05000250/FIN-2006002-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.2 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71111.2 | ||
| Inspector = S Vias, R Taylor, R Chou, S Stewart, T Kolbs, | | Inspector = S Vias, R Taylor, R Chou, S Stewart, T Kolbs, Viase Michel, H Gepford, J Kreh, G Kuzo, R Carrion, S Stewart, T Kolb, J Diaz, Velezr Baldwin | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The inspectors observed portions of the plant shutdown and cooldown in accordance with FPL procedure 3-GOP-305, Hot Standby to Cold Shutdown, to verify that cooldown restrictions and similar procedural requirements were followed. During the shutdown, while attempting to place the B loop of residual heat removal into shutdown cooling, the residual heat removal system injection valve, 3-MOV-744B, did not open when demanded. The licensee then placed the A loop of RHR in service and began an investigation to determine the cause of the failure. The initial results of the investigation identified that the motor had failed. However, at the end of the inspection period, additional inspection was needed to resolve this issue. Therefore, pending additional inspection this will remain open as unresolved item URI 50- 250/2006-02-02, Failure of MOV-3-744B to open when demanded on March 7, 2006. | | description = The inspectors observed portions of the plant shutdown and cooldown in accordance with FPL procedure 3-GOP-305, Hot Standby to Cold Shutdown, to verify that cooldown restrictions and similar procedural requirements were followed. During the shutdown, while attempting to place the B loop of residual heat removal into shutdown cooling, the residual heat removal system injection valve, 3-MOV-744B, did not open when demanded. The licensee then placed the A loop of RHR in service and began an investigation to determine the cause of the failure. The initial results of the investigation identified that the motor had failed. However, at the end of the inspection period, additional inspection was needed to resolve this issue. Therefore, pending additional inspection this will remain open as unresolved item URI 50- 250/2006-02-02, Failure of MOV-3-744B to open when demanded on March 7, 2006. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000250/2006002 Section 1R20 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2006 (2006Q1) |
| Type: | URI: Severity level Enforcement Discretion |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.2 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | S Vias R Taylor R Chou S Stewart T Kolbs Viase Michel H Gepford J Kreh G Kuzo R Carrion S Stewart T Kolb J Diaz Velezr Baldwin |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |