ML090120669: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION | |||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 | |||
ADDRESSEES | January 29, 2009 | ||
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently | |||
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor | |||
vessel. | NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2009-02 | ||
All current and potential applicants for a combined license, manufacturing license, standard | USE OF CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE GASEOUS RADIOACTIVITY | ||
design certification, or standard design approval for a nuclear power plant under the provisions | MONITORS AS REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE DETECTION | ||
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52 (10 CFR), Licenses, Certifications, and | EQUIPMENT AT NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS | ||
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants. | |||
All applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses under the | ADDRESSEES | ||
provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. | |||
INTENT | All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS) | ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor | ||
to communicate the NRC plan to address the situation created when some containment | vessel. | ||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors are unable to meet technical specification (TS) | |||
requirements. The plan consists of integrating a streamlined license amendment process with | All current and potential applicants for a combined license, manufacturing license, standard | ||
the use of enforcement discretion, where appropriate. This RIS requires no action or written | design certification, or standard design approval for a nuclear power plant under the provisions | ||
response on the part of an addressee. | of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52 (10 CFR), Licenses, Certifications, and | ||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION | Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants. | ||
In order to meet General Design Criterion 30, "Quality of reactor coolant pressure boundary," of | |||
Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, licensees typically include RCS leakage detection equipment in | All applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses under the | ||
their plant designs because the equipment can be used to detect reactor coolant pressure | provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities. | ||
boundary (RCPB) leakage. A typical RCS leakage detection system consists of a combination | |||
of the following: | INTENT | ||
* | |||
* | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS) | ||
* | to communicate the NRC plan to address the situation created when some containment | ||
* | atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors are unable to meet technical specification (TS) | ||
ML090120669 | requirements. The plan consists of integrating a streamlined license amendment process with | ||
the use of enforcement discretion, where appropriate. This RIS requires no action or written | |||
response on the part of an addressee. | |||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION | |||
In order to meet General Design Criterion 30, "Quality of reactor coolant pressure boundary," of | |||
Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, licensees typically include RCS leakage detection equipment in | |||
their plant designs because the equipment can be used to detect reactor coolant pressure | |||
boundary (RCPB) leakage. A typical RCS leakage detection system consists of a combination | |||
of the following: | |||
* | |||
a containment atmosphere particulate radioactivity monitoring system | |||
* | |||
a containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system | |||
* | |||
containment sump-level and sump-pump instrumentation | |||
* | |||
containment cooler condensate monitoring instrumentation | |||
ML090120669 | |||
RIS 2009-02 | |||
Page 2 of 5 | |||
Containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems measure RCS leakage | |||
indirectly by detecting airborne radioactivity released from RCS leakage. Response time is the | Containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems measure RCS leakage | ||
length of time required for these monitoring systems to detect a given volume of RCS leakage. | indirectly by detecting airborne radioactivity released from RCS leakage. Response time is the | ||
Response time is dependant on RCS radioactivity concentration, as well as other variables. For | length of time required for these monitoring systems to detect a given volume of RCS leakage. | ||
a given volume of leakage, with all other variables held constant, a higher RCS radioactivity | Response time is dependant on RCS radioactivity concentration, as well as other variables. For | ||
concentration will yield a shorter response time for these monitoring systems. The design | a given volume of leakage, with all other variables held constant, a higher RCS radioactivity | ||
analyses for the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used in the | concentration will yield a shorter response time for these monitoring systems. The design | ||
licensing bases for most plants typically assume a RCS radioactivity concentration | analyses for the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used in the | ||
approximately equivalent to 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. Improvements in fuel cladding | licensing bases for most plants typically assume a RCS radioactivity concentration | ||
integrity and RCS chemistry controls have significantly reduced RCS radioactivity concentration | approximately equivalent to 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. Improvements in fuel cladding | ||
at most plants. As a result, the monitors for operating units may have longer response times | integrity and RCS chemistry controls have significantly reduced RCS radioactivity concentration | ||
than they would with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core because the actual RCS radioactivity | at most plants. As a result, the monitors for operating units may have longer response times | ||
concentration is less than it would be with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. | than they would with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core because the actual RCS radioactivity | ||
Most plants have TS Limiting Conditions for Operation requirements for containment | concentration is less than it would be with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. | ||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used as part of RCS leakage detection | |||
equipment. The TS requirements for the monitoring systems response times are based on the | Most plants have TS Limiting Conditions for Operation requirements for containment | ||
design analysis that is part of a plants licensing basis. If the monitors fail to meet these | atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used as part of RCS leakage detection | ||
requirements, the monitors are inoperable. When the monitors are inoperable the licensee is | equipment. The TS requirements for the monitoring systems response times are based on the | ||
required to take remedial actions as permitted by their TS or to shut down the reactor. | design analysis that is part of a plants licensing basis. If the monitors fail to meet these | ||
Information Notice (IN) 2005-24, Nonconservatism in Leakage Detection Sensitivity | requirements, the monitors are inoperable. When the monitors are inoperable the licensee is | ||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML051780073), communicated the issue created by differences | required to take remedial actions as permitted by their TS or to shut down the reactor. | ||
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations to all licensees. The purpose of | |||
IN 2005-24 was to have licensees review information related to problems with containment | Information Notice (IN) 2005-24, Nonconservatism in Leakage Detection Sensitivity | ||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as part of RCS leakage detection equipment | (ADAMS Accession No. ML051780073), communicated the issue created by differences | ||
and consider appropriate actions as applicable to their plants. Information Notices do not | between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations to all licensees. The purpose of | ||
require any action by licensees. | IN 2005-24 was to have licensees review information related to problems with containment | ||
In September 2008, NRC inspectors at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant identified a non-cited | atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as part of RCS leakage detection equipment | ||
violation for not complying with TS requirements for RCS leakage detection equipment. In | and consider appropriate actions as applicable to their plants. Information Notices do not | ||
November 2008, the licensee for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant | require any action by licensees. | ||
requested exigent license amendments from the NRC after taking remedial actions as permitted | |||
by their TS because of a concern that the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | In September 2008, NRC inspectors at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant identified a non-cited | ||
monitor channels of the RCS leakage detection system were inoperable. | violation for not complying with TS requirements for RCS leakage detection equipment. In | ||
To address the issue, licensees working through the industry-sponsored Technical | November 2008, the licensee for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant | ||
Specifications Task Force (TSTF) have attempted to create generic TS changes, model License | requested exigent license amendments from the NRC after taking remedial actions as permitted | ||
Amendment Requests (LARs), model safety evaluations, and model proposed | by their TS because of a concern that the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | ||
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations using the NRC TS Consolidated Line Item | monitor channels of the RCS leakage detection system were inoperable. | ||
Improvement Process (CLIIP). See RIS 2000-10, Consolidated Line Item Improvement | |||
Process For Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors | To address the issue, licensees working through the industry-sponsored Technical | ||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML003693442) for more information on the NRC CLIIP. | Specifications Task Force (TSTF) have attempted to create generic TS changes, model License | ||
Amendment Requests (LARs), model safety evaluations, and model proposed | |||
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations using the NRC TS Consolidated Line Item | |||
Improvement Process (CLIIP). See RIS 2000-10, Consolidated Line Item Improvement | |||
Process For Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML003693442) for more information on the NRC CLIIP. | |||
RIS 2009-02 | |||
Page 3 of 5 | |||
SUMMARY OF ISSUE | |||
Improvements in fuel cladding integrity and RCS chemistry controls result in lower RCS | SUMMARY OF ISSUE | ||
radioactivity concentrations during operational activities, including situations where there is RCS | |||
leakage. Thus, containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems which are | Improvements in fuel cladding integrity and RCS chemistry controls result in lower RCS | ||
designed on the basis of higher assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations will not provide | radioactivity concentrations during operational activities, including situations where there is RCS | ||
accurate indication of RCS leakage in the required length of time due to the longer response | leakage. Thus, containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems which are | ||
time of the monitoring system, and must be considered inoperable. | designed on the basis of higher assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations will not provide | ||
The NRC considers the longer response times of the containment atmosphere gaseous | accurate indication of RCS leakage in the required length of time due to the longer response | ||
radioactivity monitors to be of very low safety significance. The monitors would still be able to | time of the monitoring system, and must be considered inoperable. | ||
detect degradation in the RCPB long before components fail in a manner that would affect plant | |||
safety. Additionally, plants also have multiple diverse and redundant methods available to | The NRC considers the longer response times of the containment atmosphere gaseous | ||
detect RCS leakage and to provide licensees with a means to detect significant RCPB | radioactivity monitors to be of very low safety significance. The monitors would still be able to | ||
degradation and to take appropriate action to ensure the continued protection of public health | detect degradation in the RCPB long before components fail in a manner that would affect plant | ||
and safety. Finally, nuclear power plants are designed to provide adequate core cooling | safety. Additionally, plants also have multiple diverse and redundant methods available to | ||
following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents up to and including a break equivalent in size to | detect RCS leakage and to provide licensees with a means to detect significant RCPB | ||
the double-ended rupture of the largest pipe in the RCS. This design feature, coupled with the | degradation and to take appropriate action to ensure the continued protection of public health | ||
extremely low likelihood of unstable crack growth resulting in a loss-of-coolant accident, leads | and safety. Finally, nuclear power plants are designed to provide adequate core cooling | ||
the NRC to conclude that the risk significance of this issue is very low. | following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents up to and including a break equivalent in size to | ||
The NRC plans to address the issue of inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous | the double-ended rupture of the largest pipe in the RCS. This design feature, coupled with the | ||
radioactivity monitoring systems in an integrated fashion by: (i) working with the TSTF to | extremely low likelihood of unstable crack growth resulting in a loss-of-coolant accident, leads | ||
develop revised generic TS for the monitoring system, and facilitating licensee implementation | the NRC to conclude that the risk significance of this issue is very low. | ||
of the revised generic TS through a streamlined license amendment process; and (ii) issuing | |||
guidance on NRCs exercise of enforcement discretion involving inoperable containment | The NRC plans to address the issue of inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous | ||
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems. | radioactivity monitoring systems in an integrated fashion by: (i) working with the TSTF to | ||
The NRC will review the generic TS changes that the TSTF proposes for pressurized-water | develop revised generic TS for the monitoring system, and facilitating licensee implementation | ||
reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). If the generic TS changes are found to be | of the revised generic TS through a streamlined license amendment process; and (ii) issuing | ||
acceptable, the NRC will make the generic model LARs, model safety evaluations, and model | guidance on NRCs exercise of enforcement discretion involving inoperable containment | ||
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations available to licensees using the NRC CLIIP. | atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems. | ||
Licensees are free to submit LARs for TS changes to address the issue. If licensees deem | |||
further action regarding the issue is unwarranted, they can choose to take no action. | The NRC will review the generic TS changes that the TSTF proposes for pressurized-water | ||
On November 14, 2008, the TSTF submitted TSTF-513, Revise Operability Requirements and | reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). If the generic TS changes are found to be | ||
Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation, to the NRC for review. TSTF-513 proposes generic | acceptable, the NRC will make the generic model LARs, model safety evaluations, and model | ||
TS changes for PWRs. The TSTF plans to submit TSTF-514 to the NRC in January 2009. | no-significant-hazards consideration determinations available to licensees using the NRC CLIIP. | ||
TSTF-514 will propose generic TS changes for BWRs. Licensees are free to submit LARs to | Licensees are free to submit LARs for TS changes to address the issue. If licensees deem | ||
address the issue using TSTF-513 or TSTF-514; or they can propose alternative solutions. | further action regarding the issue is unwarranted, they can choose to take no action. | ||
In certain circumstances involving inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | |||
monitoring systems, enforcement discretion is available. Specific guidance for this enforcement | On November 14, 2008, the TSTF submitted TSTF-513, Revise Operability Requirements and | ||
discretion is described in EGM-09-001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467) and is available | Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation, to the NRC for review. TSTF-513 proposes generic | ||
on the NRCs web site at www.nrc.gov. | TS changes for PWRs. The TSTF plans to submit TSTF-514 to the NRC in January 2009. | ||
TSTF-514 will propose generic TS changes for BWRs. Licensees are free to submit LARs to | |||
address the issue using TSTF-513 or TSTF-514; or they can propose alternative solutions. | |||
In certain circumstances involving inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity | |||
monitoring systems, enforcement discretion is available. Specific guidance for this enforcement | |||
discretion is described in EGM-09-001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467) and is available | |||
on the NRCs web site at www.nrc.gov. | |||
RIS 2009-02 | |||
Page 4 of 5 | |||
BACKFIT DISCUSSION | |||
The intent of this RIS is to inform addressees of the NRCs plan to address the failure of | BACKFIT DISCUSSION | ||
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as RCS leakage detection | |||
equipment to meet TS requirements. | The intent of this RIS is to inform addressees of the NRCs plan to address the failure of | ||
The staff is not imposing any new positions on licensees. This RIS is not providing any new | containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as RCS leakage detection | ||
regulatory positions. This RIS only conveys the NRCs plan to address the issue of RCS | equipment to meet TS requirements. | ||
leakage detection equipment failing to meet TS requirements because of the difference between | |||
actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations. This RIS requires no action or written | |||
response and, therefore, is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting. Consequently, the | The staff is not imposing any new positions on licensees. This RIS is not providing any new | ||
staff did not perform a backfit analysis. | regulatory positions. This RIS only conveys the NRCs plan to address the issue of RCS | ||
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION | leakage detection equipment failing to meet TS requirements because of the difference between | ||
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register | actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations. This RIS requires no action or written | ||
because it is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure | response and, therefore, is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting. Consequently, the | ||
from current regulatory requirements and practice. However, a public meeting to discuss this | staff did not perform a backfit analysis. | ||
RIS was held on January 8, 2009. The meeting summary is available under ADAMS Accession | |||
No. ML090130583. The NRC intends to work with industry representatives, members of the | |||
public, and other stakeholders in developing final guidance and in modifying related guidance | FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION | ||
documents. | |||
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT | A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register | ||
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) | because it is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure | ||
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act. | from current regulatory requirements and practice. However, a public meeting to discuss this | ||
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT | RIS was held on January 8, 2009. The meeting summary is available under ADAMS Accession | ||
This RIS does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the | No. ML090130583. The NRC intends to work with industry representatives, members of the | ||
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). | public, and other stakeholders in developing final guidance and in modifying related guidance | ||
documents. | |||
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for | |||
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT | ||
currently valid OMB control number. | |||
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808) | |||
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act. | |||
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT | |||
This RIS does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the | |||
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). | |||
PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION | |||
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for | |||
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | |||
currently valid OMB control number. | |||
RIS 2009-02 | |||
Page 5 of 5 | |||
CONTACT | |||
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the | CONTACT | ||
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the | |||
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR | /RA by Theodore R. Quay For/ | ||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, | Division of Policy and Rulemaking | ||
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR | |||
301-415-1472 | |||
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, | |||
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | |||
RIS 2009-02 | |||
Page 5 of 5 | |||
CONTACT | |||
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the | |||
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
/RA by Theodore R. Quay For/ | |||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Division of Policy and Rulemaking | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
OFFICE | Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR | ||
NAME | 301-415-1472 | ||
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov | |||
DATE | |||
OFFICE | Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, | ||
NAME | http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | ||
DATE | ADAMS ACCESSION No. ML090120669 | ||
OFFICE | OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | ||
OFFICE | |||
ITSB:DIRS | |||
DATE | |||
OFFICE PMDA | Tech Editor | ||
NAME | BC:ITSBDIRS | ||
D:DIRS | |||
DATE | PSPB DPR | ||
BC:PSPB DPR | |||
NAME | |||
MHamm | |||
via email | |||
RElliott | |||
FBrown | |||
MCheok for | |||
JWilliams | |||
SRosenberg | |||
DNelson for | |||
DATE | |||
12/19/2008 | |||
12/15/2008 | |||
1/12/2009 | |||
1/12/2009 | |||
12/30/2008 | |||
12/30/2008 | |||
OFFICE | |||
D:DSS | |||
D:DORL | |||
RI:DRP:D | |||
RII:DRP:D | |||
RIII:DRP:D | |||
RIV:DRP:D | |||
NAME | |||
WRuland | |||
for JGiitter | |||
DLew via | |||
email | |||
LWert via | |||
email | |||
CPederson | |||
via email | |||
DChamberlain | |||
via email | |||
DATE | |||
1/12/2009 | |||
12/30/2008 | |||
1/15/2009 | |||
1/14/2009 | |||
1/13/2009 | |||
1/15/2009 | |||
OFFICE | |||
D:DCI | |||
BC:CHPB | |||
DCIP | |||
D: DCIP/NRO | |||
OE | |||
OGC (NLO) | |||
OGC (CRA) | |||
NAME | |||
MEvans | |||
TFrye | |||
CHinson for | |||
GTracy | |||
DStarkey | |||
via email | |||
BJones | |||
NSanchez | |||
via email | |||
DATE | |||
1/15/2009 | |||
01/07/2009 | |||
01/08/2009 | |||
1/14/2009 | |||
01/27/2009 1/28/2009 | |||
OFFICE | |||
PMDA | |||
OIS | |||
LA:PGCB | |||
PGCB | |||
BC: PGCB | |||
D:DPR | |||
NAME | |||
LHill | |||
GTrussell | |||
CHawes | |||
SStuchell | |||
MMurphy | |||
TMcGinty TRQ | |||
for | |||
DATE | |||
01/05/2009 | |||
01/07/2009 | |||
1/28/2009 | |||
1/28/2009 | |||
1/29/2009 | |||
1/29/2009 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 14 January 2025
| ML090120669 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/29/2009 |
| From: | Mcginty T Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
| To: | |
| Hawes C, NRR/DPR/PGCB, 415-1316 | |
| References | |
| RIS-09-002 | |
| Download: ML090120669 (6) | |
See also: RIS 2009-02
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
January 29, 2009
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2009-02
USE OF CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE GASEOUS RADIOACTIVITY
MONITORS AS REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE DETECTION
EQUIPMENT AT NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS
ADDRESSEES
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently
ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor
vessel.
All current and potential applicants for a combined license, manufacturing license, standard
design certification, or standard design approval for a nuclear power plant under the provisions
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52 (10 CFR), Licenses, Certifications, and
Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
All applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits and operating licenses under the
provisions of 10 CFR Part 50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities.
INTENT
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS)
to communicate the NRC plan to address the situation created when some containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors are unable to meet technical specification (TS)
requirements. The plan consists of integrating a streamlined license amendment process with
the use of enforcement discretion, where appropriate. This RIS requires no action or written
response on the part of an addressee.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In order to meet General Design Criterion 30, "Quality of reactor coolant pressure boundary," of
Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, licensees typically include RCS leakage detection equipment in
their plant designs because the equipment can be used to detect reactor coolant pressure
boundary (RCPB) leakage. A typical RCS leakage detection system consists of a combination
of the following:
a containment atmosphere particulate radioactivity monitoring system
a containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring system
containment sump-level and sump-pump instrumentation
containment cooler condensate monitoring instrumentation
Page 2 of 5
Containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems measure RCS leakage
indirectly by detecting airborne radioactivity released from RCS leakage. Response time is the
length of time required for these monitoring systems to detect a given volume of RCS leakage.
Response time is dependant on RCS radioactivity concentration, as well as other variables. For
a given volume of leakage, with all other variables held constant, a higher RCS radioactivity
concentration will yield a shorter response time for these monitoring systems. The design
analyses for the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used in the
licensing bases for most plants typically assume a RCS radioactivity concentration
approximately equivalent to 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core. Improvements in fuel cladding
integrity and RCS chemistry controls have significantly reduced RCS radioactivity concentration
at most plants. As a result, the monitors for operating units may have longer response times
than they would with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core because the actual RCS radioactivity
concentration is less than it would be with 0.1 percent failed fuel in the core.
Most plants have TS Limiting Conditions for Operation requirements for containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems used as part of RCS leakage detection
equipment. The TS requirements for the monitoring systems response times are based on the
design analysis that is part of a plants licensing basis. If the monitors fail to meet these
requirements, the monitors are inoperable. When the monitors are inoperable the licensee is
required to take remedial actions as permitted by their TS or to shut down the reactor.
Information Notice (IN) 2005-24, Nonconservatism in Leakage Detection Sensitivity
(ADAMS Accession No. ML051780073), communicated the issue created by differences
between actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations to all licensees. The purpose of
IN 2005-24 was to have licensees review information related to problems with containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as part of RCS leakage detection equipment
and consider appropriate actions as applicable to their plants. Information Notices do not
require any action by licensees.
In September 2008, NRC inspectors at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant identified a non-cited
violation for not complying with TS requirements for RCS leakage detection equipment. In
November 2008, the licensee for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
requested exigent license amendments from the NRC after taking remedial actions as permitted
by their TS because of a concern that the containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity
monitor channels of the RCS leakage detection system were inoperable.
To address the issue, licensees working through the industry-sponsored Technical
Specifications Task Force (TSTF) have attempted to create generic TS changes, model License
Amendment Requests (LARs), model safety evaluations, and model proposed
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations using the NRC TS Consolidated Line Item
Improvement Process (CLIIP). See RIS 2000-10, Consolidated Line Item Improvement
Process For Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors
(ADAMS Accession No. ML003693442) for more information on the NRC CLIIP.
Page 3 of 5
SUMMARY OF ISSUE
Improvements in fuel cladding integrity and RCS chemistry controls result in lower RCS
radioactivity concentrations during operational activities, including situations where there is RCS
leakage. Thus, containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems which are
designed on the basis of higher assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations will not provide
accurate indication of RCS leakage in the required length of time due to the longer response
time of the monitoring system, and must be considered inoperable.
The NRC considers the longer response times of the containment atmosphere gaseous
radioactivity monitors to be of very low safety significance. The monitors would still be able to
detect degradation in the RCPB long before components fail in a manner that would affect plant
safety. Additionally, plants also have multiple diverse and redundant methods available to
detect RCS leakage and to provide licensees with a means to detect significant RCPB
degradation and to take appropriate action to ensure the continued protection of public health
and safety. Finally, nuclear power plants are designed to provide adequate core cooling
following postulated loss-of-coolant accidents up to and including a break equivalent in size to
the double-ended rupture of the largest pipe in the RCS. This design feature, coupled with the
extremely low likelihood of unstable crack growth resulting in a loss-of-coolant accident, leads
the NRC to conclude that the risk significance of this issue is very low.
The NRC plans to address the issue of inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous
radioactivity monitoring systems in an integrated fashion by: (i) working with the TSTF to
develop revised generic TS for the monitoring system, and facilitating licensee implementation
of the revised generic TS through a streamlined license amendment process; and (ii) issuing
guidance on NRCs exercise of enforcement discretion involving inoperable containment
atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitoring systems.
The NRC will review the generic TS changes that the TSTF proposes for pressurized-water
reactors (PWRs) and boiling-water reactors (BWRs). If the generic TS changes are found to be
acceptable, the NRC will make the generic model LARs, model safety evaluations, and model
no-significant-hazards consideration determinations available to licensees using the NRC CLIIP.
Licensees are free to submit LARs for TS changes to address the issue. If licensees deem
further action regarding the issue is unwarranted, they can choose to take no action.
On November 14, 2008, the TSTF submitted TSTF-513, Revise Operability Requirements and
Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation, to the NRC for review. TSTF-513 proposes generic
TS changes for PWRs. The TSTF plans to submit TSTF-514 to the NRC in January 2009.
TSTF-514 will propose generic TS changes for BWRs. Licensees are free to submit LARs to
address the issue using TSTF-513 or TSTF-514; or they can propose alternative solutions.
In certain circumstances involving inoperable containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity
monitoring systems, enforcement discretion is available. Specific guidance for this enforcement
discretion is described in EGM-09-001 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090300467) and is available
on the NRCs web site at www.nrc.gov.
Page 4 of 5
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
The intent of this RIS is to inform addressees of the NRCs plan to address the failure of
containment atmosphere gaseous radioactivity monitors used as RCS leakage detection
equipment to meet TS requirements.
The staff is not imposing any new positions on licensees. This RIS is not providing any new
regulatory positions. This RIS only conveys the NRCs plan to address the issue of RCS
leakage detection equipment failing to meet TS requirements because of the difference between
actual and assumed RCS radioactivity concentrations. This RIS requires no action or written
response and, therefore, is not a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109, Backfitting. Consequently, the
staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register
because it is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure
from current regulatory requirements and practice. However, a public meeting to discuss this
RIS was held on January 8, 2009. The meeting summary is available under ADAMS Accession
No. ML090130583. The NRC intends to work with industry representatives, members of the
public, and other stakeholders in developing final guidance and in modifying related guidance
documents.
CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW ACT
This RIS is not a rule as designated by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 801-808)
and, therefore, is not subject to the Act.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This RIS does not contain any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Page 5 of 5
CONTACT
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
/RA by Theodore R. Quay For/
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR
301-415-1472
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
Page 5 of 5
CONTACT
Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the
appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
/RA by Theodore R. Quay For/
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact: Matthew Hamm, NRR
301-415-1472
e-mail: matthew.hamm@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,
http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
ADAMS ACCESSION No. ML090120669
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
OFFICE
ITSB:DIRS
Tech Editor
BC:ITSBDIRS
D:DIRS
PSPB DPR
BC:PSPB DPR
NAME
MHamm
via email
RElliott
FBrown
MCheok for
JWilliams
SRosenberg
DNelson for
DATE
12/19/2008
12/15/2008
1/12/2009
1/12/2009
12/30/2008
12/30/2008
OFFICE
D:DSS
D:DORL
RI:DRP:D
RII:DRP:D
RIII:DRP:D
RIV:DRP:D
NAME
WRuland
for JGiitter
DLew via
LWert via
CPederson
via email
DChamberlain
via email
DATE
1/12/2009
12/30/2008
1/15/2009
1/14/2009
1/13/2009
1/15/2009
OFFICE
D:DCI
BC:CHPB
DCIP
D: DCIP/NRO
OGC (CRA)
NAME
MEvans
TFrye
CHinson for
GTracy
DStarkey
via email
BJones
NSanchez
via email
DATE
1/15/2009
01/07/2009
01/08/2009
1/14/2009
01/27/2009 1/28/2009
OFFICE
PMDA
OIS
LA:PGCB
PGCB
BC: PGCB
D:DPR
NAME
LHill
GTrussell
CHawes
SStuchell
MMurphy
TMcGinty TRQ
for
DATE
01/05/2009
01/07/2009
1/28/2009
1/28/2009
1/29/2009
1/29/2009