Specifications Guidelines. The meeting was held at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offices in Rockville, Maryland, on December 16, 2003.
The purpose of this letter is to transmit the summary of a meeting with the Industry representatives on Risk Management Technical Specifications Guidelines. The meeting was held at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offices in Rockville, Maryland, on December 16, 2003.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
/RA/
T. R. Tjader, Senior Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Section Reactor Operations Branch Division of Inspection Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
T. R. Tjader, Senior Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Section Reactor Operations Branch Division of Inspection Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


Line 39: Line 38:
: 6. RMTS Guidelines cc w/encl: See attached page
: 6. RMTS Guidelines cc w/encl: See attached page


Package ML033650093, Memo ML033650110, Enclosure 4 ML040020046, Enclosure 5 ML040020047, Enclosure 6 ML040050217 OFFICE TSS:IROB-A:DIPM               SC:TSS:IROB-A:DIPM NAME TRTjader                         THBoyce DATE       12/23/2003                 12/23/2003
Package ML033650093, Memo ML033650110, Enclosure 4 ML040020046, Enclosure 5 ML040020047, Enclosure 6 ML040050217 OFFICE TSS:IROB-A:DIPM SC:TSS:IROB-A:DIPM NAME TRTjader THBoyce DATE 12/23/2003 12/23/2003


Mr. Biff Bradley cc via e-mail:
Mr. Biff Bradley cc via e-mail:
Mr. Tony Pietrangelo               Mr. Michael S. Kitlan, Jr.
Mr. Tony Pietrangelo Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Biff Bradley Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Mike Schoppman Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Alan Hackerott, Chairman Omaha Public Power District Mr. Jim Kenny Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Mr. James Andrachek Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Jack Stringfellow Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. Donald McCamy Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. Ray Schneider Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Frank Rahn EPRI Mr. Wayne Harrison STP Mr. Drew Richards STP Mr. Wei He PSEG Mr. Rick Grantom STP Mr. Glenn Stewart Exelon Mr. Phil Tarpinian Exelon Mr. Lane Hay SERCH/Bechtel Mr. Rick Hill General Electric Nuclear Energy Mr. Michael S. Kitlan, Jr.
Nuclear Energy Institute           Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Biff Bradley                   Mr. Noel Clarkson Nuclear Energy Institute           Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Mike Schoppman                 Mr. Donald Hoffman Nuclear Energy Institute           EXCEL Services Corporation Mr. Alan Hackerott, Chairman       Mr. Ted Book Omaha Public Power District       Framatech-ANP Mr. Jim Kenny                     Mr. R. J. Schomaker Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Framatech-ANP Mr. James Andrachek               Mr. J. E. Rhoads Westinghouse Electric Company     Energy Northwest Mr. Jack Stringfellow             Ms. Deann Raleigh Southern Nuclear Operating Company Scientech Mr. Donald McCamy                 Mr. Ken Canavan Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant         DS&S Mr. Ray Schneider                 Mr. Sam Chien Westinghouse Electric Company     SCE Mr. Frank Rahn                     Mr. Gary Chung EPRI                               SCE-SONGS Mr. Wayne Harrison                 Mr. Courtney Smyth STP                               PSEG Nuclear LLC Mr. Drew Richards                 Mr. Jerry Andre STP                               Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Wei He                         Mr. David Helher PSEG                               Exelon Mr. Rick Grantom                   Mr. Eugene Kelly STP                               Exelon Mr. Glenn Stewart                 Mr. James Liming Exelon                             ABSG Mr. Phil Tarpinian                 Mr. Stanley Levinson Exelon                             Framatone ANP Mr. Lane Hay SERCH/Bechtel Mr. Rick Hill General Electric Nuclear Energy
Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Noel Clarkson Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Donald Hoffman EXCEL Services Corporation Mr. Ted Book Framatech-ANP Mr. R. J. Schomaker Framatech-ANP Mr. J. E. Rhoads Energy Northwest Ms. Deann Raleigh Scientech Mr. Ken Canavan DS&S Mr. Sam Chien SCE Mr. Gary Chung SCE-SONGS Mr. Courtney Smyth PSEG Nuclear LLC Mr. Jerry Andre Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. David Helher Exelon Mr. Eugene Kelly Exelon Mr. James Liming ABSG Mr. Stanley Levinson Framatone ANP


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
Line 50: Line 49:
The information and level of detail contained in the RMTS Guidelines will determine whether Initiative 4b will be a candidate for the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CLIIP),
The information and level of detail contained in the RMTS Guidelines will determine whether Initiative 4b will be a candidate for the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CLIIP),
and to a greater degree, whether exportable guidance will be provided to the follow-on plants to the pilot plants. The RMTS Guidelines needs to provide exportable guidance that is applicable, reliable and repeatable in other follow-on plants. With this objective in mind, pilot plant acceptance criteria needs to be established for initiative 4b. The NRC staff will propose pilot plant and RMTS Guidance acceptance criteria for discussion at the next meeting on RMTS Initiative 4b. In addition, to ensure that the industry and NRC staff are proceeding in a legally acceptable manner with RMTS Initiative 4b, the NRC staff will discuss the possible processes to be utilized with the NRC Office of General Council. The RMTS Guidance document must contain discussions of the following:
and to a greater degree, whether exportable guidance will be provided to the follow-on plants to the pilot plants. The RMTS Guidelines needs to provide exportable guidance that is applicable, reliable and repeatable in other follow-on plants. With this objective in mind, pilot plant acceptance criteria needs to be established for initiative 4b. The NRC staff will propose pilot plant and RMTS Guidance acceptance criteria for discussion at the next meeting on RMTS Initiative 4b. In addition, to ensure that the industry and NRC staff are proceeding in a legally acceptable manner with RMTS Initiative 4b, the NRC staff will discuss the possible processes to be utilized with the NRC Office of General Council. The RMTS Guidance document must contain discussions of the following:
    -    The RMTS Initiative 4b Configuration Risk Management (CRM) process must be an enhanced (a)(4) risk assessment and management process that is consistent with NUMARC 93-01, Revision 2 Section 11, which is endorsed by the NRC in RG 1.182.
The RMTS Initiative 4b Configuration Risk Management (CRM) process must be an enhanced (a)(4) risk assessment and management process that is consistent with NUMARC 93-01, Revision 2 Section 11, which is endorsed by the NRC in RG 1.182.
Note: Section 11 is the same in Revisions 2 and 3 to NUMARC 93-01.
Note: Section 11 is the same in Revisions 2 and 3 to NUMARC 93-01.
    -    Reactor Oversight Performance Indicators, PRA annual evaluations, risk assessment evaluations, and instantaneous and aggregate risk limits must together act as an incentive to limit the time in the extended Risk-Informed Completion Times (CT). The process should result in an ALARA like process to maintain risk as low as reasonably achievable. An LCO exit strategy must be addressed.
Reactor Oversight Performance Indicators, PRA annual evaluations, risk assessment evaluations, and instantaneous and aggregate risk limits must together act as an incentive to limit the time in the extended Risk-Informed Completion Times (CT). The process should result in an ALARA like process to maintain risk as low as reasonably achievable. An LCO exit strategy must be addressed.
    -    The 30 day CT backstop needs to be explained and justified in the RMTS Guidance. It should be utilized with applicable systems when catastrophic type failures are experienced, and not for routine and expected maintenance.
The 30 day CT backstop needs to be explained and justified in the RMTS Guidance. It should be utilized with applicable systems when catastrophic type failures are experienced, and not for routine and expected maintenance.
    -    Risk assessments for preplanned entries into an extended Risk-Informed CT (RICT) must be conducted prior to entry. The 24 hours provided to complete risk assessments for emergent conditions needs to be explained and justified. For emergent conditions the on-line risk assessment must be performed within 1 hour after entry into the RICT, or within the 1 hour an initial assessment must be made that confirms that 24 hours to complete the full configuration risk assessment is acceptable.
Risk assessments for preplanned entries into an extended Risk-Informed CT (RICT) must be conducted prior to entry. The 24 hours provided to complete risk assessments for emergent conditions needs to be explained and justified. For emergent conditions the on-line risk assessment must be performed within 1 hour after entry into the RICT, or within the 1 hour an initial assessment must be made that confirms that 24 hours to complete the full configuration risk assessment is acceptable.
 
The RMTS Guidance must explain that a plants ability to apply RMTS Initiative 4b must be commensurate with its PRA Quality. The plants PRA Quality must be consistent with DG-1122 (trial Reg Guide 1.200) guidance.
Enclosure 1
The level of documentation required for an RMTS Initiative 4b risk assessment must be described.
                                                      -  The RMTS Guidance must explain that a plants ability to apply RMTS Initiative 4b must be commensurate with its PRA Quality. The plants PRA Quality must be consistent with DG-1122 (trial Reg Guide 1.200) guidance.
The RMTS Guidance must be consistent with the processes described in the STP and CE pilot plant proposals. Terminology needs to be consistent between the RMTS Guidance, the pilot proposals, and the (a)(4) program.
    -  The level of documentation required for an RMTS Initiative 4b risk assessment must be described.
The RMTS Guidance should provide direction on whether the process should apply to all LCOs.
    -  The RMTS Guidance must be consistent with the processes described in the STP and CE pilot plant proposals. Terminology needs to be consistent between the RMTS Guidance, the pilot proposals, and the (a)(4) program.
The RMTS Guidance should discuss how the blending of a qualitative assessment with the quantitative assessment should occur.
    -  The RMTS Guidance should provide direction on whether the process should apply to all LCOs.
    -  The RMTS Guidance should discuss how the blending of a qualitative assessment with the quantitative assessment should occur.
The industry intends to apply RMTS Initiative 4b to emergent plants conditions that will include complete loss of system function; Initiative 4b will subsume Initiative 6 on LCO 3.0.3 entry. The industry needs to address the nexus between Initiative 4b and Initiative 6.
The industry intends to apply RMTS Initiative 4b to emergent plants conditions that will include complete loss of system function; Initiative 4b will subsume Initiative 6 on LCO 3.0.3 entry. The industry needs to address the nexus between Initiative 4b and Initiative 6.
It is expected that SERs will be written for the STP and CE (Fort Calhoun) pilot plant proposals, and for the subsequent generic changes (i.e., Topicals and TSTFs). It is also expected that either an SER will be written on the RMTS Guidance document, or that it will become a Reg Guide.
It is expected that SERs will be written for the STP and CE (Fort Calhoun) pilot plant proposals, and for the subsequent generic changes (i.e., Topicals and TSTFs). It is also expected that either an SER will be written on the RMTS Guidance document, or that it will become a Reg Guide.
The following meetings are planned:
The following meetings are planned:
January 21, 2004:           STP DG-1122 Pilot meeting January 29, 2004:           Initiative 4b meeting covering RMTS Guidance changes needed to proceed with the pilots, RMTS Guidance and Pilot Plant acceptance criteria, and the CE pilot proposal (TSTF-424)
January 21, 2004:
January 30, 2004:           Initiative 1, End States, CE TSTF-422 and BWR TSTF-423.
STP DG-1122 Pilot meeting January 29, 2004:
Initiative 4b meeting covering RMTS Guidance changes needed to proceed with the pilots, RMTS Guidance and Pilot Plant acceptance criteria, and the CE pilot proposal (TSTF-424)
January 30, 2004:
Initiative 1, End States, CE TSTF-422 and BWR TSTF-423.
The week of January 12, 2004: CRM Forum at the FPL Juno Beach FL facility
The week of January 12, 2004: CRM Forum at the FPL Juno Beach FL facility


NRC/INDUSTRY MEETING OF THE RISK-INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE ATTENDANCE LIST NOVEMBER 13, 2003 NAME                   AFFILIATION BIFF BRADLEY           NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE DON HOFFMAN           TSTF/EXCEL SERVICES FRANK RAHN             EPRI RICK GRANTOM           STP NOC DREW RICHARDS         STP NOC ALAN HACKEROTT         OPPD JIM ANDRACHEK         WESTINGHOUSE/WOG JACK STRINGFELLOW     SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY WEI HE                 PSEG RICK HILL             GE RAY SCHNEIDER         WESTINGHOUSE PSA JAMES LIMING           ABSG DEANN RALEIGH         SCIENTECH LANE HAY               SERCH/BECHTEL TOM BOYCE             NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS BOB TJADER             NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS CARL SCHULTEN         NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS MARK REINHART         NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STU MAGRUDER           NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB NICK SALTOS           NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MARK CARUSO           NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB DONNIE HARRISON       NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STEPHEN DINSMORE       NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MILLARD WOHL           NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB CLIFF DOUTT           NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB SUMMER SUN             NRC/NRR/DSSA/SRXB WAYNE SCOTT           NRC/NRR/DIPM/IEPB GARETH PARRY           NRC/NRR/DSSA Enclosure 2
NRC/INDUSTRY MEETING OF THE RISK-INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE ATTENDANCE LIST NOVEMBER 13, 2003 NAME AFFILIATION BIFF BRADLEY NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE DON HOFFMAN TSTF/EXCEL SERVICES FRANK RAHN EPRI RICK GRANTOM STP NOC DREW RICHARDS STP NOC ALAN HACKEROTT OPPD JIM ANDRACHEK WESTINGHOUSE/WOG JACK STRINGFELLOW SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY WEI HE PSEG RICK HILL GE RAY SCHNEIDER WESTINGHOUSE PSA JAMES LIMING ABSG DEANN RALEIGH SCIENTECH LANE HAY SERCH/BECHTEL TOM BOYCE NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS BOB TJADER NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS CARL SCHULTEN NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS MARK REINHART NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STU MAGRUDER NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB NICK SALTOS NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MARK CARUSO NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB DONNIE HARRISON NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STEPHEN DINSMORE NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MILLARD WOHL NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB CLIFF DOUTT NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB SUMMER SUN NRC/NRR/DSSA/SRXB WAYNE SCOTT NRC/NRR/DIPM/IEPB GARETH PARRY NRC/NRR/DSSA  


AGENDA TSS/NEI-EPRI RMTS GUIDELINES MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2003 9:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M.
AGENDA TSS/NEI-EPRI RMTS GUIDELINES MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2003 9:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M.
0-4 B6 N Industry presentation of Initiative 4b, Risk-Informed Completion Times, RMTS Risk Management Guidelines N     Public Questions and Discussion N Industry Response to NRC Staff of Acceptance Review Comments Presentation and Discussion N     Public Questions and Discussion N     Meeting Results and Follow-up Actions N     Closing Comments Enclosure 3}}
0-4 B6 N Industry presentation of Initiative 4b, Risk-Informed Completion Times, RMTS Risk Management Guidelines N
Public Questions and Discussion N Industry Response to NRC Staff of Acceptance Review Comments Presentation and Discussion N
Public Questions and Discussion N
Meeting Results and Follow-up Actions N
Closing Comments }}

Latest revision as of 05:55, 16 January 2025

Summary of Meeting with NEI, EPRI and Industry Representatives on Risk Management Technical Specifications Guidelines for Initiative 4b with Enclosures 1, 2, and 3
ML033650110
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/23/2003
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/IROB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML033650093 List:
References
Download: ML033650110 (12)
v • d • e


Text

December 23, 2003 Mr. Biff Bradley Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708

SUBJECT:

DECEMBER 16, 2003:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH NEI, EPRI AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES ON RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS GUIDELINES FOR INITIATIVE 4b

Dear Mr. Bradley:

The purpose of this letter is to transmit the summary of a meeting with the Industry representatives on Risk Management Technical Specifications Guidelines. The meeting was held at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offices in Rockville, Maryland, on December 16, 2003.

Sincerely,

/RA/

T. R. Tjader, Senior Reactor Engineer Technical Specifications Section Reactor Operations Branch Division of Inspection Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1. Meeting Summary
2. Attendance List
3. Agenda
4. RMTS Guidelines Brief
5. RMTS RMG NRC Review Comment Resolution Responses Matrix
6. RMTS Guidelines cc w/encl: See attached page

Package ML033650093, Memo ML033650110, Enclosure 4 ML040020046, Enclosure 5 ML040020047, Enclosure 6 ML040050217 OFFICE TSS:IROB-A:DIPM SC:TSS:IROB-A:DIPM NAME TRTjader THBoyce DATE 12/23/2003 12/23/2003

Mr. Biff Bradley cc via e-mail:

Mr. Tony Pietrangelo Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Biff Bradley Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Mike Schoppman Nuclear Energy Institute Mr. Alan Hackerott, Chairman Omaha Public Power District Mr. Jim Kenny Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Mr. James Andrachek Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Jack Stringfellow Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. Donald McCamy Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. Ray Schneider Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. Frank Rahn EPRI Mr. Wayne Harrison STP Mr. Drew Richards STP Mr. Wei He PSEG Mr. Rick Grantom STP Mr. Glenn Stewart Exelon Mr. Phil Tarpinian Exelon Mr. Lane Hay SERCH/Bechtel Mr. Rick Hill General Electric Nuclear Energy Mr. Michael S. Kitlan, Jr.

Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Noel Clarkson Duke Energy Corporation Mr. Donald Hoffman EXCEL Services Corporation Mr. Ted Book Framatech-ANP Mr. R. J. Schomaker Framatech-ANP Mr. J. E. Rhoads Energy Northwest Ms. Deann Raleigh Scientech Mr. Ken Canavan DS&S Mr. Sam Chien SCE Mr. Gary Chung SCE-SONGS Mr. Courtney Smyth PSEG Nuclear LLC Mr. Jerry Andre Westinghouse Electric Company Mr. David Helher Exelon Mr. Eugene Kelly Exelon Mr. James Liming ABSG Mr. Stanley Levinson Framatone ANP

SUMMARY

OF THE DECEMBER 16, 2003 MEETING WITH NEI, EPRI AND INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES ON RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS GUIDELINES FOR INITIATIVE 4b The NRC staff met with Indusrtry representatives on December 16, 2003, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting attendees are listed in Enclosure 2.

The agenda (Enclosure 3) consisted of discussions of: the Industry presentation (Enclosure 4) on Risk Management Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines for RMTS Initiative 4b, Risk-Informed Completion Times; and, the Industry response (Enclosure 5) to the NRC Staff review comments to the prior version of the RMTS Guidelines. The current version of the RMTS Guidelines are provided in Enclosure 6. Following is a brief description of the discussions.

The information and level of detail contained in the RMTS Guidelines will determine whether Initiative 4b will be a candidate for the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CLIIP),

and to a greater degree, whether exportable guidance will be provided to the follow-on plants to the pilot plants. The RMTS Guidelines needs to provide exportable guidance that is applicable, reliable and repeatable in other follow-on plants. With this objective in mind, pilot plant acceptance criteria needs to be established for initiative 4b. The NRC staff will propose pilot plant and RMTS Guidance acceptance criteria for discussion at the next meeting on RMTS Initiative 4b. In addition, to ensure that the industry and NRC staff are proceeding in a legally acceptable manner with RMTS Initiative 4b, the NRC staff will discuss the possible processes to be utilized with the NRC Office of General Council. The RMTS Guidance document must contain discussions of the following:

The RMTS Initiative 4b Configuration Risk Management (CRM) process must be an enhanced (a)(4) risk assessment and management process that is consistent with NUMARC 93-01, Revision 2 Section 11, which is endorsed by the NRC in RG 1.182.

Note: Section 11 is the same in Revisions 2 and 3 to NUMARC 93-01.

Reactor Oversight Performance Indicators, PRA annual evaluations, risk assessment evaluations, and instantaneous and aggregate risk limits must together act as an incentive to limit the time in the extended Risk-Informed Completion Times (CT). The process should result in an ALARA like process to maintain risk as low as reasonably achievable. An LCO exit strategy must be addressed.

The 30 day CT backstop needs to be explained and justified in the RMTS Guidance. It should be utilized with applicable systems when catastrophic type failures are experienced, and not for routine and expected maintenance.

Risk assessments for preplanned entries into an extended Risk-Informed CT (RICT) must be conducted prior to entry. The 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> provided to complete risk assessments for emergent conditions needs to be explained and justified. For emergent conditions the on-line risk assessment must be performed within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> after entry into the RICT, or within the 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> an initial assessment must be made that confirms that 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to complete the full configuration risk assessment is acceptable.

The RMTS Guidance must explain that a plants ability to apply RMTS Initiative 4b must be commensurate with its PRA Quality. The plants PRA Quality must be consistent with DG-1122 (trial Reg Guide 1.200) guidance.

The level of documentation required for an RMTS Initiative 4b risk assessment must be described.

The RMTS Guidance must be consistent with the processes described in the STP and CE pilot plant proposals. Terminology needs to be consistent between the RMTS Guidance, the pilot proposals, and the (a)(4) program.

The RMTS Guidance should provide direction on whether the process should apply to all LCOs.

The RMTS Guidance should discuss how the blending of a qualitative assessment with the quantitative assessment should occur.

The industry intends to apply RMTS Initiative 4b to emergent plants conditions that will include complete loss of system function; Initiative 4b will subsume Initiative 6 on LCO 3.0.3 entry. The industry needs to address the nexus between Initiative 4b and Initiative 6.

It is expected that SERs will be written for the STP and CE (Fort Calhoun) pilot plant proposals, and for the subsequent generic changes (i.e., Topicals and TSTFs). It is also expected that either an SER will be written on the RMTS Guidance document, or that it will become a Reg Guide.

The following meetings are planned:

January 21, 2004:

STP DG-1122 Pilot meeting January 29, 2004:

Initiative 4b meeting covering RMTS Guidance changes needed to proceed with the pilots, RMTS Guidance and Pilot Plant acceptance criteria, and the CE pilot proposal (TSTF-424)

January 30, 2004:

Initiative 1, End States, CE TSTF-422 and BWR TSTF-423.

The week of January 12, 2004: CRM Forum at the FPL Juno Beach FL facility

NRC/INDUSTRY MEETING OF THE RISK-INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE ATTENDANCE LIST NOVEMBER 13, 2003 NAME AFFILIATION BIFF BRADLEY NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE DON HOFFMAN TSTF/EXCEL SERVICES FRANK RAHN EPRI RICK GRANTOM STP NOC DREW RICHARDS STP NOC ALAN HACKEROTT OPPD JIM ANDRACHEK WESTINGHOUSE/WOG JACK STRINGFELLOW SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY WEI HE PSEG RICK HILL GE RAY SCHNEIDER WESTINGHOUSE PSA JAMES LIMING ABSG DEANN RALEIGH SCIENTECH LANE HAY SERCH/BECHTEL TOM BOYCE NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS BOB TJADER NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS CARL SCHULTEN NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB/TSS MARK REINHART NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STU MAGRUDER NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB NICK SALTOS NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MARK CARUSO NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB DONNIE HARRISON NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB STEPHEN DINSMORE NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB MILLARD WOHL NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB CLIFF DOUTT NRC/NRR/DSSA/SPSB SUMMER SUN NRC/NRR/DSSA/SRXB WAYNE SCOTT NRC/NRR/DIPM/IEPB GARETH PARRY NRC/NRR/DSSA

AGENDA TSS/NEI-EPRI RMTS GUIDELINES MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2003 9:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M.

0-4 B6 N Industry presentation of Initiative 4b, Risk-Informed Completion Times, RMTS Risk Management Guidelines N

Public Questions and Discussion N Industry Response to NRC Staff of Acceptance Review Comments Presentation and Discussion N

Public Questions and Discussion N

Meeting Results and Follow-up Actions N

Closing Comments

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML033650110&oldid=5408948"