ML18142A546: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18142A546 | | number = ML18142A546 | ||
| issue date = 06/14/1985 | | issue date = 06/14/1985 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-280/85-13 & 50-281/85-13.Violation Denied.Contaminated Piping Insulation Found in Posted Radioactive Matls Area & Contact Radiation Level Written on Protective Wrapping | ||
| author name = | | author name = Stewart W | ||
| author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) | | author affiliation = VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = Grace J | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) | | addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) | ||
| docket = 05000280, 05000281 | | docket = 05000280, 05000281 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = 85-383, NUDOCS 8507100564 | | document report number = 85-383, NUDOCS 8507100564 | ||
| title reference date = 05-16-1985 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:** | {{#Wiki_filter:** | ||
June 14, 1985 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator | W'lLLMM L S7Hf1ART Vice President Nuclear Operations June 14, 1985 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Gentlemen: | ||
Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | Serial No. | ||
Commission | NO/HLM:dn Docket Nos. | ||
101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Gentlemen: | License Nos. | ||
Serial No. NO/HLM:dn | Nuclear Operations Department Post Office Box 26666 One James River Plaza Richmond, Virginia 23261 VIRGINIA POWER 85-383 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of May 16, 1985 in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station on April 15 -19, 1985, and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/~and 50-281/85-13. Our response to the specific violation is attached. | ||
Docket Nos. License Nos. Nuclear Operations | We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report. | ||
Department | Accordingly, Virginia Power has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public disclosure. | ||
Post Office Box 26666 One James River Plaza Richmond, Virginia 23261 | The information contained in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. | ||
to the inspection | Very truly yours, Attachment cc: | ||
conducted | Cw/attachment) | ||
at Surry Power Station on April 15 -19, 1985, and reported in IE Inspection | Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Mr. D. J. Burke NRC Resident Inspector Surry Power Station | ||
Report Nos. 50-280/~and | -- -- ~, | ||
50-281/85-13. | ,.,----8507i00564 85060014280 | ||
Our response to the specific violation | ~DR ADOCK 050 PDR | ||
is attached. | |||
We have determined | 11"111 VIOLATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/85-13 and 50-281/85-13 | ||
that no proprietary | , 10 CFR 20. 203 (f) requires each container of licensed material to bear a visible label identifying the radioactive contents. The label shall bear the radiation caution symbol and the words "CAUTION RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL" and shall provide sufficient information to permit individuals handling or using the containers or work-ing in the vicinity thereof, to take precautions to avoid or minimize exposures. | ||
information | Contrary to the above, on April 16, 1985, a piece of p1p1ng insulation wrapped in yellow herculite measuring 30mr/hr on contact was determined to contain a quantity of radioactive material greater than that listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix C, and the wrapping over the insulation did not display the radiation caution symbol or the words "Caution" or "Danger"- | ||
is contained | "Radioactive Material." | ||
in the report. Accordingly, Virginia Power has no objection | This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement IV). | ||
to this inspection | |||
report being made a matter of public disclosure. | ===RESPONSE=== | ||
The information | (1) | ||
contained | ADMISSION OR DENIAL OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION The alleged violation is denied. | ||
in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge | Our reason for denial is as follows: | ||
and belief. Very truly yours, Attachment | The radioactively contaminated piping insulation referred to in the violation was located inside the reactor containment building which is a posted* radioactive materials area. | ||
cc: Cw/attachment) | The insulation had been removed from a reactor coolant system component to facilitate inspection activities and was wrapped in yellow herculite to afford personnel protection during movement and to minimize the potential for spread of contamination. | ||
Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating | The insulation was temporarily stored in the pressurizer cubicle behind a posted rope barrier and the contact radiation level was written on the wrapping. | ||
Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing | The use of protective wrappings for contamination control is a radiological work practice employed in* many situations when material with loose surface or internal contamination must be handled or when work is being conducted nearby. | ||
Mr. D. J. Burke NRC Resident Inspector | The wrapping reduces contamination hazards (both to the skin and through reduction in the generation of airborne radioactivity) to workers and aides in the maintenance of contamination level boundaries. | ||
Surry Power Station | Personnel working within established radioactive material areas are provided with and required to use appropriate radiation protection equipment (e.g., protective clothing, respirators, survey instruments, etc.). | ||
85060014280 | In addition, workers are trained in the various contamination control practices utilized at the station. | ||
~DR ADOCK 050 PDR | Wrappings, coverings and enclosures | ||
11"111 | |||
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION | employed in controlling contamination are not intended to serve as containers in areas where the presence of radioactive material is incident to the work environment. | ||
INSPECTION | (2) | ||
REPORT NOS. 50-280/85-13 | REASONS FOR VIOLATION Not applicable. | ||
and 50-281/85-13 , 10 CFR 20. 203 (f) requires each container | (3) | ||
of licensed material to bear a visible label identifying | CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED Not applicable. | ||
the radioactive | (4) | ||
contents. | CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN<TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS Not applicable. | ||
The label shall bear the radiation | (5) | ||
caution symbol and the words "CAUTION | DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WAS.ACHIEVED. | ||
MATERIAL" and shall provide sufficient | Not applicable. | ||
information | Under the circumstances described in Section 1 of this response, we consider that we were in full compliance with the requirments of 10CFR20.203.}} | ||
to permit individuals | |||
handling or using the containers | |||
or work-ing in the vicinity thereof, to take precautions | |||
to avoid or minimize exposures. | |||
Contrary to the above, on April 16, 1985, a piece of p1p1ng insulation | |||
wrapped in yellow herculite | |||
measuring | |||
30mr/hr on contact was determined | |||
to contain a quantity of radioactive | |||
material greater than that listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix C, and the wrapping over the insulation | |||
did not display the radiation | |||
caution symbol or the words "Caution" or "Radioactive | |||
Material." This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement | |||
IV). RESPONSE (1) ADMISSION | |||
OR DENIAL OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION | |||
is denied. Our reason for denial is as follows: The radioactively | |||
contaminated | |||
piping insulation | |||
referred to in the violation | |||
was located inside the reactor containment | |||
building which is a posted* radioactive | |||
materials | |||
area. The insulation | |||
had been removed from a reactor coolant system component | |||
to facilitate | |||
inspection | |||
activities | |||
and was wrapped in yellow herculite | |||
to afford personnel | |||
protection | |||
during movement and to minimize the potential | |||
for spread of contamination. | |||
The insulation | |||
was temporarily | |||
stored in the pressurizer | |||
cubicle behind a posted rope barrier and the contact radiation | |||
level was written on the wrapping. | |||
The use of protective | |||
wrappings | |||
for contamination | |||
control is a radiological | |||
work practice employed in* many situations | |||
when material with loose surface or internal contamination | |||
must be handled or when work is being conducted | |||
nearby. The wrapping reduces contamination | |||
hazards (both to the skin and through reduction | |||
in the generation | |||
of airborne radioactivity) | |||
to workers and aides in the maintenance | |||
of contamination | |||
level boundaries. | |||
Personnel | |||
working within established | |||
radioactive | |||
material areas are provided with and required to use appropriate | |||
radiation | |||
protection | |||
equipment (e.g., protective | |||
clothing, respirators, survey instruments, etc.). In addition, workers are trained in the various contamination | |||
control practices | |||
utilized at the station. Wrappings, coverings | |||
and enclosures | |||
contamination | |||
are not intended to serve as containers | |||
in areas where the presence of radioactive | |||
material is incident to the work environment. | |||
(2) REASONS FOR VIOLATION | |||
Not applicable. | |||
(3) CORRECTIVE | |||
STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED Not applicable. | |||
(4) CORRECTIVE | |||
STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN<TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS | |||
Not applicable. | |||
(5) DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE | |||
WAS.ACHIEVED. | |||
Not applicable. | |||
Under the circumstances | |||
described | |||
in Section 1 of this response, we consider that we were in full compliance | |||
with the requirments | |||
of 10CFR20.203 . | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 5 January 2025
| ML18142A546 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry |
| Issue date: | 06/14/1985 |
| From: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 85-383, NUDOCS 8507100564 | |
| Download: ML18142A546 (3) | |
Text
W'lLLMM L S7Hf1ART Vice President Nuclear Operations June 14, 1985 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Gentlemen:
Serial No.
NO/HLM:dn Docket Nos.
License Nos.
Nuclear Operations Department Post Office Box 26666 One James River Plaza Richmond, Virginia 23261 VIRGINIA POWER 85-383 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of May 16, 1985 in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station on April 15 -19, 1985, and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/~and 50-281/85-13. Our response to the specific violation is attached.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report.
Accordingly, Virginia Power has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public disclosure.
The information contained in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Very truly yours, Attachment cc:
Cw/attachment)
Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Mr. D. J. Burke NRC Resident Inspector Surry Power Station
-- -- ~,
,.,----8507i00564 85060014280
~DR ADOCK 050 PDR
11"111 VIOLATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/85-13 and 50-281/85-13
, 10 CFR 20. 203 (f) requires each container of licensed material to bear a visible label identifying the radioactive contents. The label shall bear the radiation caution symbol and the words "CAUTION RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL" and shall provide sufficient information to permit individuals handling or using the containers or work-ing in the vicinity thereof, to take precautions to avoid or minimize exposures.
Contrary to the above, on April 16, 1985, a piece of p1p1ng insulation wrapped in yellow herculite measuring 30mr/hr on contact was determined to contain a quantity of radioactive material greater than that listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix C, and the wrapping over the insulation did not display the radiation caution symbol or the words "Caution" or "Danger"-
"Radioactive Material."
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement IV).
RESPONSE
(1)
ADMISSION OR DENIAL OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION The alleged violation is denied.
Our reason for denial is as follows:
The radioactively contaminated piping insulation referred to in the violation was located inside the reactor containment building which is a posted* radioactive materials area.
The insulation had been removed from a reactor coolant system component to facilitate inspection activities and was wrapped in yellow herculite to afford personnel protection during movement and to minimize the potential for spread of contamination.
The insulation was temporarily stored in the pressurizer cubicle behind a posted rope barrier and the contact radiation level was written on the wrapping.
The use of protective wrappings for contamination control is a radiological work practice employed in* many situations when material with loose surface or internal contamination must be handled or when work is being conducted nearby.
The wrapping reduces contamination hazards (both to the skin and through reduction in the generation of airborne radioactivity) to workers and aides in the maintenance of contamination level boundaries.
Personnel working within established radioactive material areas are provided with and required to use appropriate radiation protection equipment (e.g., protective clothing, respirators, survey instruments, etc.).
In addition, workers are trained in the various contamination control practices utilized at the station.
Wrappings, coverings and enclosures
employed in controlling contamination are not intended to serve as containers in areas where the presence of radioactive material is incident to the work environment.
(2)
REASONS FOR VIOLATION Not applicable.
(3)
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED Not applicable.
(4)
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN<TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS Not applicable.
(5)
DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WAS.ACHIEVED.
Not applicable.
Under the circumstances described in Section 1 of this response, we consider that we were in full compliance with the requirments of 10CFR20.203.