ML15337A282: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FIGURE 1   
{{#Wiki_filter:FI GURE 1   


Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note:  (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.
Figu re 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) pr edictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note:  (1) BE ne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BE e predicts failure (CUF en = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BE e predicts possible failure well before end of life.
BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL)
BE ne 10 17 FL UENCE (n/cm 2) CUF en Lim it Line (LL)
Best Estimate (BE)
Bes t Estimate (BE)
  (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME FIGURE 1   
  (3) BE e 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PE O) TIME FI GURE 1   


Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note:  (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.
Figu re 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) pr edictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note:  (1) BE ne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BE e predicts failure (CUF en = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BE e predicts possible failure well before end of life.
BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL)
BE ne 10 17 FL UENCE (n/cm 2) CUF en Lim it Line (LL)
Best Estimate (BE)
Bes t Estimate (BE)
  (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME}}
  (3) BE e 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PE O) TIME}}

Revision as of 19:58, 8 July 2018

Official Exhibit - NYS000566-00-BD01 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey
ML15337A282
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15337A282 (1)
v • d • e


Text

FI GURE 1

Figu re 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) pr edictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note: (1) BE ne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BE e predicts failure (CUF en = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BE e predicts possible failure well before end of life.

BE ne 10 17 FL UENCE (n/cm 2) CUF en Lim it Line (LL)

Bes t Estimate (BE)

(3) BE e 1.0 (2) (1) - EOL (PE O) TIME FI GURE 1

Figu re 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) pr edictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note: (1) BE ne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BE e predicts failure (CUF en = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BE e predicts possible failure well before end of life.

BE ne 10 17 FL UENCE (n/cm 2) CUF en Lim it Line (LL)

Bes t Estimate (BE)

(3) BE e 1.0 (2) (1) - EOL (PE O) TIME

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15337A282&oldid=853832"