ML17117A366: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 71: Line 71:
REV 21  5/08 [CASE II - PLANT AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE II - PLANT AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE III - SLOPES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE III - SLOPES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE III SLOPES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE III-2 - SLOPES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6]
REV 21  5/08 [CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7]   
REV 21  5/08 [CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7]   
Line 85: Line 85:
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-16]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-16]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-17]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-17]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-2]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-2]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-3]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-3]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-4]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-4]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED IN ANALYSIS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-8]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED IN ANALYSIS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-8]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-9]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-9]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-10]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-10]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-11]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-11]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-12]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-12]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 2.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-13]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 2.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-13]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-14]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-14]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-15]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-15]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED (KC > 1.0) SPECIMENS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-16]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED (KC > 1.0) SPECIMENS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-16]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-17]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-17]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-18]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-18]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-19]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-19]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-20]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-20]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26]
REV 21  5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26]
REV 21  5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14]
REV 21  5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14]
REV 21  5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15]
REV 21  5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15]
Line 139: Line 139:
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-26]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-26]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 -95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-28]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-28]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-29]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-29]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-30]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-30]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-31]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-31]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-32]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-32]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-33]
REV 21  5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-33]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-34]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-34]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-35]
REV 21  5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-35]

Revision as of 05:25, 2 May 2018

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 27, Chapter 2, Figures 2B5B1-1 to 2B7-44
ML17117A366
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/20/2017
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17117A380 List:
References
NL-17-0534
Download: ML17117A366 (143)
v • d • e


Text

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-21]

REV 21 5/08 [LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM & DIKES RECORD OF A TYPICAL STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1A]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE 1 - SWITCHYARD JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-2]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE II - PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE III - SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE III-2 - SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7]

REV 21 5/08 [CASE VI - STORAGE POND INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-8]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MAXIMUM DAM SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-9]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES TYPICAL DIKE SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-10]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES ACCELEROGRAM REPRESENTING THE POSTULATED SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-11]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR 5% SPECTRAL DRAWING JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-12]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES COMPARISON OF INDUCED SHEAR STRESSED WITH STRESSES REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN ALONG A TYPICAL PLANE - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-13]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-14]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-15]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-16]

REV 21 5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-17]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-2]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-3]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-4]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED IN ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-8]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-9]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-10]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-11]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-12]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 2.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-13]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-14]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-15]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED (KC > 1.0) SPECIMENS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-16]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-17]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-18]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-19]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-20]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25]

REV 21 5/08 [DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BLANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BLANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 1 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 2 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 3 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 5 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)]

REV 21 5/08 [SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-20]

REV 21 5/08 [BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DAM AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 4 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [GRAIN SIZED - - COMPACTED BLANKET AND UNDERLYING SOIL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-22]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 1 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 2 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 3 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 4 OF 4)]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-26]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 -95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-28]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-29]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-30]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.0, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-31]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (KC = 1.5, 5% STRAIN) JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-32]

REV 21 5/08 [MATERIAL C-5 - 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-33]

REV 21 5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-34]

REV 21 5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-35]

REV 21 5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-36]

REV 21 5/08 [LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-37]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 1 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 2 OF 2)]

REV 21 5/08 [DAM EXCAVATION PLAN AND GEOLOGIC MAPS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39A]

REV 21 5/08 [DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39B]

REV 21 5/08 [DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39C]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 1 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 2 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 3 OF 3)]

REV 21 5/08 STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-41 REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE CENTERLINE SUBSURFACE PROFILES AND GROUNDWATER LEVELS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-42]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE OBSERVATION WELLS AND DRAIN DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-43]

REV 21 5/08 [STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE GRAVITY RELIEF WELLS AND DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-44]

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17117A366&oldid=621504"