ML20211N724: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
  ..
ce-up
      ,
..
                                                ce-up
,
    /         ~
/
                o                         UNITED STATES
o
  !"             o          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                               i
UNITED STATES
  {             ,i                     WASHINGTON, D. C. 20E55
!"
  %           /                           DEC 111986
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
      .....
i
        The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg
~
        United States Senate
o
        Washington, D.C. 20510
{
        Dear Senator Lautenberg:
,i
        Thank you for your inquiry of November 13, 1986, addressed to the NRC Office of
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20E55
        Congressional Affairs which requested information relative to the safety of
%
        the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Salem County, New Jersey.
/
        Before discussing the specific concerns at Hope Creek, it is important to say
DEC 111986
        that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission always places plant safety first in
.....
        considering actions responsive to plant events or conditions. While the NRC may
The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg
        ultimately assess civil monetary penalties or take other enforcement action
United States Senate
        against a licensee when safety problems are identified at a nuclear facility,
Washington, D.C. 20510
        our immediate concern is whether the nuclear facility should continue to operate
Dear Senator Lautenberg:
        with a particular identified safety problem.
Thank you for your inquiry of November 13, 1986, addressed to the NRC Office of
        In this regard, the NRC has frequently applied its authority under law to
Congressional Affairs which requested information relative to the safety of
        constrain plant operation until identified safety problems are resolved. This
the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Salem County, New Jersey.
        may take the form of an order modifying the license to require some specified
Before discussing the specific concerns at Hope Creek, it is important to say
        corrective action prior to further nuclear plant operation. In other cases, the
that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission always places plant safety first in
        Regional Administrator may obtain a commitment from licensee management to
considering actions responsive to plant events or conditions. While the NRC may
        refrain from operation until a specified series of corrective actions is
ultimately assess civil monetary penalties or take other enforcement action
        completed. The effect of these actions is to obtain technically adequate
against a licensee when safety problems are identified at a nuclear facility,
        resolution of safety concerns prior to further plant operation. Enforcement
our immediate concern is whether the nuclear facility should continue to operate
        actions, such as civil monetary penalties, are applied well after the safety
with a particular identified safety problem.
        concerns are put to rest.
In this regard, the NRC has frequently applied its authority under law to
        Ms. Yashinsky's letter, which was attached to your correspondence, highlights
constrain plant operation until identified safety problems are resolved. This
        three issues at Hope Creek: the quality of startup testing, the reversed
may take the form of an order modifying the license to require some specified
        sensing lines, and the Bailey logic modules. To assure the quality and
corrective action prior to further nuclear plant operation. In other cases, the
        completeness of testing, the NRC Region I office has supplemented the two
Regional Administrator may obtain a commitment from licensee management to
        full-time resident inspectors on site with additional inspectors from the
refrain from operation until a specified series of corrective actions is
        Regional office to continually monitor the preoperational and startup test
completed. The effect of these actions is to obtain technically adequate
        programs at the Hope Creek site. This intensive review resulted in an NRC
resolution of safety concerns prior to further plant operation.
        concern that the preoperational test program may not have been complete, due
Enforcement
        partly to a large number of test exceptions. As a result of this concern,
actions, such as civil monetary penalties, are applied well after the safety
        the licensee agreed to complete an additional series of tests prior to initial
concerns are put to rest.
        plant startup.
Ms. Yashinsky's letter, which was attached to your correspondence, highlights
        Our inspectors agree that the licensee maintains an aggressive schedule to
three issues at Hope Creek:
        complete the startup test phase; however, we have not found this to be a plant
the quality of startup testing, the reversed
                8612180297 861211
sensing lines, and the Bailey logic modules. To assure the quality and
                PDR ADOCK 05000354
completeness of testing, the NRC Region I office has supplemented the two
                U               PDR
full-time resident inspectors on site with additional inspectors from the
                                                            _
Regional office to continually monitor the preoperational and startup test
programs at the Hope Creek site.
This intensive review resulted in an NRC
concern that the preoperational test program may not have been complete, due
partly to a large number of test exceptions. As a result of this concern,
the licensee agreed to complete an additional series of tests prior to initial
plant startup.
Our inspectors agree that the licensee maintains an aggressive schedule to
complete the startup test phase; however, we have not found this to be a plant
8612180297 861211
PDR
ADOCK 05000354
U
PDR
_


                                                                  __ _____     ___ -_____ _ _ ___________
__ _____
___ -_____ _ _ ___________
*
*
    .
.
        -
-
    .
.
  ,
,
                                                      -2-
-2-
          safety concern. It should also be noted that one purpose of this test program
safety concern. It should also be noted that one purpose of this test program
          is to identify construction and operational problems such as the reversed
is to identify construction and operational problems such as the reversed
          sensing lines.
sensing lines.
          With respect to the specific hardware problems noted in your letter, the
With respect to the specific hardware problems noted in your letter, the
          licensee, Public Service Electric ard Gas Company, identified the reversed                     i
licensee, Public Service Electric ard Gas Company, identified the reversed
          sensing lines on August 8, 1986, and immediately shut the plant down to repair                 i
i
          the lines and assess the significance of the design error. As discussed with
sensing lines on August 8, 1986, and immediately shut the plant down to repair
          the NRC at a meeting held in Region I on August 22, 1986, several reviews and
i
          evaluations were conducted, which confirmed that no similar design errors
the lines and assess the significance of the design error. As discussed with
          existed in the plant. This meeting is documented in the attached NRC Inspection
the NRC at a meeting held in Region I on August 22, 1986, several reviews and
          Report 50-354/86-41.
evaluations were conducted, which confirmed that no similar design errors
          The Bailey logic modules, utilized at Hope Creek for plant control functions,
existed in the plant. This meeting is documented in the attached NRC Inspection
          present another set of concerns which the NRC has dealt with on several
Report 50-354/86-41.
          occasions over the last year. The Bailey solid-state logic modules represent a
The Bailey logic modules, utilized at Hope Creek for plant control functions,
          unique situation in that they are not used at any other nuclear power plant
present another set of concerns which the NRC has dealt with on several
          licensed by the NRC. As a result, considerable effort has gone into reviews of
occasions over the last year. The Bailey solid-state logic modules represent a
          their application and inspection of their failures. The plant operating license
unique situation in that they are not used at any other nuclear power plant
          was issued with a condition that the licensee establish a reliability program
licensed by the NRC. As a result, considerable effort has gone into reviews of
          for these devices and report the results to the NRC prior to the end of the
their application and inspection of their failures. The plant operating license
          first refueling outage.     In addition, a special NRC team inspection following
was issued with a condition that the licensee establish a reliability program
            the September 11, 1986 loss of off-site power test identified additional
for these devices and report the results to the NRC prior to the end of the
          concerns regarding Bailey logic module design and testability. As a result,
first refueling outage.
            two meetings were held with the licensee, three additional loss of off-site
In addition, a special NRC team inspection following
            power tests were conducted, and the plant remained shut down for over a month
the September 11, 1986 loss of off-site power test identified additional
          while evaluations were completed. The plant shutdown, pending completion of
concerns regarding Bailey logic module design and testability. As a result,
          evaluations and review by the NRC inspection team, was agreed to by the licensee
two meetings were held with the licensee, three additional loss of off-site
            and confirmed in a letter from the Region I Regional Administrator. In addition,
power tests were conducted, and the plant remained shut down for over a month
            significant improvements in reliability analysis and on-site testing capability
while evaluations were completed. The plant shutdown, pending completion of
            for the Bailey modules, were developed and agreed to by the licensee. The
evaluations and review by the NRC inspection team, was agreed to by the licensee
            special team Inspection Report, 50-354/86-50, is attached for your review.
and confirmed in a letter from the Region I Regional Administrator.
            On a broader perspective, the NRC will not hesitate to limit nuclear facility
In addition,
            operation in order to assure the health and safety of the public. Recent
significant improvements in reliability analysis and on-site testing capability
            examples of power reactors which were shutdown for NPC/ licensee agreed upon
for the Bailey modules, were developed and agreed to by the licensee. The
            analysis or modifications include: Pilgrim, Davis Besse, Sequoyah, Browns
special team Inspection Report, 50-354/86-50, is attached for your review.
            Ferry, Palisades, and Rancho Seco.
On a broader perspective, the NRC will not hesitate to limit nuclear facility
            In sumary. the NRC will continue to place priority on reactor safety, and,
operation in order to assure the health and safety of the public. Recent
            as illustrated above, will take appropriate actions to ensure that technical
examples of power reactors which were shutdown for NPC/ licensee agreed upon
            concerns are deal + with thoroughly before plant operation is allowed to
analysis or modifications include: Pilgrim, Davis Besse, Sequoyah, Browns
            continue or resume.
Ferry, Palisades, and Rancho Seco.
      -                               _ ________-__
In sumary. the NRC will continue to place priority on reactor safety, and,
as illustrated above, will take appropriate actions to ensure that technical
concerns are deal + with thoroughly before plant operation is allowed to
continue or resume.
-
_ ________-__


                "
f-
f- .
"
    n
n
    ~
*
          *
~
        ,
.
                                                    - 3-
,
            Should you have additional questions in this matter, please contact us again.
- 3-
            As you requested, a copy of your correspondence is attached.
Should you have additional questions in this matter, please contact us again.
                                                      Sincerely,
As you requested, a copy of your correspondence is attached.
                                                          &L&&
Sincerely,
                                                    .
&L&&
                                                          ictor Stello, Jr.
ictor Stello, Jr.
                                                      Executive Director for Operations-
. Executive Director for Operations-
          . Attachments:
. Attachments:
            As stated
As stated
            DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
            J. Roe
J. Roe
            T. Rehm
T. Rehm
            J. Sniezek
J. Sniezek
            J. Murray
J. Murray
            J. Taylor
J. Taylor
            H. Denton
H. Denton
            T. Murley                                 ,.
T. Murley
            R. Starostecki
,.
            W. Kane
R. Starostecki
            P. Eselgroth
W. Kane
            W. Borchardt
P. Eselgroth
            P. Lohaus
W. Borchardt
            R. Bernero
P. Lohaus
            ED0 002325
R. Bernero
            Secy 86-1216
ED0 002325
            Docket No. 50-354
Secy 86-1216
            Public Document Room
Docket No. 50-354
            Local Public Document Room
Public Document Room
            EDO Reading File
Local Public Document Room
            State of New Jersey
EDO Reading File
            OCA
State of New Jersey
            RI:DRP         RI:DRP       RI:DRP     RI:DRP     RI:DRA   RI:RA     IE
OCA
            Norrholm       Eselgroth     Collins     Kane       Allan   Murley     Partlow
RI:DRP
        i
RI:DRP
                            OCA
RI:DRP
                  g
RI:DRP
      $ 12/10/86           12/ /86
RI:DRA
RI:RA
IE
Norrholm
Eselgroth
Collins
Kane
Allan
Murley
Partlow
OCA
i
g
$ 12/10/86
12/ /86
L_
L_


          __ _ ______               _____                             -
__ _ ______
                                                                                                                                                                  ,
_____
    ..        .
-
                          -
,
                                                              ,, o
..
                                                                                n,'           +
-
        3
,, o n,'
                    /'   I    'o                                                           UNITED STATES
+
          y '' 3 y- ( I,,g                             NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                                     _ , _
.
                      ,
I
                                  j                                        WASHINGTON, D. C. 20f.55
/'
          '', .'.';' . l   .
'o
                                                                                                                                            &       b 6&%
UNITED STATES
                                              EDO PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL
3
                                              - - - - -                         - - -
y '' 3 y- ( I,,g
                                                                                                      _ _ _ _ - - - = _ _
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                                                                        --
_ , _
                                                                          _ ___
j
                                                                                                                                      -
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20f.55
      FROM:                                                                                   DUE: 12/04/86                             EDO CONTROL: 002325
,
                                                                                                                                                DOC DT: 11/13/86
'', .'.';' . l
          SEN. FRANK R. LAUTENBERG                                                                                                       FINA'. REPLY:
&
  .   TO-
b 6&%
          7CA
.
                                                                                                                                                                    1
EDO PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL
      FOR SIGNATURE OF:                                                                       **   GREEN                 **               SECY NO: 861216       l
- - - - -
          EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
_ ___
      DESC:                                                                                                                             ROUTING:
_ _ _ _ - - - = _ _
          ENCLOSES LETTER FROM KATHY YASHINSKY RE Ep                                                                         ASIS         DENTON                   l
-
          ON QUALITY TESTING AT NUCLEAR POWER PL 4TS                                                                               .     MURR Y                   '
- - -
      DATE: 11/18/86 %                                         M
--
      ASSIGNED TO: -lit-                               CONTACT:                                                                           I
FROM:
                                    -       --                                                                                     7
DUE: 12/04/86
      SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REM                                 'S:                                                 -
EDO CONTROL: 002325
            RETURN INCOMING WITH RJ LY.
DOC DT: 11/13/86
          MARK ENVELOPE ATTN:                           OM DOSH                                                   1           C
SEN. FRANK R. LAUTENBERG
                                                                                                  \ t
FINA'. REPLY:
                                                                                                                  '
.
j                                                                    v                               6
TO-
                                                                                                            .
7CA
                                                                                                            ,
1
                                                                                                                    ox
FOR SIGNATURE OF:
                                                                                                                                                                    l
**
                                                                                                                                                                    l
GREEN
                                                                                                                                                                    l
**
                                                                                                                                                                    l
SECY NO: 861216
                                                                                                                                                                    l
l
                                                                                                                                                                    i
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
      '
DESC:
                                                                _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _                                                                     l
ROUTING:
ENCLOSES LETTER FROM KATHY YASHINSKY RE Ep
ASIS
DENTON
l
ON QUALITY TESTING AT NUCLEAR POWER PL 4TS
.
MURR Y
'
DATE: 11/18/86 %
M
ASSIGNED TO: -lit-
CONTACT:
I
-
--
7
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REM
'S:
-
RETURN INCOMING WITH RJ LY.
MARK ENVELOPE ATTN:
OM DOSH
1
C
\\
t
j
v
6
' ox
.
,
l
l
l
l
l
i
'
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
l


                                                                                    -_
-_
        *
*
-
.
.
,
,
.
*
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET
PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-86-1216
LOGGING DATE: Nov 17 86
ACTION OFFICE:
EDO
AUTHOR:
F.R.
Lautenberg--Const Ref
AFFILIATION:
U.S. SENATE
'
LETTE;t CATE:
Nov 13 86
FILE CODE: ID&R5 Hope Creek
SUBJECT:
Places emphasis on quality testing at nuc plants
ACTION:
Direct Reply
DISTRIBUTION:
OCA to Ack
SPECIAL HANDLING: None
NOTES:
Kathy Yaskinsky
DATE DUS:
Dec
1 86
SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
.
.
      -                                                                                  ;
AFFILIATION:
  .                                                                                    ,
. , a e 'Y)
          ,
j;{g
    .
..
      *
" " ' "
                            OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
De
                          CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET
E00 - 002325
  PAPER NUMBER:    CRC-86-1216                          LOGGING DATE: Nov 17 86
-.
  ACTION OFFICE:    EDO
. _ .
  AUTHOR:          F.R. Lautenberg--Const Ref
- .
                                                                                        l
. _ - -
  AFFILIATION:      U.S. SENATE                                                        '
- _ - - - _ .
  LETTE;t CATE:    Nov 13 86        FILE CODE: ID&R5 Hope Creek
  SUBJECT:          Places emphasis on quality testing at nuc plants
  ACTION:          Direct Reply
  DISTRIBUTION:    OCA to Ack
  SPECIAL HANDLING: None
  NOTES:            Kathy Yaskinsky
  DATE DUS:        Dec  1 86
  SIGNATURE:        .                                  DATE SIGNED:
  AFFILIATION:
                                                        . , a e 'Y)
                                                      ""'"
                                                                  j;{g           ..
                                                      De
                                                                  E00 - 002325
                -.           . _ .     - . . _ - -               - _ - - - _ .
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:19, 23 May 2025

Responds to 861113 Request for Info Re Safety at Facility. Aggressive Schedule for Startup Test Phase Not Safety Concern.Reversed Sensing Lines Identified on 860822 Subj of Insp Rept 50-354/86-41.NRC Places Priority on Plant Safety
ML20211N724
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek 
Issue date: 12/11/1986
From: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Lautenberg F
SENATE
Shared Package
ML20211N729 List:
References
NUDOCS 8612180297
Download: ML20211N724 (5)


See also: IR 05000354/1986041

Text

ce-up

..

,

/

o

UNITED STATES

!"

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

i

~

o

{

,i

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20E55

%

/

DEC 111986

.....

The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Lautenberg:

Thank you for your inquiry of November 13, 1986, addressed to the NRC Office of

Congressional Affairs which requested information relative to the safety of

the Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Salem County, New Jersey.

Before discussing the specific concerns at Hope Creek, it is important to say

that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission always places plant safety first in

considering actions responsive to plant events or conditions. While the NRC may

ultimately assess civil monetary penalties or take other enforcement action

against a licensee when safety problems are identified at a nuclear facility,

our immediate concern is whether the nuclear facility should continue to operate

with a particular identified safety problem.

In this regard, the NRC has frequently applied its authority under law to

constrain plant operation until identified safety problems are resolved. This

may take the form of an order modifying the license to require some specified

corrective action prior to further nuclear plant operation. In other cases, the

Regional Administrator may obtain a commitment from licensee management to

refrain from operation until a specified series of corrective actions is

completed. The effect of these actions is to obtain technically adequate

resolution of safety concerns prior to further plant operation.

Enforcement

actions, such as civil monetary penalties, are applied well after the safety

concerns are put to rest.

Ms. Yashinsky's letter, which was attached to your correspondence, highlights

three issues at Hope Creek:

the quality of startup testing, the reversed

sensing lines, and the Bailey logic modules. To assure the quality and

completeness of testing, the NRC Region I office has supplemented the two

full-time resident inspectors on site with additional inspectors from the

Regional office to continually monitor the preoperational and startup test

programs at the Hope Creek site.

This intensive review resulted in an NRC

concern that the preoperational test program may not have been complete, due

partly to a large number of test exceptions. As a result of this concern,

the licensee agreed to complete an additional series of tests prior to initial

plant startup.

Our inspectors agree that the licensee maintains an aggressive schedule to

complete the startup test phase; however, we have not found this to be a plant

8612180297 861211

PDR

ADOCK 05000354

U

PDR

_

__ _____

___ -_____ _ _ ___________

.

-

.

,

-2-

safety concern. It should also be noted that one purpose of this test program

is to identify construction and operational problems such as the reversed

sensing lines.

With respect to the specific hardware problems noted in your letter, the

licensee, Public Service Electric ard Gas Company, identified the reversed

i

sensing lines on August 8, 1986, and immediately shut the plant down to repair

i

the lines and assess the significance of the design error. As discussed with

the NRC at a meeting held in Region I on August 22, 1986, several reviews and

evaluations were conducted, which confirmed that no similar design errors

existed in the plant. This meeting is documented in the attached NRC Inspection

Report 50-354/86-41.

The Bailey logic modules, utilized at Hope Creek for plant control functions,

present another set of concerns which the NRC has dealt with on several

occasions over the last year. The Bailey solid-state logic modules represent a

unique situation in that they are not used at any other nuclear power plant

licensed by the NRC. As a result, considerable effort has gone into reviews of

their application and inspection of their failures. The plant operating license

was issued with a condition that the licensee establish a reliability program

for these devices and report the results to the NRC prior to the end of the

first refueling outage.

In addition, a special NRC team inspection following

the September 11, 1986 loss of off-site power test identified additional

concerns regarding Bailey logic module design and testability. As a result,

two meetings were held with the licensee, three additional loss of off-site

power tests were conducted, and the plant remained shut down for over a month

while evaluations were completed. The plant shutdown, pending completion of

evaluations and review by the NRC inspection team, was agreed to by the licensee

and confirmed in a letter from the Region I Regional Administrator.

In addition,

significant improvements in reliability analysis and on-site testing capability

for the Bailey modules, were developed and agreed to by the licensee. The

special team Inspection Report, 50-354/86-50, is attached for your review.

On a broader perspective, the NRC will not hesitate to limit nuclear facility

operation in order to assure the health and safety of the public. Recent

examples of power reactors which were shutdown for NPC/ licensee agreed upon

analysis or modifications include: Pilgrim, Davis Besse, Sequoyah, Browns

Ferry, Palisades, and Rancho Seco.

In sumary. the NRC will continue to place priority on reactor safety, and,

as illustrated above, will take appropriate actions to ensure that technical

concerns are deal + with thoroughly before plant operation is allowed to

continue or resume.

-

_ ________-__

f-

"

n

~

.

,

- 3-

Should you have additional questions in this matter, please contact us again.

As you requested, a copy of your correspondence is attached.

Sincerely,

&L&&

ictor Stello, Jr.

. Executive Director for Operations-

. Attachments:

As stated

DISTRIBUTION

J. Roe

T. Rehm

J. Sniezek

J. Murray

J. Taylor

H. Denton

T. Murley

,.

R. Starostecki

W. Kane

P. Eselgroth

W. Borchardt

P. Lohaus

R. Bernero

ED0 002325

Secy 86-1216

Docket No. 50-354

Public Document Room

Local Public Document Room

EDO Reading File

State of New Jersey

OCA

RI:DRP

RI:DRP

RI:DRP

RI:DRP

RI:DRA

RI:RA

IE

Norrholm

Eselgroth

Collins

Kane

Allan

Murley

Partlow

OCA

i

g

$ 12/10/86

12/ /86

L_

__ _ ______

_____

-

,

..

-

,, o n,'

+

.

I

/'

'o

UNITED STATES

3

y 3 y- ( I,,g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

_ , _

j

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20f.55

,

, .'.';' . l

&

b 6&%

.

EDO PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL

- - - - -

_ ___

_ _ _ _ - - - = _ _

-

- - -

--

FROM:

DUE: 12/04/86

EDO CONTROL: 002325

DOC DT: 11/13/86

SEN. FRANK R. LAUTENBERG

FINA'. REPLY:

.

TO-

7CA

1

FOR SIGNATURE OF:

GREEN

SECY NO: 861216

l

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

DESC:

ROUTING:

ENCLOSES LETTER FROM KATHY YASHINSKY RE Ep

ASIS

DENTON

l

ON QUALITY TESTING AT NUCLEAR POWER PL 4TS

.

MURR Y

'

DATE: 11/18/86 %

M

ASSIGNED TO: -lit-

CONTACT:

I

-

--

7

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REM

'S:

-

RETURN INCOMING WITH RJ LY.

MARK ENVELOPE ATTN:

OM DOSH

1

C

\\

t

j

v

6

' ox

.

,

l

l

l

l

l

i

'

_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

l

-_

-

.

.

,

,

.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

PAPER NUMBER:

CRC-86-1216

LOGGING DATE: Nov 17 86

ACTION OFFICE:

EDO

AUTHOR:

F.R.

Lautenberg--Const Ref

AFFILIATION:

U.S. SENATE

'

LETTE;t CATE:

Nov 13 86

FILE CODE: ID&R5 Hope Creek

SUBJECT:

Places emphasis on quality testing at nuc plants

ACTION:

Direct Reply

DISTRIBUTION:

OCA to Ack

SPECIAL HANDLING: None

NOTES:

Kathy Yaskinsky

DATE DUS:

Dec

1 86

SIGNATURE:

DATE SIGNED:

.

AFFILIATION:

. , a e 'Y)

j;{g

..

" " ' "

De

E00 - 002325

-.

. _ .

- .

. _ - -

- _ - - - _ .