ML19317D732: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19317D732 | | number = ML19317D732 | ||
| issue date = 12/07/1972 | | issue date = 12/07/1972 | ||
| title = Responds to | | title = Responds to .Notifies That Implementation of Shift Sizes Proceeding Per Deyoung | ||
| author name = Thies A | | author name = Thies A | ||
| author affiliation = DUKE POWER CO. | | author affiliation = DUKE POWER CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 7912100500 | | document report number = NUDOCS 7912100500 | ||
| title reference date = 11-13-1972 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:b '' . t W | {{#Wiki_filter:b ''. t W bilt* h*e L. | ||
L. | DUKE POWER COMPANY POWER EUILDINO 4aa Sourn Caumen SrazzT, CnAn n. | ||
DUKE POWER COMPANY POWER EUILDINO 4aa Sourn Caumen SrazzT, CnAn | ~ | ||
.s e | |||
A r THits | |||
-\\ | |||
A r THits | 2/. | ||
s.,, on enessoanT V | |||
4.', | |||
December 7, 1972 | P. G. Box a17e h#'' | ||
Paooucteow | |||
.o Tmamensissio% | |||
December 7, 1972 ej | |||
#4 2.. | |||
If g s | If g s | ||
1 g'.' | |||
1 g'.' | i x | ||
s si A '. 8 Mr. John F. O' Leary Director of Licensing U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. | |||
20545 Re: Ocone Nuclea on Docket Nos. | |||
A '. 8 | 269, -270, -287 | ||
Mr. John F. O' Leary Director of Licensing U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. | |||
==Dear Mr. O' Leary:== | ==Dear Mr. O' Leary:== | ||
This refers to your letter of November 13, 1972 concerning the minimum shift crew size for multiple units at Oconee Nuclear Station. For the initial operation of Oconee, we are proceeding to implement the shift sizes in accordance with R. C. DeYoung's letter of August 15, 1972. However, we remain convinced that these requirements are in excess of an optimum shift size. | This refers to your letter of November 13, 1972 concerning the minimum shift crew size for multiple units at Oconee Nuclear Station. For the initial operation of Oconee, we are proceeding to implement the shift sizes in accordance with R. C. DeYoung's letter of August 15, 1972. However, we remain convinced that these requirements are in excess of an optimum shift size. | ||
After we have obtained sufficient operating experience at Oconee to adequately demonstrate that your required shift sizes are excessive, we will present this information to members of your staff. | After we have obtained sufficient operating experience at Oconee to adequately demonstrate that your required shift sizes are excessive, we will present this information to members of your staff. | ||
Sincerely, A. C. Thies ACT:vr | Sincerely, A. C. Thies ACT:vr s'd b | ||
4 c_ | |||
s'd | |||
i | i | ||
's nTSS N | |||
r_. | |||
\\ 9' NO g | |||
7912100}} | |||
7912100 | |||
Latest revision as of 22:04, 1 January 2025
| ML19317D732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1972 |
| From: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Oleary J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912100500 | |
| Download: ML19317D732 (1) | |
Text
b . t W bilt* h*e L.
DUKE POWER COMPANY POWER EUILDINO 4aa Sourn Caumen SrazzT, CnAn n.
~
.s e
A r THits
-\\
2/.
s.,, on enessoanT V
4.',
P. G. Box a17e h#
Paooucteow
.o Tmamensissio%
December 7, 1972 ej
- 4 2..
If g s
1 g'.'
i x
s si A '. 8 Mr. John F. O' Leary Director of Licensing U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C.
20545 Re: Ocone Nuclea on Docket Nos.
269, -270, -287
Dear Mr. O' Leary:
This refers to your letter of November 13, 1972 concerning the minimum shift crew size for multiple units at Oconee Nuclear Station. For the initial operation of Oconee, we are proceeding to implement the shift sizes in accordance with R. C. DeYoung's letter of August 15, 1972. However, we remain convinced that these requirements are in excess of an optimum shift size.
After we have obtained sufficient operating experience at Oconee to adequately demonstrate that your required shift sizes are excessive, we will present this information to members of your staff.
Sincerely, A. C. Thies ACT:vr s'd b
4 c_
i
's nTSS N
r_.
\\ 9' NO g
7912100