ML18262A398: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05200026
| docket = 05200026
| license number = NPF-092
| license number = NPF-092
| contact person = Cozens I A
| contact person = Cozens I
| case reference number = ITAAC 2.6.09.08
| case reference number = ITAAC 2.6.09.08
| document type = ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (VEF)
| document type = ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (VEF)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC) Page 1 of 2 A Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to a n uncompleted ITAAC notification (UIN) review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.
{{#Wiki_filter:UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC)
Docket No:
A Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an uncompleted ITAAC notification (UIN) review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.
5200026 Plant Name
Docket No:           5200026                             Plant Name:         Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License Licensee Name:       Southern Nuclear Operating         Combined            NPF-92 Company, Inc                       License No:
: Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License Licensee Name:
ITAAC ID No:         2.6.09.08                           ITAAC Type:         Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or       17C enter N/A:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc Combined License No:
Uncompleted ITAAC Notification (UIN) ADAMS ML No:                           ML18211A622 Name of Lead Reviewer:                                                       Cozens, Ian Name of Technical Reviewer assigned to UIN Review based on an affirmative response to statement f below:
NPF-92 ITAAC ID No:
Name of the Technical Reviewer:                     Frost, John Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.
2.6.09.08 ITAAC Type:
: a.       Yes     The UIN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or enter N/A:
: b.       Yes     The ITAAC as stated in the UIN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
17C  Uncompleted ITAAC Notification (UIN)
: c.       Yes     NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Completion Description (ICD) of the UIN contains sufficient information, including summarizing the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee will successfully perform the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC if the licensee uses the methodology described in the UIN.
ADAMS ML No
The methodology described in the ICD of the UIN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.
: ML18211A622 Name of Lead Reviewer
: d.       Yes     NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ICD of the UIN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee will be able to show that it has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC if it performs the ITAAC as stated in the UIN.
: Cozens, Ian Name of Technical Reviewer assigned to UIN Review based on an affirmative response to statement "f" below:
: e.       N/A     For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the UIN indicates that the Page 1 of 2
Name of the Technical Reviewer:
 
Frost, John Enter "Yes" in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, "No" if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and "N/A" if the statement is not applicable.
UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC) inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC are being performed at location(s) other than the final installed location, then the UIN, based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarizes a technical justification or provides a reference to a generic technical justification in the ICD of the UIN that establishes why it is acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC is not being performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]
: a. Yes The UIN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plant's docket number.
: f.     Yes     An additional reviewer was assigned to the UIN review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required If the NRC reviewers determine that a UIN has sufficient information, this is based on the UINs description of the proposed methodology for completing the ITAAC. The UIN review is not based on consideration of actual performance of the ITAAC, the acceptance criteria results, the completion of NRC inspections, or the resolution of NRC inspection findings, if any. These matters will be addressed during the NRCs review of the later ITAAC closure notification (ICN) for that ITAAC. The NRC staff plans to rely on a UIN review in its review of the later ICN to the extent that the ITAAC completion methods described in the UIN and ICN are the same, subject to new information that might arise between the UIN and ICN reviews.
: b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the UIN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian                                                           Date: 8/19/2018 Lead Approver: Gaslevic, James                                                       Date: 8/20/2018 Licensing PM: Hoellman, Jordan Technical Reviewer: Frost, John                                                       Date: 8/9/2018 Technical Approver:     Rivera, Alison                                               Date: 8/9/2018 Page 2 of 2}}
: c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Completion Description (ICD) of the UIN contains sufficient information, including summarizing the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee will successfully perform the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC if the licensee uses the methodology described in the UIN. The methodology described in the ICD of the UIN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.
: d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ICD of the UIN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee will be able to show that it has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC if it performs the ITAAC as stated in the UIN.
: e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on "as
-built" structures, systems, or components (SSCs):   If the UIN indicates that the UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC) Page 2 of 2 inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC are being performed at location(s) other than the final installed location, then the UIN, based on the guidance in NEI 08
-01 either summarizes a technical justification or provides a reference to a generic technical justification in the ICD of the UIN that establishes why it is acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC is not being performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as "as
-built."] f. Yes An additional reviewer was assigned to the UIN review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required If the NRC reviewers determine that a UIN has sufficient information, this is based on the UIN's description of the proposed methodology for completing the ITAAC. The UIN review is not based on consideration of actual performance of the ITAAC, the acceptance criteria results, the completion of NRC inspections, or the resolution of NRC inspection findings, if any. These matters will be addressed during the NRC's review of the later ITAAC closure notification (ICN) for that ITAAC. The NRC staff plans to rely on a UIN review in its review of the later ICN to the extent that the ITAAC completion methods described in the UIN and ICN are the same, subject to new information that might arise between the UIN and ICN reviews.
Lead Reviewer:
Cozens, Ian Date: 8/19/2018 Lead Approver:
Gaslevic, James Date: 8/20/2018 Licensing PM:
Hoellman, Jordan Technical Reviewer:
Frost, John Date: 8/9/2018 Technical Approver:   Rivera, Alison Date: 8/9/2018}}

Latest revision as of 14:29, 20 October 2019

Uncompleted ITAAC Notification Checklist (UINC) 2.6.09.08 for ITAAC (Index No. 650) for Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License (VOG4)
ML18262A398
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/19/2018
From:
Human Performance, Operator Licensing & ITAAC Branch
To:
Cozens I
References
ITAAC 2.6.09.08
Download: ML18262A398 (2)
v • d • e


Text

UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC)

A Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an uncompleted ITAAC notification (UIN) review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200026 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-92 Company, Inc License No:

ITAAC ID No: 2.6.09.08 ITAAC Type: Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or 17C enter N/A:

Uncompleted ITAAC Notification (UIN) ADAMS ML No: ML18211A622 Name of Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian Name of Technical Reviewer assigned to UIN Review based on an affirmative response to statement f below:

Name of the Technical Reviewer: Frost, John Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The UIN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the UIN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Completion Description (ICD) of the UIN contains sufficient information, including summarizing the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee will successfully perform the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC if the licensee uses the methodology described in the UIN.

The methodology described in the ICD of the UIN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.

d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ICD of the UIN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee will be able to show that it has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC if it performs the ITAAC as stated in the UIN.
e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the UIN indicates that the Page 1 of 2

UNCOMPLETED ITAAC NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST (UINC) inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC are being performed at location(s) other than the final installed location, then the UIN, based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarizes a technical justification or provides a reference to a generic technical justification in the ICD of the UIN that establishes why it is acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC is not being performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]

f. Yes An additional reviewer was assigned to the UIN review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required If the NRC reviewers determine that a UIN has sufficient information, this is based on the UINs description of the proposed methodology for completing the ITAAC. The UIN review is not based on consideration of actual performance of the ITAAC, the acceptance criteria results, the completion of NRC inspections, or the resolution of NRC inspection findings, if any. These matters will be addressed during the NRCs review of the later ITAAC closure notification (ICN) for that ITAAC. The NRC staff plans to rely on a UIN review in its review of the later ICN to the extent that the ITAAC completion methods described in the UIN and ICN are the same, subject to new information that might arise between the UIN and ICN reviews.

Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian Date: 8/19/2018 Lead Approver: Gaslevic, James Date: 8/20/2018 Licensing PM: Hoellman, Jordan Technical Reviewer: Frost, John Date: 8/9/2018 Technical Approver: Rivera, Alison Date: 8/9/2018 Page 2 of 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18262A398&oldid=1922465"