ML11341A106: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003)11/30/2011 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:00pm NAME OF PERSON(S) | {{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003) 11/30/2011 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:00pm NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Gordon Clefton. et. al. D VISIT ORGANIZATION CONFERENCE Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) | ||
CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Gordon Clefton. et. al. D VISIT ORGANIZATION CONFERENCE Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)SUBJECT | TELEPHONE SUBJECT Preparation for the December 15, 2011, ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on the 10 CFR 50.46c D INCOMING Proposed Rule D OUTGOING | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
(Continue on Page 2) | |||
Gordon Clefton TVA Participant: | NEI Participant: Gordon Clefton TVA Participant: Tom Eichenberg NRC | ||
Tom Eichenberg NRC Participants: | |||
==Participants:== | |||
Paul Clifford, Tara Inverso The purpose of the call was to prepare for the December 15, 2011, ACRS subcommittee meeting on the 10 CFR 50.46c proposed rule. The teleconference participants discussed what information should be contained in the presentations which cover the BWR and PWR owners' groups reports. NRC staff explained that the presentation should summarize what was done on a generic basis, describe how the groups were binned, etc. The information in the presentations should be non-proprietary. | Paul Clifford, Tara Inverso The purpose of the call was to prepare for the December 15, 2011, ACRS subcommittee meeting on the 10 CFR 50.46c proposed rule. The teleconference participants discussed what information should be contained in the presentations which cover the BWR and PWR owners' groups reports. NRC staff explained that the presentation should summarize what was done on a generic basis, describe how the groups were binned, etc. The information in the presentations should be non-proprietary. | ||
The participants then discussed the status of the proprietary scrub of the audit report associated with the owners' groups submittals. | The participants then discussed the status of the proprietary scrub of the audit report associated with the owners' groups submittals. The participants agreed that it would be useful to have a publicly available version of the report available by the December 15th meeting. | ||
The participants agreed that it would be useful to have a publicly available version of the report available by the December 15th meeting.The participants then discussed how proprietary questions asked by ACRS would be handled. NRC staff explained that ACRS will likely hold all proprietary questions (if any) until the end of the meeting for a short closed session.The participants briefly discussed the meaning of "compliance demonstration" within the publicly available 50.46c preliminary draft proposed rule language. | The participants then discussed how proprietary questions asked by ACRS would be handled. NRC staff explained that ACRS will likely hold all proprietary questions (if any) until the end of the meeting for a short closed session. | ||
NRC staff will elaborate on the meaning of "compliance demonstration" during the December 15th presentation. | The participants briefly discussed the meaning of "compliance demonstration" within the publicly available 50.46c preliminary draft proposed rule language. NRC staff will elaborate on the meaning of "compliance demonstration" during the December 15th presentation. | ||
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATYRE DATE Tara Inverso A 12/01/2011 ACTION TAKEN None TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003)PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER}} | Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATYRE DATE Tara Inverso A 12/01/2011 ACTION TAKEN None TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:05, 6 December 2019
| ML11341A106 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/30/2011 |
| From: | Tara Inverso Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
| To: | Clefton G Nuclear Energy Institute, Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| Download: ML11341A106 (1) | |
Text
Page 1 NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE (9-2003) 11/30/2011 CONVERSATION RECORD TIME 2:00pm NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU TELEPHONE NO. TYPE OF CONVERSATION Gordon Clefton. et. al. D VISIT ORGANIZATION CONFERENCE Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
TELEPHONE SUBJECT Preparation for the December 15, 2011, ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on the 10 CFR 50.46c D INCOMING Proposed Rule D OUTGOING
SUMMARY
(Continue on Page 2)
NEI Participant: Gordon Clefton TVA Participant: Tom Eichenberg NRC
Participants:
Paul Clifford, Tara Inverso The purpose of the call was to prepare for the December 15, 2011, ACRS subcommittee meeting on the 10 CFR 50.46c proposed rule. The teleconference participants discussed what information should be contained in the presentations which cover the BWR and PWR owners' groups reports. NRC staff explained that the presentation should summarize what was done on a generic basis, describe how the groups were binned, etc. The information in the presentations should be non-proprietary.
The participants then discussed the status of the proprietary scrub of the audit report associated with the owners' groups submittals. The participants agreed that it would be useful to have a publicly available version of the report available by the December 15th meeting.
The participants then discussed how proprietary questions asked by ACRS would be handled. NRC staff explained that ACRS will likely hold all proprietary questions (if any) until the end of the meeting for a short closed session.
The participants briefly discussed the meaning of "compliance demonstration" within the publicly available 50.46c preliminary draft proposed rule language. NRC staff will elaborate on the meaning of "compliance demonstration" during the December 15th presentation.
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED None NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIGNATYRE DATE Tara Inverso A 12/01/2011 ACTION TAKEN None TITLE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACTION DATE NRC FORM 699 (9-2003) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER