ML120180212

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
12 Draft Outline Comments
ML120180212
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2011
From:
NRC Region 4
To:
Entergy Operations
References
50-416/11-301
Download: ML120180212 (4)


Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: GG First Exam Date: December 5-9, 2011 Written Exam Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution Ensure revision numbers at the page Request we do this at the question level 1

level for SRO/RO written exam. (versus page level)

SRO- re-sample Tier 3 (Radiation Replaced with 2.3.11 2 Control) K/A 2.3.4. SROs have had this K/A on the last two exams.

3 4

5 Administrative JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution SRO - Emergency Procedures/Plan, K/A 1 2.4.41 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A RO - Equipment Control, K/A 2.2.13 2 used on last two exams. Re-sample this K/A.

Was the admin previously used on the Yes. Selected randomly from all on previous 3

RO exam from 2010 randomly selected? 2 exams.

4 5 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution Need K/A and Importance Rating Done 1

notated for each JPM.

Any of the Simulator JPMs to be ran in Yes. See proposed schedule.

2 parallel?

288000/Secure Fuel Pool Sweep- this This was intended as a backup JPM. It has appears to be a ninth Simulator JPM been removed from the outline.

which is unnecessary. Also, this JPM is 3

designed to be administered in the Control Room. No JPMs on this test will be administered in the control room.

Startup Shutdown Cooling B - I assume Correct.

4 this is RHR pump B?

5 Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 Add Rev number to all D-1s. Revision numbers added Scenario 1, Event 8: Critical Task to Note 1 (at the end of this document) place the Mode Switch in Shutdown when the reactor enters the Exclusion 2

Region on the power to flow map -

Should this critical task occur before entering this region?

Scenario 1, Event 9: Critical Task to Note 1 restore RPV level greater than -191 when reactor pressure decreases to 3

219#. Does this task need to occur before a certain parameter is reached?

Define the failure mode of this task.

Scenario 1, Event 10: This is the third The ACROs actions that result from event 7 major for this scenario and it looks like (loss of AC) are wrapped up in event 8 (RPS 4 only the ACRO gets credit. Does the automatic scram does not occur).

ACRO not have any verifiable actions on the major for loss of AC? OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Scenario 1, Event 7: Loss of Service This is a partial loss of AC power; however, Transformer 11. Is this a loss of all AC? this loss of AC causes a loss of both RFPTs It appears the guiding procedure is an and a loss of the only remaining Recirc pump, 5 Off Normal which leads me to think this both of which would normally cause an should be counted as an Abnormal and automatic scram. RPS fails to scram in this not a major unless it is a total loss of AC. scenario and a manual scram is inserted by the ACRO.

Scenario 1, Event 10: What EP is A FW rupture inside the drywell will result in 6

entered for this major? an entry into EP-3 (containment)

Scenario 2, Event 5: Does the ACRO The ACRO will be directed to bypass an have verifiable actions for failure of two APRM.

7 APRM channels in order to constitute an Instrument bean?

Scenario 2, Event 6: Critical task for the Note 1 crew to close MSIVs when MSL annunciators alarm. Define by when this 8 task has to be completed. If the crew closes MSIVs 5 minutes after alarms is this ok? Need drop dead limit to define success.

Scenario 2, Event 8: What is the I/C This requires the operator to attempt to event and verifiable actions for the isolate the leak by placing the E51-F063/F064 ACRO/BOP for the RCIC room handswitches in the closed position. Also, this 9

unisolable steam leak? scenario simulates a motor pinion failure in which the isolation does not complete and the operator must identify and report this failure.

Scenario 2, Event 8: Critical Task to Note 1 emergency depressurize. Is there a 10 pressure limit by when this has to be done? Define by what limit this task must be completed.

Scenario 3, Event 4: Appears to be one The other abnormal is event 3.

of two Abnormals listed for this scenario.

What is the other scenario? Event 6 11 utilizes an ONEP but is a Major and could not be counted as an Abnormal as well.

Scenario 4, Event 3: No actions taken to This bus is locked out. Operators may 12 restore the 16BB3 bus? attempt to re-shut the breaker once, but this will not restore bus power in this case.

Scenario 4, Event 4: Control Rod Drift is This leads to a scram. The crew will reduce categorized as a Major event. Does this power using Recirc flow control valves, but 13 event lead to scram? Appears to be an when a second rod begins to drift the ONEP Abnormal. If it is a Major it cant be will require a scram.

counted as an Abnormal.

Scenario 4: What are the Abnormal Outline revised to reflect 1 Abnormal event.

events in this scenario? No 14 component/instrument failure after event 5 (or event 4 if this really is a Major) can be counted as an Abnormal event. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Scenario 4, Event 4: If event 4 is a Prior to the scram, the operator is required to 15 Major it cant count as a Reactivity event lower reactor power using Recirc flow control as well. valves.

Scenario 4, Event 6: Critical Task to re- Critical task revised to reflect the crews need energize the 17AC bus with an alternate for this bus. Note 1 does not apply This CT is 16 feeder. When does this have to be per NUREG-1021 App D.

completed? Define success.

Scenario 4, Event 7: This event utilizes Cooling water is not restored to this Diesel 17 an Ops philosophy procedurewill Generator.

cooling water be restored to this DG?

General Outline Comments (7/20/10)

Comment Resolution Suggested improvement - cross Will add specific question KAs used on next reference of written exam KAs to outline submittal with the draft exam on 55.41/43 and op test KAs to 55.45. This 10/14/11.

1 would provide objective evidence for 4.b on Exam Outline Quality Checklist (ES-201-2).

2 Ensure initial schedule is marked Rev. 0 Done.

Suggested improvement - provide Memorandum of Exam Methodology summary of safety analysis and industry attached.

3 OE used in op test development (Required by ES-301 D.1.f.)

Add an A to D-1 Event Type to specify This item was added.

4 facility identified Abnormal Event.

ES-301-5 Transient and Event ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event 5 Checklist - Did not include RO bean count based on the proposed exam week counts for Scenario 3. Please revise. schedule.

ES-301 Scenario 4 is identified as ES-301-5 Revised to reflect expected event 6 the Back-up. Back-up scenario will be count based on the proposed exam week identified during validation week. schedule.

7 8

9 Note 1: Critical tasks were standardized (as a result of the 2009 INPO CPO) by GGNS procedure 14-S-02-21, Preparers Guide for Simulator Evaluation Scenarios. Critical tasks have been updated to reflect the specific criteria as defined in 14-S-02-21. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process