ML092020052: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:43, 25 August 2018

E-mail from R. Conte of Usnrc to A. Stone of Usnrc, Regarding Additional Q&A
ML092020052
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 01/21/2009
From: Conte R J
NRC Region 1
To: Stone A M
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070
Download: ML092020052 (2)


Text

Sarah Rich From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Richard Conte , P-S Wednesday, January 21, 2009 11:32 AM AnnMarie Stone John Richmond; Michael Modes; Doug Tifft RE: additional Q&A C-I.(b)(5)From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:42 AM To: Doug Tifft; Richard Barkley Cc: John Richmond; Richard Conte

Subject:

RE: additional Q&A Good idea to capture our position in a Q&A ... the problem is: what is our position?(b)(5)From: Doug -ifft Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 9:20 AM To: Richard Barkley Cc: John Richmond; Richard Conte; Michael Modes

Subject:

additional Q&A Inbffan in this record was deleted If, aordance with theFredom of iintmef Ac Exemp t'-1 FQIN 52-0041 1 Al/I)

Rich, We need to add an additional Q&A on this article: http:/Irl2k3web.nrc.qov/headlines/OCProtect.1-16-2009.pdf Specifically, the part where she states that the exit meeting was closed to the public I recommend:

Q: Why was the December exit meeting closed to the public?A: Meetings open to the public are held throughout the license renewal process including after the 71002 license renewal inspection.

Although this exit meeting was not open to the public, the inspection report contains all the information that was discussed during the December exit meeting.Any comments/suggestions?-Doug 2