ML042580010: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUSNEI RITSTFNEIBiff Bradley, 202 739-8083WOGJack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037CEOGAlan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431EXCEL/
{{#Wiki_filter:RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)
TSTFDonald Hoffman, 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRIFrank Rahn, 650 855-2037  BWOGPaul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796BWROGRick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388John Gaertner, 704 547-6169 R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595Page 1 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER1Technical SpecificationRequired ActionsPreferred End States Industry and NRCdeveloping implementationguidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423. NRC/Industry met 1/30/04 on TSTF 422 andTSTF 423. The NRC/RITSTF agreed toresolutions for all the NRC comments. A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidancedocument was provided to the NRC for commentin 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and arevised document has been developed to address these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04. NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice forComment and Availability in 2004. TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03. RITSTF provided draft responses to NRCcomments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting. A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidancedocument was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.
RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE                TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                            NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                             TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1          Technical Specification
The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting. The NRC wants more information in the BWROGTSTF 423 Implementation Guidance. Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422Implementation Guidance, the NRC will providethe scope of additional information they want to BWROG.CEOG - TSTF-422 R0BWROG - TSTF-423 R0BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0(Not created)
* Industry and NRC
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 2 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER1Technical SpecificationRequired ActionsPreferred End States Industry and NRCdeveloping implementation guidance for TSTF-422 and TSTF-423. BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold. TSTF-431 has been distributed to the BWOG andthe RITSTF for review.CEOG - TSTF-422 R0BWROG - TSTF-423 R0BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 WOG - TSTF-432 R0(Not created)
* NRC/Industry met 1/30/04 on TSTF 422 and              CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 Required Actions          developing implementation            TSTF 423. The NRC/RITSTF agreed to Preferred End States      guidance for TSTF-422 and            resolutions for all the NRC comments.                 BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 TSTF-423.
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 3 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER2Missed SurveillancesSR 3.0.3 TSTF-358, R6, has beenapproved and published forCLIIP adoption. Initiative Complete.TSTF-358 R63Increase Flexibility inMode Restraints LCO
* A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidance      BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 document was provided to the NRC for comment in 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and a        WOG - TSTF-432 R0 revised document has been developed to address       (Not created) these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04.
* NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice for Comment and Availability in 2004.
* TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03.
* RITSTF provided draft responses to NRC comments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting.
* A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.
The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting.
* The NRC wants more information in the BWROG TSTF 423 Implementation Guidance.
* Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422 Implementation Guidance, the NRC will provide the scope of additional information they want to BWROG.
NEI RITSTF NEI      Biff Bradley, 202 739-8083            WOG Jack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037          CEOG Alan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081              Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018                    Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431 EXCEL/
TSTF     Donald Hoffman, 301 984-4400                Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723                      Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRI      Frank Rahn, 650 855-2037            BWOG Paul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796            BWROG Rick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388 John Gaertner, 704 547-6169                  R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917                        Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298 Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348                              Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595 Page 1 of 2                                                                    9/09/2004


3.0.4 TSTF-359, R9, has beenapproved and published for CLIIP adoption. The final ImplementationGuidance, NEI-03-10, wasissued on September 5, 2003. Initiative Complete.TSTF-359 R94aIndividual RiskInformed Allowed Outage Times (AOTs) Owners Groups (OGs) arepursuing generic Risk Informed AOT extensionsthrough OG-specificTopicals and license amendments. Ongoing.TSTF-373 R2 (CEOG)TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG)TSTF-417 R0 (WOG)TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                        NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                        TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1    Technical Specification
TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)
* Industry and NRC
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 4 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER4bRisk Informed AOTsWith ConfigurationRisk Management Program or Maintenance Rule BackstopHope Creek, Fort Calhoun,South Texas Project, and PrairieIsland have volunteered to develop pilot submittals.Fort Calhoun and South TexasProject have submitted theirpilots. RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address theinterface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide to NRC in October 2004. NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI. The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroupto coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs. Current schedule is to provide responses to NRCand meet in 12/04.TSTF-424 R05aRelocate SurveillanceRequirements Not Related to Safety Deterministic portion ofInitiative 5 transferred to TSTF responsibility. TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated. TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.None assigned5bRelocate SurveillanceTest Intervals toLicensee Control RITSTF/BWROG/PilotPlant will be applying themethodology andinterfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004. NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings toobserve process. The Limerick lead plant license amendment wassubmitted on June 11, 2004. TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04. NEI is preparing the methodology document forsubmittal to the NRC in 09/04.TSTF-425 R0 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 5 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER6aModify LCO 3.0.3Actions and Timing 1hour - 24 hours On hold. On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c todetermine if Initiative 6a is required.None assigned6bProvide Conditions inthe LCOs for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists toPreclude Entry IntoLCO 3.0.3 NRC issued SafetyEvaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04. TSTF-426 R0 wassubmitted to the NRC on8/30/2004. CEOG submitted revised version of TopicalReport to address NRC RAIs in 10/03. NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Reporton 7/9/04. TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on8/30/04. RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in11/04.TSTF-426 R06cProvide Specific Timesin the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately NRC issued SafetyEvaluation for Topical Report on 7/9/04. TSTF-426 R0 wassubmitted to the NRC on8/30/2004. CEOG submitted revised version of TopicalReport to address NRC RAIs in 10/03. NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Reporton 7/9/04. TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on8/30/04. RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in11/04.TSTF-426 R0 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 6 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER7aImpact of NonTechnical SpecificationDesign Features on Operability Requirements - Barriers TSTF-372, Rev. 4submitted on 4/23/04. TSTF-427 submitted on3/4/03. NRC provided commentson TSTF-427 on 6/26/03. Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03.NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed theircomments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC on 4/23/04. On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additionalinformation to support review of TSTF-372. TheTSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04. NRC requested additional information in 7/04 andIndustry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04. NRC plans FRN for Comment for TSTF 372 by10/04. NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses onTSTF 427 in February 2004. TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to thedefinition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns. TSTF-427 implementation guidance beingdeveloped and will be provided to the NRC by09/17/04. TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.TSTF-372 R4TSTF-427 R0 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 7 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER7bImpact of Non TSDesign Features onOperability Requirements - All other SSCs not in Technical Specifications A White Paper on theprocess to address this scopeof SSCs is being developed. RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline theprocess to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04. RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented onthe revised Operability guidance that will supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18. RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit toNRC by 12/04.None assigned8aRemove or RelocateSystems LCOs That Do Not Meet the 4Criterion of 10 CFR50.36 From Technical Specifications A White Paper on theapplication of the 10 CFR 50.36 criteria is beingdeveloped. NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as thebasis for Criterion 4 application. RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline theguidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -
* BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on      CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 Required Actions          developing implementation        1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.
current plans are fourth quarter 2004.None assigned RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUSPage 8 of 29/09/2004INITIATIVETITLEINITIATIVE STATUSNEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/RESPONSIBILITYTSTF NUMBER8bModify 50.36 Rule toPermit Removal orRelocation of Non Risk Significant Systems out of Technical Specifications Requires Rulemaking RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b withlonger term initiatives given the requirements forrulemaking. Approach favored by NEI and NRC is makingCriterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocatedeven if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).Not applicableBWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5}}
Preferred End States      guidance for TSTF-422 and        BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond    BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 TSTF-423.                        to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold.            BWOG - TSTF-431 R0
* TSTF-431 has been distributed to the BWOG and    WOG - TSTF-432 R0 the RITSTF for review.                          (Not created)
Page 2 of 2                                                              9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                          NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/    TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 2    Missed Surveillances
* TSTF-358, R6, has been
* Initiative Complete.          TSTF-358 R6 SR 3.0.3                  approved and published for CLIIP adoption.
3    Increase Flexibility in
* TSTF-359, R9, has been
* Initiative Complete.          TSTF-359 R9 Mode Restraints LCO        approved and published for 3.0.4                      CLIIP adoption.
* The final Implementation Guidance, NEI-03-10, was issued on September 5, 2003.
4a    Individual Risk
* Owners Groups (OGs) are
* Ongoing.                     TSTF-373 R2 (CEOG)
Informed Allowed          pursuing generic Risk Outage Times (AOTs)        Informed AOT extensions                                          TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG) through OG-specific Topicals and license                                            TSTF-417 R0 (WOG) amendments.
TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)
TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)
TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)
TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)
Page 3 of 2                                          9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE          TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                            NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                             TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 4b    Risk Informed AOTs    Hope Creek, Fort Calhoun,                                                                         TSTF-424 R0 With Configuration    South Texas Project, and Prairie
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address the Risk Management      Island have volunteered to                  interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Program or            develop pilot submittals.                  Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Maintenance Rule                                                  transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide Backstop              Fort Calhoun and South Texas                to NRC in October 2004.
Project have submitted their pilots.
* NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI.
* The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
* Current schedule is to provide responses to NRC and meet in 12/04.
5a    Relocate Surveillance
* Deterministic portion of
* TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.         None assigned Requirements Not            Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety          TSTF responsibility.
* TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.
5b    Relocate Surveillance
* RITSTF/BWROG/Pilot                                                                          TSTF-425 R0 Test Intervals to          Plant will be applying the
* NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings to Licensee Control            methodology and                      observe process.
interfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004.
* The Limerick lead plant license amendment was submitted on June 11, 2004.
* TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.
* NEI is preparing the methodology document for submittal to the NRC in 09/04.
Page 4 of 2                                                                  9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                        NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                         TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a    Modify LCO 3.0.3
* On hold.
* On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1                                        determine if Initiative 6a is required.
hour - 24 hours 6b    Provide Conditions in
* NRC issued Safety
* CEOG submitted revised version of Topical        TSTF-426 R0 the LCOs for Those       Evaluation for Topical            Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
Levels of Degradation     Report on 7/9/04.
Where No Condition
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report Currently Exists to
* TSTF-426 R0 was                  on 7/9/04.
Preclude Entry Into      submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3                8/30/2004.
* TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
* RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
6c    Provide Specific Times
* NRC issued Safety
* CEOG submitted revised version of Topical        TSTF-426 R0 in the LCO For Those     Evaluation for Topical            Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.
Conditions That           Report on 7/9/04.
Require Entry Into
* NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report LCO 3.0.3 Immediately
* TSTF-426 R0 was                  on 7/9/04.
submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.
* TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
* RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.
Page 5 of 2                                                              9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                        NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                       TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7a    Impact of Non
* TSTF-372, Rev. 4
* Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03. TSTF-372 R4 Technical Specification    submitted on 4/23/04.             NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed their Design Features on                                          comments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC     TSTF-427 R0 Operability
* TSTF-427 submitted on              on 4/23/04.
Requirements - Barriers  3/4/03.
* On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additional
* NRC provided comments            information to support review of TSTF-372. The on TSTF-427 on 6/26/03.          TSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04.
* NRC requested additional information in 7/04 and Industry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04.
* NRC plans FRN for Comment for TSTF 372 by 10/04.
* NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses on TSTF 427 in February 2004.
* TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to the definition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns.
* TSTF-427 implementation guidance being developed and will be provided to the NRC by 09/17/04.
* TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.
Page 6 of 2                                                            9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE        TITLE          INITIATIVE STATUS                          NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b    Impact of Non TS
* A White Paper on the
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the  None assigned Design Features on    process to address this scope        process to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04.
Operability            of SSCs is being developed.
Requirements - All
* RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented on other SSCs not in                                            the revised Operability guidance that will Technical                                                    supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18.
Specifications
* RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit to NRC by 12/04.
8a    Remove or Relocate
* A White Paper on the
* NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as the  None assigned Systems LCOs That Do    application of the 10 CFR            basis for Criterion 4 application.
Not Meet the 4          50.36 criteria is being Criterion of 10 CFR    developed.
* RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the 50.36 From Technical                                        guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 Specifications                                              for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -
current plans are fourth quarter 2004.
Page 7 of 2                                                                9/09/2004
 
RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE                TITLE            INITIATIVE STATUS                    NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/                           TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 8b          Modify 50.36 Rule to
* Requires Rulemaking
* RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with  Not applicable Permit Removal or                                        longer term initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk                                  rulemaking.
Significant Systems out of Technical
* Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications                                          Criterion 4 a two way door (e.g., if it doesnt meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).
BWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7 CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5 Page 8 of 2                                                                9/09/2004}}

Latest revision as of 00:55, 24 November 2019

Enclosure 4 Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force (RITSTF) Risk Management Technical Specification Initiative Status
ML042580010
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/15/2004
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/IROB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML042580006 List:
References
Download: ML042580010 (8)
v • d • e


Text

RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)

RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1 Technical Specification

  • Industry and NRC
  • A draft of the TSTF-422 implementation guidance BWOG - TSTF-431 R0 document was provided to the NRC for comment in 6/04. NRC provided comments on 7/9/04 and a WOG - TSTF-432 R0 revised document has been developed to address (Not created) these comments. The document will be submitted to NRC by 9/20/04.
  • NRC will attempt to issue TSTF 422 Notice for Comment and Availability in 2004.
  • TSTF-423 was submitted to the NRC on 8/12/03.
  • RITSTF provided draft responses to NRC comments on TSTF 423 at the 1/30/04 meeting.
  • A draft of the TSTF-423 implementation guidance document was provided to the NRC on 7/20/04.

The NRC had not provided any comments before the 9/9/04 meeting.

  • The NRC wants more information in the BWROG TSTF 423 Implementation Guidance.
  • Based on review of the CEOG TSTF 422 Implementation Guidance, the NRC will provide the scope of additional information they want to BWROG.

NEI RITSTF NEI Biff Bradley, 202 739-8083 WOG Jack Stringfellow, Southern Nuclear, 205 992-7037 CEOG Alan Hackerott, OPPD, 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo, 202 739-8081 Jim Andrachek, Westinghouse, 412 374-5018 Gary Chung, SCE, 949 368-9431 EXCEL/

TSTF Donald Hoffman, 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse, 412 374-4723 Ray Schneider, CE, 860 731-6461 EPRI Frank Rahn, 650 855-2037 BWOG Paul Infanger, Progress Energy, 352-563-4796 BWROG Rick Hill, GE, 408 925-5388 John Gaertner, 704 547-6169 R. Schomaker, Framatome, 434 832-2917 Dusty Rhoads, Energy Northwest, 509 377-4298 Mike Kitlan, Duke, 980 373-8348 Don McCamy, TVA 256 729-4595 Page 1 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 1 Technical Specification

  • Industry and NRC
  • BWOG Topical Report was submitted to NRC on CEOG - TSTF-422 R0 Required Actions developing implementation 1/19/04. The NRC provided an RAI on 6/29/04.

Preferred End States guidance for TSTF-422 and BWOG informed the NRC they could not respond BWROG - TSTF-423 R0 TSTF-423. to the RAI until early 2005, and the NRC has put review of the Topical Report on hold. BWOG - TSTF-431 R0

Page 2 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 2 Missed Surveillances

3 Increase Flexibility in

  • Initiative Complete. TSTF-359 R9 Mode Restraints LCO approved and published for 3.0.4 CLIIP adoption.
  • The final Implementation Guidance, NEI-03-10, was issued on September 5, 2003.

4a Individual Risk

  • Owners Groups (OGs) are

Informed Allowed pursuing generic Risk Outage Times (AOTs) Informed AOT extensions TSTF-409 R1 (CEOG) through OG-specific Topicals and license TSTF-417 R0 (WOG) amendments.

TSTF-430 R0 (BWOG)

TSTF-439 R1 (ALL OG)

TSTF-446 R0 (WOG)

TSTF-454 R0 (BWROG)

Page 3 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 4b Risk Informed AOTs Hope Creek, Fort Calhoun, TSTF-424 R0 With Configuration South Texas Project, and Prairie

  • RITSTF will develop a White Paper to address the Risk Management Island have volunteered to interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Program or develop pilot submittals. Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Maintenance Rule transition for ITS and non ITS plants and provide Backstop Fort Calhoun and South Texas to NRC in October 2004.

Project have submitted their pilots.

  • NRC provided 3 separate RAIs in 8/04 to NEI.
  • The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
  • Current schedule is to provide responses to NRC and meet in 12/04.

5a Relocate Surveillance

  • Deterministic portion of
  • TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated. None assigned Requirements Not Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety TSTF responsibility.
  • TSTF will provide a TSTF to the NRC by 12/04.

5b Relocate Surveillance

  • RITSTF/BWROG/Pilot TSTF-425 R0 Test Intervals to Plant will be applying the
  • NRC attended several Limerick IDP meetings to Licensee Control methodology and observe process.

interfacing with the NRC on the issues in 2004.

  • The Limerick lead plant license amendment was submitted on June 11, 2004.
  • TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.
  • NEI is preparing the methodology document for submittal to the NRC in 09/04.

Page 4 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3

  • On hold.
  • On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1 determine if Initiative 6a is required.

hour - 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 6b Provide Conditions in

  • NRC issued Safety
  • CEOG submitted revised version of Topical TSTF-426 R0 the LCOs for Those Evaluation for Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.

Levels of Degradation Report on 7/9/04.

Where No Condition

  • NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report Currently Exists to

Preclude Entry Into submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 8/30/2004.

  • TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
  • RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.

6c Provide Specific Times

  • NRC issued Safety
  • CEOG submitted revised version of Topical TSTF-426 R0 in the LCO For Those Evaluation for Topical Report to address NRC RAIs in 10/03.

Conditions That Report on 7/9/04.

Require Entry Into

  • NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report LCO 3.0.3 Immediately

submitted to the NRC on 8/30/2004.

  • TSTF-426 R0 was submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04.
  • RITSTF submit draft Implementation Guidance in 11/04.

Page 5 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7a Impact of Non

  • Draft Revision 4 of TSTF-372 created on 2/24/03. TSTF-372 R4 Technical Specification submitted on 4/23/04. NRC reviewed and agreed it addressed their Design Features on comments. TSTF-372, Rev. 4 submitted to NRC TSTF-427 R0 Operability

Requirements - Barriers 3/4/03.

  • On 5/28/04, the NRC requested additional
  • NRC provided comments information to support review of TSTF-372. The on TSTF-427 on 6/26/03. TSTF/RITSTF responded on 6/7/04.
  • NRC requested additional information in 7/04 and Industry/NEI responded with responses 9/7/04.
  • NRC provided feedback on RITSTF responses on TSTF 427 in February 2004.
  • TSTF/RITSTF will delete the additions to the definition of OPERABILITY for TSTF 427 to address NRC concerns.
  • TSTF-427 implementation guidance being developed and will be provided to the NRC by 09/17/04.
  • TSTF/RITSTF will provide a revision to TSTF-427 after completion of the implementation guidance document.

Page 6 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b Impact of Non TS

  • A White Paper on the
  • RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the None assigned Design Features on process to address this scope process to address this scope of SSCs by 10/04.

Operability of SSCs is being developed.

Requirements - All

  • RITSTF/TSTF reviewed and has commented on other SSCs not in the revised Operability guidance that will Technical supersede the guidance distributed with GL 91-18.

Specifications

  • RITSTF/TSTF will develop a TSTF and submit to NRC by 12/04.

8a Remove or Relocate

  • A White Paper on the
  • NEI 00-04 is being reviewed and will serve as the None assigned Systems LCOs That Do application of the 10 CFR basis for Criterion 4 application.

Not Meet the 4 50.36 criteria is being Criterion of 10 CFR developed.

  • RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the 50.36 From Technical guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-04 Specifications for the application of the four criteria of 10 CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for relocation. RITSTF working on the schedule -

current plans are fourth quarter 2004.

Page 7 of 2 9/09/2004

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 8b Modify 50.36 Rule to

  • Requires Rulemaking
  • RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or longer term initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk rulemaking.

Significant Systems out of Technical

  • Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications Criterion 4 a two way door (e.g., if it doesnt meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).

BWOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4 and 7 CEOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 6 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 WOG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, and 5 Page 8 of 2 9/09/2004

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML042580010&oldid=2199069"