ML12338A440

Official Exhibit - ENT000066-00-BD01 - Engineering Calculation Process, EN-DC-126, Rev. 4

ML12338A440
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	03/28/2012
From:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22102, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 EN-DC-126, Rev 4
Download: ML12338A440 (36)

Text

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 1 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process Procedure Contains NMM eB REFLIB Forms:

YES NO Effective Date Procedure Owner:

Title: Site: Norm Eisenmann Supervisor I&C

PNP Governance Owner:

Title:

Site: Oscar Limpias VP Engineering HQN 1/31/2011 Exception Date* Site Site Procedure Champion Title ANO B.J. Daiber Manager, Design Eng N/A BRP GGNS Doug Jones Manager, Design Eng IPEC T. S. McCaffrey Manager, Design Eng JAF V.P. Bacanskas Manager, Design Eng PLP B. Kemp Manager, Design Eng PNPS T. F. White Manager, Design Eng RBS F.W.

Corley Acting Manager, Design

Eng VY J. Rogers Manager, Design Eng W3 B. Lanka Manager, Design Eng NP G. Zinke Manager, New Plant HQN Luis Terrazas Manager, Prgm. & Comp Site and NMM Procedures Canceled or Superseded By This Revision Process Applicability Exclusion)

All Sites:

Specific Sites: ANO BRP GGNS IPEC JAF PLP PNPS RBS VY W3 Change Statement The following editorial changes have been made. 1. Title Page: Removed NP from the Process Applicability Exclusion per EN-AD-101-01 page 10. 2. Multiple sections: Removed the bold/underlined/capital letters per EN-AD-101-01 page 9. 3. Section 5.3[4] and Attachment 9.1 Section 6: Added a specific discussion on margin, which is inherent in preparing calculations, per LO-WTHQN-2009-233 CA160, LO-WT-2008-57 CA124, LO-WTHQN-2008-57 CA227, CR-JAF-2010-390 CA13, and comments from ANO and GGNS. 4. Sections 5.3[3] and 5.10[2](a): deleted sentence regarding Interdiscipline ECs per LO-WTHQN-2008-57 CA174. 5. Added Section 5.2[13[ to provide a prompt to perform walkdowns if warranted per LO-WTHQN-2008-57 CA227. 6. Section 6.0 deleted EN-DC-118 and added EN-DC-195. 7. Enhanced Attachment 9.1, Section 10.0, Attachment, to attach any references to the calculation that are not readily retrievable. 8. Section 5.3[8]: Provided clarification regarding other calculations that may be impacted and the associated EC per comments from ANO.

• Requires justification for the exception ENT000066 Submitted: March 28, 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

ASLBP #:07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #:05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:

Identified:

Admitted: Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken: Other: ENT000066-00-BD01 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 2 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process

_________________________________________________________________________

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................ 3

2.0 REFERENCES

..................................................................................... 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................... 4 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................ 8 5.0 DETAILS .......................................................................................... 11 6.0 INTERFACES

..................................................................................... 24 7.0 RECORDS .......................................................................................... 25 8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS ...................................................... 25 9.0 ATTACHMENTS

................................................................................ 26 A TTACHMENT 9.1 E NGINEERING C ALCULATION FORMAT

................................... 27 A TTACHMENT 9.2 E NGINEERING C ALCULATION C OVER PAGE ........................... 30 A TTACHMENT 9.3 C ALCULATION R EFERENCE S HEET ....................................... 32 A TTACHMENT 9.4 R ECORD OF R EVISION ......................................................... 35 A TTACHMENT 9.5 N EW P LANT C ALCULATION P REPARATION ............................ 36 N EW P LANT C ALCULATION P REPARATION ............................................................ 36

_________________________________________________________________

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 3 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 1.0 PURPOSE

[QAPM B.2] [QAPM B.3] [QAPM B.14][N45.2.11] [NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3] [NP QAPD, Part II, Section 6] [NP QAPD, Part III, Section 1.3] [NP QAPD, Part III, Section 1.6] [NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, Basic Requirement(BR) 3 and Supplement 3S-1] [NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, BR 6 and Supplement 6S-1]

[1] This procedure provides a single process governing preparation, revision, review, approval and use of engineering calculations. [2] This procedure is applicable to the Entergy Nuclear Engineering and Business Development New Plant engineering organizations. Calculations prepared by contractors and vendors working under the Entergy QA program should be developed in accordance with this procedure. Calculations developed by vendors under their QA

program may be reviewed and approved by Entergy in accordance with this

procedure. [3] This procedure is applicable to all Engineering functions requiring the preparation of quality related calculations as defined in this procedure. This procedure may be

applied to new non-quality related calculations at the discretion of the Responsible

Supervisor. Existing non-quality calculations that were developed in accordance with

this procedure or its predecessors should continue to use this procedure. [4] This procedure is not applicable to calculations/calculation changes that were developed prior to issuance of this procedure. However, changes or revisions to

existing calculations/calculation changes should be processed per this procedure. [5] Calculations that are controlled by other site procedures are not required to adhere to this procedure. Minor computations, such as minor arithmetic functions performed

within surveillance procedures which do not affect the design basis and that are controlled by other plant procedures, are not required to adhere to this procedure.

[6] [NP] Pending changes or revisions are not utilized in New Plant design activities.

Calculations associated with New Plant activities become effective immediately on

approval.

2.0 REFERENCES

[1] 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants. [2] ANSI N45.2.10, Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions, site committed revision [3] ANSI N45.2.11, Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants, site committed revision [4] ANSI N18.7, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants, site committed revision.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 4 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 2.0 cont [5] Regulatory Guide 1.64, Quality Assurance Requirements for Design of Nuclear Power Plants, site committed revision. [6] Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual (QAPM)

[7] [NP] ASME NQA-1-1994, Quality Assurance Requirement for Nuclear Facility Applications

[8] [NP] Entergy New Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD) 3.0 DEFINITIONS [1] As - Built - The state of any document that reflects the actual physically installed configuration. When an associated Engineering Change reaches Modified or Closed status, then the Engineering Change Markup is considered As-Built.

[2] Assumption - the supposition of plant configuration or station procedures that exists but has no documented supporting design basis. There are two types of

assumptions:

Those based on reasonableness, generally backed by similar configurations or practices that are backed by design basis or engineering judgment.

Those that have no design basis but can be conveyed as calculation output in the form of a qualifying or conditional statement such as The results of this calculation

are valid if the following maintenance acceptance criteria are met. The calculation

then becomes the design basis for the assumed configuration or station practice. [3] Augmented Quality Related - Structures, Systems and Components (SSC) have been designated as requiring additional quality level oversight or as Important to Safety.

This designation is an optional subset of the classification category non-safety related. It may be applied to any item that is subject to non-safety related regulatory requirements or special requirements imposed by the utility. The scope of the

classification category is station specific. [

QAPM Section A.1.c]

[NP QAPD, Part II, Section 2]

[4] Calculation - A design analysis performed in an orderly process using appropriate design inputs and methodology to provide an original result or conclusion. Calculations are design process implementing documents that ensure the applicable design inputs are correctly translated into design outputs.

A calculation may be utilized, as necessary, to provide support, basis, and/or justification for existing design, proposed design, preliminary design studies, regulatory/licensing basis, etc., and to establish parameters for equipment

performance.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 5 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 3.0 cont [5] Calculation Change

- An amendment to an approved calculation made via an Engineering Change Markup. These changes supplement the calculation to reflect installed/implemented configuration changes or approved (but not

installed/implemented) configuration changes. A Calculation Change does not

represent plant configuration until the associated Engineering Change reaches Modified or Closed status. At this point, the calculation change is considered As-

Built. A Calculation Change will be referred to as an Engineering Change Markup throughout this procedure. Calculation changes are not applicable to processing

calculations associated with the New Plant organization.

[6] Design - Technical and management processes which commence with the identification of criterion and which lead to and include the issuance of final design

documents.

[ANSI N45.2.11-1974] [

NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, Introduction, Section 4]

[7] Design Basis

- Information that identifies the specific functions to be performed by a structure, system, or component of a facility, and the specific values or ranges of

values chosen for controlling parameters as reference bounds for design. (a) These values may be: (1) Restraints derived from generally accepted state of the art practices for achieving functional goals, or (2) Requirements derived from analysis (based on calculation and/or experiments) of the effects of a postulated accident for which a structure, system or component must meet its functional goals

(10CFR50.2). [8] Design Basis Calculation - Calculations that represent design basis information, which is required to construct, test and operate facility systems, structures, components

and/or software. [9] Design Basis Document

- The encapsulation or summary of system or topical information that relates to design bases as defined by 10 CFR 50.2 and engineering

design bases. These documents serve to delineate the design intent, and either

directly incorporates the related design documentation or are a directory to relate

design documentation (e.g., Calculations and analyses). (NUREG-1397) [10] Design Input - Those criteria, parameters, bases or other design requirements upon which detailed final design is based.

[ANSI N45.2.11-1974]

[NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, Introduction, Section 4].

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 6 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 3.0 cont [11] Design Output - Drawings, specifications and other documents defining technical requirements of structures, systems and components. (ANSI N45.2.11-1974). The design output of calculations not only includes the results of the calculation, but the

conditions identified as configuration or plant practice assumptions that support the

calculation results.

[12] [NP] Design Output - Drawings, specifications, and other documents used to define technical requirements of structures, systems, components and computer programs.

[NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, Introduction, Section 4]. [13] Design Verification (DV) - The process of reviewing, confirming, or substantiating the design by one or more methods to provide assurance that the design meets the

specified design inputs. (Adapted from ANSI N45.2.11) [14] Editorial Change

- Minor document /database corrections which do not represent a change to the technical content. Examples include: correcting typographical errors, correcting references to figures, sections, documents, etc., revision to improve grammar or clarity, revision to modify nonessential information. [15] Engineering Change (EC)

- Any change to a structure, system or component including design changes, document only changes and equivalent changes. [16] Engineering Change Markup (EC markup)

- A document used to change controlled Engineering documents and tracked by an Engineering Change. [17] Electronic Data Management System (EDMS)

- The primary system used to provide records and current revision information to personnel, including indexing and imaging

of Lifetime and Nonpermanent Quality Assurance Records. [18] Engineering Judgment - Decisions needed to perform evaluations based on the appropriate knowledge and experience of personnel performing the evaluation.

Engineering judgment should be avoided and is typically used in lieu of specific calculational or other engineering methods to support a value, conclusion, etc. The main consideration is whether other similarly experienced engineers would readily reach the same conclusion. The basis for engineering judgment must be documented

in the body of the calculation and is generally classified as an assumption. [19] INDUS Asset Suite (IAS) - The INDUS software product used by the Entergy operating fleet for Work Management, Document Management, Engineering Change, Action Tracking and Supply Chain (includes Material Control, Inventory Control, Contract Management, Accounts Payable, Procurement Engineering and

Purchasing).

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 7 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 3.0 cont [20] Native Files

- The electronic files (Word, Excel, etc.) the responsible engineer uses during the preparation of the calculation. [21] Non-Design Basis Calculation - A calculation that does not change the design or the licensing basis of the plant and its associated EC is therefore exempted from entering the Process Applicability Process (EN-LI-100) or from completing the Calculation Reference Sheet and design inputs. Examples of calculations that are not design bases include: (1) Sensitivity analyses, (2) Calculations for beyond design basis events, (3) What-if calculations, (4) Trending calculations, (5) Computations to determine conformance to surveillance procedure requirements

, (6) Calculations to support the determination of SSC functionality or operability, etc. (7) Calculations to support a temporary maintenance condition

[22] Pending

- The state of any document for which a physical change to the plant is required by its approved associated Engineering Change and not yet implemented.

An Engineering Change Markup is considered Pending when the document is listed

on its associated Engineering Change Affected Document List. When the

Engineering Change reaches Modified or Closed status, the Engineering Change

Markup is considered As-Built.

[23] [NP] Pre-operational Plants

- Plants that are not nor have ever been in commercial operation. [24] Quality Related (QR)

- Any design activity that establishes the methods or means of performing activities associated with structures, systems, and components which are

subject to quality requirements and are governed by the Quality Assurance Program, e.g. safety related or controlled by 10 CFR 72, or transportation packages controlled by 10 CFR 71, or other items or other activities as determined on a case-by-case

basis. [Reference - QAPM Section A.1 .c] [

NP QAPD, Part II, Section 2]

[25] Resulting Documents - Documents required to perform any follow up actions that are required as a result of the calculation conclusion.

[26] Review - The process of assuring that a calculation is technically adequate, procedurally compliant, reasonably accurate, and of sufficient quality to warrant

approval and issuance.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 8 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 3.0 cont [27] Revision - A calculation, which supersedes the previous calculation revision (of the same number) and incorporates all outstanding, As-Built Calculation Changes (Engineering Change Markups). [28] Safety Related

- A plant structure, system, component or part thereof necessary to assure: (1) The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, or (2) The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in safe shutdown condition, or (3) The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to those referred to in 10CFR 50.34(a) (1), 10CFR 50.67(b) (2), or 10CFR

100.11, as applicable

[29] Safety Related Calculation

- A calculation that meets the criteria of safety related as defined by this procedure. [30] Vendor Calculation/Engineering Change Markup - Any calculation/Engineering Change Markup prepared by an organization outside Entergy Nuclear.

[31] [NP] Vendor Calculation

- Any calculation prepared by an organization outside the New Plant organization unless prepared by Entergy Nuclear.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

[1] Vice President, Engineering has overall responsibility for the calculation process and this procedure. [2] For operating plants, Director, Engineering or designate as assigned by the Vice President, Engineering (a) Has overall responsibility for the performance of calculations at the site. (b) Ensures a mechanism is in place for getting notification when a document revision is required.

[3] [NP] For pre-operational plants, Director, Engineering - New Plant (a) Has overall responsibility for implementation of this procedure at pre-operational sites (b) Has overall responsibility for the performance of calculations for pre-operational sites.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 9 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 4.0[3] cont (c) Ensures a mechanism is in place for getting notification when a document revision is required. [4] For operating plants , Engineering Manager or designate as assigned by the Vice President, Engineering, has overall responsibility to ensure that personnel working in or under the supervision of their department comply with the requirements of this

procedure and other requirements for calculation preparation, revision, review, approval, and control.

[5] [NP] For pre-operational plants, Manager, Composite Engineering - New Plant , has overall responsibility to: (a) Ensure that personnel working in or under the supervision of their department comply with the requirements of this procedure and other requirements for

calculation preparation, revision, review, approval, and control. (b) Assign Responsible Engineer(s) to perform, verify and review calculations, as necessary. (c) Perform overall review and approval of calculations and associated revisions and changes. (d) Ensure calculations are processed in accordance with this procedure. (e) Resolve all disagreements between the Preparer and Reviewer/Design Verifier.

(f) Determine which calculations developed by vendors under their QA program are to be reviewed and approved by Entergy in accordance with this procedure and assigns Responsible Engineer(s) to perform the review. (g) Can be the Design Verifier as allowed by EN-DC-134 [6] For operating plants, Responsible Supervision

[P-15534] (a) Assigns Responsible Engineer(s) to perform, verify and review calculations, as necessary. (b) Performs overall review and approval of calculations and associated revisions and changes. (c) Ensures calculations are processed in accordance with this procedure.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 10 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 4.0[6] cont (d) Resolves all disagreements between the Preparer and Reviewer/Design Verifier. (e) Determines which calculations developed by vendors under their QA program are to be reviewed and approved by Entergy in accordance with this procedure and assigns Responsible Engineer(s) to perform the review (f) Can be the design verifier in accordance with EN-DC-134.

[7] Responsible Engineer

(a) Prepares the design inputs per EN-DC-141, as necessary. (b) Prepares or originates the calculation, calculation revision, or changes as assigned. (c) Determines other documents that may be affected by the assigned calculation.

(d) Initiates appropriate changes or actions tracking items to ensure impacted documents are updated appropriately.

NOTE [NP]

New Plant calculations are processed as stand alone documents without an associated Engineering Change / Engineering Change Markup.

(e) For Operating Plants, determines compatibility with approved Engineering Change Markups that have not been incorporated in the base/parent calculation. This may be performed by an individual other than the Responsible

Engineer. (f) Reviews calculations prepared by a vendor as assigned. (g) Transmits documents to Administrative Services (AS) in accordance with EN-AD-103. (h) For Operating Plants, initiates post-EC items to ensure proper associations with other documents are created.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 11 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 4.0 cont [8] Technical Reviewer (a) Ensures the calculations are procedurally compliant, legible, and of sufficient quality to warrant approval and issuance. For in-house prepared calculations, the technical review should also ensure that the calculations are technically and

reasonably accurate. The Technical Reviewer does not have to be independent

of the Responsible Engineer (Preparer) as required for the design verifier.

[9] Design Verifier (required for quality related (i.e., safety related and augmented quality)). (a) Applies appropriate measures necessary to verify the technical adequacy of an engineering calculation in accordance with procedure EN-DC-134. Design

verification of a safety-related vendor calculation is performed by the vendor

under its QA program.

[10] Administrative Services processes calculations and associated files (e.g., CDs, DVDs) in accordance with EN-AD-103.

5.0 DETAILS 5.1 PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS [1] When processing Entergy Nuclear operating plant calculations within IAS, then the electronic forms and associated reviews and approvals are documented in INDUS

Asset Suite (IAS). [2] If processing New Plant calculations or if IAS is not available, then attachments from this procedure can be used. 5.2 GENERAL

[1] A calculation may be utilized for temporary or permanent applications , as necessary, to provide support, basis, and/or justification for existing design, proposed design, preliminary design studies, regulatory/licensing basis, etc., and to establish parameters for equipment performance. If credit is taken for a numerical value in a

safety system, in a design basis or licensing basis document, or as an operational

parameter, then the basis for that value must be documented. If there is a need to

maintain and retrieve the basis for this value, then a calculation should be generated.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 12 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.2 cont [2] Calculations shall be legible and be in a form suitable for imaging, reproduction, storage, and retrieval. Calculations should be sufficiently detailed as to purpose, method, assumption, design input, references, and units such that a person

technically qualified in the subject can review and understand the calculation and

verify the adequacy of the results without recourse to the Responsible Engineer

.[NP NQA-1-1994 Part I Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1] [3] Calculations prepared in accordance with this procedure to support a Reasonable Expectation of Operability (REO) do not need to be design verified. Calculations prepared for Operability Determinations shall also meet the requirements of EN-OP-

104. [4] A calculation should not in and of itself be used to initiate or implement a change to the physical configuration of the facility therefore EN-LI-100 does not apply. The associated EC or design change drives the need to engage the EN-LI-100 process. [5] Operating Plant related calculations: (a) An Engineering Change should be used to process all calculations for Entergy Nuclear operating plants. Reviews, design verification and approvals of

calculations/calculation changes prepared in conjunction with an Engineering

Change are documented in the Engineering Change.

(b) Impact Screenings performed in conjunction with the Engineering Change and the initiation of actions to track incorporation of the calculation results are

defined by EN-DC-115 and EN-LI-100. (c) Cumulative effects of Engineering Change Markups (both Pending and As-Built) should be considered whenever preparing a calculation, calculation change or

revision.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 13 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.2 cont [6] [NP] New Plant calculations : (a) New Plant calculations are processed as stand alone documents. No Engineering Change (EC) is required. (b) As such, associated reviews, design verifications and approvals are transmitted to Administrative Services via the EN-AD-103 process and stored as a record under the calculation number.

[NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3.2]

NOTE Editorial Changes, do not require the same review and approval as the original document.

[NP QAPD Part II, Section 6.2]

(c) Changes to calculations shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations that performed the original review and approval unless other

organizations are specifically designated or the calculation change is editorial.

[NP QAPD, Part II, Section 6] [

NP NQA-1994 Part I, BR 6 and Supplement 6S-1,Section 3.2] (1) Editorial revisions to calculations are appropriately marked as such on .2. (2) Editorial revisions are approved by the Manager, Composite Engineering - New Plant. No additional reviewers or verification are

required. [7] Only Approved calculations (including Pending or As-Built EC Markups) results are used for one of the following: (a) Input into a final document (b) For Operating Plants, Authorization of work activities based on the calculation activities. However, work at risk activities may be allowed with prior approval as defined by EN-DC-115. For preliminary calculations that serve as a basis for

a configuration change, approval of the calculation will be tracked by a RTS or

Post-RTS item associated with the Engineering Change. [8] Software utilized for calculations should be identified and tracked on Calculation Reference Sheet (Attachment 9.3), so that notifications of errors or inaccuracies

provided by software vendors or end users can be evaluated relative to calculations

performed with the software.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 14 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.2 cont [9] The application of computer software shall be controlled in accordance with the software quality assurance (SQA) requirements in EN-IT-104. If the software is exempted as described in EN-IT-104, then the calculation shall describe the method used to verify the software. Software inputs or outputs stored on CDs or DVDs should be transmitted to Administrative Services via EN-AD-103 requirements

[10] [NP] Computer programs used in the preparation of a calculation do not require re-verification for each application provided that the software Verification and Validation (V&V) documentation required by EN-IT-104 demonstrates the following: (a) The V&V documentation demonstrates that the program produces correct solutions for the encoded mathematical model within defined limits for each

parameter employed in the calculation. (b) The V&V documentation demonstrates that the encoded mathematical model produces a valid solution to the physical problem associated with the particular

application.

[NP NQA-1-1994 Part I, BR3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1(a)]

[11] Input assumptions, parameters and their sources should be clearly identified. This will enable an independent user to regenerate the calculation results. A copy of the input

file may be filed with the calculation.

[NP NQA-1994 Part I, BR 3 and Supplement 3S-1,Section 3.1][NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3]

[12] Spreadsheet applications, created using Microsoft EXCEL for example, should have the formulas identified in the Methodology section of the calculation or on the

worksheet. [13] If the engineer or the reviewer or the supervisor believe that the plant has been changed and that change is not reflected in the current revision of the calculation then

a walkdown should be performed and then plant configuration documented. [14] If a condition adverse to quality is identified during the preparation of a calculation, e.g. plant configuration is not reflected in the calculation, then the Responsible Engineer should initiate a CR in accordance with EN-LI-102 [15] Limitations and applicability for calculations (e.g., mode dependent load calculations or maximum heat load for areas under certain accident scenarios) should be clearly

identified and stated in the calculation purpose or conclusions and in the associated

Engineering Change, if applicable. [16] All actions requiring tracking as a result of approving the calculation should be clearly referenced in the associated Engineering Change for operating plants OR for Pre-operational plants, a Work Tracking (WT) item shall be initiated.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 15 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.2 cont [17] To the extent practical, calculation native files should be stored in a central controlled location (common server, common directory, etc.). [18] ASME Section III Class 1 Stress Report calculations must be certified by a Registered Professional Engineer. Calculations certified by a vendor do not require recertification.

[19] (RBS Unit 1 Only) Safety related setpoint calculations are developed in accordance with the guidelines given in RBS Unit 1 USAR, Section 7.1.2.5, "NSSS and BOP

Safety-Related Set Point Methodology." 5.3 PREPARATION OF CALCULATIONS

[P-24502], [P-25224], [P-22267] [

NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3] [

NP NQA-1994 Part I, BR 3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1]

[1] [NP] If preparing New Plant calculations, then go to Attachment 9.5. [2] Determine the scope, inputs, and outputs. (a) For safety related calculations:

• Document applicable Design Inputs in accordance with procedure EN-DC-141 or

• Document the applicable Design Inputs in the body of the calculation. (b) For non-safety related operating plant Calculations, completion of Design Inputs in accordance with procedure EN-DC-141 is not required. [3] The Responsible Engineer performs the following: (a) Ensures that a similar calculation does not already exist. (b) Ensures an associated Engineering Change (EC) is initiated per EN-DC-115.

(c) Obtains new calculation numbers from INDUS Asset Suite Document Management module. (d) Identifies interfaces between systems and organizations.

(e) Identifies related/affected interface documents including other calculations, FSAR, licensing basis documents, and design basis documents through contact with interfacing departments and use of Impact Screening in the EC Process (EN-DC-115).

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 16 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.3[3] cont (f) Develops the format and content in accordance with section 5.4 of this procedure. (g) Prepares the calculation as an Engineering Change markup per EN-DC-132 when changing an operating plant calculation. (h) Provides justification or substantiation with references when documenting assumptions or engineering judgment as input or in supporting a position. (i) Documents and validates data supplied through informal communications (e.g., telephone, Internet, etc.) commensurate with the impact the data has on the calculation results. [4] If a calculation is replaced by an entirely new calculation, then the Responsible Engineer should ensure the design conditions enveloped by the original calculation

are completely enveloped by the successor calculation or document the basis for the

differences and ensure the previous calculation is superseded. [5] When superseding or voiding a calculation, then the design documents referencing the calculation should be assessed for proper disposition and/or captured in the

resulting new calculation.

[QAPM B.2.c]

[6] Attachment 9.3, Calculation Reference Sheet is completed to track impacted interfacing documents.

[7] If superseding or voiding a calculation, then other documents that rely on the calculation that is being superseded or voided may need to be revised and shall be

listed on the Affected Documents LIST (ADL) of the associated Engineering Change.

[QAPM B.2.c]

[8] The preparer and the reviewer shall consider the amount of margin remaining while preparing the calculation/mark-up. EN-DC-195 provides guidance on different types

of margin and controls the Margin Management process. If the calculation reduces

the amount of margin that should be discussed in the calculation conclusion.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 17 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.4 FORMAT and CONTENT [1] The recommended format and content for calculations is contained in Attachment 9.1. [2] Additional sections may be included at the Responsible Engineers discretion.

Conversely, simple calculations that are only a few pages in length may incorporate considerations of Attachment 9.1 into the body of the calculation. When applicable, the section should be clearly labeled. [3] The Calculation Cover Page as shown in Attachment 9.2 or an electronic equivalent should be used.

NOTE A non design basis calculation can not change the design basis of the plant and is therefore exempted from completing the Calculation Reference Sheet. [4] Each calculation should include Calculation Reference Sheet per Attachment 9.3. [5] Every calculation should include a Record of Revisions page, similar to format in .4, including a brief description and reason for the change. [6] Reformatting of an existing calculation to the requirements of this procedure is left to the discretion of the supervisor.

NOTE [NP] Section 5.5 is not applicable to processing New Plant Vendor Calculations.

Vendor Calculations are processed in accordance with EN-DC-149.

5.5 VENDOR SUPPLIED CALCULATION

[P-24486], [P-15534]

Vendor supplied calculations which are developed under Entergys Quality Assurance program are reviewed and approved in accordance with this procedure. At the discretion of the supervisor of the responsible engineer, vendor supplied calculations which are

developed under the vendors Quality Assurance program may be reviewed and approved in

accordance with this procedure. Vendor calculations which support permanent

modifications to the facility should be strongly considered for processing under this

procedure. However, a detailed review of the vendors design reports and other design

outputs may be used to provide an equivalent engineering review function when the

complexity of maintaining configuration control of the vendors calculations makes this not

practical. If the calculation will simply become a record, then it is handled via EN-DC-149.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 18 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.5 cont [1] When selected for review and approval in accordance with this procedure, then vendor supplied calculations should be processed as follows: (a) Vendor supplied calculations that are prepared in accordance with the Vendor's calculation procedures should be assigned a site calculation number and entered into INDUS Asset Suite as a new calculation. The original vendor

calculation number should be added as an alternate reference if the vendor

calculation number is not used as the site calculation number. (b) All design information supplied to a Vendor by Entergy personnel for Quality Related SSCs should be formally transmitted as approved inputs and identified

as such in accordance with Section 5.10, Interface Control, of this procedure. (c) Review Of Vendor Supplied Calculations (1) Vendor supplied calculations should be reviewed for administrative aspects in accordance with EN-DC-149. (d) Acceptance Of Vendor Supplied Calculations (1) The Reviewer should complete Calculation Cover Page (Attachment 9.2), consistent with Section 5.3 and Calculation Reference Sheet (Attachment 9.3). The Reviewer should enter the Vendor's name in the

Responsible Engineer Section of the cover page. If the vendor used

.2 as the cover page, then enter the vendors name on the bottom of the form in order to ensure that the name is entered into the

site document control system. This technical review:

• Is not a design verification of the calculation,

• Is a check to ensure reasonableness of inputs, assumptions and results, and to verify that the calculation satisfies the sites expectations, as specified to the vendor in the contract and

associated design requirement documents.

• Is to identify unverified design assumptions to be processed as described in section 5.9 below. (2) Design Basis Vendor calculations should be included with the associated Engineering Change (per EN-DC-115); the EC Affected

Documents List (ADL) should be updated to reflect impacts due to the

calculation. (3) Upon resolution of comments with the Vendor or acceptance of the calculation with comments in accordance with EN-DC-149, the

Reviewer documents his approval and forwards the calculation to the

Responsible Supervisor for acceptance.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 19 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.6 REVIEWS

[NP QAPD, Part II, Sections 3.1 and 6.1] [

NP QAPD, Part III, Sections 1.3 and 1.6]

[1] Reviews should be performed as indicated in Section 5.8. [2] Reviews may vary from a general overview of the calculation to a thorough examination, including a number-by-number check, commensurate with the impact on safety considerations. Calculation reviews may be performed using the Design

Verification methods as follows (a) For Operating plants, refer to Section 5.7. (b) [NP] For New Plant, refer to EN-DC-134. [3] As a minimum, calculations should be reviewed by the responsible discipline. These reviews are tracked by the reviews of the associated Engineering Change unless a hardcopy calculation is being processed due to INDUS Asset Suite unavailability or

the calculation is a New Plant calculation. In this case, all reviews should be

documented, by a signature, on the calculation cover page in accordance with .2. Any reviews not performed on the entire calculation should be

documented on the calculation cover page. [4] For operating plant non-quality related, non-risk significant (i.e., outside of Maintenance Rule scope) systems structures, or components where the engineering

calculation does not affect any design bases and is not subject to QA program requirements, the responsible supervisor may perform the review and the approval

function. 5.7 DESIGN VERIFICATION

[QAPM B.3] [P-26437, P-23961] [

NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3.1] [

NP NQA-1994 Part I, BR 3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 4] [1] Design Verifications should be performed as indicated in Section 5.8 [2] For quality and augmented quality related calculations, any inputs derived from a field walk down or direct component measurement should be documented.

[3] When engineering judgment is used as an input, then the Verifier should evaluate the judgment to ensure it is reasonable and can be substantiated. [4] The verifier should also determine if all resulting documents have been identified and are appropriately tracked.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 20 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.7 cont [5] Design verification is performed on quality related calculations in accordance with requirements in procedure EN-DC-134, Design Verification.

[6] [NP] The Manager- Composite Engineering-New Plant may provide Design Verification through the normal supervisory review of non-quality related New Plant calculation involving SSCs that are significant contributors to plant safety. No

additional Technical Review is necessary

.[NP QAPD, Part III, Section 1.3]

5.8 APPROVAL

[1] The responsible supervisor performs an overall review of the calculation, including: (a) Ensuring that the calculation achieves the required objectives, (b) Ensuring that the appropriate discipline/organization review(s) occur, (c) Checking that the inputs, assumptions and results are reasonable, and (d) Ensuring that the Responsible Engineer, Reviewer/Verifier have signed and dated the Calculation Cover Sheet or associated Engineering Change as appropriate.

[2] If processing an operating plant calculation within IAS along with an EC, then the Responsible Supervisor signifies concurrence with the calculation by documenting their approval in IAS. The EC and associated calculation will be transmitted to

records via IAS as the EC progresses through to closure.

[QAPM B.15]

[3] If processing hardcopy calculations (i.e., New Plant calculations, IAS is not available) then approval is signified by the Responsible Supervisor signature on the calculation

cover page and is then transmitted by the Responsible Engineer to records via the EN-

AD-103 process.

[QAPM B.15][

NP QAPD, Part II, Section 17]

NOTE In the following situation the Design Verification Checklist and Cover Sheet are not required to be included with the calculation:

• Design Review is the method of verification;

• No comments need to be documented;

• All questions on the Design Verification Checklist are answered YES or N/A; and

• The Supervisor is not the design verifier.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 21 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.8 cont [4] The requirements for review, verification, and approval of calculations generated by this procedure is summarized in the following table:

Required Reviews /

Approvals 1,3 Safety/Quality Related A ugmented Quality Related Non Quality Related Editorial Revision[NP] Vendor Quality Related Vendor Non-Quality Related Technical Review n/a n/a X n/a X X Design Verification X X n/a n/a Normally performed by Vendor n/a Supervisor Approval 2 X X X X X X Notes: 1) The reviews and approvals may be documented in the associated Engineering Change.

2) [NP] The Manager Composite Engineering - New Plant may perform the function of the Supervisor.

3) Other reviews may be performed at the discretion of the Responsible Supervisor.

5.9 CONFIGURATION CONTROL [1] For Operating plants, (a) After calculation is approved in conjunction with the associated Engineering Change, the calculation is retained as part of the associated Engineering Change until the EC reaches Modified or Closed status, at which time the

Engineering Change Markup of the calculation revision may be incorporated. (b) Based on the document update criteria in EN-DC-132, the Responsible Engineer should process the calculation as a calculation revision in INDUS

Asset Suite.

[2] [NP] New Plant calculations are processed as full calculation revisions that become as-built upon approval. [3] The following supplemental requirements should be incorporated into calculations whenever applicable: (a) Unverified assumptions should be identified in the calculation. A tracking number should be assigned to verify these assumptions prior to returning

affected structure, system or equipment to service.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 22 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.9[3] cont (b) Design Inputs, assumptions or any parameters used in the calculation, which have an expiration date should be identified in the calculation. Each of these items should be assigned a tracking number from the action tracking system.

Upon expiration of the parameter, the calculation should be reassessed and

voided or revised with an updated parameter as applicable. Vendor documents

should also meet this requirement. 5.10 INTERFACE CONTROL Interface information is design information that crosses a system-to-system or organization-to-organization boundary and becomes a design requirement for one of

these systems or organizations. It may be design input, output, or any restrictions associated with the calculation. A system-to-system interface is physical or parametric

information that affects another system that should be identified at the start of the

calculation. Interface information may be revised, as needed, until approval of the

calculation.

[1] Identification Of Interfaces The identification of interfaces between systems and organizations which affect the

development of the calculation by establishing design inputs should be completed prior

to the development of the calculation. All design inputs should be identified and

documented in the Input and Design Criteria section of the calculation as described in

Section 5.3.

[2] Documentation

[NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, BR 3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 6]

(a) [NP] Design information transmitted across interfaces that support New Plant calculations should be formally entered into records and include:

(1) The status of the design information or document provided and, (2) Identify any incomplete items which require further evaluation review or approval.

(b) [NP] When it is necessary to initially transmit design information orally or by other informal means, then the transmittal shall be promptly confirmed by a

controlled document.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 23 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.10 cont [3] Input And Design Criteria Typical design inputs and criteria used in the development of a calculation are listed in the Input and Design Criteria section (Section 7.0 of Attachment 9.1) of the

Calculation. The source documents for these items should be listed on the Calculation

Reference Sheet (Attachment 9.3).

[4] Output The output of a calculation may require the generation of a new document or affect an existing document. When processing an Operating Plant calculation the resulting documents should be listed on Attachment 9.3 and on the Affected Documents List of

the associated Engineering Change (EC).

[NP] when processing a New Plant calculation, then the affected documents should be listed on Attachment 9.3 and revised along with New Plant calculation or tracked by a

work tracking item.

NOTE [NP] Engineering Mark-Ups are not utilized in the New Plant calculations process.

Revisions are prepared in accordance with Section 5.3 and processed to meet requirements of this procedure 5.11 CALCULATION REVISION

[P-22267], [P-24502], [P-25224] [1] EN-DC-132 defines the process and update criteria for revising calculations with Engineering Change Markups that are As-Built. [2] Calculation revisions are implemented to incorporate As-Built Engineering Change Markups attached to an Engineering Change. [3] Calculation format and content requirements are defined in Attachment 9.1.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 24 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 5.12 CANCELING, VOIDING, SUPERSEDING CALCULATIONS [1] Operating Plant Calculations (a) EN-DC-132 defines the process for canceling, voiding and superseding documents and Engineering Change Markups. [2] New Plant Calculations (a) New Plant calculations are canceled, voided or superseded through issuance of an EN-AD-103 Attachment 9.3 Supplemental form with instructions and justification for making the calculation historical along with references to any

superseding documents. 5.13 INDICATION OF STATUS [1] When processed with an EC, then the status of each calculation and calculation revision is tracked through INDUS Asset Suite and directly tied to the Engineering Change status progression.

[2] [NP] Pending changes are not allowed against New Plant calculations .Therefore, New Plant calculations are statuses as active when approved and entered into records. 6.0 INTERFACES [1] EN-AD-103, Document Control and Records Management Activities [2] EN-DC-115, Engineering Change Development

[3] EN-DC-132, Control of Engineering Documents

[4] EN-DC-134, Design Verification

[5] EN-DC-141, Design Inputs

[6] EN-DC-149, Review and Acceptance of Vendor Documents

[7] EN-DC-195, Margin Management

[8] EN-IT-104, Software Quality Assurance Program

[9] EN-LI-100, Process Applicability Determination

[10] EN-LI-102, Corrective Action Process

[11] EN-OP-104, Operability Determinations NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 25 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process 7.0 RECORDS [1] For Operating Plant related calculations

[QAPM B.15]

(a) Engineering calculations and Engineering Change Markups are retained as part of the associated Engineering Change record.

[2] [NP] For New Plant calculations [

NP QAPD, Part III, Section 1.17] [

NP NQA-1-1994, Part I Basic Requirement 17 and Supplement 17S-1] [

NP QAPD ,Part II, Section 17] (a) Engineering calculations are retained in EDMS.

(b) Associated review and approval forms are retained in EDMS as a separate record filed by the calculation number.

8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS Step Site Document Commitment Number or Reference [1] RBS RBF1-95-0180 P-15534 [2] WF3 IR 90-23 P-22267 [3] WF3 IR 90-24 (96-0210.ASC)

P-23961 [4] WF3 IR 97-08 (IN970128.ASC)

P-24448 [5] WF3 IR 97-10 (97-0178.ASC)

P-24486 [6] WF3 IR 97-10 (96-0178.ASC)

P-24502 [7] WF3 IR 97-25 (IN980105.DOC)

P-25224 [8] WF3 IR 97-08 (IN970128.ASC)

P-25660 [9] PNPS Letter 2.99.005 (RC99.2005.03/ IFI98-203-05)

[Calc Impact Reviews]

[10] PNPS Letter 2.99.005 (RC99.2005.03/ IFI98-203-005/ IFI98-203-13) [Calculation Comment Sheets/EC Markups]

[11] VY INS9720113_03, [

Update Calculation if Assumptions or Inputs Change]

[12] VY INS971001H, [

Ensure Correct References and Inputs Are Used in Design Calculations]

[13] VY INS9720105_02, [

Ensure Proper Use of Technical Specifications as Design Input]

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 26 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process NOTE The forms shown in the Attachments are typical forms. These exact forms are not required to be used in Calculations. Similar forms generated electronically may be used if they contain all of the information shown on the Attachment forms.

9.0 10.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 ENGINEERING CALCULATION FORMAT 9.2 ENGINEERING CALCULATION COVER PAGE 9.3 CALCULATION REFERENCE SHEET

[P-24448], [P-24502], [P-25224], [P-25660] 9.4 RECORD OF REVISION

9.5 [NP] NEW PLANT CALCULATION PREPARATION

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 27 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.1 E NGINEERING CALCULATION FORMAT Sheet 1 of 3 A Calculation Package typically should consist of the following components, in the order shown. Existing calculations, when revised, may follow their original format.

1.0 Calculation Cover Page (See sample cover page in Attachment 9.2) 2.0 Calculation Reference Sheet (Attachment 9.3) 3.0 Record of Revision (Attachment 9.4) 4.0 Table of Contents 4.1 List each section in the order shown in the format 4.2 Numerically identify the location of each section by page number. 4.3 Pages of the calculation should be numbered sequentially starting with the cover page. Each page of the calculation should also include the

calculation number and revision. A List of Effective Pages can be

added (and included in the Table of Contents) if desired to track the

revision in effect for each page. 4.4 A list of figures and tables may be included after the Table of Contents if applicable.

5.0 Purpose Briefly describe the stated objective of the calculation.

6.0 Conclusion

Detail the conclusions derived from the results of the calculation with reference to the purpose, input criteria, and resulting documents (e.g., specific documents that may require changes as a result of the

calculation). Include a discussion on margin and if the margin is

unacceptably low enter the Margin Management Process in accordance

with EN-DC-195, 7.0 Input and Design Criteria Provide conditions or known values such as the following: Appropriate codes and standards Physical or measured data Functional requirements Performance requirements Design criteria Design conditions Interface requirements Safety requirements Economic requirements Other specific requirements NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 28 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.1 E NGINEERING CALCULATION FORMAT Sheet 2 of 3 NOTE Assumptions that must be verified should be identified.

8.0 Assumptions 8.1 Specify with appropriate justification all assumptions with appropriate reference to previous calculations, industry standards or published texts. 8.2 When engineering judgment is used as an input to the document or in supporting a position taken in using the document, then that judgment should be quantified or substantiated.

9.0 Method of Analysis Describe the development process for the calculation. In calculations where computer analyses are used, the code methodology and application should be addressed.

10.0 Calculations Develop calculations in logical order.

Identify the source of equations and or constants where they are introduced into the calculation. 10.1 All non-standard symbols should be listed and defined to avoid confusion.

10.2 All symbols and units should be defined and equations sources identified.

10.3 Describe any notes, sketches, diagrams or equations not considered standard. 10.4 As a minimum the computer printouts should contain the calculation number and a method for maintaining page accountability in the printout. If the

computer outputs are recorded on microfiche or electronic media, then an index that contains a description for each fiche or file output and a unique identifier for

each fiche or file shall be included in lieu of page numbers and calculation

numbers. Duplicate copies of fiche or electronic media should be produced for storage in document control. Additionally, the following software program

information should be provided: Program name Program number Program version or release Run number (as applicable), Run Date (as applicable) Method of software verification, if the software verification has not already been documented. [NP] Program Inputs

[NP NQA-1-1994, Part II, BR3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1] [NP] Basis for application of the computer program to the specific physical problem.

[NP NQA-1-1994, Part II, BR3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1]

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 29 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.1 E NGINEERING CALCULATION FORMAT Sheet 3 of 3 Attachments: 1. A list of attachment pages should be included in the table of contents or should be the last sequentially numbered page of each calculation. 2. Include any non standard or unique reference and other material needed to clarify the calculation. 3. Attachment pages must be numbered in a manner that maintains page accountability. 4. Any referenced document that is not readily retrievable should be attached to the calculation. This may include records of communications, e.g., faxes, Internet

messages, phone communications, sketches, etc.

5. The calculation number should be listed on the first page of each attachment.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 30 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.2 E NGINEERING CALCULATION C OVER PAGE Sheet 1 of 2 ANO-1 ANO-2 GGNS IP-2 IP-3 PLP JAF PNPS RBS VY W3 NP-GGNS-3 NP-RBS-3 CALCULATION COVER PAGE (1) EC #

(2)Page 1 of (3) Design Basis Calc.

YES NO (4) CALCULATION EC Markup (5 ) Calculation No:

(6) Revision: (7) Title: (8) Editorial YES NO (9) System(s):

(10) Review Org (Department):

(11) Safety Class:

Safety / Quality Related Augmented Quality Program Non-Safety Related (12) Component/Equipment/Structure Type/Number:

(13) Document Type:

(14) Keywords (Description/Topical Codes):

REVIEWS (15) Name/Signature/Date

______________________

(16) Name/Signature/Date

________________________

(17) Name/Signature/Date

____________________

Responsible Engineer Design Verifier Supervisor/Approval Reviewer Comments Attached Comments Attached

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 31 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process A TTACHMENT 9.2 E NGINEERING C ALCULATION C OVER PAGE Sheet 2 of 2 Calculation Cover Page Instructions

1. EC#: Indicate associated EC. (N/A for NP)

2. Page 1 of ___:

Insert total page count. 3. Design Basis Calc:

Mark Yes" or No, as appropriate.

4. Calculation or EC Markup:

Mark the appropriate block for a calculation or EC Markup

.(N/A to NP) 5. Calculation No: Enter affected calculation number.

6. Revision:

Enter appropriate revision number

7. Title: Enter appropriate title.

8. Editorial:

Mark Yes" or No, as appropriate.

9. System(s):

Enter primary impacted system by system designator. Additionally, the system description may be entered for clarity if desired.

10. Review Org (Department): Enter Department responsible for the calculation or EC Markup.

11. Safety Class: Indicate by checkmark whether the calculation is Safety/Quality related, Augmented Quality Program applies, Non-Safety Related.

12. Component/Equipment/Structure Type/Number: Enter impacted components, equipments and structures by designators.

13. Document Type:

Enter appropriate document type (i.e., Record Type)

14. Keywords (Description/Topical Codes):

Enter any keywords and/or topical codes associated with the calculation/Engineering Change Markup.

NOTE: Signatures are captured in IAS and are not required on the cover unless processing hardcopy due to IAS unavailability or processing a New Plant calculation.

15. Responsible Engineer:

IF the calculation is being processed hardcopy, THEN the Responsible Engineer signs and dates this section, OTHERWISE type in the REs name and enters "See associated EC".

16. Design Verifier and Reviewer:

IF the calculation is being processed via hardcopy, THEN the Reviewer signs and dates this section, OTHERWISE type in the Design Verifiers or Reviewers name and enter "See associated EC". Indicate by checkmark the type of review (Design Verifier, Reviewer) and indicate if comments are attached. 17. Supervisor/Approval:

Indicate by checkmark if comments are attached IF the calculation is being processed hardcopy, THEN the Reviewer signs and dates this section, OTHERWISE type in the Supervisors name and enter "See associated EC".

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 32 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process A TTACHMENT 9.3 C ALCULATION R EFERENCE S HEET Sheet 1 of 3 CALCULATION REFERENCE SHEET CALCULATION NO:

REVISION:

I. EC Markups Incorporated (N/A to NP calculations)

1. 2.

3.

4.

5. II. Relationships

Sht RevInput Doc Output Doc Impact Y/N Tracking No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. III. CROSS REFERENCES

1. 2.

3.

4.

5. IV. SOFTWARE USED

Title: Version/Release: Disk/CD No.

V. DISK/CDS INCLUDED

Title: Version/Release Disk/CD No.

VI. OTHER CHANGES

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 33 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process A TTACHMENT 9.3 C ALCULATION R EFERENCE S HEET Sheet 2 of 3 Calculation Reference Sheet Instructions 1. The Calculation Reference Sheet provides a list of documents used in the preparation of the calculation/Engineering Change Markup, as well as documents that are impacted by the calculation/Engineering Change Markup.

[NP] For New Plant calculations, this section will only list documents that are incorporated into the current revision. EC mark-ups are not applicable to New Plant calculations 2. Consider the following documents when determining documents to list on the Calculation Reference Sheet Licensing Basis Impact

• SAR (Including Figures)

• Technical Specifications (Including Bases)

• Technical Requirements Manual

• Environmental

• QA Manual

• Other e.g., Emergency Plan, dry fuel Cask Certificates of Compliance, etc.

• Design Basis Impact

• Drawings (EC required)

• Equipment Database (EC is required)

• System Design Criteria such as SDCs, ULDs, DBDs, etc. (EC required)

• Calculations

• Specifications (EC required)

• Mechanical Programs (e.g., Pipe Stress, HVAC, etc.)

• Electrical/I&C Programs (e.g., Setpoints, EQ, etc.)

• Civil Programs (e.g. SQRT files, etc.)

• Safety Analysis Ground rules/Core Reload Analysis Input Parameter documents (e.g., Ground rules, OPL-3, Plant Parameter Document, etc.)

• Plant Data Book

• Other (e.g., Safety Analysis, Main Control Room Integrity, Procedures, Plant Programs, Reactivity Management, Surveillances, Vendor Tech. Manuals, etc.)

3. Enter the calculation number and revision level in the space provided at the top of the form.

4. SECTION I: EC Markups INCORPORATED: - Enter the EC Markups being incorporated into the calculation revision. This section should be left blank for calculation changes and New Plant calculations.

5. SECTION II: RELATIONSHIPS: - List documents indexed in EDMS whose revision may impact the results derived by the calculation or Engineering Change Markup or vise versa. (Related/References) Include the Engineering Change tracking number for documents that are impacted by the results derived by the calculation/Engineering Change Markup. Include sheet number and revision as appropriate. Check Input Doc and/or Output Doc as appropriate. Only documents relevant to the change need to be listed.

6. SECTION III: CROSS

REFERENCES:

List documents whose revision will not impact the results of the calculation/Engineering Change Markup or documents not in EDMS (e.g., ANS, EPRI, etc.). List vendor calculation number if appropriate. Only documents relevant to the change need to be listed.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 34 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process A TTACHMENT 9.3 C ALCULATION R EFERENCE S HEET Sheet 3 of 3

7. SECTION IV: SOFTWARE USED - Enter the title, version or release number and disk or CD number as applicable of software to develop the calculation or of disks or CDs that are being transmitted to Administrative Services with the calculation.

8. SECTION V: DISK/CDs INCLUDED - DISK/CDs INCLUDED enter the disk or CD number, as applicable, of software to develop the calculation and/or enter the disks or CDs that are becoming part of the

calculation record, as applicable.

9. SECTION VI: OTHER CHANGES: - List other documents as determined by the responsible engineer. Documents that no longer are referenced in the calculation should be noted in order for proper update of IAS. (Only documents relevant to the active revision of the calculation should be listed in IAS.) Expand or contract sections of the form as needed to accommodate the documents required to be listed for the calculation.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 35 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.4 R ECORD OF R EVISION Sheet 1 of 1 Revision Record of Revision 0 Initial issue.

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

MANUAL QUALITY RELATED EN-DC-126 REV. 4 R EFERENCE U SE PAGE 36 OF 36 Engineering Calculation Process ATTACHMENT 9.5 N EW PLANT CALCULATION PREPARATION Sheet 1 of 1 N EW P LANT C ALCULATION P REPARATION

[NP QAPD, Part II, Section 3] [

NP NQA-1-1994, Part I, Basic Requirement (BR) 3 and Supplement 3S-1, Section 3.1] [

NP QAPD Part III, Section 1.3]

[1] Determine the scope, inputs, and outputs. (a) For safety related and non safety related calculations:

• Document applicable Design Inputs in accordance with procedure EN-DC-141 or

• Document the applicable Design Inputs in the body of the calculation.

[2] The Responsible Engineer performs the following: (a) Ensures that a similar calculation does not already exist. (b) Obtains new calculation numbers from the New Plant calculation log. (c) Identifies interfaces between systems and organizations. (d) Identifies related/affected interface documents including other calculations, licensing basis documents, design basis documents and complete Attachment 9.3. (e) Develops the format and content in accordance with section 5.4 of this procedure. (f) When processing a change to a calculation, then prepare the calculation as a full revision. (g) Provides justification or substantiation with references when documenting assumptions or

engineering judgment as input or in supporting a position. (h) Documents and validates data supplied through informal communications (e.g., telephone, Internet, etc.) commensurate with the impact the data has on the calculation results.

[3] If a calculation is replaced by an entirely new calculation, hen the Responsible Engineer should ensure the design conditions enveloped by the original calculation are completely enveloped by the successor calculation or document the basis for the differences and ensure the previous calculation is

superseded.

[4] When superseding or voiding a calculation, the design documents referring to the calculation should be assessed for proper disposition and/or captured in the resulting new calculation. [

NP QAPD, Part III, Section 1.3].

[5] Review and approve the calculation in accordance with Section 5.6, 5.7, and 5.8