ML120180212: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:         GG                             First Exam Date:   December 5-9, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Date)
{{#Wiki_filter:Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:
Comment                                     Resolution Ensure revision numbers at the page     Request we do this at the question level 1
GG First Exam Date:
level for SRO/RO written exam.          (versus page level)
December 5-9, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Date)
SRO- re-sample Tier 3 (Radiation       Replaced with 2.3.11 2  Control) K/A 2.3.4. SROs have had this K/A on the last two exams.
Comment Resolution 1 Ensure revision numbers at the page level for SRO/RO written exam.
3 4
Request we do this at the question level (versus page level) 2 SRO-re-sample Tier 3 (Radiation Control) K/A 2.3.4. SROs have had this K/A on the last two exams.
5 Administrative JPM Outline (Date)
Replaced with 2.3.11 3
Comment                                     Resolution SRO - Emergency Procedures/Plan, K/A 1  2.4.41 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A RO - Equipment Control, K/A 2.2.13 2  used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A.
4 5
Was the admin previously used on the   Yes. Selected randomly from all on previous 3
Administrative JPM Outline (Date)
RO exam from 2010 randomly selected? 2 exams.
Comment Resolution 1
4 5                                                     OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
SRO - Emergency Procedures/Plan, K/A 2.4.41 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A 2
RO - Equipment Control, K/A 2.2.13 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A.
3 Was the admin previously used on the RO exam from 2010 randomly selected?
Yes. Selected randomly from all on previous 2 exams.
4 5  


Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)
Comment                                         Resolution Need K/A and Importance Rating               Done 1
Comment Resolution 1 Need K/A and Importance Rating notated for each JPM.
notated for each JPM.
Done 2 Any of the Simulator JPMs to be ran in parallel?
Any of the Simulator JPMs to be ran in       Yes. See proposed schedule.
Yes. See proposed schedule.
2 parallel?
3 288000/Secure Fuel Pool Sweep-this appears to be a ninth Simulator JPM which is unnecessary. Also, this JPM is designed to be administered in the Control Room. No JPMs on this test will be administered in the control room.
288000/Secure Fuel Pool Sweep- this         This was intended as a backup JPM. It has appears to be a ninth Simulator JPM         been removed from the outline.
This was intended as a backup JPM. It has been removed from the outline.
which is unnecessary. Also, this JPM is 3
4 Startup Shutdown Cooling B - I assume this is RHR pump B?
designed to be administered in the Control Room. No JPMs on this test will be administered in the control room.
Correct.
Startup Shutdown Cooling B - I assume       Correct.
4 this is RHR pump B?
5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)
5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)
Comment                                         Resolution 1   Add Rev number to all D-1s.                 Revision numbers added Scenario 1, Event 8: Critical Task to       Note 1 (at the end of this document) place the Mode Switch in Shutdown when the reactor enters the Exclusion 2
Comment Resolution 1 Add Rev number to all D-1s.
Region on the power to flow map -
Revision numbers added 2
Scenario 1, Event 8: Critical Task to place the Mode Switch in Shutdown when the reactor enters the Exclusion Region on the power to flow map -
Should this critical task occur before entering this region?
Should this critical task occur before entering this region?
Scenario 1, Event 9: Critical Task to       Note 1 restore RPV level greater than -191 when reactor pressure decreases to 3
Note 1 (at the end of this document) 3 Scenario 1, Event 9: Critical Task to restore RPV level greater than -191 when reactor pressure decreases to 219#. Does this task need to occur before a certain parameter is reached?
219#. Does this task need to occur before a certain parameter is reached?
Define the failure mode of this task.
Define the failure mode of this task.
Scenario 1, Event 10: This is the third     The ACROs actions that result from event 7 major for this scenario and it looks like   (loss of AC) are wrapped up in event 8 (RPS 4  only the ACRO gets credit. Does the         automatic scram does not occur).
Note 1 4
ACRO not have any verifiable actions on the major for loss of AC?                                                         OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
Scenario 1, Event 10: This is the third major for this scenario and it looks like only the ACRO gets credit. Does the ACRO not have any verifiable actions on the major for loss of AC?
The ACROs actions that result from event 7 (loss of AC) are wrapped up in event 8 (RPS automatic scram does not occur).


Scenario 1, Event 7: Loss of Service         This is a partial loss of AC power; however, Transformer 11. Is this a loss of all AC?    this loss of AC causes a loss of both RFPTs It appears the guiding procedure is an      and a loss of the only remaining Recirc pump, 5  Off Normal which leads me to think this      both of which would normally cause an should be counted as an Abnormal and        automatic scram. RPS fails to scram in this not a major unless it is a total loss of AC. scenario and a manual scram is inserted by the ACRO.
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 5
Scenario 1, Event 10: What EP is             A FW rupture inside the drywell will result in 6
Scenario 1, Event 7: Loss of Service Transformer 11. Is this a loss of all AC?
entered for this major?                      an entry into EP-3 (containment)
It appears the guiding procedure is an Off Normal which leads me to think this should be counted as an Abnormal and not a major unless it is a total loss of AC.
Scenario 2, Event 5: Does the ACRO           The ACRO will be directed to bypass an have verifiable actions for failure of two   APRM.
This is a partial loss of AC power; however, this loss of AC causes a loss of both RFPTs and a loss of the only remaining Recirc pump, both of which would normally cause an automatic scram. RPS fails to scram in this scenario and a manual scram is inserted by the ACRO.
7 APRM channels in order to constitute an Instrument bean?
6 Scenario 1, Event 10: What EP is entered for this major?
Scenario 2, Event 6: Critical task for the   Note 1 crew to close MSIVs when MSL annunciators alarm. Define by when this 8  task has to be completed. If the crew closes MSIVs 5 minutes after alarms is this ok? Need drop dead limit to define success.
A FW rupture inside the drywell will result in an entry into EP-3 (containment) 7 Scenario 2, Event 5: Does the ACRO have verifiable actions for failure of two APRM channels in order to constitute an Instrument bean?
Scenario 2, Event 8: What is the I/C         This requires the operator to attempt to event and verifiable actions for the        isolate the leak by placing the E51-F063/F064 ACRO/BOP for the RCIC room                  handswitches in the closed position. Also, this 9
The ACRO will be directed to bypass an APRM.
unisolable steam leak?                      scenario simulates a motor pinion failure in which the isolation does not complete and the operator must identify and report this failure.
8 Scenario 2, Event 6: Critical task for the crew to close MSIVs when MSL annunciators alarm. Define by when this task has to be completed. If the crew closes MSIVs 5 minutes after alarms is this ok? Need drop dead limit to define success.
Scenario 2, Event 8: Critical Task to       Note 1 emergency depressurize. Is there a 10 pressure limit by when this has to be done? Define by what limit this task must be completed.
Note 1 9
Scenario 3, Event 4: Appears to be one The other abnormal is event 3.
Scenario 2, Event 8: What is the I/C event and verifiable actions for the ACRO/BOP for the RCIC room unisolable steam leak?
of two Abnormals listed for this scenario.
This requires the operator to attempt to isolate the leak by placing the E51-F063/F064 handswitches in the closed position. Also, this scenario simulates a motor pinion failure in which the isolation does not complete and the operator must identify and report this failure.
What is the other scenario? Event 6 11 utilizes an ONEP but is a Major and could not be counted as an Abnormal as well.
10 Scenario 2, Event 8: Critical Task to emergency depressurize. Is there a pressure limit by when this has to be done? Define by what limit this task must be completed.
Scenario 4, Event 3: No actions taken to This bus is locked out. Operators may 12 restore the 16BB3 bus?                        attempt to re-shut the breaker once, but this will not restore bus power in this case.
Note 1 11 Scenario 3, Event 4: Appears to be one of two Abnormals listed for this scenario.
Scenario 4, Event 4: Control Rod Drift is This leads to a scram. The crew will reduce categorized as a Major event. Does this power using Recirc flow control valves, but 13 event lead to scram? Appears to be an when a second rod begins to drift the ONEP Abnormal. If it is a Major it cant be      will require a scram.
What is the other scenario? Event 6 utilizes an ONEP but is a Major and could not be counted as an Abnormal as well.
counted as an Abnormal.
The other abnormal is event 3.
Scenario 4: What are the Abnormal           Outline revised to reflect 1 Abnormal event.
12 Scenario 4, Event 3: No actions taken to restore the 16BB3 bus?
events in this scenario? No 14 component/instrument failure after event 5 (or event 4 if this really is a Major) can be counted as an Abnormal event.                                                           OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
This bus is locked out. Operators may attempt to re-shut the breaker once, but this will not restore bus power in this case.
13 Scenario 4, Event 4: Control Rod Drift is categorized as a Major event. Does this event lead to scram? Appears to be an Abnormal. If it is a Major it cant be counted as an Abnormal.
This leads to a scram. The crew will reduce power using Recirc flow control valves, but when a second rod begins to drift the ONEP will require a scram.
14 Scenario 4: What are the Abnormal events in this scenario? No component/instrument failure after event 5 (or event 4 if this really is a Major) can be counted as an Abnormal event.
Outline revised to reflect 1 Abnormal event.


Scenario 4, Event 4: If event 4 is a       Prior to the scram, the operator is required to 15 Major it cant count as a Reactivity event    lower reactor power using Recirc flow control as well.                                    valves.
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 15 Scenario 4, Event 4: If event 4 is a Major it cant count as a Reactivity event as well.
Scenario 4, Event 6: Critical Task to re-   Critical task revised to reflect the crews need energize the 17AC bus with an alternate    for this bus. Note 1 does not apply This CT is 16 feeder. When does this have to be          per NUREG-1021 App D.
Prior to the scram, the operator is required to lower reactor power using Recirc flow control valves.
completed? Define success.
16 Scenario 4, Event 6: Critical Task to re-energize the 17AC bus with an alternate feeder. When does this have to be completed? Define success.
Scenario 4, Event 7: This event utilizes   Cooling water is not restored to this Diesel 17 an Ops philosophy procedurewill           Generator.
Critical task revised to reflect the crews need for this bus. Note 1 does not apply This CT is per NUREG-1021 App D.
cooling water be restored to this DG?
17 Scenario 4, Event 7: This event utilizes an Ops philosophy procedurewill cooling water be restored to this DG?
Cooling water is not restored to this Diesel Generator.
General Outline Comments (7/20/10)
General Outline Comments (7/20/10)
Comment                                       Resolution Suggested improvement - cross               Will add specific question KAs used on next reference of written exam KAs to           outline submittal with the draft exam on 55.41/43 and op test KAs to 55.45. This   10/14/11.
Comment Resolution 1
1 would provide objective evidence for 4.b on Exam Outline Quality Checklist (ES-201-2).
Suggested improvement - cross reference of written exam KAs to 55.41/43 and op test KAs to 55.45. This would provide objective evidence for 4.b on Exam Outline Quality Checklist (ES-201-2).
2   Ensure initial schedule is marked Rev. 0   Done.
Will add specific question KAs used on next outline submittal with the draft exam on 10/14/11.
Suggested improvement - provide             Memorandum of Exam Methodology summary of safety analysis and industry     attached.
2 Ensure initial schedule is marked Rev. 0 Done.
3 OE used in op test development (Required by ES-301 D.1.f.)
3 Suggested improvement - provide summary of safety analysis and industry OE used in op test development (Required by ES-301 D.1.f.)
Add an A to D-1 Event Type to specify   This item was added.
Memorandum of Exam Methodology attached.
4 facility identified Abnormal Event.
4 Add an A to D-1 Event Type to specify facility identified Abnormal Event.
ES-301-5 Transient and Event               ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event 5  Checklist - Did not include RO bean        count based on the proposed exam week counts for Scenario 3. Please revise.      schedule.
This item was added.
ES-301 Scenario 4 is identified as     ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event 6  the Back-up. Back-up scenario will be     count based on the proposed exam week identified during validation week.          schedule.
5 ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist - Did not include RO bean counts for Scenario 3. Please revise.
ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event count based on the proposed exam week schedule.
6 ES-301 Scenario 4 is identified as the Back-up. Back-up scenario will be identified during validation week.
ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event count based on the proposed exam week schedule.
7 8
7 8
9 Note 1: Critical tasks were standardized (as a result of the 2009 INPO CPO) by GGNS procedure 14-S-02-21, Preparers Guide for Simulator Evaluation Scenarios. Critical tasks have been updated to reflect the specific criteria as defined in 14-S-02-21.                                                         OBDI 202 - IOLE Process}}
9 Note 1: Critical tasks were standardized (as a result of the 2009 INPO CPO) by GGNS procedure 14-S-02-21, Preparers Guide for Simulator Evaluation Scenarios. Critical tasks have been updated to reflect the specific criteria as defined in 14-S-02-21.}}

Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 January 2025

12 Draft Outline Comments
ML120180212
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2011
From:
NRC Region 4
To:
Entergy Operations
References
50-416/11-301
Download: ML120180212 (4)
v • d • e


Text

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:

GG First Exam Date:

December 5-9, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 Ensure revision numbers at the page level for SRO/RO written exam.

Request we do this at the question level (versus page level) 2 SRO-re-sample Tier 3 (Radiation Control) K/A 2.3.4. SROs have had this K/A on the last two exams.

Replaced with 2.3.11 3

4 5

Administrative JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1

SRO - Emergency Procedures/Plan, K/A 2.4.41 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A 2

RO - Equipment Control, K/A 2.2.13 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A.

3 Was the admin previously used on the RO exam from 2010 randomly selected?

Yes. Selected randomly from all on previous 2 exams.

4 5

OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 Need K/A and Importance Rating notated for each JPM.

Done 2 Any of the Simulator JPMs to be ran in parallel?

Yes. See proposed schedule.

3 288000/Secure Fuel Pool Sweep-this appears to be a ninth Simulator JPM which is unnecessary. Also, this JPM is designed to be administered in the Control Room. No JPMs on this test will be administered in the control room.

This was intended as a backup JPM. It has been removed from the outline.

4 Startup Shutdown Cooling B - I assume this is RHR pump B?

Correct.

5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 Add Rev number to all D-1s.

Revision numbers added 2

Scenario 1, Event 8: Critical Task to place the Mode Switch in Shutdown when the reactor enters the Exclusion Region on the power to flow map -

Should this critical task occur before entering this region?

Note 1 (at the end of this document) 3 Scenario 1, Event 9: Critical Task to restore RPV level greater than -191 when reactor pressure decreases to 219#. Does this task need to occur before a certain parameter is reached?

Define the failure mode of this task.

Note 1 4

Scenario 1, Event 10: This is the third major for this scenario and it looks like only the ACRO gets credit. Does the ACRO not have any verifiable actions on the major for loss of AC?

The ACROs actions that result from event 7 (loss of AC) are wrapped up in event 8 (RPS automatic scram does not occur).

OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 5

Scenario 1, Event 7: Loss of Service Transformer 11. Is this a loss of all AC?

It appears the guiding procedure is an Off Normal which leads me to think this should be counted as an Abnormal and not a major unless it is a total loss of AC.

This is a partial loss of AC power; however, this loss of AC causes a loss of both RFPTs and a loss of the only remaining Recirc pump, both of which would normally cause an automatic scram. RPS fails to scram in this scenario and a manual scram is inserted by the ACRO.

6 Scenario 1, Event 10: What EP is entered for this major?

A FW rupture inside the drywell will result in an entry into EP-3 (containment) 7 Scenario 2, Event 5: Does the ACRO have verifiable actions for failure of two APRM channels in order to constitute an Instrument bean?

The ACRO will be directed to bypass an APRM.

8 Scenario 2, Event 6: Critical task for the crew to close MSIVs when MSL annunciators alarm. Define by when this task has to be completed. If the crew closes MSIVs 5 minutes after alarms is this ok? Need drop dead limit to define success.

Note 1 9

Scenario 2, Event 8: What is the I/C event and verifiable actions for the ACRO/BOP for the RCIC room unisolable steam leak?

This requires the operator to attempt to isolate the leak by placing the E51-F063/F064 handswitches in the closed position. Also, this scenario simulates a motor pinion failure in which the isolation does not complete and the operator must identify and report this failure.

10 Scenario 2, Event 8: Critical Task to emergency depressurize. Is there a pressure limit by when this has to be done? Define by what limit this task must be completed.

Note 1 11 Scenario 3, Event 4: Appears to be one of two Abnormals listed for this scenario.

What is the other scenario? Event 6 utilizes an ONEP but is a Major and could not be counted as an Abnormal as well.

The other abnormal is event 3.

12 Scenario 4, Event 3: No actions taken to restore the 16BB3 bus?

This bus is locked out. Operators may attempt to re-shut the breaker once, but this will not restore bus power in this case.

13 Scenario 4, Event 4: Control Rod Drift is categorized as a Major event. Does this event lead to scram? Appears to be an Abnormal. If it is a Major it cant be counted as an Abnormal.

This leads to a scram. The crew will reduce power using Recirc flow control valves, but when a second rod begins to drift the ONEP will require a scram.

14 Scenario 4: What are the Abnormal events in this scenario? No component/instrument failure after event 5 (or event 4 if this really is a Major) can be counted as an Abnormal event.

Outline revised to reflect 1 Abnormal event.

OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 15 Scenario 4, Event 4: If event 4 is a Major it cant count as a Reactivity event as well.

Prior to the scram, the operator is required to lower reactor power using Recirc flow control valves.

16 Scenario 4, Event 6: Critical Task to re-energize the 17AC bus with an alternate feeder. When does this have to be completed? Define success.

Critical task revised to reflect the crews need for this bus. Note 1 does not apply This CT is per NUREG-1021 App D.

17 Scenario 4, Event 7: This event utilizes an Ops philosophy procedurewill cooling water be restored to this DG?

Cooling water is not restored to this Diesel Generator.

General Outline Comments (7/20/10)

Comment Resolution 1

Suggested improvement - cross reference of written exam KAs to 55.41/43 and op test KAs to 55.45. This would provide objective evidence for 4.b on Exam Outline Quality Checklist (ES-201-2).

Will add specific question KAs used on next outline submittal with the draft exam on 10/14/11.

2 Ensure initial schedule is marked Rev. 0 Done.

3 Suggested improvement - provide summary of safety analysis and industry OE used in op test development (Required by ES-301 D.1.f.)

Memorandum of Exam Methodology attached.

4 Add an A to D-1 Event Type to specify facility identified Abnormal Event.

This item was added.

5 ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist - Did not include RO bean counts for Scenario 3. Please revise.

ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event count based on the proposed exam week schedule.

6 ES-301 Scenario 4 is identified as the Back-up. Back-up scenario will be identified during validation week.

ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event count based on the proposed exam week schedule.

7 8

9 Note 1: Critical tasks were standardized (as a result of the 2009 INPO CPO) by GGNS procedure 14-S-02-21, Preparers Guide for Simulator Evaluation Scenarios. Critical tasks have been updated to reflect the specific criteria as defined in 14-S-02-21.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML120180212&oldid=5266419"