ML16019A357: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Buckberg, | {{#Wiki_filter:From:Buckberg, Perry To:Docket, Hearing | ||
; Pepperl, Nicole | |||
; Scro, Jennifer | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment | RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Date:Friday, January 15, 2016 8:37:28 AM Good morning, | ||
The comments below look to be intended for the official hearing record for this week's Turkey Point cooling canals hearing (Jan. 11, 2016 in Homestead, FL) but were submitted via an OPA feedback form. I am forwarding the comments to you-but I can provide | I am acting as the NRR/DORL Turkey Point Project Manager while the Lead PM (Audrey | ||
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please let me know. | |||
Thanks,Perry | Klett) is out of the office. | ||
The comments below look to be intended for the official hearing record for this week's Turkey Point cooling canals hearing (Jan. 11, 2016 in Homestead, FL) but were submitted | |||
via an OPA feedback form. | |||
I am forwarding the comments to you-but I can provide | |||
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please | |||
let me know. | |||
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 From: Buckberg, Perry Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:54 AM To: Hannah, Roger; Klett, Audrey; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger. | RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger. | ||
I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues' as requested and as appropriate. Thanks,Perry | |||
From: Hannah, Roger Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey | I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues' | ||
as requested and as appropriate. | |||
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 -----Original Message----- | |||
From: Hannah, Roger | |||
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM | |||
To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia | |||
Cc: Ledford, Joey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | ||
This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of you so that it hopefully gets to the right place. | This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this | ||
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR Senior Public Affairs Officer Region II -- Atlanta, Ga. | |||
Office - 404-997-4417 Mobile - 404-317-3879 roger.hannah@nrc.gov | individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of | ||
you so that it hopefully gets to the right place. | |||
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR | |||
Senior Public Affairs Officer | |||
Region II -- Atlanta, Ga. | |||
Office - 404-997-4417 | |||
Mobile - 404-317-3879 | |||
roger.hannah@nrc.gov | |||
-----Original Message----- | -----Original Message----- | ||
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM To: OPA2 Resource <OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov> | |||
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [ | |||
mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com | |||
]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM | |||
To: OPA2 Resource < | |||
OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov | |||
> | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | ||
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by | Below is the result of your feedback form. | ||
It was submitted by | |||
Larry E. Fink, M.S. (larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27 | Larry E. Fink, M.S. ( | ||
larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com | |||
) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27 | |||
through the IP 216.246.75.15 | through the IP 216.246.75.15 | ||
using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov | using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html | ||
and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov | |||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered. | comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered. | ||
Thank you. | Thank you. | ||
Larry E Fink, M.S Owner and Principal Waterwise Consulting, LLC | |||
Larry E Fink, M.S | |||
Owner and Principal | |||
Waterwise Consulting, LLC | |||
organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC | organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC | ||
Line 73: | Line 129: | ||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
From:Buckberg, | From:Buckberg, Perry To:Docket, Hearing | ||
; Pepperl, Nicole | |||
; Scro, Jennifer | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment | RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Date:Friday, January 15, 2016 8:37:28 AM Good morning, | ||
I am acting as the NRR/DORL Turkey Point Project Manager while the Lead PM (Audrey | |||
Klett) is out of the office. | |||
The comments below look to be intended for the official hearing record for this week's Turkey Point cooling canals hearing (Jan. 11, 2016 in Homestead, FL) but were submitted | |||
via an OPA feedback form. | |||
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please let me know. | I am forwarding the comments to you-but I can provide | ||
Thanks,Perry | |||
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please | |||
let me know. | |||
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 From: Buckberg, Perry Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:54 AM To: Hannah, Roger; Klett, Audrey; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger. | RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger. | ||
I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues' as requested and as appropriate. Thanks,Perry | |||
From: Hannah, Roger Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey | I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues' | ||
as requested and as appropriate. | |||
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 -----Original Message----- | |||
From: Hannah, Roger | |||
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM | |||
To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia | |||
Cc: Ledford, Joey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | ||
This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of you so that it hopefully gets to the right place. | This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this | ||
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR Senior Public Affairs Officer Region II -- Atlanta, Ga. | |||
Office - 404-997-4417 Mobile - 404-317-3879 roger.hannah@nrc.gov | individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of | ||
you so that it hopefully gets to the right place. | |||
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR | |||
Senior Public Affairs Officer | |||
Region II -- Atlanta, Ga. | |||
Office - 404-997-4417 | |||
Mobile - 404-317-3879 | |||
roger.hannah@nrc.gov | |||
-----Original Message----- | -----Original Message----- | ||
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM To: OPA2 Resource <OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov> | |||
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [ | |||
mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com | |||
]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM | |||
To: OPA2 Resource < | |||
OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov | |||
> | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period | ||
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by | Below is the result of your feedback form. | ||
It was submitted by | |||
Larry E. Fink, M.S. (larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27 | Larry E. Fink, M.S. ( | ||
larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com | |||
) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27 | |||
through the IP 216.246.75.15 | through the IP 216.246.75.15 | ||
using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov | using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html | ||
and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov | |||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered. | comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered. | ||
Thank you. | Thank you. | ||
Larry E Fink, M.S Owner and Principal Waterwise Consulting, LLC | |||
Larry E Fink, M.S | |||
Owner and Principal | |||
Waterwise Consulting, LLC | |||
organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC | organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC |
Revision as of 14:49, 30 June 2018
ML16019A357 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Turkey Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 01/14/2016 |
From: | Fink L Waterwise Consulting |
To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, NRC/SECY |
SECY/RAS | |
References | |
50-250-LA, 50-251-LA, ASLBP 15-935-02-LA-BD01, VVV-28 | |
Download: ML16019A357 (3) | |
Text
From:Buckberg, Perry To:Docket, Hearing
- Pepperl, Nicole
- Scro, Jennifer
Subject:
RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Date:Friday, January 15, 2016 8:37:28 AM Good morning,
I am acting as the NRR/DORL Turkey Point Project Manager while the Lead PM (Audrey
Klett) is out of the office.
The comments below look to be intended for the official hearing record for this week's Turkey Point cooling canals hearing (Jan. 11, 2016 in Homestead, FL) but were submitted
via an OPA feedback form.
I am forwarding the comments to you-but I can provide
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please
let me know.
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 From: Buckberg, Perry Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:54 AM To: Hannah, Roger; Klett, Audrey; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey
Subject:
RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger.
I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues'
as requested and as appropriate.
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 -----Original Message-----
From: Hannah, Roger
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM
To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia
Cc: Ledford, Joey
Subject:
FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period
This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this
individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of
you so that it hopefully gets to the right place.
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR
Senior Public Affairs Officer
Region II -- Atlanta, Ga.
Office - 404-997-4417
Mobile - 404-317-3879
roger.hannah@nrc.gov
Original Message-----
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [
mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com
]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM
To: OPA2 Resource <
OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
>
Subject:
FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period
Below is the result of your feedback form.
It was submitted by
Larry E. Fink, M.S. (
larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com
) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27
through the IP 216.246.75.15
using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html
and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov
comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered.
Thank you.
Larry E Fink, M.S
Owner and Principal
Waterwise Consulting, LLC
organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC
address1: 1601 S. Ocean Drive
address2: Suite 406
city: Hollywood
state: FL
zip: 33019
country: USA
phone: 954-923-7374
From:Buckberg, Perry To:Docket, Hearing
- Pepperl, Nicole
- Scro, Jennifer
Subject:
RE: FPL"s Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Date:Friday, January 15, 2016 8:37:28 AM Good morning,
I am acting as the NRR/DORL Turkey Point Project Manager while the Lead PM (Audrey
Klett) is out of the office.
The comments below look to be intended for the official hearing record for this week's Turkey Point cooling canals hearing (Jan. 11, 2016 in Homestead, FL) but were submitted
via an OPA feedback form.
I am forwarding the comments to you-but I can provide
'Notice of Hearing' submittal requirements with this member of the public if needed. Please
let me know.
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 From: Buckberg, Perry Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:54 AM To: Hannah, Roger; Klett, Audrey; Williamson, Alicia Cc: Ledford, Joey
Subject:
RE: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period Thanks Roger.
I will ensure these comments are included 'in the official hearings record on these issues'
as requested and as appropriate.
Thanks,Perry Buckberg Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 415-1383 O-08E03 -----Original Message-----
From: Hannah, Roger
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:40 AM
To: Klett, Audrey; Buckberg, Perry; Williamson, Alicia
Cc: Ledford, Joey
Subject:
FW: FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period
This came in through our public web page and I'm not sure who should get it or if this
individual has provided these comments in some other manner, but I'm sending it to all of
you so that it hopefully gets to the right place.
Thanks, Roger Hannah, APR
Senior Public Affairs Officer
Region II -- Atlanta, Ga.
Office - 404-997-4417
Mobile - 404-317-3879
roger.hannah@nrc.gov
Original Message-----
From: Larry E. Fink, M.S. [
mailto:larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com
]Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:04 PM
To: OPA2 Resource <
OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
>
Subject:
FPL's Turkey Point Permit Comment Period
Below is the result of your feedback form.
It was submitted by
Larry E. Fink, M.S. (
larryfink@waterwiseconsulting.com
) on Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 17:04:27
through the IP 216.246.75.15
using the form at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/public-affairs/contact-opa.html
and resulted in this email to opa2.resource@nrc.gov
comments: The old Turkey Point units are operating outside of permit limits regarding fresh cooling water flow, water temperature, salinity and radionuclides and the combined facility-contaminated groundwater and surface water loads to Biscayne Bay are causing or contributing to a violation of Water Quality Standards, and the routine operation of new Units 6 and 7 will just exacerbate these problems when the old units consume more fresh surface and ground water than they were originally allocated and more pollution assimilation capacities in the groundwater and surface water to which its regulated and unregulated discharges are effluent. In addition, FPL misrepresented the source of tritium in the groundwater underlying the facility and confluence with Biscayne Bay as primarily natural rather than unnatural in origin, a misrepresentation for which it was held to account by scientists working for the South Florida Water Management District under the aegis of its Executive Director, Carol Wehle. Please include these comments in the official hearings record on these issues. Operation of the old units should be scaled back until the more restrictive of the fresh water flow, temperature, or salinity on the source side or pollution load limits are met on the receiving waters side based on a USGS-approved, calibrated, and validated combined surface water-groundwater water quantity and quality model. This temporary emergency operating condition should continue until such time as the EIS for the combined operation of the old and new units are revised to reflect these new circumstances and the ability for FPL to provide the required reasonable assurances reconsidered.
Thank you.
Larry E Fink, M.S
Owner and Principal
Waterwise Consulting, LLC
organization: Waterwise Consulting, LLC
address1: 1601 S. Ocean Drive
address2: Suite 406
city: Hollywood
state: FL
zip: 33019
country: USA
phone: 954-923-7374